Before starting off on the Tea Party’s craziness, I would like you to examine some images from two nearly identical tragedies that occurred over a hundred years and several thousand miles apart. Later in the post I hope to make a connection between these twin horrors and the strange metamorphosis of the American right. Please bear with me.
Compare this Reuters photograph of the Tazreen Fashions Fire, Bangladesh – 2012 with the photograph below of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire:
![]() |
| The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire, New York – 1911 |
![]() |
| The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory Fire, New York – 1911 |
The great mystery of American politics, a mystery which no one in the world can fathom, not even most Americans, is why so much money, hot air and spittle is being spent on literally paralyzing the American political system and making it impossible, not just to negotiate solutions, but to even have an intelligent conversation about solving the problems facing everyone, everywhere today. For that is what the Tea Party is really about: making first thought, then negotiation, and finally action impossible.
What is all this sound and fury covering up?
In my opinion it has much to do with where contemporary globalization is leading, the forces that it is setting in motion, which for historically minded Americans could elicit a bit of dèjá vu.
It seems to me that the globalization of today is in many ways similar on a world scale to the explosion of growth, power and sophistication of the US economy in the period after the Civil War, commonly called “The Gilded Age“. This was the period of the “robber barons” and viewed nostalgically by many of the American right as a paradise of anarcho-capitalism. This was a period of immense growth and innovation, but also one of enormous inequality, suffering and exploitation and financial crisis, all of it interpenetrated by an ubiquitous political corruption as the enormous new wealth so recently created set about purchasing and deforming to its benefit the institutions of American government: federal, state and local.
The excesses of the Gilded Age gave birth to a mass reform movement in the United States called, “Progressivism“. This movement, in a titanic struggle, bridging decades, among other things brought into effect: the regulation of interstate commerce, the breaking up of the monopolies known as “trusts“, laws regulating the purity of food and drugs, the rise of labor unions, laws eliminating child labor and in 1913, even progressive income tax, something which still causes intense indignation on the American ultra-right.
I would maintain that today the “Gilded Age” is happening on a global scale. The same viral growth and innovation; the same inequality, suffering and exploitation and financial crisis and similar corruption as rootless, multinational corporations evade much needed tax money and corrupt the political systems where they find themselves, world wide. And today we can add the more recent concerns for climate change and renewable energy.
Action and reaction, just as in the late 19th and early 20th centuries the grotesque abuses of the system brought forth a muscular reform movement to tame the beasts of the Gilded Age, today the feeling is growing all over the world that this new Gilded Age must also be brought under some sort of rational control and regulation. As the center of the world economic system, any general reform and regulation of globalization logically must begin in the United States of America.
That is what the one-percent are afraid of and that is why they fund and promote the paralysis of the American political system.
Just to show you the symmetry between the urge to reform one hundred years ago and to reform today, I’d ask you to take the trouble to read two texts, they are like the tiny samples taken to analyze DNA.
