Thyroid abnormalities have now been confirmed among tens of thousands of children downwind from Fukushima. They are the first clear sign of an unfolding radioactive tragedy that demands this industry be buried forever.
Two years after Fukushima exploded, three still-smoldering reactors remind us that the nuclear power industry repeatedly told the world this could never happen.
And 72 years after the nuclear weapons industry began creating them, untold quantities of deadly wastes still leak at Hanford and at commercial reactor sites around the world, with no solution in sight.
Radiation can be slow to cause cancer, taking decades to kill.
But children can suffer quickly. Their cells grow faster than adults’. Their smaller bodies are more vulnerable. With the embryo and fetus, there can never be a “safe” dose of radiation. NO dose of radiation is too small to have a human impact.
Last month the Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Survey acknowledged a horrifying plague of thyroid abnormalities, thus far afflicting more than forty percent of the children studied.
The survey sample was 94,975. So some 38,000 children are already cursed with likely health problems…that we know of.
A thyroid abnormality can severely impact a wide range of developmental realities, including physical and mental growth. Cancer is a likely outcome.
This is the tenth such study conducted by the prefecture. As would be expected downwind from a disaster like Fukushima, the spread of abnormalities has been increasing over time. So has the proportion of children with nodules that are equal to or larger than 5.1 mm. The number of cysts has also been increasing.
And the government has revealed that three cases of thyroid cancer have already been diagnosed in the area. All have been subjected to surgery.
Fukushima’s airborne fallout came to our west coast within a week of the catastrophe. It’s a virtual certainty American children are being affected. As health researcher Joe Mangano puts it: “Reports of rising numbers of West Coast infants with under-active thyroid glands after Fukushima suggest that Americans may have been harmed by Fukushima fallout. Studies, especially of the youngest, must proceed immediately.”
Untold billions of gallons of unmonitored liquid poisons have poured into the Pacific. Contaminated trash has carried across the ocean (yet the US has ceased monitoring wild-caught Pacific fish for radiation).
Worldwide, atomic energy is in rapid decline for obvious economic reasons. In Germany and elsewhere, Solartopian technologies—wind, solar, bio-fuels, efficiency—are outstripping nukes and fossil fuels in price, speed to install, job creation, environmental impact, reliability and safety.
No one has yet measured the global warming impacts of the massive explosions and heat releases at Fukushima (or at Chernobyl, where the human death toll has been estimated in excess of a million).
The nuclear fuel cycle—from mining to milling to enrichment to transportation to waste management—creates substantial greenhouse gases. The reactors themselves convert ore to gargantuan quantities of heat that warm the planet directly, wrecking our weather patterns in ways that have never been fully assessed.
Even in the shadow of Fukushima, the industry peddles a “new generation” of magical reactors to somehow avoid all previous disasters. Though they don’t yet exist, they will be “too cheap to meter,” will “never explode” and will generate “radiation that is good for you.”
But atomic energy is human history’s most expensive technological failure, defined by what seems to be a terminal reverse learning curve. After more than a half-century to get it right, the industry has most recently poked holes in the head of a reactor in Florida, and installed $700 million steam generators it knew to be faulty in two more in California. It now wants to open San Onofre Unit Two at a 70% level, essentially to see what happens. Some 8 million people live within a 50-mile radius.
This from an increasingly dangerous industry that has brought us four “impossible” explosions—one at Chernobyl, three at Fukushima—clearly with more yet to come. Its radiation has spewed for decades. Its wastes have no place on this planet.
The ultimate death toll among Fukushima’s victims may be inescapable. But the industry that’s harming them is not.
Those thyroid-damaged children bring us yet another tragic warning: There’s just one atomic reactor from which our energy can safely come.
Two years after Fukushima, it is still 93 million miles away—but more ready than ever to safely, cleanly and cheaply power our planet.
Harvey Wasserman’s SOLARTOPIA! OUR GREEN-POWERED EARTH is at www.harveywasserman.com. With Norman Solomon, Robert Alvarez & Eleanor Walters, he is co-author of KILLING OUR OWN: THE DISASTER OF AMERICA’S EXPERIENCE WITH ATOMIC RADIATION, available free on the internet. He will speak 3/24 at 2pm in Santa Monica on shutting San Onofre (ilenepr@sbcglobal.net).
Fukushima photo by twobombs under Creative Commons license




14 Comments

The contaminated water is an ongoing, severe problem, even as it becomes very highly diluted. Far more resources – not just Japanese, but American, Chinese, Korean, Filipino and Russian – need to go into oceanic monitoring for Fukushima radiation.
The contaminated trash is mostly another matter. Far more than 90% of it was swept to sea before any of the Fukushima reactors began having their problems. What contamination exists in that trash has been accumulated while at sea, and mostly from fallout that came down upon it from the atmosphere, not that in the water already.
I’ve checked some of the trash that has come to Alaska via ocean currents. Others have too. I’ve also been checking fish since the spring of 2012. So far, none of my or others’ readings have been disturbing. The ocean-borne radiation has been showing up in fish that breed near Japan then migrate elsewhere, and in Kelp beds on the Pacific coast of the USA and BC, but not yet in Alaska, to my knowledge. Kelp, like automotive air filters is a a great place to look for warning signs.
