This past week I was in San Francisco at a business conference and I want to tell you a bit about it. The conference is one I attend most years – BSR – Business for Social Responsibility. Now BSR like any conference has it’s high points and low points, but what strikes me each time I go is how the conversation amongst this slice of the business community is often so far advanced, so far beyond any conversation that seems to happen in Washington or the DNC.
This year’s event took place directly across the street from Occupy San Francisco – and from the welcome by BSR’s head, Aaron Cramer – through the passionate call to action of Al Gore and finally to the insights of Civicus’ Ingrid Srinath – the presence of Occupy was a constant message and the attendees were listening carefully.
Gore began with a critique of the financial markets that was stunning – calling Wall Street and many company’s “short-termism” “functionally insane.” And he pointed out that “short term” now is not even quarterly earnings targets but automated trading at a millisecond pace which controls over 70% of trades. This was one reason he pushed hard for support for the Transaction Tax.
In contrast to his take down of Wall Street, Vice President Gore praised OWS for “already succeeding in giving visibility to the inequality” we face – and called them a “primal scream of democracy.” In fact, Gore reminded us that the nuclear freeze movement was seen as crazy when launched but led in just two years to 75% of Americans agreeing in the need for a nuclear freeze and Reagan being forced to act. Noting that the majority of Americans already say they agree with Occupy, “we will see possibilities of genuine change.”
While Gore seemed careful to not directly critique Obama or speak in partisan terms, he was very clear in advising us that “the world of policy and politics has been degraded so much in recent years, I would caution [you] about being caught up in that world.” Describing what he called “sclerotic democracies”, Gore went on to call Congress “a wholly owned subsidiary of the financial services industry” and said that Congress is “on a leash” and noted that was not just true of “one party.”
Gore ended with a call for all of us to be passionate – truly passionate – about working for change. His own passion was clear and it was wonderful to see the 1000 attendees stand and cheer him as he finished by reminding us that:
“We have a choice to make now,” he told the audience in closing his speech. “You are a key part of the solution. I congratulate you on what you are doing. We have everything we need to succeed, with the possible exception of political will and the will of the executive suite of some businesses, but always remember that the will to act is itself a renewable resource.”
While Gore’s speech has not been released on video, above I’ve embedded the final keynote of the conference, highlights of a presentation by Ingrid Srinath, the Secretary General of Civicus. Srinath has fought for children’s rights and civil society her entire life and knows how hard the struggle is. Her words were also passionate – and inspiring – speaking on behalf of bottom up change, of consensus rather than control – and they are a good encouragement for us all.



50 Comments

Thanks, Siun. The MOTU are gonna get the message, one way or another.
Thanks SD.
Many thanks, Siun.
We really need these words of encouragement, and to know that there are others out there, not only as passionate as we are, but working as hard as well. Sometimes, after reading the endless string of stories about the “bad guys” and their control over just about everything, I feel that we’re outnumbered and being out-spent. Encouragement from folks like Al Gore and Bill Moyers is treasure.
I really wish Gore would run against Obama. Hell, I wish almost anyone would run, but Gore would have enough credibility to garner some votes. Okay, he’s not perfect and he made some mistakes, but compared to the sell-out criminal Obama, he’s Mary Sunshine.
Thank you again for bringing us this.
Thanks, Siun, for your encouraging report.
I looked for the speech. Not up yet. He did speak as keynoter at the Green Aruba Conference:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOXKfJ_Y2z4
Glad you could attend, Siun. What a different approach from the US Chamber of Commerce – Business for Social Responsibility.
Gore was scathing – I so wish they were releasing a video of his comments. He’s often a very good speaker but this had a particular energy that should be seen.
And the continuing references to the occupations and what this all means were really interesting throughout the week. I first got involved with the responsible business world shortly after WTO and, as Aaron Cramer noted in his opening, that too was a time when demonstrations in the streets led to important realizations amongst many in the business world – and to an energizing of many to change how business works, factoring social and environmental impacts into the bottom line. There was definitely the feeling that OWS must be heard – and is being heard. Also that OWS is part of a global shift was loud and clear … and that global view is one too often missed here in the US.
Al Gore was a founding member of the DLC. He is a multi-millionaire, and when he was in office he supported pro-corporate policies.
I did not and do not trust Al Gore.
Agreed. According to http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-politicians/democrats/al-gore-net-worth/ Gore’s net worth is over $100 million.
Doesn’t that make him part of the 1%?
Gore is also a bandwagonning coattail rider. Gore should have been front and center as soon as O revealed himself to be Trojan Condom.
Gore’s mee-tooism may hurt or help the cause.
Gore’s Judgement: Lieberman – to deliver the Jewish Vote in Miami.
What a belly flop that was.
We should certainly be skeptical of Gore overall. However, he has done some important things since leaving politics. He’s made some of the most important American out-of-power speeches of this century, against war, on a host of environmental issues, and on a few social justice topics.