I’m sure you have heard about the terrible fire in a garment factory in Bangladesh a few days ago,which took the lives of over a hundred workers trapped in the blaze, (the color photo at the top of the page shows the aftermath) so the first text I’d like you to read, is about that tragedy:
(…) On the third floor, where firefighters later recovered 69 bodies, Ms. Pakhi was stitching sweater jackets for C&A, a European chain. On the fifth floor, workers were making Faded Glory shorts for Walmart. Ten bodies were recovered there. On the sixth floor, a man named Hashinur Rahman put down his work making True Desire lingerie for Sears and eventually helped save scores of others. Inside one factory office, labor activists found order forms and drawings for a licensee of the United States Marine Corps that makes commercial apparel with the Marines’ logo. In all, 112 workers were killed in a blaze last month that has exposed a glaring disconnect among global clothing brands, the monitoring system used to protect workers and the factories actually filling the orders. After the fire, Walmart, Sears and other retailers made the same startling admission: They say they did not know that Tazreen Fashions was making their clothing.(…) David Hasanat, the chairman of the Viyellatex Group, one of the country’s most highly regarded garment manufacturers, pointed out that global apparel retailers often depend on hundreds of factories to fill orders. Given the scale of work, retailers frequently place orders through suppliers and other middlemen who, in turn, steer work to factories that deliver low costs — a practice he said is hardly unknown to Western retailers and clothing brands. The order for Walmart’s Faded Glory shorts, documents show, was subcontracted from Simco Bangladesh Ltd., a local garment maker. “It is an open secret to allow factories to do that,” Mr. Hasanat said. “End of the day, for them it is the price that matters.” New York Times
A little over a hundred years ago something almost identical happened in the USA. You probably know about it, but read the following text to refresh your memory and to compare it with the Bangladesh tragedy:
The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire in New York City on March 25, 1911, was the deadliest industrial disaster in the history of the city of New York and resulted in the fourth highest loss of life from an industrial accident in U.S. history. It was also the second deadliest disaster in New York City – after the burning of the General Slocum on June 15, 1904 – until the destruction of the World Trade Center 90 years later. The fire caused the deaths of 146 garment workers, who died from the fire, smoke inhalation, or falling or jumping to their deaths. Most of the victims were recent Jewish and Italian immigrant women aged sixteen to twenty-three; of the victims whose ages are known, the oldest victim was Providenza Panno at 43, and the youngest were 14-year-olds Kate Leone and “Sara” Rosaria Maltese. Because the managers had locked the doors to the stairwells and exits – a common practice at the time to prevent pilferage and unauthorized breaks – many of the workers who could not escape the burning building jumped from the eighth, ninth, and tenth floors to the streets below. The fire led to legislation requiring improved factory safety standards and helped spur the growth of the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, which fought for better working conditions for sweatshop workers. (emphasis mine)Wikipedia
The only real difference between the two fires is that today the money is not bringing poor immigrant women to America to do the sewing, they are sending the sewing out to poor women in their home countries.
The text I put into bold type, the reforms the Triangle fire produced, is the key, the symbol, to explain the energy and funds behind the Tea Party’s mostly successful struggle against rational thought in the USA today.
It is easy to imagine that we will be seeing more and more incidents like these sweatshop fires, some of them may cause thousands of deaths, pollute the atmosphere or spread disease in much the same way that the financial crisis that began in the USA has spread around the world. Today, unless the world cooperates to regulate, what goes around, comes around.
Now it happens that there is only one state in the whole world that is still, for the moment at least, potentially powerful enough to be able to bring this situation under some sort of control at home and abroad, and this state is in theory a democracy that is elected by its citizens to serve them.
That state is, of course, the United States of America.
Now, for the state apparatus of the United States of America to bring the situation under control in America and to a great extent around the world, all the branches of the state, executive, legislative and judiciary would have to be in nearly total alignment, as they were during World War Two.
Keeping that from happening, paralyzing the political system, with racism and paranoia so that unity is entirely unthinkable except around “supporting our troops” to defend the “homeland” against the threat of “terrorism” is what the Tea Party movement and every move of Fox and Kochs is about.
So that is what it is really all about: it is about not legislating and not getting things done… to paralyze the government of the United States of America at a critical time in its history and the history of the world at large. To prevent the system from flushing itself out and regenerating itself. To cut the wires of the burglar alarms so they can sack the house, the house of everyone in the world, in peace. Their peace.





54 Comments

Well done, David. Recommended. You even used the C-word(capitalism). And that is precisely why the billionaires are doing what they’re doing. They are on top, they want to stay there, and they want to extend their power over the rest of us even more than they already have.
I think they want to set up a neo-feudal regime. Unfortunately, I don’t think the current American governmental system has a chance of stopping this. The whole system has to be transformed. I am open to suggestions on how this might best be accomplished.
Excellent post! I think our best hope for resisting the plutocrats is to use what’s left of our local power to throw monkey-wrenches into the works of the global system. I am heartened by mass protests in Spain, Greece, Canada, and other parts of the developed world… as consumers, voters, and workers we can resist the fat-cats in thousands of ways. It is urgent for us to ally with our brothers and sisters in the third world and resist global capitalism with global occupation.
