“Any given accumulation of commercial wealth may be indicative, on the one hand, of faithful industries, progressive energies, and productive ingenuities: or, on the other, it may be indicative of mortal luxury, merciless tyranny, ruinous chicanery.” John Ruskin (8 February 1819 – 20 January 1900)
Trying to find any kernel of wisdom following the news media is a little like trying to get to the nectar of Jesus Christ by reading Sinclair Lewis’s “Elmer Gantry” or studying the Vatican’s account books. Difficult, rare, but sometimes it happens: suddenly, lo and behold, someone as unlikely as Lance Armstrong comes along to teach us how to distinguish price from value.
![]() |
| Lance Armstrong |
With Lance, we might even be looking at a good teaching illustration of Marx’s “use value” versus “exchange value” or especially “commodity fetishism“.
There are certainly plenty of people around who have stolen — are stealing — more than Lance, have lied — are lying — more than Lance, bullied the vulnerable more than Lance, but few provide such a clear and simple story of lying, bullying, cheating, defrauding and stealing as Lance does. It is a simple story and unlike Wall Street, it’s easy to understand and follow and Americans just love stories.
Lance has made a lot of money… and not only for himself… ask Nike and Anheuser-Busch or ask any kid that bought an overpriced jersey, shoes or a helmet just because Lance wore them.
His victories have been declared officially valueless, but he can still make a lot of money for himself and you can still make money by chasing his wheels up the shit-hill where he now reigns… just ask Oprah.
There is a book here and probably a film to be made from it… Who will play Lance?
Really, nothing could be simpler than Lance himself, the world is filled with mean, hard faced, sociopathic assholes like him, they only differ from him in that they can’t go up a hill as fast, even doped… it is the rest of us and our reactions to Lance Armstrong’s story that are complicated.




11 Comments

“T” for Texas!
T for Texas
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK_o4ZmPTQk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMNw_-yUm_0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLU_IYflUkQ
Which reminds me: Patrick Bateman, the ultimate example of commodity fetishism run amok. (And while he’s fictional, there are lots of real people who are quite similar to him.)
The bigger question to me is what made A’strong such a hero in the first place…yeh, I know he could ride a bike (What’s wrong with this picture? A bike, I say) What’s wrong with us that riding a fast bike could ever engender such glamour and worship. The sin is in ourselves….and repulsive. Maybe I am terribly out of touch; no, I was never a fan to any degree. What brought about the worship?
For instance, I was a big Ali fan; he was witty and smart and fought off the draft with the truth that the Viet Cong had never done him any harm….See the difference. We really should be more careful about those we make a hero/ine.
Great comment! You’ve nailed it.
I don’t know why the media wants to go after Lance Armstrong, yet give a pass to all the political cheating of The Republican Party that truly ruins our lives and our world. Lance is still a hero, compared to The House of Representatives. We ought to keep Lance as a hostage hero until we can get some political justice.
Thanks….always glad to see you. ;)