I’ll continue to monitor, though, as I’m convinced the chances of nuclear contamination from Fukushima have not yet peaked.
Thanks for this article. Highly recommended.
From what I understand, by following various websites that were independent of the US government, the entire West Coast ws blanketed with radiation during late March, April and May. My mouth had a metallic taste until the day or two after the seasonal rains stopped hitting my Northern California residence, in mid or late May of 2011. (A metallic taste in your mouth is often a sign of radioactivity.)
The US government’s response was to simply turn off the radiation monitoring stations run by the EPA. That way the government officials could tell us how “No harmful levels of radiation have been reported,” with a clear conscience. That was a true statement – nothing at all was reported, so of course, no “harm” via radiation could be stated as fact!
The media also has the “ostrich with its head buried in sand” response. By mid Summer, 2011, Time Magazine was saying, with its usual total authority! that no one anywhere has any data on effects of radiation! (Funny how as grammar school kids, most of us Baby Boomers were taught that there were many scientists studying the Hiroshima and Nagasaki residents for data after the bombs had fallen there. What ever happened to that data?)
Query: levels of thyroid abnormalities pre- and post- Fukushima in children outside of the affected zones? A graph can do wonders for getting a message across.
… globally?
Zilch.
As in none to speak of.
This looks like a bit of unscientific flailing on your part. Greenhouse gases, CO2 et al, have their effect by allowing more solar heat to be trapped… they leverage solar power and thus can have their devastating effect.
Indeed, total global effects from human-created heat are much less than the natural solar cycle. So as much of a disaster as Fukushima was it’s heat output was nothing on the global scale.
global insolation in watts (sunlight hitting Earth):
1.73E+17
albedo of Earth (what gets reflected): 0.3
global absorbed watts:
1.21E+17
insolation variance (the natural cycle of the sun):
+-0.1%
that variance in watts:
+-1.21E+14
anthropogenic waste heat:
1.80E+13
In other words human waste heat is much less than even solar variance.
And BTW, not only does your “argument” fail upon a moment’s consideration but you also sandbag your “solartopia” when you advance it…
… because energy is energy and thermodynamics are thermodynamics and your “solartopian” substitutes for current power sources will still produce waste heat roughly on the same scale as current sources.
Your views have some valid points but I think you can do better than the above.
Holy crap. And I believe it because when the BP fire on the deep water horizon was burning, spewing toxins in the air, the EPA monitoring stations were shut off, but they weren’t designed to measure the KIND of chemicals that were in the air. Also, the measurement of the VOCs off the oil wasn’t even part of the EPAs pervue, there was another agency that measured stuff one mile off shore. Those numbers needed to be seen.
That underwater gusher was just part of the contamination.
… and the hundreds of millions of dollars worth of DHS-sponsored radiation sensors scattered up and down the west coast? Those sensors at seaports and airports everywhere tasked with keeping
contractor’s pockets linedus safe from dirty bombs were doing… exactly what?Of course, I am one those “ne’er do wells” that think nuclear power (with some serious caveats) is the only way forward. Nationalize all of the reactors and make safety and disposable the utmost priorities (so corners are not cut on security and disposal in the name of the almighty dollar). There are simply too many people on the planet and too significant a demand for steady power for wind, solar, or wave energy to ever suffice.
All well and good but until such time as humans perfect a way to clean up or dispose of the toxic waste with half-life of thousands of years, there is no such thing as “safe” nuclear power.
The sun shines most every day, the wind blows at varying levels all over the world, the ocean generates power to spare. The only drawback is storage of the power generated so that it can be dispensed when the sun is not shining or the wind is not blowing.
And given the billions in costs for nuclear power even today, spend those same amounts perfecting the capture and distribution of wind, solar, and wave you might be surprised at how steady those far cleaner energies could (and will) become.
Thyroid abnormalities?
Nuclear accidents are very bad, but at least very infrequent. Hide behind children if you’re ready to outlaw everything.
Agreed! If you want to get rid of the number of people on the planet, nuclear is definitely the way to go. It’ll use up the water needed for drinking, cooking and bathing. It’ll contaminate the air, soil and water that happens with regular operation of nuclear plants. The waste can never be safely contained. And melt downs are inevitable as the plants keep getting older and getting relicensed to keep running after the dates they were meant to be shut down. By all means keep the nukes as a way to get rid of excess people. It works fabulously well at this task.
Nuclear power needs to be ended yesterday. The sad thing is that as a species we may not even have the resources anymore to safely dispose of all the deadly nuclear waste we’ve been generating over the past 40 years. We are imperiling the entire biosphere for electrical power that’s more expensive than tar sands when all the costs are added in. We are sick and twisted species led by psychopathic politicians.
You stub your toe on a ticking bomb and then say that dropping a weight on your foot is a lot worse than sitting next to a ticking bomb because the bomb only stubs your toe.
That is some insane logic there.
The thing about radiation is that it’s a slow death. Long after the disaster leaves the matrix, people are still dying.
No, no, and no. Simply call a toe truck.
Fallacious argument is his speciality.