
"Composite Image of Daiichi Explosion" by Oldmaison on flickr
The horrible news from Japan continues to be ignored by the western corporate media.
Fukushima’s radioactive fallout continues to spread throughout the archipelago, deep into the ocean and around the globe—including the US. It will ultimately impact millions, including many here in North America.
The potentially thankful news is that Fukushima’s three melting cores may have not have melted deep into the earth, thus barely avoiding an unimaginably worse apocalyptic reality.
But it’s a horror that humankind has yet to fully comprehend.
As Fukushima’s owners now claim its three melted reactors approach cold shutdown ( http://nukefree.org/fukushima-reactors-approach-cold-shutdown-temperatures ), think of this:
X At numerous sites worldwide—including several in the US—three or more reactors could simultaneously melt, side-by-side. At two sites in California—Diablo Canyon and San Onofre—two reactors each sit very close to major earthquake faults, in coastal tsunami zones.
X Should one or more such cores melt through their reactor pressure vessels (as happened at Fukushima) and then through the bottoms of the containments (which, thankfully, may not have happened at Fukushima), thousands of tons of molten radioactive lava would burn into the Earth.
X The molten mass(es) would be further fed by thousands of tons of intensely radioactive spent fuel rods stored on site that could melt into the molten masses or be otherwise compromised.
X All that lava would soon hit groundwater, causing steam and hydrogen explosions of enormous power.
X Those explosions would blow untold quantities of radioactive particles into the global environment, causing apocalyptic damage to all living beings and life support systems on this planet. The unmeasurable clouds would do unimaginable, inescapable injury to all human life.
Fukushima is far from over. There is much at the site still fraught with peril, far from the public eye. Among other things, Unit Four’s compromised spent fuel pool is perched high in the air. The building is sinking and tilting. Seismic aftershocks could send that whole complex—and much more—tumbling down, with apocalyptic consequences.
Fukushima’s three meltowns and at least four explosions have thus far yielded general radioactive fallout at least 25 times greater than what was released at Hiroshima, involving more than 130 times the cesium, an extremely deadly isotope.
Reuters reports that fallout into the oceans is at least triple what Tokyo Electric has claimed ( http://nukefree.org/reuters-radiation-dumped-sea-triple-tepco-estimate ). Airborne cesium and other deadly isotopes have been pouring over the United States since a few scant days after the disaster.
Overall the fallout is far in excess of Chernobyl, which has killed more than a million people since its 1986 explosion.
Within Japan, radioactive hotspots and unexpectedly high levels of fallout continue to surface throughout the archipelago ( http://nukefree.org/japan-misstated-fukushima-fallout ). The toll there and worldwide through the coming centuries will certainly be in the millions.
And yet….it could have been far worse.
In the US, in the past few months, an earthquake has shaken two Virginia reactors beyond their design specifications. Two reactors in Nebraska have been seriously threatened by flooding. Now a lethal explosion has struck a radioactive waste site in France.
We have also just commemorated a 9/11/2001 terror attack that could easily have caused full melt-downs to reactors in areas so heavily populated that millions could have been killed and trillions of dollars in damage could have permanently destroyed the American economy.
The only thing we now know for certain is that there will be more earthquakes, more tsunamis, more floods, hurricanes and tornadoes….and more terror attacks.
Horrifying as Fukushima may be, we also know for certain that the next reactor catastrophe could make even this one pale by comparison.
Japan will never fully recover from Fukushima. Millions of people will be impacted worldwide from its lethal fallout.
But the next time could be worse—MUCH worse.
The only good news is that Japan, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Sweden and others are dumping atomic power. They are committing to Solartopian technologies—solar, wind, tidal, geothermal, ocean thermal, sustainable bio-fuels, increased efficiency and conservation—that will put their energy supplies in harmony with Mother Earth rather than at war with her.
The rest of humankind must do the same—and fast. Our species can’t survive on this planet—ecologically, economically or in terms of our biological realities—without winning this transtion.
