As Jon Walker posted earlier, President Obama today directed EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to pull EPA’s proposed updates to the national ozone (smog) standards, which were scheduled to be adopted in the next few weeks. Intense lobbying by polluting industries, championed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, combined with relentless GOP attacks on EPA regulations to produce yet another White House fold. And the Chamber is doing a victory dance.
Environmental and public health advocates were apparently blindsided by Obama’s decision. Most fully expected EPA to go forward with the new rules. Their reactions following the White House announcement were both angry and stunned. Many are shocked the President would pull a critical public health rule that would have saved thousands of lives and billions of dollars in public health care costs and created jobs in mitigation and pollution control industries or spurred efficiency and alternative energy investments.
Equally offensive, as Walker noted, the President’s statement appeared to adopt GOP framing, particularly one that Eric Cantor had used in singling out the proposed Ozone rule as a “job killing” regulation that should be stopped. From Cantor’s target list:
Ozone Rule (Winter): This effective ban or restriction on construction and industrial growth for much of America is possibly the most harmful of all the currently anticipated Obama Administration regulations. Consequences would reach far across the U.S. economy, resulting in an estimated cost of $1 trillion or more over a decade and millions of jobs. Unlike her predecessors, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson is pushing for a premature readjustment of the current ozone standards, dramatically increasing the number of “nonattainment” areas. The new readjustment rule is expected early this fall and I expect the Energy and Commerce Committee to act swiftly to prevent its implementation, in order to protect American jobs.
A further reaction is that Obama has clearly forfeited any remaining claim to environmental leadership. Indeed, there’s a widely held feeling that the President is now showing “deep contempt” for environmental concerns, given this announcement and his Administration’s clear bias towards approving the tar sands/Keystone XL Pipeline project.
Here are typical reactions from those concerned about this environmental and public health setback:
From the American Lung Association, President Obama’s Failure to Update Ozone Standards Outrageous
“For two years the Administration dragged its feet by delaying its decision, unnecessarily putting lives at risk. Its final decision not to enact a more protective ozone health standard is jeopardizing the health of millions of Americans, which is inexcusable,” said Charles D. Connor, President and CEO of the American Lung Association.
“The American Lung Association now intends to revive its participation in litigation with the Administration, which was suspended following numerous assurances that the Administration was going to complete this reconsideration and obey the law. We had gone to court because the Bush Administration failed to follow the law and set a protective health standard.”
From Conressman Ed Markey:
“I am disappointed that the President chose to further delay important clean air protections that would have helped to prevent respiratory and cardiac disease in thousands of Americans.
“While I agree with the President that using up-to-date science to inform policy decisions is important, I disagree that the 2006 pollution science that the Bush Administration ignored should be ignored once again in favor of additional delays in issuing rules to reduce the smog-producing ozone that threatens public health.
“This administration previously has taken positive steps towards cleaning up our air by issuing interstate air pollution transport and tailpipe emissions rules.
“In light of today’s decision, I urge the President to direct EPA to move forward aggressively and use its full authority under the Clean Air Act to address the other clean air challenges facing the nation – from carbon pollution that is warming our planet, to mercury and other toxic air pollutants that are making the air unsafe to breathe.”
From Friends of the Earth: Obama smashes smog protections
President Obama decided today to trash fundamental protections for Americans’ health. His decision will mean more children suffering from asthma and more permanent lung damage for adults. It is unacceptable.
“Adding insult to injury, President Obama claimed that asking corporations to act responsibly is too much of a ‘burden’ for them, ignoring the fact that studies show responsible environmental protections spur investment in clean technology and create jobs.
“The president’s claim that he has shown an ‘unwavering’ commitment to public health and the environment is absurd. In truth, when considering the extent of the transformation that’s needed, his administration’s record on environmental issues has bordered on the pathetic.
“Americans are crying out for leadership, instead we have a president taking his cues from Eric Cantor. To call this discouraging is an understatement.”
More:
From Quit Coal, Corporate Polluters Need Not Worry, Obama’s Doing Their Dirty Work
From Get Energy Smart Now, With ozone decision, President Obama spits on his own record and the law
From Grist, by giving in to Big Oil, Obama seals his political fate
From It’s Getting Hot in Here, President Obama abandons clean air; picks polluters over sick and dying American kids
Lisa Heinzerling, Georgetown Law Faculty Blog, Ozone Madness




51 Comments

Sigh…
Like they are going to pass something stronger! HA
Looks like the XL Pipeline is going to be built too….
I’m glad I’m not a Democrat anymore because this crap shows how messed up the Dems are now.
“Many are shocked the President would pull a critical public health rule that would have saved billions of dollars in public health care costs and created jobs in mitigation and pollution control industries or spurred efficiency and alternative energy investments”
Are people really shocked? Disappointed maybe, but shocked, after Obama fast tracked 42 of 48 mountain top removal mining permits the first couple months he was in office.
