Cross posted from: http://seaton-newslinks.blogspot.com
I remember once reading an Indian guru, who said that if the water buffalo had a god, it would probably look like a very large water buffalo. He believed that there is only one god, formless and all pervading, but that he/she/it responds to intense worship by taking on the form that most pleases his/her/its devotees depending on their temperament and station in life.
I am beginning to think that the goddess of paranoia pursues a similar strategy: she appears to the crunchy granola/ruccola crowd as global warming and to the deep fried Mars Bar set as black helicopters.
I was reminded of an incident from the darkest days of the Second World War, a time with millions of human beings freshly dead, or about to die, with European civilization ground to dust or burned to ashes, when there, deep in his bomb proof bunker, Winston Churchill sent a pudding back to the kitchen, complaining that it had “no theme”.
That, I think is problem with America’s free floating paranoia: like Winnie’s dessert, the paranoia pudding that Americans are collectively pulling, has no “theme”.
Grasping to sum up the country’s perilous position, the US president said the country was facing its “Sputnik moment”, a reference to the alarm felt in 1957 when the former Soviet Union launched the first orbiting satellite. “We need to out-innovate, out-educate and out-build the rest of the world,” he said. – Financial Times
The president is too young to have lived the first “Sputnik moment”, but it was one of the turning points of my life and on hearing the word “Sputnik”, the goddess of paranoia walked over my grave.
For any American child alive then who was principally interested in the humanities: art, literature, history, as I was, it was a terrible moment. The Soviet Union, may she rest in peace, put up the first hunk of the endless rubbish that now tirelessly circles our planet, something about the size of a grapefruit that sailed the heavens in earth orbit going “beep, beep, beep”, soon to be followed by an unfortunate dog named Laika, the first warmblooded creature to die out there. From one day to the next, there was a political-ideological science hysteria that prioritized everything that I am not interested in: math, chemistry etc, to the detriment of everything I love. I think it was then that I vowed to myself that I would someday live in Europe, as far away as I could get from such barren, Sputnik induced, philistinism. Without the first “Sputnik moment” I might never have left.
We are part of the American family. We believe that in a country where every race and faith and point of view can be found, we are still bound together as one people; that we share common hopes and a common creed; that the dreams of a little girl in Tucson are not so different than those of our own children, and that they all deserve the chance to be fulfilled. That, too, is what sets us apart as a nation. – President Barack Obama
I disagree, I think the opposite is precisely the truth and that is what “sets us apart as a nation”…. And I can prove it with a few simple graphs:

Actually this is exactly what doesn’t set us apart, here is the entire world’s estimated distribution of wealth:
So as you can see, if anything sets us apart it is that the distribution of wealth in the USA is much more unequal than the world average.
So if there is one thing the American people are not is a “family” with “common goals”. One percent of the population controls thirty five percent of the net worth. Twenty percent of the population controls eighty five percent of that wealth. That leaves no less than eighty percent of the population to divide up the remaining fifteen percent of the wealth left over.
How does that sort of wealth distribution play out in real life? Here is a reading of America’s mood from Pew Research:
The survey finds that a majority of the public (57%) says it is very difficult or difficult to afford things they really want. About the same percentage said this two years ago (55%). And for many Americans, affording basic necessities remains a struggle – 51% say it is difficult to afford health care, 48% say the same about their home heating and electric bills, and 29% say it is difficult to afford food. – Pew Research Center
In the richest country in world nearly thirty percent of the population have trouble earning enough money to eat. Fifty one percent say it is difficult to afford health care and another forty eight percent can’t afford to heat their homes.
We are part of the American family. We believe that in a country where every race and faith and point of view can be found, we are still bound together as one people
So here is how the paranoia thing works:
The one percent of the population that controls forty three percent of the financial wealth and the next four percent that controls twenty nine percent, plus those who control the next twenty one percent are justifiably paranoiac thinking what would happen if the eighty percent of the population left with only seven percent of the financial wealth ever woke up and decided to change the percentages around, if only by democratically using income taxes to redistribute that wealth.
So the major cultural, legal and ideological industry of the USA is to keep that eighty percent, the peasantry, from actually discovering who is making them so miserable and how they do it and then getting together and changing the situation… as has so often happened throughout history. With ninety three percent of America’s money at their disposal there is no lack of funds for the one percenters to do the job.