I think we could start by being very careful who we buy our clothes from.
The Triangle Fire raised consciousness and grew the International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union. We have to talk about what our purchases of clothing purchase besides what we wear.
x2 What they are afraid of is what they were afraid of since the Russian revolution.
That their power would be toppled and their money confiscated and capitalism itself becoming an anachronism.
That even money itself – in its current form – would return to being nothing but pieces of paper with pictures of ex rulers on it. Good for wiping your ass but not much more.
Forgot to add.
But their actions may lead to a self fulfilling prophecy.
Such re-action generally does.
Yes, the more they press their advantage home, the more enemies they make and the more they stretch the system upon which they rely to the breaking point.
Nothing can expand forever.
Excellent. Recommended.
The era of the robber barons was also the era in which corruption subsidized the transcontinental railroad system, the military finally put all Native Americans on reservations and “opened up the land for settlement”, the US purchased Alaska, and the US began building an overseas empire that included Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Hawai’i, and other Pacific Islands deemed useful as coaling stations for the Great White Fleet that then practiced gunboat diplomacy in China and Latin America.
Your exceptionalism is showing. In fact, the 1% are quickly reversing progressive gains in Canada and the UK. The bankers in Europe are holding the people of the EU hostage for debts negotiated by the 1%. And China has a widely corrupt state capitalism to match that of Singapore and Taiwan. And the US blew its power on the failed wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In addition, the 1% are the folks driving the World Trade Organization delegates, World Intellectual Property Organization delegates, International Telecommunications Union delegates, Climate Change talks delegates. Meanwhile the the International Labor Organization is the least powerful of the UN bodies.
And the US is incapable of driving the UN agencies like it did in the 1950s because of the growth of anti-Americanism in the developing world.
Whatever progressive movement brings about limits to the 1%’s power will of necessity be an network of trans-national groups. This is very clear in the Occupy movement which has a connectional network across the key cities of the world.
Being fixated on the US misses the possibilities available in having a global movement. And otherwise, you are just playing legal whack-a-mole with corporate violators.
The Bangladesh government does not get off the hook just because a US corporation was playing fast and loose with their regulators.
It is not that much different from the connectional networks that were established across state lines a hundred years ago.
They took a major step forward by pushing right-to-work legislation through the Michigan legislature. The symbolic value is enormous: imagine Texas doing away with high school football, or Pennsylvania outlawing deer hunting.
A-men
MADE IN AMERICA only
“So that is what it is really all about”
It is about undoing the ratification and drafting of the US Constitution.
The power of Congress to tax was the driving force behind the new compact between the States circa 1790, the US Constitution has in its enumerated powers of Congress beginning with the first, the power to tax, is absolutely rejected by the likes of Dick Armey and Jim DeMint and the Tea Party.
To these people, Rhode Island then, and today, represent the idea government, a government that will not tax to pay for what it authorizes. Rhode Island was mercantilist and the opposition to taxes was the opposition of wealth derived from outside Rhode Island through trade passing through their hands. That is the basis of Wall Street, and people dying in India for goods sold to the poor in the US who work for Wal-Mart with all the profits flowing to the wealthy and Wall Street, just like with Rhode Island where slaves produced the goods that provided profits in rum sold to the poor who became drunkards to profit the Quaker merchants.
Note this is not capitalism. Wall Street owns nothing but profits from the trade in assets at inflated prices from cooked numbers from immoral acts, just as the traders of Rhode Island profited from carrying goods produced by immoral means to sell to men to engage what was considered immoral drunkenness. The oil and coal industry are not capitalism because they consider an asset like mining rights as something to destroy and sell to others to burn.
Indeed, the US’ power has waned as the rest of the world has either recovered from World War II or found ways to industrialize. China, using the useful idiots the Waltons of Walmart infamy, helped to accelerate this process by in essence luring America’s CEOs to destroy America’s manufacturing base by moving it to China.