My sense is that there are advocates at various stages of disappointment, disillusionment, disgust, betrayal, etc. But everyone is moving in the same direction, and each announcement just pushes even the last holdouts.
I don’t see how this POTUS is going to avoid going to prison with all the preponderance of evidence of his utter contempt for the welfare of the people of this nation.
I tend to agree, although it is starting to become difficult to tell the difference between the corrupt and the truly dillusional, with all the eveidence mounting that Obama is not on their side. I still don’t understand how Obama can maintain a 40% approval rating.
He will write a book and the next president will look forward not backward.
I wonder what the Sierra Club is doing to stop Tar Sands or stop weak ozone standards? The home page does have some cute polar bears.
http://www.sierraclub.org/
If they’re shocked, it’s only because they haven’t been paying attention.
They should have expected this and been prepared for it. Like hopeful above, the mountaintop projects he approved years ago left me with no doubt about his environmantal credentials.
Boxturtle (Perhaps he’ll try to get Sarah’s endorsement by taking her wolf hunting on Marine 1)
Do what they always do collect donations, pretend to care about the environment and shill for large corporations.
http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/06/15/sierra-club-pro-corporate-anti-grass-roots/
” still don’t understand how Obama can maintain a 40% approval rating.”
What precentage of the population do you suppose gets their news from commercials?
Boxturtle (Bet it’s around 40%)
I get all my news from Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and America’s clean natural gas companies. Why do you ask?
Her is about as useful to the progressive causes as a penny with a hole in it.
And, of course, it never occurred to the Compromiser-in-Chief to use his various environmental sellouts as bargaining chips for a jobs agenda or the like.
Whotta shock!
If Cheney never went to jail, it’s hard to imagine what crime must be committed in order to face accountability.
PS: Nothing could either make me vote Republican or vote for Obama again. What’s shocking to me as a Texan who loathes the very ground Perry walks on (and was warning against him here when most considered him a joke) is that I have even considered voting for Perry to stop this guy. Obama is getting away with more damage than any Republican could.
WHAT a fucking asshole.
I hear you. I agree the democrats may actually oppose the radical agenda that Perry pushes for, but they won’t fight against Obama’s radical agenda. I still couldn’t vote for Perry, I will write in someone’s name if I don’t have a good choice.
Obama does nothing but cave to conservatives and big business.
Obama and his supporters should be called cavemen.
Why stunned? Don’t they know that this is part of obama’s shrewd re-election strategy and that there is a huge sweet spot of single issue independent voters that are going to jump aboard the hope-and-change train becoz of the obvious economic benefits of dirtier air?
Z
Republicans who hate Obama are stupid.
Thanks Scarecrow, this is utterly disgusting, but not surprising as others have stated. I wonder how this will intersect with this Earthjustice suit against the EPA: http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/175915-green-groups-to-court-end-epas-inexcusable-delay-on-smog-rule
They were already at the DC Circuit this month basically demanding that the EPA quit dragging its feet. If the DC Circuit has already held that the EPA must change the standard (which I think they have, this has been in court for awhile now), then I think the EPA might soon be in contempt of court.
In defense of environmentalists who were blindsided, the EPA really seemed to be moving on this rule, which they sent on its final step, review by the White House OIRA, in July: http://www.progressivereform.org/CPRBlog.cfm?idBlog=483F8B22-F51E-8878-8CF5637195407C19 (the CPR folks aren’t a naive bunch). It’s interesting here that instead of the EPA withdrawing its rule it’s Obama (and Cass Sunstein at OIRA, a real anti-regulatory asshole) telling Lisa Jackson to stand down. I wonder if she’ll quit (but I doubt it).
I’m shocked, shocked.
It’s part of a grand economic strategy. Our new Gross National Product: phlegm.
I was thinking just the other day what Obama would do prior to his speach to appease republicans. I knew he was going to cave in on something to show them – again – that he just so values their ideas. And here we go. Surprise, surprise. And they will piss on his back, as always. The guy just never learns. I’d ask what next but I am afraid I’ll find out too soon.
President Obama apparently hates the environment. He is consistently dishonest about it.
Fabulous observation. Maybe there’s a bright side – maybe if phlegm might be a useful water sealant or substitute for asphalt…
But God, this is awful. Yes, a tighter standard would require costs for emission controls. But if these costs are more than offset by reduced health costs because of fewer cases of asthma, bronchitis, etc., what on Earth is the problem?
Make the decision. Protect the people. Especially the children and the elderly who will be most at risk.
What a freaking sellout.
I agree with you. At this point, I’m wondering when the vast majority of citizens will realize that both the Republican and Democratic parties have been corrupted and no longer represent the citizens as a whole. There no longer IS a “lesser of two evils” as both parties are corrupt and evil. Where is “representative government” when your only choices are neo-liberal or conservative candidates which put special interests first? This is pathetic and certainly no longer represents a country which should be a “Republic” and a “Democracy”.
I figure the Green party is pretty much a placeholder for a stronger third party but it wouldn’t be a bad place to put your vote in 2012 considering how hard Obama is to make the choice appropriate.