Did you ever hear the expression, “talk is cheap”?
On second thought, I’m not sure that applies here: how many of those pretty speeches was he paid for?
Who gives a FF what Gore sez. He’s just another RWM. And a fat one at that.
Or, one could ask whether it is better to be transparent like Lieberman or sleazy & hidden like Gore/Kerry/X/Y/Z [insert your fave D name between slashes].
Mahalo, Siun…! Always a delight to see your fonts…!
Wisdom from Al Gore.
Thanks Siun for this report.
Thanks CT – hope to post more as my health improves.
On Gore – I don’t see the issue as whether Gore is some kind of hero … what was stunning for me was to see OWS acknowledged and praised and seemed as a transformational force by not just Gore but 1000 business leaders who stood and applauded his call for support for dramatic change inspired by OWS.
I agree with you. It’s a big step forward for Occupy to be recognized on this level and by these particular people.
I posted the ManBearPig thing because I can’t read Al Gore’s name without thinking about that South Park episode :)
Thanks for the post, Siun.
Same here. He’s full of shit.
I’m sure he’d laugh along – he does have a good sense of humor about himself and seems to be someone who is learning as are we all. I did not vote for Gore but I have immense respect for his work on climate change and his willingness to challenge assumptions.
” … Gore seemed careful not to directly critique Obama …”
Albert Gore had the opportunity to “occupy” his own personal integrity during the Bush v. Gore “episode”. However, he chose to remain careful and cautious, to NOT directly challenge the illegal and likely, un-Constitutional effrontery of SCOTUS in blatantly inserting itself, in the most naked political fashion imaginable, into the 2000 election. Albert Gore is treating OWS and the current reality of millions of Americans and billions of the world’s human beings like some form of an intellectual parlor game in which he fancies himself to be an astute and powerful “player”.
Otherwise, Siun, I am, as always, most appreciative of what you have shared with us in this post. I do think, however, it would be prudent to include a list of the sponsors of this “event”, that we might see what specific corporate entities appear to be supportive of the 99%, which support, you imply, is to be understood as the essence of the speakers at this conference.
The “Thank you sponsors” list, for this conference includes:
Enabalon PWL
Hitacthi
Bloomberg Businessweek
Sprint
GE
DNV
Abbot
Chevron
Ford
Best Buy (A Walt Disney Company)
AVON
BNY Mellon
Exxon Mobil
and others …
While it is certainly possible that these corporations and companies do support the 99%, the past behaviors of some of them suggest that they might not happily support such conferences in future … were they to suspect that it might impact their “bottom lines” … in both a “short termish” and a long-termish manner … different to which they are accustomed.
DW
Actually DW, those of us who work in the field of corporate responsibility and sustainability know that those companies, like most, are not monolithic. Many of those same companies have supported BSR conferences for years, including the one I attended in 2004 (I think) at which Van Jones spoke on behalf of incarcerated youth.
There’s a very strong movement attempting to re-envision the role of business in society and the conversation is intense and complex. I can say that in the ten years I’ve worked specifically in this field, I’ve seen more movement and more engagement with significant global issues (workplace rights, human rights, carbon emissions) and in some cases more achievements than I’ve ever seen at the governmental level.
If only Gore had “gotten religion” in 2000 instead of trying to out center-right Dubya. Who knows, he might have carried his home state, or given 3rd party voters a reason to vote for him, won the election, and changed history. Better late than never I suppose.
Thanks Siun. Good to see you back on the front page.
Spot on. I mean, how many times do the Democrats have to try the middle right path and FAIL before it’s not conventional wisdom anymore?
Siun, I thank you for responding to my concerns. As you are the one saying some things which I very much hope are true, I am now willing to add some further substance to that hope. I quite agree that business companies are not monolithic in their phiposophy or business practice. Yet, I wonder about how much suasion those who do “understand” may have upon their companies and corporations, as, too often, at least in the non-profit sector, I have observed that “best practice” gets lip service but very often does not translate into policy … Too many business models remain top-down, essentially un-democratic, rigid and concerned, in terms of actual behavior … with but one thing.
I will, however, as I say, take your insights and perspectives as a sign that there may, indeed, be a real possibility of meaningful change.
When we witness corporations and companies, who now have carte blanche to raise and make clear public use of very large and significant political monies … and thereby hugely influence political outcomes and policy … do with conscience and humanity foremost, then we will, both of us, you and I, have genuine reason to celebrate.
I always appreciate your posts and perspectives, Siun.
DW
I love the Ingrid Srinath highlights! Thank you for the post.
Thanks DW. Let’s hope at least some of the efforts work. You might like some of the work of http://www.ceres.org and http://www.iccr.org/ for some info on the advocacy that is going on. Long haul but … aren’t they all!
Isn’t she awesome! I loved her …
And dumbass Obama is going down the same “center-right, hippie punching” road.
