Asking the Left side of the Blogosphere what the greatest of President Bush’s crimes/sins against this nation was is kind of inviting a shouting match. There are so many to choose from, wars, torture, environmental law changes or lack of enforcement, the list goes on and on. Without an operational definition it is a argument which could consume thousands of words on line or tens of pints at a bar. The Dog is going to provide you with the definition and explain why he thinks there is one overarching act which out shines (if that is the right metaphor for such heinous acts) all others.
"Originally posted at Squarestate.net"
First the definition: the single action or plan of action which caused the most damage to the United States through its direct and indirect consequences. That seems pretty clear, no? Now to the Dog there is one act which stands out in these terms; the politicization of the Department of Justice. The Dog knows there are will be at least a few of his readers who will say this is not as bad as the war of choice in Iraq, but stick with the old hound a little bit and he will do his best to show you were the real and lasting damage is.
We can be fairly sure Vice President Cheney and his legal svengali David Addington were already looking down the road to be able to expand the powers of the Presidency. This is clear from the choices they placed in the Office of Legal Council and who they picked to be the AG. John Ashcroft looked like just the kind of person they needed, a former Senator who unexpectedly lost to the wife of his dead opponent. A known conservative who would (they thought) do pretty much anything they wanted as long as it meant he could stay in a position of power.
After 9/11 the crisis they needed was at hand. By now they were well on their way to stocking people in all of the levels of the DOJ they needed, loyalists in the Voting Rights Section, new hirers in the professional level and lots and lots of fiercely loyal Federalist Society members in place. Then the damage began.
The damage of this tactic is three fold. First by having an AG who was a Republican loyalist they knew there would be no investigations of just about anything the Bush administration wanted to do in terms of politicizing other Federal Departments. This let them use the announcement of money being spent in States as a political tool to shore up support for Republican candidates. This grew to the level where we know that Hatch Act violations were common with Secretary level administrators holding meetings to brief senior staff on how they could help Republican candidates.
This leads to using the mechanisms of government for partisan purposes. It reaches it height in the politically motivated trail of Gov. Siegelman and the firing of the US Attorneys in the second term of the Bush administration. This might seem like a small amount of damage to our country but the reality is anytime the forces of the government are used to influence an election it undermines the very nature of representative democracy.
The second area of damage is in the use of the DOJ to justify the illegal actions of torture for prisoners and for illegal surveillance of US citizens. The Dog finds it really strange that AG Ashcroft would continence torture, but would scruple at the illegal surveillance of citizens. In any case these two outcomes from the politicization of the DOJ have done incalculable damage to our nation. Torture is a truly something which can be compared to cancer in terms of the way it spreads and degrades the society which has allowed it and accepts it, even on a tacit level. There is nothing which can be more destructive than the idea that intolerable pain and suffering is acceptable for those who your government has deprived of their freedom. It is a slippery and very steep slope which only continues to steepen until those who order it and those who carry it out are brought to justice.
The issue of illegal surveillance goes straight to an issue the Framers of the Constitution were very concerned about. Look what they wrote:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
They placed a great deal of importance on the idea a free people should be free of the government looking through their documents and possessions. The 4th Amendment has been so chipped away at the idea of the government hovering up all the e-mails and phone calls that pass through our nation is not one people flinch at, but they should. Thus far there have been few, though fairly shocking, abuses of this information. However this is not a situation which will continue. Sooner rather than later some group or party will use this vast store of information for political purposes. The dirty tricks of the 50’s and 60’s will return with the same consequences. This is a time bomb waiting to go off, all it will take is someone of questionable morals and a desire for political power.
The third area of damage is the in the combination of the embedding of the political ideologues in the professional staff of the DOJ and the revelation of the politicization. The hiring of attorneys based on their conservative political views is a major one as the Civil Service rules prohibit us from firing all of these hires. It does not matter how suspect the practice was, once they are hired we have to wait for their actions to be unacceptable in the conduct of the work they are assigned to fire them. This is a process which will take years. Even after that time there will be those left who are smart enough to avoid crossing the line and will continue to put a partisan political spin on the work they do for the people of the Untied States.
With the knowledge of all of these actions the worst piece of damage becomes clear; there is a very real question in the mind of the people of the United States if they can in fact trust the Department of Justice to do the work of the People impartially. This is a critical blow as the DOJ is the one Department which we need to be able to rely upon to make the fair functioning of our nation a possibility. Without this capstone in the arch of democracy we can not be sure if our votes will be counted, if the law will be applied fairly and evenly, if the very Constitutional protections we rely on will be upheld. The easy which this Department was subverted and the way we only found out about it through overreach of the subverter’s have to send a cold chill down the spine of anyone who believes in the rule of law and it fair application.
For all of these reasons, this is the worst of the Bush Administrations crimes or sins against the nation. By politicizing the DOJ they were able to commit countless crimes, assured of no retribution, safe to use the weight of the government for partisan political purposes to try to assure their party would have a permanent majority. This callus disregard for the nature of our country and its traditions is a wound we will be a generation in healing, if we are able to do so at all.
The Dog believes the Bush Administration to be guilty of many crimes, but it is this one which he will never forgive nor forget.
The floor is yours.



19 Comments







So many crimes from which to choose. Give me a minute.
Well, that is kind of how I got to this; what is the root cause of all their ability to commit those crimes, to me it is having a tamed DOJ.