The 1% is not only reversing gains in Canada and the UK, it is doing so here. More, our poverty levels are growing and unemployment remains high. Such jobs as have been created are, often as not, low paying ones. Our political class is convincing us all that to save us they very much need to reduce our deficits, aka our so called entitlements. There are those who want to reduce the minimum wage. Fox News is dedicated in nearly every story they run to promote the right wing point of view. Round two of this fiscal cliff nonsense will be the debt limit. I expect we will be told something like ” well what else could I do? They were going to force us to default?” And so cuts to entitlements will be made to please the Kochs and Fox News, at least for a moment.
Think about the debt limit for a moment. Forget about platinum coins. So if the President told the Treasury to pay its obligations what could happen? I would love to see the Supreme Court tell the Treasury to go ahead and default or Congress to do so. This is so much silliness. Any President with half a backbone would tell Boner to go fuck himself.
In the end Occupy may be our last hope of fixing this thing. But I am having second thoughts about that. The US is incapable of fixing the world. We shot our load in the ME wars. We have no moral power to influence anyone. I doubt how much real power we have anymore. The longer we allow our wealth to be destroyed through the scourge of unemployment and poverty level jobs the quicker we will fall into irrelevancy. If you doubt the decline in real wealth start with the infrastructure and then our education system and our manufacturing capacity. Just look around. We are quickly becoming an empty shell. Best thing we could do for Bangledesh would be to prevent anymore imports from them. Not going to happen.
One other thing :the billionaires, aka plutocrats, are not afraid of anything at the moment. They have outposts all around the world. Their money and they are more mobile than they ever have been. Plus they virtually own most of the governments. Where,exactly, are they in retreat?
David, I appreciate the attempt to make sense of history, but I can’t really agree here. You are comparing adolescent capitalism with capitalism in its old age. Moreover, you have cast the “tea party billionaires” as the 1% because, it seems, you don’t want to think too hard about the billionaires who in fact cast themselves as “progressives,” e.g. George Soros and Warren Buffett. Let’s start with this:
First off, the 1% are not afraid of the rational control and regulation of capitalism. They already know that they have the regulators well in hand, that they have already had their great holiday with the creation of trillions of dollars of phony assets, and that when their companies go bust they will write themselves fat checks and retire handsomely. They also know that the “progressives” pose no opposition to them at all, because they can always be persuaded to vote for DLC Democrats who will work overtime to co-opt public opposition to what it is they want to do.
Secondly, the Progressive movement of the first two decades of the 20th century was successful because capitalism could afford it. The capitalism of that era still had significant room to expand and was still significantly based on expanding production. Today the “progressives” are thoroughly co-opted into voting for neoliberal politicians, and today’s capitalism is being picked clean by finance capital like a dead gazelle carcass being picked clean by hyenas.
If you want to do something that poses a threat to that portion of the 1% you actually dislike, you might consider supporting something other than capitalism, or for that matter Obama.
Correctamundo.
I think David hits the nail on the head… The system we have is stuck and then there are the people with their hair on fire and no one sees of even cares when the do and when the do they can’t find a way to do anything… and so the killing and the stealing goes on and on and on.
That goes without saying. But ignoring the rest of the world in the current situation is like the Progressive movement in New York state trying to solve it problems a hundred years ago within New York state and ignoring the export of jobs to Southern states. When the minimum wage passed it raised the wages in places like New York a little, but the wages in Southern states a lot. That allowed people in those states to become customers for goods made in New York, and in Pennsylvania and Illinois and other states.
It is less and less possible to close national borders to goods and people and money. And of those closing it to people is the easiest of the three but you see the issues with immigration.
What that means is that the solution must include higher labor, environmental, accounting, transparency and other standards worldwide. The transnational political institutions are there, however imperfectly, but they are currently captured by transnational corporations because the national governments are also captured by transnational corporations. It is the US that is behind the curve in participating with the transnational popular movements required to change these institutions. And the whole right-wing anti-UN campaign is not to disempower those institutions but to keep them captive for the 1%.
Au contraire. There are terrified of people in the streets–to the point that they have their politicians crack down on the feeblest protest. Look at what happened in Lansing. Three thousand people and the capitol police used pepper spray on peaceful protesters. And on next Tuesday more folks in Michigan are coming out. But the PtB are so scared that they’ve had “conservatives” reserve the capitol steps.