This right here is the nut graf for me:
Gore gets the point of the Occupy movement — and why it needs to avoid the muck of party politics. They’ll have much more influence if they’re not seen as being tied to (or co-opted by) a particular party.
http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/occupywallstreet/truth-about-the-federal-reserve–world-war-i-.html
let al denounce this and i will respect him.
Thank you for those links, Siun.
DW
What has happened is the “big names” have proven themselves bankrupt intellectually unless they have transparently said that the big names are bankrupt. There opinions can no longer be considered privileges–and likely shouldn’t have been been drivers of opinion for probably a generation. Their popularity reflects a time in which people were grasping at straws.
You’re just jealous because he won’t date you. /snark
Siun’s is a valid point — as is Gore’s, even though he’s committed the horrible crime of being fat (eeeek!). Namely, that there are some companies out there who are capable of looking beyond the next quarterly balance sheet and which understand that the current oncological model of capitalism is not sustainable, and that if they are to survive and thrive, they have to learn to work in ways that facilitate the greater good.
Tipper apparently thought that he had to distance himself from Bill even though Clinton’s approval ratings were sky-high. So she encouraged Gore to go with the guy who backstabbed his boss and gave the Republicans the “bipartisan” figleaf they needed to keep impeachment alive.
It’s amazing how she says things in such a clear manner — in a way that over the past three decades has been all but banned from American commercial and even publicly-funded mass media.
You have to admit though, that Gore knows how to exploit just about anything to make more money.
You haven’t heard any words like Gore’s from Obama. Whatever you think of Gore, there’s a great difference between the two.
In response to the OWS protests, Republicans just issued their update to a famous John F. Kennedy quote:
“Ask not what Wall Street can do for you, ask what you can do for Wall Street.”
Along with,
“Ask not what a right-wing authoritarian can do for you, ask what you can do for a right-wing authoritarian.”
And,
“Ask not what your corporate master can do for you, ask what you can do for your corporate master.”
I have a few doubts too.
I agree; Gore should run to Primary Obama. Gore’s biggest mistake was not fighting for his right, that he legitimately won, to be president. But, this should not be held against him since the leadership of the Democratic Party was never solidly behind him— nor were the American people sufficiently prepared to fight to put him in the office he won which Bush stole out from under him. I would participate in a movement to draft Al Gore to run in the Primary challenging Obama. But, would Gore be able to muster more fight than he had before when it was needed and would the American people be willing to fight to get rid of Obama?
In the meantime, we have a good solid progressive candidate in Jill Stein to get behind. She might not be as popular and well-known as Al Gore; but, if the Occupy Wall Street movement were to get behind her this particular “short-coming” would change over-nite.
The problem with this is, are people willing to push this particular discussion into the public square and have the debate? Or, will people be bullied into silence by the “leaders” of this “leaderless” movement who insist that OWS wants no part of electoral politics because “this is working with-in the system” which is a real cop-out at such a crucial period in our history.
Shouldn’t we be looking at “occupying” the presidency with a president worthy of the support of the American people?
And shouldn’t we be looking to “occupy” the United States Congress with real people’s politicians who will stand up and fight for an end to these dirty imperialist wars; which would, in terms Wall Street can understand, provide the American people with a huge dividend that could be invested in solving our many problems through the creation of universal social programs like a National Public Health Care System and a National Public Child Care System which combined would create some 15-million new jobs?
Hello,everybody,the good shopping place,the new season approaching, click in. Let’s facelift bar!
===== http://www.imadeshopping.com/ ===
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $30
ugg BOOT $50
Nike (R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $33
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $33
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $12
New era cap $9
Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $18
FREE SHiPPING
http://www.imadeshopping.com/
Cheapest Max Shoes,Discount Brand Purses,Wholesale A&F Clothing
Yes. Agree. I can accept for that.
Gore DID win the 2000 election. In the spring of 2001 a group of media outlets got permission to have a recount of the entire state of Florida. Gore had won, but by then Bush had already been inaugurated. The people had spoken, all five of them.
John Bois, in Bush v. Gore made the mistake of only asking for a recount of four counties, rather than the whole state. SOTUS jumped on this, claiming the rest of the people of Florida were not getting equal protection under the law, and said the original count must stand, making Bush president. SOCTUS was careful to caution that their ruling should not be used as precedent, further revealing the political nature of their action.
We should Occupy the White House. Is there a write-in candidate most of us could agree on? The vast majority of Americans are fed up with two-party politics. If someone consistently speaks for the solutions most of us want, they just might have a chance. Scheinderman, Grayson, Warren, Kucinich….somebody. Pick one.
the anyone but dem or gop. start a movement to elect the socialist whoever that is, or whoever we can agree on i.e. throw a monkey wrench into the gears..Mario Savio by way of Chris Hedges
a TU For the post Siun