Fifteen years ago Charles Bowsher’s warned us about unregulated OTC derivatives. Now he’s warning us about mark-to-myth accounting rule changes.
We now know just how dangerous unregulated OTC derivatives like credit default swaps are to the global financial system. But 15 years ago – 4 years before Brooksley Born’s warning and more than 6 years before the CFMA 2000 was passed in a bipartisan rejection of regulation, Charles Bowsher, as Comptroller General of the United States, sounded the warning in the GAO report, FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES Actions Needed to protect the Financial System and in testimony before Congress.
From his 1994 GAO report:
Much OTC derivatives activity in the United States is concentrated among 15 major U.S. dealers that are extensively linked to one another, end-users, and the exchange-traded markets. This combination of global involvement, concentration, and linkages means that the sudden failure or abrupt withdrawal from trading of any of these large dealers could cause liquidity problems in the markets and could also pose risks to the others, including federally insured banks and the financial system as a whole.
From his 1994 testimony before Congress:
Given the gaps and weaknesses that impede regulatory preparedness for dealing with a financial crisis associated with derivatives, we recommend that Congress require federal regulation of the safety and soundness of all major U.S. OTC derivatives dealers. The immediate need is for Congress to bring the currently unregulated OTC derivatives activities of securities and insurance firm affiliates under the purview of one or more of the existing federal financial regulators and to ensure that derivatives regulation is consistent and comprehensive across regulatory agencies. We also recommend that the financial regulators take specific actions to improve their capabilities to oversee OTC activities and to anticipate or respond to any financial crisis involving derivatives.
Now Charles Bowsher is sounding another warning, this time about accounting rule changes that have replaced mark-to-market with mark-to-myth.
FHLB Executive Who Left Cites Securities Valuations
Charles Bowsher said he resigned last month as chairman of the Federal Home Loan Bank system’s Office of Finance because he wasn’t comfortable with the way the banks value their mortgage securities.
"I decided I didn’t have confidence in the financial statements," Mr. Bowsher said in an interview, confirming remarks that previously appeared in a Bloomberg News article. Mr. Bowsher, a former partner at the accounting firm Arthur Andersen, said he believes financial companies generally, not just the home-loan banks, have too much discretion in valuing assets such as mortgage securities. "They put a lot of assumptions in there," he said.
The Office of Finance coordinates debt sales by the 12 regional home-loan banks and compiles combined financial results for them. But the individual banks and their auditors are responsible for accounting policies.
Tyler Durden, guest posting at naked capitalism, explains what this means in a must read post, FHLB Chairman Disgusted With FASB Accounting Alchemy, Quits
When the man in charge of the second largest borrower in the U.S. is willing to lose his job due to his discomfort with the FASB’s shift in accounting rules, you can bet that the tragic fallout of all the "market buoying" recent events is only a matter of time.
…one of the men who knows the ins and outs of the financials of banks involved in the mortgage crisis more intimately than even Bernanke and Geithner, let alone Obama, is saying that the newly implemented changes by the FASB will throw the whole system into tailspin and he want none of it.
If this isn’t the most damning condemnation of the Kool Aid the administration, the Treasury, the Fed, the FASB, the FDIC, and all the other alphabet soups are trying to make the common U.S. citizen drink and have seconds, then nothing else possibly could be…. of course until Bowsher is proven right and everything collapses into the smoldering heap of defaulted MBS still marked at par on various liquidating banks’ balance sheets…
Oh and yes, let’s hold a moment of silence for Lehman which held billions of mortgage backed securities that it too was "holding until maturity." Well, Lehman is no more, and all these securities now trade, in the form of the company’s general unsecured claims, at the generous price of 12 cents on the dollar… Furthermore, one can’t say the market is illiquid – the bid-ask spread is only 1 cent. And as there are over $150 billion of these claims floating around, one can’t say the market is in any way limited from a price discovery standpoint.
Maybe if more honest leaders follow in Bowsher’s unique example, the general population will finally start seeing though the everyday lies and misinformation coming out of D.C.
One last note on where the pressure came for FASB to change it’s rules – that would be our Democratic majority Congress, led by Barney Frank (for background see ubetchaiam’s diary, Mark to Whatever You Think is Right)



26 Comments




charles bowsher’s bio is amazing, 57th member of the Accounting Hall of Fame and more. i hope we don’t ignore him this time.
Dugg and recommended.
Thanks selise, great post.
Of all the jaw-dropping frauds perpetrated by the fraudsters, elimination of mark-to-market for FASB purposes is the most fraudulent.
Thanks, selise. DUGG and recommended.
I think the general population gets it; doesn’t matter what we think because the campaign contributions drive congress and Obama and his killers of the economy. If Obama listened to the general outcry, or the real economists he would have booted Geithner & Summers (better yet, never have chosen them).
selise, one excellanmt thread, very many thanx
Would not be surprised if Jane “front pages” this. Well done.
Of all the jaw-dropping frauds perpetrated by the fraudsters, elimination of mark-to-market for FASB purposes is the most fraudulent.
Not so sure. “Mark to cash flow” is also a valid account method. Asset cash flow (income generated) is considered more important than asset value.
