There are many ways to fall into bad habits, but the easiest is when one tries a vice and then is rewarded for having done so. This is where the nation is with the Congressional Republicans. Their vice has been economic hostage taking, and like all successful hostage takers, when they want something they look around of the nearest economic crisis to grab a hold of and insist that they get their way.
Which is exactly where we are with the impending, and probably inevitable, government shut down; their least reasonable members, newly elected (thanks midterm voters) have been signaling for months that if they did not get every little mean spirited and economically moronic thing they wanted, they would shutter the Federal Government.
Now with Speaker Boehner (Putz-OH) reneging on his privately agreed to cuts, there is little chance that there will be an agreement and a vote. In fact there would have to be a bill published today in order to be able to follow the new House rule of 72 hours before a vote, for there to be anything to vote on by the deadline on Friday.
It is not like the Republicans think that the public is going to be kind to them on this issue. Their leadership remembers how it played out in 1995 and they don’t want to go into another presidential election with weak candidates and a sour taste for their party in the mouths of the electorate.
Which is why they are trying to do everything they can to pin this on the Democrats. Too bad the facts are all against them. Today they are going to introduce another Continuing Resolution that would extend spending for another week. Sounds good until you hear what the price tag is.
They will insist on 12 billion in cuts for that week and that all the riders (the direction that no money be spent on Planned Parenthood, NPR, Head Start, etc.) be included. If you annualized those cuts they would come out at ½ trillion dollars (500,000 million). This is going to be their attempt to look “reasonable”. Maybe someone should tell them reasonable people don’t demand everything they want and more when they are negotiating? Perhaps they need a couple of dictionaries so they can look up negotiation?
The other prong of their attack is going to be what we see from Sen. Tom Coburn (Mega-Putz, OK) in this mornings Washington Post. He takes the Op-Ed pages to talk about how it is all the fault of people failing to see that we are spending too much money so we must cut, cut, cut!
He asserts that the public is really concerned about the debt and deficit (which is against the polling which show they are really concerned about jobs and the economy) and that it is just inside the beltway that the argument over gutting social programs that serve the people is a problem.
He brings out some scary factoids from Conservative economists trying to make us sound like Ireland or Greece. From Sen. Coburn’s piece:
Economists Carmen Reinhart and Ken Rogoff estimate that when an advanced economy such as ours reaches a debt-to-GDP ratio of 90 percent, we chop one percentage point of gross domestic product off our economy. That translates into about a million jobs not created. When you count the money we’ve raided from Social Security and Medicare, we’ve already reached that tipping point.
There are signs the inflation beast is beginning to awaken. Bill Simon, the head of U.S. operations for Wal-Mart, said last week that he sees “serious” inflation ahead. Inflation is an insidious indirect tax increase that can wipe away wealth and savings with little warning.
Sen. Coburn gives the old Republican flim-flam of conflating Social Security with Medicaid and Medicare. He says that if interest rates on Treasury bills go up to the historic 6% that by 2022 we will only be able to pay for these programs with our taxes and nothing else. For the 2 millionth time, Social Security is not paid for by income taxes, it never has been and it never will be.
This is where the good Senators credibility falls to pieces. In this entire article he never once mentions raising taxes. Even as he predicts apocalyptic economic collapse if we don’t reign in our debt he fails to look at the side of the equation that would produce the most results the fastest ending the Bush era tax cuts.
This is probably because extending them for the richest Americans was the last hostage taking that the Republicans engaged in. Back in December they held the 3 million unemployed workers (including at the time, myself) hostage to extend these unsupportable and unaffordable tax cuts. Now that the tax cuts are in place they are insisting that we cut the budget drastically and immediately to help pay for them.
The Republicans think they can generate enough smoke to obscure the fact that it is their intransigence and hostage taking that has brought us to the point of shutting down the federal government. I think they are wrong.
The American people might not pay close enough attention to their government most of the time, but they do have a sense, in general, of who is being a pouting baby and who is trying to do the work of the people. The fact is the Democrats in both the House and Senate have tried to compromise to avoid this shut down, even to the point of despair of their base, and nothing is good enough except exactly what the House voted in HR 1.
That fact along is going to make it more than clear that the Republicans for all their talk of fiscal responsibility are the same folks who will cut Head Start for poor kids, so people like Paris Hilton don’t have to pay a reasonable tax on money they never earned.
It is never a good policy to negotiate with hostage takers. Sooner or later you have to put your foot down and say “No”, even if the consequences are bad for you too. This is the time for the President and the Congressional Democrats to call the bluff of the Republicans.
