Read carefully the two quotes below as if they were a Zen koan on the order of “what is the sound of one hand clapping?” or “does a dog have Buddha nature?”, and see if you notice the cognitive dissonance they produce.
Consumer spending is not only the key to economic recovery in the short term; it’s also necessary for balanced growth in the long term. If our goal is to repair our damaged economy, we should bank on consumer culture — and that entails a redistribution of income away from profits toward wages, enabled by tax policy and enforced by government spending. James Livingston – New York Times
“For capitalism is abolished root and branch by the bare assumption that it is personal consumption and not enrichment that works as the compelling motive.”
Karl Marx – Das Kapital – Vol. II, Ch. IV, p. 123
Meditating on the above, first, on the the need for carefree consumer spending in order to avoid an even deeper recession, and then on the essential capitalist virtues of thrift and capital accumulation, sound fiscal policies and solid currency, I began to get some understanding of where we are and the dangers we may be facing.
We are being urged to drastic cost cutting and thin-lipped austerity in order to manifest the capitalist virtues of thrift and the sacrifice of immediate gratification, with a view to accumulation, which when manifested will paradoxically lead to even greater economic hardship, certainly in the short term… and as Maynard Keynes said, “in the long run, we are all dead”.
For some reason, known only to my neurons, the following simile occurred to me:
In cities such as Beirut and Cairo, a sophisticated middle class lives in a liberated, western style in the midst of a deeply conservative, Arab society, where all men, Christian and Muslim alike expect to marry virgins. In consequence, the best plastic surgeons in Europe are charging rich, young, Arab women high fees to perform Hymenorrhaphy or hymenoplasty, the surgical restoration of the hymen. This relatively simple operation is perfectly safe when performed by a skilled professional under hygienic conditions, and is, of course, performed with the patient under anesthetic.
What conservative economists are asking western consumers, the motor of the world’s economies, to do right now, is to restore our capitalist “virginity”… but instead of being in the hands of competent surgeons, we are being asked to undergo surgery performed with dull knives by incompetent, butcher-quacks, with dirty hands (politicians etc)… and without anesthetic.
Once this ordeal has been undergone and our “virtue” restored, it is hoped that we, thus painfully re-cherry-ed, will soon return to our former libidinous lubricity.
The question would be: is this trip really necessary?
For many years, people have been getting jobs, owning a home, getting an education, paying their medical bills, all because of easy credit. Now, it seems to me, that having a job, owning a home, getting an education, paying medical bills, are basic human needs that almost all human beings rightfully aspire to, and rightfully demand. The system provided all those things, therefore the system was considered “good”.
Now the credit has been shut off and humans no longer can get a job, own a home, get an education and pay the doctor, therefore the system is “no good” and should be changed so that people can return to owning a home, getting an education and paying the doctor.
But what was our system really?
“Personal consumption” and not “enrichment” was the compelling motive that moved the economy, and that according to Karl Marx, who knew a thing or two about it, is not capitalism.
As the quote from Marx at the top of the post indicates, our economy had long ceased to be classic capitalism and had become, what for want of a better word, I would call “consumer socialism”. The state printed money and practically gave it away at absurdly low interest and every obstacle to lending it, such as credit worthiness, was removed and people had jobs, owned homes, got an education and paid the doctor.
If we really are going “tighten our belts”, there is a very real chance of our entering into a full blown depression similar to the 1930s and we would be well advised to remind ourselves that only two countries avoided the Great Depression of the 1930s, to wit, Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Russia and the United States only climbed out of the depression by entering World War Two and creating a command and control economy with unlimited public debt, severe price controls etc. Thus, during the war the American economy came to resemble those of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union and after the Second World War, the Cold War soon began, which established the Military-Industrial Complex as a continuation of America’s sui generis wartime “corporate state”, which was the beginning of America’s legendary prosperity.
So now, at the this late date, we are expected to apply classic, capitalist “fundamentals”, when history shows us the result?



12 Comments

You have state the koan right there. What is the sound of capitalism without cold war military spending on planet where 3/4 of it is just emerging from the dark ages or has been bombed back to the dark ages ?
I have written on this very subject a length. State sponsored capitalism where private enterprise is allowed to exist on a small scale.
I watched a good video of Neil Degrasse Tyson a while ago. (sorry do not have the link) where he pointed out that NASA and all the spending that went with it began under Eisenhower a year after Sputnik went up.
That one event caused Washington, the Pentagon and Wall Street to shit their pants. Since if the USSR could put some silly metal sphere up into space that went beep beep beep, they could put a nuclear bomb over us just as easily.
And we had nothing like it at the time. Making B52s rather unimportant.
Capitalism here began to collapse when the cold war began to collapse and when the USSR ceased to exist, the reason for the military spending and NASA and all the rest did as well.
So we had to find a new reason to keep up the charade. Islamic terrorists fit the bill for now.
But this too will end and the charade will end. We simply cannot keep it up indefinitely. Sooner or later the whole house of card will come crashing down.
What will happen after is anybodies guess. Though I do not see a revolution in the historic sense. We are to diverse and divisive and revolutions require cohesion.
This is why I can see the spitting up of the US. Or a tremendous shift of power and control…towards states and/or regions.