I think I suggested that Occupy might be the only hope. It is the only thing I see anywhere. But I have my doubts about it. If they are going to lead this thing they better get cracking. I don’t see any real political movement. Third parties go nowhere. They can’t even get going on local levels. In fact the 1% seems to have captured far too many state houses. The dimwits are content with national office and they too are infected with the 1% malady.
Oddly enough I read where GE and now Apple are bringing back some production to the US. Prolly just flashes in the pan.
Here’s hoping you are right. They tried that recall in Ws and lost. But if we can get enough in the street, I agree some change could result. But I just don’t see the 1% shaking in their boots. Not yet anyway, since they can call out the dogs whenever they choose. sometimes I think they have more room to protest in Cairo then we do in NYC.
The largest ” party ” when the territory of Iowa was formed into a state was the Radical-Progressive Party. Wouldn’t it be shits and giggles if, in 2016, we returned to our roots and nominated a radical progressive tag team? I’m thinking a Feingold/Dean unification ticket announced in Sept-Oct. of 2015 to cut the DLCers off at the pass. They’re headed for a Clinton/Cantwell or a Biden/Cantwell or a ???/Cantwell ticket combo. Their other option is Clinton/McCaskill. Yikes! Lots of money in them there Seattle waters, eh? Can any of these jokers catch a frozen fish? Or understand why a Missouri Mule is already genetically modified?
You need to read. Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else, by Chrystia Freeland.
Amazon link
http://www.amazon.com/Plutocrats-Rise-Global-Super-Rich-Everyone/dp/1594204098
It is not a question of a new political party, it is more about a wide consensus that more effective regulation is needed. This consensus must begin in the developed countries that consume the goods and raw materials produced in the developing nations. There also needs to be a universal agreement among developed nations about closing tax havens. Some progress is being made with Switzerland right now.
Just as reform was doable 100 years ago in the red in tooth and claw economy of America’s “Gilded Age”, it is doable today, worldwide. It is a matter of consciousness. That is why the Tea Party and Fox, etc, are making so much noise and obstruction…. This consciousness is close.
Great post, but the Gilded Age was AFTER the US Civil War (in North the War to Preserving The Union or in South called War of Northern Agression). It was that war that cement the foundations of the industrialization…mostly in upper Midwest and northeast that allowed the robber barons to grow with the expansion of railroads, shipping and funneling of capital to nyc and Chicago on a lessor scale… Steel mills and mining and shipping and equipment manfacturing. But the barons were more often financiers.
Great post, but the Gilded Age was AFTER the US Civil War (in North the War to Preserving The Union or in South called War of Northern Agression). It was that war that cement the foundations of the industrialization…mostly in upper Midwest and northeast that allowed the robber barons to grow with the expansion of railroads, shipping and funneling of capital to nyc and Chicago on a lessor scale… Steel mills and mining and shipping and equipment manfacturing. But the barons were more often financiers. It occurred during The Long Depression of the 1870s-90s which were punctuated by financial panics. The rich got much richer but also lost vast sums. Everyone else muddled though.
Before the Civil War there had been a long depression in the 1830s followed by a fight between the economic rivalry between young industrial north and primary economic engine of slave agriculture in the South.
Sorry. Reading too early at airport. You did say it was after the civil war. I made the post above because I have read a number of posts over the past couple years comparing today to the 1850s and possible coming conflict. However, that parallel is more social and religious as in abortion and gay rights that aren’t as directly related to economic conflict that was caused by slavery….. Which made the stakes much higher.
I’m worried more about the coming fight over the latter. The robber barons can be bought off. Not so the moralists….there is no in between.
The “moralists” are simply tools of the one-percent in order to keep the yokels confused. You can see the Republicans who want to get (re)elected backing off from them rather quickly now.