And that boys and girls explains why so many Americans are worried about Islam and abortion and black helicopters and climate change and transgenic food and whether Barack Obama was born in the USA and polar bears. Anything but the 800 pound gorilla in the room… identifying the fucker and the fuckee.
Paranoia is what “binds us together as one people”… the paranoia of the haves, fearing that the have nots will someday dispossess them and the have nots with whatever paranoia du jour that the media, owned by that one percent, chooses to feed them and that “suits their temperament and station in life”.






52 Comments

Oh do I ever remember Sputnik. There is no way Obama or any young person could relate to how big a deal that was.
Radios that could, were tuned to 20MHZ to hear that beep, beep, beep.
I heard it on an old Hallicrafters S38D
So the USA absolutely had to prove to the world that OUR brand of Capitalism was superior tho THEIR brand of
Capitalismcommunism. By putting – as Tom Lehrer would say – some clown on the moon and bringing them back.And fighting to preserve a corrupt pro USA government in Vietnam from falling to the North.
When it comes to your mention of climate change and polar bears on that list above, I’d say you have things backwards.
The same deluded ideology that puts 1% of the population in control of such a HUGE percent of wealth, also gives us the idea that one single species (humans) has the right to use the planet how ever they see fit.
Both these situations lead to trouble.
Climate Change is real and not paranoia. Lumping it in with Islamic terrorism and black helicopters is ridiculous and misleading. We just had the warmest Spring on record after almost no Winter, the last ten years have been the warmest ever recorded globally, Colorado and New Mexico are burning and the storm cycle is ramping up every year, not to mention that all climate scientists who aren’t paid by the energy industry are in complete agreement that anthropogenic climate change is likely to make the ongoing extinction event catastrophic. Just how is evidence based science “paranoia”? How in the Hell do you sit there and smugly pronounce climate science to be on par with anti ‘Sharia” laws and the black helicopter/implosion theories? And abortion “paranoia” has led to an all out Republican war on women’s health so that hardly seems to be of the trivial nature that you suggest. The point about economic disparity is a good one but that point is lost in the utter mindlessness of your judgment that climate change, women’s health and reproductive rights, and even the habitat of polar bears are not worth consideration.
Once again I have to repeat my call for a “Flag this post as stupid” button.
Who would have thought that when the Soviet Union fell, that in doing so it struck a near fatal blow to the elites and bourgeois plutocracy. Forcing them to desperately search for another bad guy to keep the paranoia cruising along.
Oh I love it when someone points out that the left is just a gullible and as big a suckers as the right.
LOL :-D
I am not talking about rational scientific discourse. I am talking about the mood, the zeitgeist, the paranoia industry. It feeds where it can, there is something for everybody.
Yes, but the problem is that the general reaction to global warming is too subdued, not too extreme.
I thought I made it clear that I belong to those who worry about polar bears and global warming… I don’t float mystically above all of this I am just as alienated as the next man/woman whatever.
I found this the other day and thought it was a very interesting perspective on global warming:
http://th05.deviantart.net/fs70/PRE/f/2011/123/e/7/mother_gaia_by_humon-d3fh24i.jpg
It’s just that reading things like the following quote (from the diary above)
It sounds as if you are saying that there is an element of paranoia involved with regard to worrying about polar bears and global warming. And I disagree with that statement. Worrying about global warming and polar bears is NOT paranoia.
I love it.
{{{looks under bed for black helicopters}}}
The important thing is to keep us worrying about anything but who owns all the lolly. I do care about polar bears and child soldiers and ablations… but I think we could solve all of those if we solved the first thing first.
Bingo !
Sputnik induced philistinism, comrade? Perhaps American philistinism predated, no? Don’t you think Amerika was rather looking for an excuse to be “philistine”?
Yeah, well, probably, if only because it’s humanity’s impossible problem. Doesn’t justify your provocation though, does it comrade?
Sorry, comrade maukonen, that was meant for Senor Seaton.
I disagree. It is not just the wealthiest 1% who are driving the SUVs. We could be doing much more to use resources responsibly (Americans as a whole are not doing a very good job at this), but having 7 billion humans on the planet is a major problem (especially if people in poorer countries start to look for a life style similar that of the wealthier countries).
In regard to your general statement about paranoia, the problem with America is that people here are too paranoid about stuff like terrorism, and not fearful enough about stuff like global warming. Of course, that is all by the design of the powers that be. There has been a deliberate campaign to make people less concerned about GW, while people’s 9/11 fears have been stoked.