The only question is whether we do it before the next Fukushima times ten thousand makes the whole issue moot.
Harvey Wasserman’s SOLARTOPIA! OUR GREEN-POWERED EARTH is at www.harveywasserman.com. He’s among many activists featured in Gary Null’s KNOCKING ON THE DEVIL’S DOOR (http://www.knockingonthedevilsdoor.com ).



21 Comments

The potentially thankful news is that Fukushima’s three melting cores may have not have melted deep into the earth, thus barely avoiding an unimaginably worse apocalyptic reality.
If they melt enough so that particles can reach the ground water table especially the radio active life span for thousands of years particles then thats enough worry to evacuate Japan.
X At numerous sites worldwide—including several in the US—three or more reactors could simultaneously melt, side-by-side. At two sites in California—Diablo Canyon and San Onofre—two reactors each sit very close to major earthquake faults, in coastal tsunami zones.
America’s government is on the hook for the cost of any radioactive clean up after Japan S&P should downgrade our debt just for the potential cost and liability.
Fukushima’s three meltowns and at least four explosions have thus far yielded general radioactive fallout at least 25 times greater than what was released at Hiroshima, involving more than 130 times the cesium, an extremely deadly isotope.
Any ideas on how much this will increase cancer in Japan? Any ideas on the time frame? Any reports on birth defects?
Speaking of Gary Null, he recently interviewed a NASA scientist who said that solar storms of the magnitude of the largest of the 1800′s will fry the US power grid, probably for a few years, ‘perhaps’ eventually cutting the plants’ capability to run their coolers. (I don’t recall any ‘perhaps’ qualifiers used during the interview, but now that I’m writing this, I got to thinking about it more, and I don’t see why an atomic power plant can’t power it’s own coolers, except during an emergency shutdown. I guess I need to listen, again.).
The grid will get fried because the transformers will get fried, and it takes about 3 years to get replacements, which are all made in China.
Anyway, even if no nuclear plants fail, being without power for 3 years will set this country back at least 30 years, I should think.
Gary Null is starting a new anti-nuclear movement, which he wants to take world-wide. Personally, although I don’t know a lot about the subject, thorium nuclear reactors sound like a good thing, but that’s not what we are dealing with.
My son has been pushing the thorium reactor notion in our conversations about the environment. He is of the opinion that the array of sustainable technologies wind, solar, geothermal, tidal, thermocline, etc are inadequate to fill our energy needs.
I couldn’t disagree more.
And since the entire nuclear industry has proven to be entirely without credibility since it’s inception I trust nothing they have to say re thorium reactors and their safety.
Great article that sums up all the affects after Irene and a lot of the issues you shed more light on.
http://www.truth-out.org/earthquakes-hurricanes-highlights-serious-regulation-flaws/1315152458
I don’t think anyone in power really cares about what’s going on, they have to maintain their New World Order script and continue plugging on in the face of planetary suicide.
The pressure is mounting however I believe, and one can almost feel the winds of change….or at least I’d like to think so….
Yes we can and let us please do so now.
But the nuclear industry isn’t pushing thorium reactors. Not AFAIK. AFAIK, none of our current reactors use thorium. There was a fork in the technological road, early on, and we went the uranium route because it was more compatible with atomic bomb development.
BTW, there’s what may be a promising route to small scale fusion, being spearheaded by a scientist, Eric Lerner, here in NJ. I spoke to him about 4 months ago, when he came to Newark to participate in a demonstration for immigrant rights. (He’s quite an activist, also.)
That technology is Focus Fusion. Lerner told me they need cash. Small potatoes compared to what we spend on bombs and subsidies to the oil giants, but big potatoes for Focus Fusion! If your son or anybody else can get research dollars into Lerner’s hands, I believe they’d be well spent. If they’re successful, we won’t need thorium reactors, except to dispose of radioactive wastes that the uranium reactors have left behind.
“may have not have melted deep into the earth”
Operative word: may.
Weasel word: deep.