I see the biggest conflict for progressives centering around intellectual property. We like generic drugs, open source, creative commons, digital printers, copy left, and the money doesn’t. The big battles, even among ourselves, will be about the tradeoffs there. We want universal minimum wage, right to organize and strike and universal safety standards… those may be easier battles than intellectual property.
2 must reads
http://citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=5277
http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/4_huge_corporate_power_grabs_that_never_came_to_pass/
Thanks for the links!
Great post David. I would only add that the plutocrats already have the system in a glide path to destruction so the purpose is to keep the system as it is. The Federal government is already in their pocket and they are now attacking at the state level to finish the deal.
Unfortunately, the Judas politicians don’t understand they will be standing next us when all is said and done, not with the Koch Brothers.
This is the most cogent explanation of creeping fascism I’ve seen. Excellent!
Many attempts at instituting fascism throughout history but never very long lasting. History will repeat itself. No doubt in my mind. The current PTB are mostly third generation or more and preternaturally stupid. Humanity is at it’s best when things are at their worst. The MOTU are meatheads in the final analysis and their reign will be ugly and short.
thank you,for all you report
so true
talk about feeling ENTITLED
Mittens,Booosh,McNasty,Quayles
lordy lord
Assuming paralysis to be a goal in itself, it’s amazing it has worked so long. But paralysis is really unpopular. Americans are getting tired of Republicans voting against their own proposals out of pure partisanship.
Shhh. You might threaten the defeatism on the left.
If “they”. That is the big contradiction on the left. The way the Occupy movement is structured, what “they” do depends on who shows up and does it.
Quaking in their boots is part of the endgame.
You’re absolutely right… and I have the cracked ribs from NYPD batons to prove it! :)
Koch Succor:
The Koch brothers contribute a large amount of money to conservative, libertarian, and free-market individuals and organizations.[1]They have given more than $196 million to dozens of free-market and advocacy organizations.[1] Tax records indicate that, in 2008, the three main Koch family foundations contributed to 34 political and policy organizations, three of which they founded, and several of which they direct.[1][2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_activities_of_the_Koch_brothers
These organizations are part of a more aggressive political force that is adept at controlling the 24-hour news cycle and managing coalitions. Unlike ordinary business lobbies that simply support Right to Work, these advocacy groups go out and shape public opinion through broad messaging and content development, which in turn is used for organizing around policies.
The unfortunate thing about most Americans is that they really don’t pay enough attention to what’s going on behind closed doors and simple accept what they hear on Main Stream Media as the way things should be. It’s the old Lemmings over the cliff thing.
The exact same thing is going to happen with this budget
Subject: Michigan
By most accounts, Snyder and his allies took everyone by surprise. On Tuesday evening, Snyder called a press conference to say he would be reversing himself, and would be throwing his weight for the first time behind making Michigan a Right to Work state. The day Snyder unveiled his new position on the controversial law, several business lobby groups endorsed the bill, and a $1 million television and radio ad campaign began airing in local media to encourage the public to support it. The Michigan Freedom Fund, the group airing the ad, was founded on November 5th by a campaign operative named Greg McNeilly. He is known locally for his work as GOP gubernatorial candidate Dick DeVos’ campaign manager in 2006, and as an employee to a DeVos company. [See the ad here]
In the last few years, conservatives have made significant contributions to political organizations that have pushed the state to the right on core economic issues, and explicitly pushed Right to Work as a top goal (see the graph above):
—Americans for Prosperity – Michigan, the group founded by the billionaire Koch brothers, has a relatively new chapter in Michigan that has produced pamphlets extolling anti-Right to Work reforms. This week, the group set up a heated tent outside the capital to support Snyder’s law and bused activists to Lansing to counter labor protesters.
—The Mackinac Center is a right-wing think tank in Michigan that produces pro-Right to Work reports, sponsors an anti-labor legal foundation, and produces an array of other content, from a Pininterest page toshort videos explaining why Michigan should adopt Right to Work. The Center has gone on a media tour, touting Snyder’s move this week on CNN, Fox Business, and much of the Michigan press. Notably, the group recently started two of its own media outlets, Michigan Capitol Confidential and Watchdog Wire Michigan.