The War on Terror makes big bucks for the MIC; whereas admitting that human industrial activity is screwing up the planet, might get in the way of business as usual.
Looking for the “harridan” flag…
A-yep.
I seem to recall that Molly Ivins once stated that she figured that most Americans really did know (or at least could make a good guess at knowing) who was screwing them, but felt powerless to do anything about it, so they attacked the things/people they felt they could actually get away with attacking: Women, blacks, union workers, civil servants, etc. I believe she likened it to why highway patrol cops don’t go after the fastest speeders, but the ones nearest to them, even though those speeders aren’t necessarily the fastest.
No war but class war, indeed. The Culture Wars and the Wars on Science are funded by the elites as a way to distract the attention of working-class voters from how the elites are screwing them.
I wrote over five years ago about the American public’s obsession with the extremely rare crime of child abduction by strangers, and how it was a stand-in for the real fear, the fear that is politically incorrect to state out loud, the fear generated by the awareness of the loss of economic stability over the past few decades — as shown by the drop in real wages since 1973, a drop that even the rise of women in the out-of-home workforce can no longer mask.
The fear that is engendered by a real calamity is suppressed, but, like the toothpaste in a closed tube, is not eliminated, just pushed into another area that isn’t taboo to discuss openly.
…X 2
With the Big C imploding in late 1980′s USA soon and oddly had the Big T and its attendant GWOT which now does not end by design.
We should/need to play “What’s My Line?” with WashingtonDC and the bunch DS is talking about uptop.
DS…well set up and laid out … commendable…
Commending it.
The statistics are even worse than I thought.
Excellent graphs illustrating inequality in this country which has to change. I was eager to share and then I got the condescending hostile attitude toward environmentalists shared by republicans and many liberals.
We are tired of supporting other causes only to be told that we have to wait until everyone is completely satisfied with their own particular causes before anything is done for the environment. As documented by Obama’s own EPA, people are dying right now because of Obama’s failed smog regulations and toxic coal emissions. If the majority of published scientists are correct, future generations will call our failure to act on climate change to be perhaps the most irresponsible act of one generation to another.
We are all on the same team. Sure let us address income inequality, the power of banks and corporations, bring back civil rights, and end wars. Future generations, however, may not regard those as the most important issues. Environmentalists are not the enemy and our concerns are based on science, not paranoia.
Buffalo Springfield nailed it in 1966:
They cannot admit to themselves who is really responsible for the situation for the same reasons an abused spouse cannot admit who is responsible. For doing so would mean they would have to confront those they have been relying upon for security.
From today’s Guardian on Zizek:
And from today’s NYT:
http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/06/09/how-racist-are-we-ask-google/
You’ll be happy to learn that between the rednecks and the lefties, Obama is toast.
I agree
Ah – in the poor side of town a $1.29 “crystal” “kit” set up from Radio Shack was the receiver of choice – as we lusted after Heathcraft kit products and did not know that the Hallicrafters S38D existed.
Sputnik in large part pulled me out of a future life as a laborer – due to english as a second (or third or fourth) language with a very limited vocabulary and spelling skills, and no discernible athletic ability, I was classified marginally retarded until the State of Illinois offered (I do not believe it was a mandate) student standardized testing in response to Sputnik and allowed science/math teacher comments into the student record (I had taught myself most of the high school courses before graduating from Grade School which impressed a few) – all was picked up in the National Student education Defense Act post Sputnik Paranoia – and the resulting Federal grants got me into and through college.
Paranoia – just another motivational device that got the rich paying for the education of a lot of non-rich? There was brief period post WW2 where labor unions and the newly educated middle management that wanted to follow a Christian life combined to sell the corporation has 3 masters theory – the masters being the need to be fair to employees, fair to the community, and fair to the shareholders, with CEO’s getting only good – not great – pay because after all they were just hired management. That all died with Reagan. Indeed we are now just returning to the American capitalist norm – to the 1920′s wealth distribution.
Excellent comment! Thank you.
So I’m a “harridan” now? Let the record show that the word “harridan” now means “a female who objects to someone replacing science with their own opinion”. What should we call a person who reflexively leaps to the defense of the person who is insisting his/her opinion is just as valid or more valid than established science? Sorry, “media pundit” is already taken…
And that worked out so well.
