Arizona Senator John McCain appearing on this morning’s “Meet the Press” told commentator David Gregory that the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision was one of the worst decisions that the high court has ever rendered labeling it naive and ill conceived. McCain pointed out, as an example, how one individual, in this case Newt Gingrich’s benefactor Sheldon Adelson has totally distorted the primary process by propping up a candidate that has little real appeal and no chance of winning the nomination. This in turn has contributed to a tainting the entire process of the Republican primaries and hurting the G.O.P.’s brand among the critically important independent voter.
In the analysis of the show’s moderator David Gregory Mitt Romney is a weak candidate that can’t put away a field of weak contenders and seal the deal on the nomination. He sees this as a direct result of the influence of the amounts of money pouring into the campaign by a handful of super rich donors who are distorting the wishes of ordinary Americans. Political columnist Bob Woodward stated that we have not seen this degree of political distortion in our politics since the age of the Robber Barons.
The great irony of all of this is that those on the far right may be faced with voting for Mitt Romney, hardly a bona fide conservative even though he’s parroting their talking points, because the super rich donors have long since swamped the true conservative candidates who really represented the beliefs of the ultra conservative wing of the G.O.P. What’s even more ironic is that it’s conservatives who usually complain about activist judges rendering decisions that distort the will of the people and now they themselves may be victims of that same judicial activism as a result of Citizens United.
Is this anyone’s idea of popular democracy?
S.J. Gulitti
3/18/12
Senator McCain Condems Citizens United |
|
| By: SJGulitti Sunday March 18, 2012 8:13 am | |



7 Comments

“Is this anyone’s idea of popular democracy?”
Not mine.
I doubt McCain would have the same issues if it had been the same superPAC propping up his embarrassing 2008 campaign.
I have a hard time wrapping my head around a serious issue in which I would consider John McCain’s opinion of it being “naive and ill-conceived” a valid talking point.
Actually, I can’t conceive of John McCain as being a valid talking point.
He’s so yesterday, dirty-old-man creepy. Fuck John McCain and the slime he oozed in with. imho
Thank you for posting, SJGulitti. Good post. I got side tracked by my own sense of disgust.
I’ve been wondering where the true conservatives will show. I haven’t seen them. And my values as a socialist/Constitutionalist are not that far from theirs on many key issues. Except the social/government responsibility issue, which is huge and a dog fight,unfortunately.
The elites who give McCain his talking points are not happy that Newt or the Papal candidate can take all these primary delegates away from the Obamaney huckster. Otherwise they wouldn’t be trying to change the rules as they go along. I don’t think they care about CU.. but maybe they don’t like being outbid.
So it’s all good, then?
“I’ve been wondering where the true conservatives will show.” Open Hope
Good question! For many of us, McCain was our last hope, but by 2003 he had completely sold out. Obama was our next choice and we all know what happened to him. Now I am with the New Progressive Alliance and find myself in agreement with moderate socialists more often than those who call themselves conservative. Capitalism under the reasonable regulation of government, being careful about getting into extended wars, following the constitution even if it was unpopular, and no “hocus-pocus” economics used to be conservative values. Now, thanks to the neolibs and neocons, believing in those values puts me too far to the left to even be a member of the democratic party.