In Minnesota we have the DFL – the Democratic Farm Labor Party. Maybe we need a Green Labor Party since the Democrats no longer want to be associated with Labor.
For all of the Democrats and Progressives that sat on their hands and wallets in 2010, the fruits of your labor are upon you! Over and over and over again you are reaping what you have sowed. Do not misunderstand, as I am just as disapponted as most with the President’s actions on some progressive issues but I can not help but believe that if it were not for 2010 we would now still be making incremental progress. So, if you like what you are seeing now, you will love the results of Democratic loss in 2012! Any questions?
MSNBC has been broadcasting a terrific 1936 clip of FDR laden with withering humor and sarcasm directed the R’s of his day. Obama is no FDR and the times require one. He needs a primary challenge, if only we could find a challenger.
Blame the victim much?
I really hate how this reply system works. That was to rckisok September 2nd, 2011 at 1:57 pm
Democratic news geeks and (Democratic/non-Democratic) activists are a small portion of the population. The other 80-90% of Democratic voters don’t give politics all that much attention and just assume, while not closely following the ins and outs of what’s happening in government, their team and its leader are doing the best they can.
If they feel Obama and Democrats could have and should have done more, they may sit out this election or just do the bare minimum and vote against the Bad Cop. If they feel their life is fine and this unemployment number means nothing to them, they will likely be more enthusiastic to support Obama as election day approaches. This would include the growing fiscally conservative, socially liberal types (at least over one issue, identity politics).
The Obama and Democratic Party we see from following the ins and outs closely, they don’t.
Democratic Party-feeding, feel good (for wealthier liberals), faux activist group. They use the shady Fund for Public Interest Research to help gather funds. The latter hires young people at low wages, with very long hours, to stand on busy city streets and beg for donation money for big “activist” groups like the Sierra Club. They learn no skills and are not directly involved with any of the organizations for which they are fund raising. A job is a job, but if you read feedback from people who have worked for them, not many/any seem to think they got out of it what they expected.
Ah. You watch PBS! Gee! How did I know that?
Sierra Club members drive SUVs to their meetings. I will say no more on that subject.
Five years. Maybe ten.
We do indeed.
Only a true democratic loyalist could find logic in your statement. Rahm is that you?
I am not sure how I am blaming the victim?
If you didn’t like the results you got when we delivered majorities in the house, senate, and presidency, vote dem and make sure you get some more of the same, good and hard.
Darwin award aspirant?
sorry, that was for the one who needs to be attend a course of deprogramming.
Maybe it’s because you view Obama as the victim?
obaa makes the Bushes and karl very happy with their choice.
I’m kind of glad that Ed Markey isn’t running everything, because if he were then the whole country would be a lot more like Massachussetts: a so-called ‘Eds and Meds’ economy, very expensive, very high tax, with a lot of people — including many Democrats — wanting to leave. Why do you think New Hampshire is so much more Democratic now than it used to be? They don’t call it Taxachusetts for nothing.
It’s like Ann Arbor: very expensive, very gentrified, very liberal, no one can afford to live there unless you’re affluent or living on welfare. Hollowed out economy, hollowed out community.
Personally, with the Green Party, been there, tried that. Lovely people who find it extremely difficult to work together. I’m afraid the GP isn’t the answer we need.
In the same way that the Tea Party isn’t a real “Party”, according to election laws, but is rather a group of voters banded together to influence events, I suggest we all form the “Healthy Planet Party”. Motto – ‘Planet Before Party’. We need to pass the inheritance of a healthy planet on to our – and others’ – children and grandchildren. That would be The Healthy Planet Party’s sole goal.
If a politician will support that, we’ll support them (hear that, Obama?). Otherwise, we’ll find someone else.
Electorally, we don’t need all the trappings of a formal party with conventions, officers, party apparatuses, in fact it would just bog things down. Candidates can run as independents and be endorsed by the Healthy Planet Party.
The energy being generated by the tar sands protests is there for the corralling. Let’s do this!
Resigning in protest would be the ethical for Lisa Jackson to do, wouldn’t it?
aargh…ethical ‘thing’
Let them eat soot. – Barack Obama
Name a low cost US state. (Hint, it’s not Texass, I lived and paid the property taxes there)
Canada has lower costs than the US.
South Africa was even less expensive.
I’m sure many states have lower taxes as well as a regulatory environment that’s less burdensome. Markey doesn’t mind imposing more burdens on smokestack industries — there probably aren’t many such industries near where he serves, so it’s easy for him to make it harder for others to do business, and to be snooty and self-righteous about it at the same time. I don’t think Texas has an income tax, does it — I’m not saying I agree with that — I believe in taxes. I live close to Canada. A lot of things that are bought in Canada are more expensive than they are here; I assume it’s because of excise taxes, but admit I am not certain of the exact reason. “Taxes” can be hidden in the cost of a thing, too, ie., the regulatory costs.