Great comment by the way.
I’d sincerely add that ‘transgenic food’ concerns are so far from an imagined concern, given that, as with climate change, we may have already passed the tipping point to protect the global food supply from genetically-modified monoculture crops, which are inherently unstable. Evidence is accumulating that there are health risks galore.
Dave and readers might consider how different the terms ‘fear’ and ‘paranoia’ are, too.
And Dave is, imo, engaging in another misdirection: Don’t look over at that issue or the other one; if ya do, yer paranoid, need a tinfoil hat! Look only at wealth distribution!
They are all important.
That is exactly what Wendy and I are trying to say. It does not help one cause to belittle another cause. The Occupy Movement is right in saying there are many causes we have to deal with that have been allowed to become intolerably bad. We have got to get over the liberal habit of fighting amongst ourselves instead of uniting for common goals.
But we cannot deal with them all at once. We need to focus on the the one(s) that are the most important and the most effective.
In order to have a clear and focused message.
I want to emphasize that Americans of all tendencies seem to spend their lives worrying about almost anything except who owns them and their lives. I postulate that this is no accident.
That’s what good compradors do.
I’d suggest that the most important issue is human impact on the environment. Because (A) our society cannot exist without a functional bio-sphere, and (B) future generations (even if they do survive) will not care who equitable our society was, if we leave the bio-sphere as a polluted mess.
And just how do you plan on solving this when the PTB and elites are the ones currently in charge or and dictating how the environment is to be used/abused/manipulated/controlled.
Do you really believe you will be able to convince the majority or people to use EVs, install solar panels, down size etc. when those with the money and convincing them they should not ?
Our society cannot exist. Concern for others is not much different than concern for future others. What does your concern for ranking these concerns mean?
Nonsense! A society that is not capable of multi-tasking cannot survive. Picking one issue has only served to divide and conquer. Specifically, it has been used as an excuse to do nothing for the environment. See Environment – http://newprogs.org/blog/2011/11/08/environment-under-democraticrepublican-uni-party
Saying we have to wait for more income equality before doing anything about the environment dooms the next generation. Again, not saying that dealing with corporate power, income inequality, wars, and civil rights is not important nor am I saying it will not in the long run help environmentalists. By all means, go after what you are passionate about and work for change. Just know that environmentalists are through patiently waiting at the back of the line. Together or alone, we will go forward. Believing in science is not paranoid, it is necessary for our survival.
To throw your question back at you: do you really believe you will be able to convince the majority of people to take action to decrease the power of the wealthy, when those with the money are convincing them that such steps should not be taken?
I’m assuming that people can take such actions (either in terms of using solar panels, or raising taxes on the wealthy).
But I’m saying that the key problem we all face today is that seven billion humans is too many humans for the bio-sphere to support.
In 200 years (or 2,000 years) nobody alive to day will matter anymore (they’ll all be gone). But the damage to the bio-sphere will still be a factor for eons.
Aha. You have made your choice between seven billion humans and “our society”.
Let’s partay!
Environment, clean water, and protected native seeds, for me. I’ve been wanting to write about this, but there’s whale of a lot of info. It seems that at the coming Rio+20 conference climate change isn’t really on the agenda.
Couple links; gotta get on my horse.
http://www.climateemergencyinstitute.org/uploads/To_Rio_groups_20_April.pdf
http://climatesoscanada.org/blog/2012/05/02/declaration-of-teotihuacan-2012-towards-the-peoples-summit-in-rio-de-janeiro-of-the-rio-20-summit-of-the-united-nations/
I’ll try to at least bring some Occupy Rio videos, some background. So many issues, so little…well, you know the rest.
Thanks Wendy, a couple of things from that last link you gave really sums up my feelings :
And especially this part here:
If things were fairly shared the world could support twice the population of today.
Nope. I think that estimate is an error. . . .
We’d actually need several Earths to sustain the full population wanted to live with an American lifestyle. But even if we assume that this is not the case, even with a more modest lifestyle, we can see that large enough numbers of poor people of the world are causing environmental damage.
http://www.ecospherics.net/pages/population.htm
Environmental degradation (destruction) and inequality are mutual. The system can’t admit it’s killing the earth because that would be control suicide. Thus the clearly fraudulent American Dream must be lashed together with terror and hope and change.
Should we prioritize the fraud or the destruction? Why bother?