Groups representing middle class families to hold discussion on national budget outside Pete Peterson’s elite gathering
WATCH SENATOR SANDERS LIVE STARTING AT 1:30PM ET
On May 15, Sen. Bernie Sanders will join with citizen groups to protest the Peter G. Peterson “Fiscal Summit” where elite power brokers including House Budget Committee Chair Paul Ryan (R-WI), House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH), former Sen. Alan Simpson, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and former President Bill Clinton will gather inside to discuss a so-called “grand bargain” budget that will cut Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid.
Senator Bernie Sanders, Terry O’Neill, president of the National Organization for Women, Max Richtman, president of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, Roger Hickey, co-director of the Campaign for America’s Future and Maya Rockeymoore, president of Global Policy Solutions, will join activists on Tuesday, May 15 at 1:30 p.m., at 1301 Constitution Avenue NW outside the Andrew Mellon Auditorium in Washington D.C. to protest conservative austerity plans and say, “Hands Off Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.”
The austerity protest is sponsored by the Campaign for America’s Future, Health Care for America Now, Progressives United, CREDO Action, Social Security Works, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, the National Committee to Protect Social Security and Medicare, and the National Organization for Women.
As a refresher about what they are talking about inside, below is a fact sheet we put together about how the Bowles-Simpson destroys Social Security (PDF).
The Bowles-Simpson deficit reduction plan, authored by Erskine Bowles and former Senator Alan Simpson (R-WY), is once again being discussed in Congress as a possible model for bipartisan deficit reduction legislation. Members of Congress should know that the Bowles-Simpson plan would cut Social Security benefits for today’s and tomorrow’s beneficiaries. Of even greater concern, it would end Social Security as we know it. Specifically, the Bowles-Simpson plan would:
• Drastically cut the benefits of middle-class families. The Bowles-Simpson proposal cuts Social Security’s retirement, survivors, and disability benefits by between 19% and 42% for young people entering the workforce today. 1
• Reduce the annual Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) for current and future Social Security beneficiaries. The Bowles-Simpson proposal would cut the COLA for current and future Social Security beneficiaries, reducing benefits more with every passing year. This would prevent benefits from keeping up with increases in the cost of living overtime. Under these plans, retirees claiming benefits at 65 would see their benefits decline by 3.7% at age 75, by 6.5% at age 85, and 9.2% at age 95. 2
• Raise the Full Retirement Age to 69, and the Earliest Eligibility Age to 64. Because of the way that Social Security benefits are calculated, raising the retirement age, as the Bowles-Simpson proposal recommends, is indistinguishable from an across-the-board benefit cut, no matter how long workers continue to work – even when they work to age 70 and beyond. Raising the full retirement age by two full years amounts to a 13% benefit cut, on top of the 13% cut already made when the retirement age was increased from 65 to 67. 3 The cuts are hardest for workers in physically demanding jobs, poor health, or who are otherwise unable to continue to work.
• Radically restructure the program. The Bowles-Simpson proposal would destroy Social Security by stealth. It would eliminate a fundamental and carefully-crafted feature that has been part of the program since the beginning: the link between benefits and earnings. As Figure 1 shows, over time, everyone would receive nearly the same subsistence-level benefit unrelated to wages.
• Cut benefits for the most vulnerable. More than half of all workers with an annual income of about $11,000 would see their benefits cut by about 16% under the Bowles-Simpson proposal. 4

