Today at 10am the House Agriculture committee will hold a hearing on the role of credit derivatives in the U.S. economy. I think this is a follow up from the 1994 hearings.
The private nature of credit derivatives contracts has made it impossible to precisely measure the size of the market. Estimates within the industry range from about $35 trillion to $55 trillion.
Credit default swaps were developed about a decade ago as a way for bondholders to protect themselves against defaults by borrowers. The market exploded as investors started buying and selling the credit protection without ever owning the underlying bonds.
The September failure of Lehman Brothers generated anxiety for the credit derivatives market on two fronts. Investors were left worrying whether they would suffer losses on contracts in which Lehman was their counterparty, and holders of protection against a Lehman default were concerned about whether all their claims would get settled.
I wonder what Charles A. Bowsher must be thinking. Bowsher, who in 1994 as Comptroller General of the United States, testified before Congress at two hearings on "Financial Derivatives, Actions Needed to Protect the Financial System." From his statements:
Given the gaps and weaknesses that impede regulatory preparedness for dealing with a financial crisis associated with derivatives, we recommend that Congress require federal regulation of the safety and soundness of all major U.S. OTC derivatives dealers. The immediate need is for Congress to bring the currently unregulated OTC derivatives activities of securities and insurance firm affiliates under the purview of one or more of the existing federal financial regulators and to ensure that derivatives regulation is consistent and comprehensive across regulatory agencies. We also recommend that the financial regulators take specific actions to improve their capabilities to oversee OTC activities and to anticipate or respond to any financial crisis involving derivatives.
*** Check out this excellent reference from RGE: Structured Finance Glossary – Making Sense of the Alphabet Soup
audio and video webstreams available from the committee website.
Witnesses:
- Ananda Radhakrishnan, Director, Division of Clearing and Intermediary Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Patrick M. Parkinson, Deputy Director, Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
- Erik R. Sirri, Director of Division of Trading and Markets, Securities Exchange Commission
- Eric R. Dinallo, Superintendent, State of New York, Insurance Department
Also today at 10am, the House Small Business committee will hold a hearing to
Review of Recent Federal Efforts to Improve Credit Conditions for Small Businesses



12 Comments







if anyone, like me, was having problems with the webstream, it is now up and opening statements are still in progress.
thanx for this report selise, I would not have known about it, good reading from 1994 too
i understand from the committee that there may not be an archive of the hearing. i’m recording the audio (although i missed some of the opening statements) and will post it if that is the case.
interesting, and not very encouraging so far. sec is arguing about why they need to be in charge of regulating otc derivatives even though they seem woefully unprepared to do so. petty empire building always pisses me off – but now of all times it’s just criminal.
i posted the hearing audio (mp3 for download and streaming for dialup) of the hearing, as my understanding is that the committee will not provide an archive.
unfortunately i missed some of the beginning, but was able to rip most of it.
Selise, FWIW:
Worse Than the Great Depression?
U.S. Needs to Pump $1.2 Trillion Into Banks, FBR Says (Update3)
“To get the credit markets functioning now, the government must”
suspend dividend payments for all banks, convert TARP funding into
common stock, force banks to raise more capital above current
requirements and create a central clearinghouse for credit default swaps,
Miller said.”
30 reasons for Great Depression 2 by 2011
thanks ubetchaiam! although as per usual it doesn’t look like happy days reading.
i watched some of the yesterday’s hearing on the auto bailout and sachs told them flat out that if they let gm fail they risking a depression. i haven’t been a big fan of sachs (see russia shock therapy), but he’s not, imo, as bat shit crazy as most of the neoliberal economists. yesterday he sounded positively socialist.
your third link doesn’t work for me…
Given the history where those ‘in the know’ were waving the red flag to no avail, ‘happy days are here again’ is a LOOOOONG way off; wanna bet that Obama didn’t have a full understanding of what he was going to confront even with all his advisors?
Look for massive public spending in 2009 and then watch out.
my question is does obama understand now? do any of his advisors? i am not reassured from what i’ve seen to date.
Third link
(They moved it because of it being a ‘most read’).
I suspect he does BUT it is a political game. That Bush is willing to sign extended unemployment benefits is about the only thing that will be accomplished until Obama takes office.
Personally, I think Neil Young has the right idea regards the automakers. And I suspect the dealy in naming the treasury,commerce,and state secretaries is because of the illumination that Obama is having re how Bush really f*&^ked everything up.
i hope you’re right that obama and his advisors get it. still waiting to see some sign of that.