These organizations are part of a more aggressive political force that is adept at controlling the 24-hour news cycle and managing coalitions. Unlike ordinary business lobbies that simply support Right to Work, these advocacy groups go out and shape public opinion through broad messaging and content development, which in turn is used for organizing around policies.
Both AFP and the Mackinac Center are backed financially by the billionaire DeVos family, which has sought to control public policy debates through state-level nonprofits. Donors Trust, the nonprofit foundation used by wealthy conservative donors to anonymously finance activism on the right, has heavily funded AFP and Mackinac in the last three years. Doug DeVos chairs a nonprofit that has mobilized influential executives in the state to support Right to Work in Michigan.
The model isn’t new. In Wisconsin, Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI) relied heavily on Americans for Prosperity Wisconsin and a state-based think tank called the MacIver Institute to build political support for his effort to curtail union rights. In Ohio, Gov. John Kasich (R-OH) worked closely with another business-backed group, the Buckeye Institute, for his attempt to crush local unions.
On the left, the only comparable group in Michigan is Progress Michigan. Progress Michigan, which is backed by several local unions, brought together a coalition of progressives to oppose Right to Work, and demonstrated at the capital in Lansing this week. Although Progress Michigan has leveraged a sizable local union membership base to make up for its small budget, as the chart I created above shows, they haven’t been able to compete financially with the right.
Now that the Right to Work fuse has been lit, establishment groups on both sides of the ideological divide have entered the fray, including local chambers of commerce and the Tea Party on the right, and unions on the left. Working America, the AFL-CIO affiliate, has helped mobilize people for protests today. But in terms of shaping the ideological debate—it’s important to realize that the anti-labor forces have worked for years through groups like Mackinac and AFP to set the stage.
More: http://www.thenation.com/blog/171663/pro-right-work-groups-michigan-outspend-union-counterparts#
Yep. Well, my 18-hour “vacation” in the Chicago Police Department’s custody didn’t seem to be the product of a confident Rahm Emmanuel.
At what point are there a million Michigan citizens in the streets of Lansing to protest this action? Three thousand at the capitol on short notice was a good start.
I know you’re right about the ugly… but what do you mean by “short?” It doesn’t take many months of full-bore fascist violence to cause incredible amounts of devastation for millions of people. To win this struggle we need to maintain focus on the natural resentments of most people against the plutocrats and their minions. We can’t afford the luxury of uniting only with those who have alresdy had their consciousness raised on all issues of importance to us. It matters little to defeating the man why people will risk their lives to fight the man in the streets, only that they show up in their thousands until the corporate fascists rule no more.
Please blog this, it would make an excellent post.
It’s bedtime where I live, so I’d like to thank everybody for their comments and toddle off. Big hug to all.
It’s a very good start… the upper midwest is where the American working class has to make its last stand!
The reason for this is because far to many on the left – even progressive – believe in the “American Nightmare”. That there and can a kinder, gentler Oligarchy.
They do not want to or cannot accept that the Oligarchy has to be totally and completely destroyed. Killed !
David thank you. I have never blogged; would love to but don’t know how. Fee free to use it in its entirety – word needs to get out.
Well, there you go again, saying that everything will be fine if only capitalism is effectively regulated. That is where you and I differ. Regulations can work for awhile, but eventually capitalism’s insatiable lust for more and quicker profits will find a way around those regulations and eventually get rid of them altogether.
I have come to the conclusion that capitalism can never be successfully regulated for more than a couple of generations, if that. Better to destroy it and come up with a more sustainable, not to mention evolutionarily viable, economic system.
I admit that’s easy for me to say, as I have never benefited more from the capitalist society in which I’ve lived my entire life than I would have in other systems. I also find it interesting that people like you who DO benefit from capitalism in some ways are never willing to just kill the beast.
No, you’ll wait until it totally self-destructs and your own precious self has nothing left to lose. I find that sad.
Interestingly enough Barbarian, I have generally done best when the economy is in the dumper.
Did real will during the Reagan recession.
All you have to do is post it here at the diaries of FDL and you are a blogger. That easy.