If they define deep as a mile and we only melted down a few hundred yards….
I still think the black smoke at the time of the meltdowns was the concrete floor burning as opposed to fried insulation.
Don’t think it would be enough to evac Japan, even if the worst was true. However, that’d be a few hundred square miles unlivable and unable to grow crops in a country that’s already hurting for space and imports more food than it grows.
Boxturtle (And I see radioactive plankton being eaten by radioactive fish)
“America’s government is on the hook for the cost of any radioactive clean up”
Yes. Everybody says listen to the market. The market said there was too much liability to even consider financing a new reactor. So the government steps in to cover that.
Boxturtle (As for a downgrade, it won’t be that expensive to pretend that everything is fine)
The thorium reactor is a very good idea, compared to our current reactors. However, thorium still generates radioactive waste. And we still have no place to put said waste. Until we do, all nuclear power is a bad idea.
Boxturtle (But this waste we could ship to the 3d world, as there are no fissle isotopes)
If we knew the insulation material we might have a better idea white smoke combustion in a car is perfect but the engine just started up, blue smoke you are not burning gas and some is getting through to the exhaust, black smoke you are burning oil and you have an oil leak.
Different colors of smoke tell you different things.
Also the plant was next to the ocean any bets the water table is right near the surface.
How long was the smoke burning that color if we know the temperature of the core and the amount and what kind of insulation well even if the insulation and concrete both burn black we can estimate from how long the smoke burned if the insulation and concrete burned.
Diesel Back up generators can they Maybe survive an EMP Electro Magnetic Pulse assuming the back up generators are Diesel and they have enough fuel they Might have power.
Assuming a solar storm does not cause a surge of power and fry the pumps and circuits controlling the cooling valves I do not know enough about electronics to know if this could happen or if all the circuits are shielded by the cement tower around American nuclear plants or how much if any protection the tower may provide.
I don’t even know if the back up generators are Diesel. Googling facts about a nuclear power plant is hard these days because of terror concerns.
I don’t think anyone in power has a science or engineering degree and can see past industry propaganda the Harvard MBA guys think they can manage anything if they surround themselves by experts. Experts paid by the Nuclear industry with a bias to lie.
Depends on how old they are. Anything with a chip in it is in trouble, so the older stuff is actually better.
All the industrial sized generators I’m aware of run on either diesel or jet fuel.
Boxturtle (You can harden a chip for EMP, but that’s never been tested real world)
God forbid anyone should ever successfully set off a small nuke over us. The resulting EMP would fry our grid and most of our communications and computer nets as well. We’d have massive failures of electronic systems. Many cars wouldn’t run etc. It would be chaos and a quick return to the early 20th century or earlier. One well placed small nuke and fini 21st century.
Fission nukes are a crime against humanity past, present and especially future.
The die is cast, the deed is done and so are we.
I got a real laugh when i saw Meta believes in mini-fusion but not global warming. This seems to be a malady that many have, high tech will save us but low tech is not the answer.
I studied Pulse Power Fusion at Sandia Labs 20yrs ago and toured the Z-Machine, the giant ring experiment. The only practical use for that machine was testing radiation hardened electronics for the CIA and eating billions in research funding.
If you have followed this research you hear that success is always just around the corner 20-40yrs away, this keeps the funding flowing while hiding the fact that it will always be sometime in the future and never now.
… and Sandia’s Z-machine is completely irrelevant to Focus Fusion, which uses a variant of Dense Plasma Focus technology.
Though you may well not be aware of it the rest is oligarchic propaganda and, believe or not, eliminationist rhetoric.
… but that’s a whole other discussion on energy that’s missing from the public discourse. One of many that’s MIA.
Quibble: The research I’ve seen says a mimimum 1MT or so detonated centrally in the USA in the stratusphere. They usually us Topeka as the target.
1MT is medium sized as such things go. A Hiroshima sized bomb wouldn’t do it.
That said, your description of the results is quite accurate.
Boxturtle (if I wanted to EMP America, I’d hit over Philly too)