It is possible they are so insane that they really will bring this country to its knees. But it is better if it happens now before the vote for the debt ceiling comes up. If they are intransigent on that, then it would not just be the United States that they would bring down but the entire world economy.
It is time to break the hostage taking habit of the Republicans. It is time for them to own the failure of their vision and policy and their complete lack of understanding that winning one House of Congress does not make you rulers of the nation.
The floor is yours.




29 Comments

Bill, this isn’t 1995 and Barack Obama isn’t Bill Clinton or a “Democrat” if that Party still exist. I hope the TeaBags expose Obama as the worthless Republican whore that he is. I’m with the TeaBags, I hope they shut down our Fascist Washington based government, but we both know they won’t shut down the government for long. This is just bad political theater. How do you like Ryan’s Medicare and Medicaid cuts? I guess I’ll repeat that question after Obama capitulates and you continue your blind support. Change? “Obama2012: Are you in?” LOL
Golly you sound really bitter and angry there Bin. You might want to watch that, you need people to want to be with you on your views if you are going to get the change you say you’re working for.
I’ve already concluded that I can only achieve my goals by the complete destruction of this perversion of “Democratic” Party. A little creative destruction is good for our democracy, and Obama has done more to help Third Parties than anyone since Lincoln/Buchanan. Good luck with these “Democrats” or Obamacrats.
I’m with Bin Quick. The Democrat party is beyond saving, it’s bought, paid for, and fully owned by the corporate bastards. Anyone who thinks otherwise is either a fool or lying to themselves in light of the clear evidence that Obama Inc. has provided us.
Horse pucky. Have you ever talked to your Senator or Rep? Have you talked to your governor? You are saying they are all corrupt, well I know from personal experience that is not true.
Beyond that Bin is calling for things to get much worse, before they get better. It is nihilistic.
He talks a big game about 3rd parties but I have $100 that says there won’t be a single Green or Libertarian or New Progressive Alliance member of Congress or the Senate, or in a Governors house come 2013.
The usual democratic party two step – they could have passed a budget last year, when they controlled Congress. But it was politically advantageous to not pass it, putting the budget in the hands of the GOP, while squawking about how horrible the GOP is.
Bill,
There aren’t any “Democrats” in Congress now. When Obama cuts his next deal, capitulation, or surrender, all the so-called “good” Democrats will obey and vote for everything they oppose. Wake up, we have loss this battle. Time to retreat and regroup with a new General and different troops.
The “Democratic” Party is a bad joke, but they have their masochistic supporters.
Show me a functional third party and I will talk about it. But since there is no viable alternative, I have to stick with the tools I have no matter how imprefect.
There are Democrats in Congress. As far as I know there is no definition other than saying you are one. There are big differences if you’re not trying to use hyperbole to convince people otherwise and as long as these things are true, I am going to be a Democrat and yell and scream and work to make them more the way they should be. I will not give that up on the vague hope that something different will suddenly appear and change the game.
You’re welcome to do that, if that is what you want, but it looks like a lot of pain and tears and frustration for no end result to me.
And the 3rd party supporters have their political nihilists.
I think you are correct, no Third Party has a chance but my choice is between a Party w/o a chance or the lying corporate whore that stabbed me in the back. I’ll take “no chance” for $200 Alex.
@ Bin Quick April 5th, 2011 at 7:18 am
I’ll make you an offer, and it goes for any of the primary or 3rd party people out there:
- Pick the district and candidate
- Get a phone list
- I’ll make 100 phone calls in a phone banking effort
If you do the work, I’ll support it with work. I’ll pledge up to 1,000 out-of-my-district calls this year if there are 9 other takers.
Put your work where your mouth is and you’ll find you get support.
Nihilism, it is a wonder you get out of bed in the morning.
As I said early, I don’t think the 3rd Party has a chance anywhere. Our only hope is to take back the Democratic Party from the current Republicans in charge. Until then, we will lose, maybe slower with a “Democrat” in the WH but the long run trajectory in bad for Progressive. The only way to take back the Democratic Party is to force the current corporate whores out, primaries aren’t a viable option so we must let all of them lose. There maybe some exception but I can’t think of one right now. Republicans in charge is our best weapon anyway.
Sorry for the typos, I’m simultaneously working and screwing off.
I see.
The only work you are willing to do to advance progressive causes and candidates is to vote with the conservatives.