When valuing on a cash flow bases, the value of the asset is very dependant on current interest rates. Today, an asset that generates 5% return on “face value”, could well be worth more than face value if one can buy the asset with money at a 2% interest.
not an accountant and hope someone who knows the details of this can help out…. but my limited understanding was the that the mark-to-market rule was not eliminated, but rather it wasn’t so clear before and now there is, um, even more flexibility in how mbs (for example) are valued.
can any experts clarify?
from willem buiter at FT:
I agree this is front page-worthy.
Fascinated to learn that there’s an Accounting Hall of Fame. Sounds like a bang-up tourist destination, until you look it up and discover its noncorporeal nature.
Interestingly, Maurice Stans was inductee #24 in 1960, a dozen years before his entanglement in Watergate as Nixon’s chief fundraiser (indicted but never convicted for fundraising irregularities, and never directly connected to the Watergate crimes his funds helped bankroll).
oh, that’s a hoot re stans. thanks for bringing me back to earth.
p.s. in reference to a comment you made recently on another thread…. some of us don’t actually know how to write and would appreciate any specific corrections you would care to make. seriously.
Market value is what a knowledgeable and willing buyer will pay to a knowledgeable and willing seller.
IMHO, it is the only reasonable test of value to use to determine whether a bank or other firm is solvent.
Charles Bowsher sounds like a good person to invite to address a Congressional Committee or two.
Meant to mention, while living in DC, a close friend was his assistant (not secretary) at GAO.
how cool is that! does your friend think he is an honest straight shooter (as i’m hoping from what i’ve read)?
according to his bio, he has testified before congress over 200 times during his years as comptroller general (about 1981-1996).
testified before congress 200 times…..talk about stubborn refusal to learn!!
Can you imagine this good man’s frustration? Over and over for at least 15 years telling the wooden heads in congress what was coming down…and now it has.
Hyman Minsky was warning about this nonsensical system back in 1986 during the S&L fiasco, the first GOP bailout of criminals that cost us $500 billion.
Of course, Keynes had shown that systemic shocks were endemic to the capitalist system but his remarks critical of the system were left out of discussions of the General Theory and his book, A Treatise on Money which centers on financial systems and investment, now goes for $600, not something your average reader is going to spend money on. Of course, Marx himself, whose empirical work hasn’t been discredited by the fall of Soviet-style state capitalism masquerading as Marxism, predicted that the capitalist system would wind up imploding just about the way this thing is playing out.
By 2025 we will be seeing another round of failures after this recedes from memory only there won’t be any sympthy for a bailout then and there will be no chance for an economic stimulus (read robbery of the middle class) because that ship will have already sunk.
Obama’s only got one chance to do this right and with the players he has in place, he isn’t even close.
A year ago, Kevin Phillips kicked off a tour for his book Bad Money with this talk in Cambridge, Mass. Although so much of the current economic implosion took place after this talk, and although the presidential primary season was just settling into Obama v McCain, the talk gives a lot of clear insight into the economics and politics of today’s crisis. Nothing terribly new, given all we’ve been forced to study and learn in the past months, but all of it well-expressed.
One dubious assertion he made was that the current crisis is unlikely to result in disruption comparable to the Great Depression. Not sure if he’d hold to that view a year later.
Worth a listen.
Everyone here is intelligent and well educated.
But we subordinate ourselves to elected leaders.
Why do we do this?
Answer: Because we trust them. We believe in them.
Yup.
Thanks selise, for an excellent diary.
thanks, that was very good. i especially appreciated that it was from a year ago, makes me appreciate the clarity and depth of phillips’ analysis even more. would love to have an update from him now.
from the discussion near the end on credit default swaps:
Ugh. We really need to find a way to convince people to stop using resignation as a form of protest. The people left behind that you’re protesting just don’t care if you leave, they’re better off for it.
All that ends up happening is all the right people perform a steady exodus as their allies in the institution dwindle, and the bad actors that are left behind simply replenish the vacancies with more bad actors.
The mess spirals out of control.
Speaking from experience having resigned as President of a non-profit corporation in essentially an act of defiance and protest against the founders that were continually sabotaging Board action to make the institution viable. All that happened was the remaining good people in the institution left within days of my resignation, as they felt like there was now no positive leadership. The condition of the corporation completely unravelled within 3 months. Now the community that this non-profit served is significantly poorer for its collapse. I’ll never make the same mistake again.
maybe another issue at work here. just guesing but since sarbane-oxley, don’t financial reports have to be signed off as accurate? is it possible that he didn’t think he could do that?
Yeah, ever since SOX the CEO or CFO has to sign off on the financials as being accurate and in good faith.
However, if he believes they are not, then I’m still not sure why he’d have to resign. He could refuse to sign off on what he believes to be cooked books.
In so far as I understand it.
Guess you missed this “This occurred after the House Financial Services Committee, a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Bankers Association, had, at hearings on March 12, 2009, effectively ordered the FASB to revise its guidance on fair value in inactive markets.”
Frank,Kanjorski,et all led this charge at the behest of the Obama Admin.
Thanks for the h/t Selise.