I’m gonna go with;
lying us into war
hard to top that really, even if you count the damage done to the doj, that can be fixed if we have a will, there is no way to fix the murder from false war
Recommended. Thanks, HoundDog. I wish every citizen of our country and the world would seriously consider this question. The answers were seeded long ago, at least as far back as Allen Dulles and his interpreter, Henry Kissinger at the end of WWII. Many of those responsible for the 2000 takeover were indoctrinated by these two men, and many now in the current administration.
The first crime, upon which all later ones depended, was stealing the 2000 election. That is undeniable.
Next, if they were in any way responsible for 9/11, then that is the worst for they used it as a weapon to fearmonger congress into passing the Patriot Act which was IMO a necessary blow to the Constitution upon which our Laws are based. The misrepresentations, deceptions and outright lies about 9/11 were wrongfully used to blunder into first the Afghan war, then the Iraq war. More and more soundly based information is coming out that implicates the Bush administration’s complicity in the attacks of 9/11.
If they truly bore no guilt in that tragic event, then second in line was the Patriot Act and the emasculation of the 1978 FISA, from which evolved the politicization of the Department of Justice. Thereafter I am in total agreement with you, Dog.
This is so important. Please post it on as many sites as you can.
Possibly parallel in importance was the muzzling and manipulation of the Press, but Allen Dulles was a master at that so Bush/Cheney simply used the tools already in place.
there are many things the nitwit did in his life prior to 2000 but for me his acceptance of the selection by scotus nessessarily caused the precipitation into all that followed
All the crimes are crimes of absolutist arrogance. All amount to the same thing, the underlying crime that the Founders saw as grounds for impeachment: he tried to make himself king.
Now that is one alternate I can agree with. Good point Robspierre!
Woof. I agree. The corruption of the DoJ was the keystone to the Bush administration’s corruption of government. Its staffing, its noncompliance with the law, its legal reasoning, its politicization of prosecutors for partisan electoral gain, its serving as sword and shield for corruption across the federal government. Its demonstration that the law could be bought and ignored at the executive’s whim. Combine it with massive illegal domestic spying – a Rovian whet dream that would have made J. Edgar Hoover blush, even while wearing his prettiest pink frock – and you have a hammer over the whole legislature and the top staff who get their work done.
Nitpick: Mr. Ashcroft may be ethically incontinent, but he surely countenanced ethical and legal breaches by the highest executive officers in the Bush administration. Like Powell, he seems to have left the government (or been pushed for not getting with the Addington program), rather than fulfill his duty as Attorney General to out, investigate and prosecute those crimes. Like Fredo, he never understood that as Attorney General, he was the people’s lawyer, not the President’s.
His loyalty and silence may not have been bought with his multi-million dollar contracts to “oversee” corporate reform plans – in lieu of exacting criminal penalties for corporate crimes – but it is hard to convince a man to bite the hand that feeds him.
Well, he did put up something of a fight on wiretapping. That was a strange place to draw a line in the sand after all the other things you point out he allowed, that was all I was saying.
Agreed, though being in hospital and in fear of meeting one’s maker would make most of us pause and reflect about our misdeeds. It may also have to do with his not being the shiniest apple on the legal tree, and that, unlike Fredo, he could plausibly claim not to know some of what was going on. (A possible explanation, not an excuse.) Fredo, on the other hand, wasn’t much brighter, but he was in the loop from the get go, even if only as Addington’s gofer.
Imagine the leverage over corporate supporters – telecoms giants and their greed for mergers, coal polluters, investment bankers, energy distributors, property developers, tobacco and insurance companies, defense contractors and outsourcing firms – and their gratitude, if you can reliably demonstrate that the law won’t touch them as long as Bush stays in office.
But, haven’t all recent presidents appointed partisan hacks and ass-covering toadies to the position of AG? JFK appointed his brother, for cryin’ out loud — that’s hardly a show of respect for the independence of the office.
Unfortunately, most of Bush’s crimes are not unique in recent history, truth be told. Most recent presidents have initiated military action that was at least arguably unnecessary, for example.
But took the crimes to a whole ‘nother level by waging them out in the open, without pretext or apology. I guess that’s the “arrogance” referred to above. He attempted to normalize the crime of agressive war, torture, indefinite detention, etc., and create a legal precedent for continuing them in the future.
For that he belongs in a dock in the Hague.
Well, the AG is a political position. However, in theory the AG is supposed to have some autonomy after appointment. It is also the level to which they went to embed political partisans in the ranks of the hired (and theoretically impartial) staff attorneys where a lot of the problem comes from.
And it all goes back to what is the worst crime of the Supreme Court (besides the one giving corproations the same rights as a living,breathing person).
Agreed, and when do we get to revisit that corporate personhood decision?
Seems long past due, especially in light of the whole political donations = free speach B$.
Torture, revenge and arrogance.
Lying to war, prevaricating the truth, take it or leave it justice.
Embarassing America is his top sin.
Being born
Ask the family members of those dead, injured and displaced in Iraq based on a “pack of lies”
Ask the family members of American soldiers who have been killed in Iraq based on a “pack of lies”
Ask the 30 some thousand Americans soldiers who are injured from a war based on a “pack of lies”
And not one not one person or persons has been held accountable for those lies or false pre-war intelligence. Not one
No one is above the law…horseshit