It to me is the only area the far right and far left agree on – though none would admit it publicly – and that is to give Washington the bums rush. But for vastly different reasons.
I think you are over-complicating your definition. Capitalism is the economic system where the ONLY objective is the accumulation of more capital, aka profit, by any means, and the faster the better.
That’s it. I’m not sure, but Marx may have been comparing how capitalists behave with their money to how old feudal lords, kings, and even ancient oligarchs did. The key phrase there is “compelling motive.” Perhaps you should meditate on that.
As for Livingston, well, he writes for the New York Times. ‘Nuff said.
If one can stand back a bit to look seriously at the situation, there really is a striking resemblance between our current conditions and those of the USSR under Khrushchev or even Brezhnev.
We have our own gulags and state sponsored economy. We deal with descent and foreign leaders who oppose us in similar a manor. We feign an open political system but all real opposition is suppressed.
Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck……
Yes, there are similarities, but also some pretty big differences. The late Soviet Union saw the Communist Party become something of a hereditary institution, with its members controlling the state, which controlled the industries.
Here, something of a hereditary aristocracy controls the corporations, which in turn control the state.
Both systems saw increasing inequality of wealth, both suppressed dissent, albeit it in different ways until recently. What is so different about gulags and “indefinite detention?” Both had very fragile economic systems–the Soviet collapse was triggered by a drastic drop in oil prices while the American one is now based on bets on which debts will be paid.
And both spent WAY too much on the military and engaged in unpopular and unwinnable foreign wars and occupations. The American oligarchy thinks it’s outsmarted that last by outsourcing wars and occupations to private corporations, but they still get subsidies from the government. It just can’t last.
George H.W. Bush -> G.W. Bush
Bill Clinton -> Hillary Clinton
Whose members control the industries which control the state.
Any difference that makes no difference is no difference.
Tinfoil hat on.
Perhaps, David, the PTB WANT conditions such as the Great Depression, figuring desperate people will take whatever crumbs they can get and therefore be easier to control. Then they can fight it out amongst themselves to determines who gets Ultimate Power.
In that sense, they’re like spoiled bullies playing King of the Mountain, only instead of a dirt hill it’s a whole civilization they are fighting over. And without a real external threat and alternative, like Communism was in the 1930′s, they figure they can get away with it.
Tinfoil hat off.
That’s a very simplistic case I just made; I realize that. I do believe that many of them want to secure power for themselves and their descendants in perpetuity, that is, to establish a new sort of feudalism. In that sense, it’s not all about capitalism; capitalism is a means to an end. And the end is power over others. Domination and control, both of which are far older than capitalism, no matter how you define it.
In psychological terms, we’re talking sociopathy and psychopathy here. Since capitalism rewards sociopathic behavior, it’s really no surprise.
There’s hope, though. Sociopaths and psychopaths can be very intelligent and very clever, but they also tend to be very arrogant. They nearly always screw up and underestimate somebody.
As well as over estimate themselves.
“A man’s got to know his limitations.” – Dirty Harry
“is” never pays.
David, you and others would be correct if you hadn’t omitted some events that destroyed the United States economy.
In 06, when Ben Bernanke raised the interest rate, although it should have been lowered, an immense amount of wealth was destroyed overnight in the form of “real estate”. That affected the middle class of this entire country. While people who owned their homes, weren’t foreclosed on, their homes were worth much less than before. The value of “real estate” had always “trended up”, never down, before this. The family home is the only thing most middle class people had of value. ARM’s is a name no one should ever forget, that stands for Adjustable Rate Mortgage. If people had “fixed rate mortgages”, they wouldn’t have been affected one iota by that rate increase, because their payments would have remained the same no matter how high Ben raised the rate. When I sold real estate, I would not have gotten one of those ARM loans for my worst enemy. During the years the real estate meltdown was occuring, something else came into play, it was gasoline at over $4.00 at the pump plus “sky high” food prices.
If you go to this website http://wp.me/p2vRlu-4 and click on the gasoline chart, in 2008, gasoline cost over $4.00 at the pump. That alone caused catastrophe all over this country, no one escaped. When you couple that with the high price of food, as verified by a price of $7.40. for a bushel of corn in 2008; that increased the cost of living more than this economy could bear. People struggling to survive can not comprehend how much the price of corn and gasoline effect their lives. Each family is so busy trying to cope, that there is no way they can comprehend how these prices affect every aspect of their lives.
If you have a good memory, all you have to do is jog it back to the time before you saw $4.00 gas at the pump. The shopping mall you went to was full of stores. There were more eating places and car dealerships. The effect of those “sky high” prices was the same as a giant “Hoover Vacuum Cleaner” sucking money out of the economy of this country. If I can’t buy what you’re selling, the people who manufacture what you’re selling are no longer needed. Those people can no longer buy what someone else is selling, and on it goes. Where did all that money go?
Once upon a time, we had a government that protected us from “commodity market manipulation”. Now we have a government that’s guilty of colluding with the “commodity market manipulators”. After you’ve include the factors I’ve introduced, that can be verified by recorded records, plus all the elements that others have mentioned, you’ll get a much clearer picture.
Great comment! Thank you.