Footnotes:
_____________
1- Social Security Administration (SSA), Table 1B1 in Letter from Stephen C. Goss, Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration, to Fiscal Commission Co-Chairs and Bipartisan policy Center Debt Reduction Task Force Co-Chairs, February 2, 2010. http://ssa.gov/oact/solvency/BowlesSimpsonRivlinDomenici_20110202.pdf. Office of the Chief Actuary (OCACT) of the Social Security Administration (SSA), Table 2B1 in Letter from Stephen C. Goss, Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration, to Fiscal Commission CoChairs and Bipartisan policy Center Debt Reduction Task Force Co-Chairs, February 2, 2010. http://ssa.gov/oact/solvency/BowlesSimpsonRivlinDomenici_20110202.pdf
2- OCACT, SSA, Tables 1B1 and 2B1 in Letter from Stephen C. Goss, Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration, to Fiscal Commission CoChairs and Bipartisan policy Center Debt Reduction Task Force Co-Chairs, February 2, 2010. http://ssa.gov/oact/solvency/BowlesSimpsonRivlinDomenici_20110202.pdf
3- Each one-year increase represents a cut of 6% to 7%. Social Security Administration (SSA), “Effect of Early or Delayed Retirement on Retirement Benefits,” 2010. Available at http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/ProgData/ar_drc.html. Social Security’s full retirement age is slowly rising from 65, where it was for those first accepting their retired worker benefits at age 62 or older before 2000, to age 67 for those who are first eligible to receive retired worker benefits at age 62 in 2022. A chart of retirement benefits by age is at http://www.ssa.gov/retire2/agereduction.htm
4- According to Social Security’s Chief Actuary, about 60 percent of actual “Very Low” earners, those with earnings of around $10,771, would have their benefits cut under the Bowles-Simpson proposal, because they would neither qualify for a hardship exemption, nor be helped by the proposed minimum benefit. (The Chief Actuary assumes that the hardship exemption would require 25 or more years of covered employment. As under current law, the full enhanced minimum benefit would only be available to workers with 30 years of covered employment.) Office of the Chief Actuary (OCACT) of the Social Security Administration (SSA), Table 2B1 in Letter from Stephen C. Goss, Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration, to Fiscal Commission Co-Chairs and Bipartisan policy Center Debt Reduction Task Force Co-Chairs, February 2, 2010. http://ssa.gov/oact/solvency/BowlesSimpsonRivlinDomenici_20110202.pdf



18 Comments

Won’t effect me. I didn’t want to retire at 62 but,,, nobody s hiring 63 yr. olds are they? I can’t live on SSI though so I’m looking into cheaper cat foods and I’m making sure my 9mm is kept cleaned and I have at least on round when needed. Isn’t that what Simpson-Bowles is really about? Getting rid of the surplus Baby boomers like me who didn’t save enough to live another 25 yrs.?
Excellent chart.
Obama wants the Bowles-Simpson deficit reduction plan and had Pelosi suggest adding more cut backs to it. Mitt wants it also. And the Dems in Congress have no backbone and no honor and not enough empathy and sympathy for the non-rich to overcome their love of campaign contributions.
And they wonder why the base is staying home this election.
Looks i have 45min to run to town for brew before i watch this fiasco.
Any bets on which one AARP will be attending?
And where is ANY labor union representative?
All my rifles are clean and sighted in.
Obama’s only mission from his masters was to destroy Social Security and further impoverish the working people in this country. He’ll leave office and live very comfortably while this country becomes a Dickensian nightmare.
Oh, not to worry. The US prints all the money it needs. Of course the benefits promised may not be worth much in the future, but hey who cares. Right?
stream isn’t working for me.
Big Doggy Bill will be sure the cameras don’t catch him colluding with New Deal butchers like Paul Ryan this year. The Dems are now the Clinton Army, and Big Doggy has plans for us..
Woof!
The benefits are fine for the next fifty years and more than that, and yes, we print all the money we need. This has been shown again and again. Next question.
The Alliance for Retired Americans (the retiree organization affiliated with the AFL-CIO) was part of the event. They are at their national field meeting right now or they would have spoken at the event.
Don’t listen to Bernie Sanders, after all, he’s a socialist, who thinks the resources of the country belong to it’s people. We really need to listen to the nobles who have our best interests (serfdom) at heart.
I hear that Bill Clinton was in attendance. I’m sure many of Obama’s henchmen and women also went along to pick up some tips on how to bamboozle the 99%ers and show their fealty to the 1%ers.
No soup for you!
mmmmm mmm! Cat Food Soup!
Bernie Sanders… INDEPENDENT
It’s OK… to NOT VOTE FOR… corrupt Democrats and Republicans.
Somehow, that doesn’t cut it when it comes to labor and the unions. the organizers couldn’t get RoseAnn Demoro or Trumka or Hoffa or….?
I organized it. I am telling you that it was supported by our labor allies who we work with everyday.
Do you disagree with organizing against the mad rush to cut Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid? If not I am not sure what your point is.