Doesn’t it occur to you that you still have the same problem set when your republican gets voted in?
Yes, it will cause some short-term problems but look at where we are now. GOP advocating gutting Medicare and Medicaid, and Obama’s response… Exporting American jobs to China, yearly $300B – $500B trade deficit during a recession. Unlimited wars, Obama signed tax cuts for millionaires while agreeing to cut social programs for middle class and poor. Your own post about foreclosures, where is AG Holder? Obama? Fucking jokes! Lets not mention Wall Street and no one has gone to jail. Madoff’s mistake was that he stole from the rich unlike Angelo Mozilo. I could go on forever but you get the point, and I bet you generally agree. I’ll be here when you realize these Democrats are not worth your efforts. I’ve made your argument, walked in your shoes, supporting these whores has no future. “We have sustained defeat without war”, and it disgust me that I vote for the worthless corporate whore in the WH. Never again!
I’m not voting Obama, but I’m not voting Republican either.
I’m talking about the local districts and state stuff, and you’re putting support in my words that I’ve never written;
I say there is progressive work to do, primaries to be run, issues to support, and I’m going to do it. I would help you in your district, but the only effort you care to make is vote against, rather than truly participate in change.
I don’t blame people for being mad and frustrated. But after expressing such if they just want to wallow in it and whine, I won’t bother with them further.
Good day.
Kelly, I support good local Progressive candidates but I’m not wallowing. I’ve made conscience decision that I’m not repeating the same behavior and expecting a different result. I understand you haven’t gotten here yet or maybe you never will. That’s OK. Obama’s capitulations have forced me to release my fear of the evil Republicans. Once you realize they are only slightly more evil and you have options, it’s easy to make long-term decisions that may seem contrary to immediate goals.
Good luck, and good day.
Bill you don’t understand because you are blind. Until you realize there are no “Democrats” in Washington, you are just screaming at the moon. Support Obama as he guts Medicare and Medicaid, and you can blame those mean Republicans for forcing Obama to cut your future health care.
Nihilists? LOL! You are delusional at best. I use to think TeaBags were stupid for supporting Republicans but Democrats/Obamacrats are just as stupid.
Well, from my perspective the Republicans are considerably worse. They show a nasty propensity for interfering in the lives of women, gays and anyone else who doesn’t fall into line with their patriachal, angry-deity perverted form of Christianity.
If the Republicans get back in the White House, say goodbye to birth control, any access to safe and legal abortion as starters.
I’m not willing to consign the young women in my family to that particular form of misery.
“If the Republicans get back in the White House, say goodbye to birth control, any access to safe and legal abortion as starters.”
Considering that it didn’t happen last time, why do you take it for granted that it will happen next time?
Incidentally, Bart Stupak is a Dem, you know? Same as teh man who signed Executive Order 13535
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13535
Yeah that’s right Bin, you are the all knowing and wise one who sees the only truth.
Sheesh, arrogant much?
My congressman is a former mob lawyer. How far do you think you will get trying to change his mind. He probably could call in a “hit” man and have a contract placed on me.
Same old circular arguments, Mr. Egnor. We don’t have any viable third parties so we have to vote Dem, thus ENSURING no viable third parties to vote for…
You want to see arrogance, look in a mirror. By the way, what specific rules did Rusty1776 break that caused his banning? Same question regarding Michael Kwiatkowski…
But that is not true. There are two 3rd parties that have been around for decades the Greens and the Libertarians. In the 30 years or so they have been in existence they have never elected a Governor, never elected a Representative, never elected a Senator.
The best they have been able to do is a grand total of 4 State Senators and none of them are currently serving.
It is not that people have not tried, it is that it has not worked and I don’t see why any should waste the effort to do so when it is easier to take over and reform the Democrats. The problem around here is that people would rather say that can’t be done because it is fashionable and easier to say like the Socialists and Communists I knew in my youth “When the Revolution comes”.
It is a cop out, it is an abdication of responsibility to say that first we have to have an entirely new way of politics before there is any chance of things getting better.
What that means is that in the mean time things will get worse because the people with the most progressive policy views are spinning their wheels trying to do something that has never been successful in our nation instead of trying to work the system as it exists and achieve the gains that are available there.
And call me Bill, please. If we are going to argue it might as well be on a first name basis.
Yeah, you caught me, I am the one asking for an explanation of a someones assertions, who insists instead of supporting an argument with fact and I am the arrogant one.
And of course, I’m not a bit surprised that you ignored my questions…