Ugh I don’t even know why I bother to read the Washington Post editorial page. Maybe it is the boost it gives my morning by raising my blood pressure, but in any case I exposed my tender brain-cells the thoughts of Charles Krauthammer this morning.
Chucky has a piece in the WaPo with the title of “The union owned Democrats” the first thing I thought when I read it was “I wish!”. This is a tired old meme from a tired old man. The idea that everything the Democrats do on issues of workplace rules or safety is somehow motivated by the fact that unions overwhelmingly support Democrats.
It could not possibly be because the funders of the Republican party have been wanting to dismantle the counterbalancing force of organized labor for, well, ever. One of the reasons that Ronald Regan has been sainted if not deified by the Republican Party is that he broke the Air Traffic Controllers union and set the DOJ on other unions looking for mafia ties and corruption. It was the start of the major decline of the Labor movement in this country.
What has Krauthammer’s undies in a twist? A couple of things; first off there is the NLRB’s decision to take Boeing to court over the union busting attempt they made by building a factory in South Carolina, which is a right to work state. To be clear (since everyone including Chucky misses this point) it is not about the fact that Boeing decided to build a new plant in a management friendly state, it is their intentions in doing so. You can build wherever you like, but if you do it with the intention of busting your union at your primary facilities, that is illegal.
He also rails against the saving of the Auto Industry by the Obama administration. Take a look:
In 2009, Obama pushed through a federally run, questionably legal, bankruptcy for the auto companies that robbed first-in-line creditors in order to bail out the United Auto Workers.
You know, the successful saving of our domestic auto industry did have some benefits for UAW workers. But they also took on a lot of liability to help out with that. They are now funding the health care that was promised by GM and Chrysler to employees who worked their entire lives on the factory floor. The UAW did it because it would help to reduce the costs of the companies and save jobs, but it was not like they were not taking over an obligation that was the auto companies. It is and was a big blow to the financial health of the UAW, but it was the right thing to do.
That is before we get to the fact that having our domestic auto industry collapse would have been a huge blow to both the economy and our ability to compete world wide in heavy manufacturing.
The last point on this is that it worked. It was far, far cheaper than the bail out of our banks, coming in at some 17 billion in estimated losses (we can’t know for sure yet because the Federal Government owns a lot of GM stock they got at rock bottom prices and will sell at something hire than they paid for it). It also kept tens of thousands of workers on the job at a time when we were shedding jobs from the economy at a rate of ¾ of a million a month.
To say this was some kind of “union only” policy is to be completely blind to all the other important factors of the auto industry bail out. But that is our Red Skull of the Right for you.
The Red Skull then goes on to make a bizarre defense of Gov. Scott Walker and the Republicans in Wisconsin attempt to gut collective bargaining for public employees. He compares the move to deny the Republicans a quorum by Democrats to arson. Yeah, Chucky thinks that acting to prevent a railroading of a radical and massively unpopular policy through the legislature to a felony. It is too bad that he is not interested in felonies committed by Republicans, like torture or outing a covert CIA operative or lying to a Federal Grand Jury, instead of accusing Democrats of similar crimes.
What is amazing about this section of his column is that he sees the implementation of this law as a victory for Republicans. He seems to gloss over the fact that the actions of the Wisconsin State Senate has led to the recall of six of the Republicans and will likely result in that party losing their majority. I will say that I will take that kind of Republican victory everyday of the week and twice on Sundays.
Krauthammer keeps making the point that since Labor gives a lot of money to Democratic campaigns that this means the Dems are beholden to them and will always work in their interest, for that reason alone. This is a dangerous comparison to make given the amount of money that flows to Republicans from people like the Koch Brothers and Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS.
After all if the standard is that giving money predominately to one party means that you are dictating their actions, is Chucky the Skull ready to say that Republicans are owned by the Health Insurance Industry, the Banking Industry. Big Oil and Phrama? This is his standard for accusation, not mine, so I think it is completely fair. Anyone think I should hold my breath waiting for this kind of statement from Krauthammer? Me either.
The column ends with this line:
But what are those when there are unions to appease and elections to win?
It would be great if the Democrats were actually trying to appease Labor. The Labor movement has a ton of policies that actually benefit, not just their members, but the working public as a whole. The fact is Dems are not trying to appease Labor. If they were we would have seen real movement on the Employee Free Choice Act, which would have allowed, among other things, card check voting, if no one in the labor force objected to it.
What has Chucky spun up is the fact that the Obama administration is once again enforcing existing labor law and regulations. After eight years of malevolent neglect in this area by the criminal Bush administration, any return to normalcy looks like an attack on the business interests that Krauthammer prays to daily.
A resurgent Labor movement would be big trouble for people like Chucky who dream of a time when you could abuse your workers all you like and there was nothing they could do about since they had to have this job and there was always someone else starving in the street that would take it if they spoke up.
The assault on Labor is far from over. This is part and parcel of what we will see in the Republican campaigns this cycle. They have decided that they have enough power to take out one of the last counterweights to the huge amount of money they have, Labor. They are going to do everything they can to weaken and destroy the movement that gave us the weekend, the middle class and a manufacturing base that not only provided good jobs but was the back bone of our prosperity.
This kind of dishonesty needs to be called out at every turn. The idea that corporations are going to look out for the good of jobs and workers in this country is false on its face. There is a reason we have labor laws and unions, it is because of the abuses of business. If we remove those checks on business the abuses will come back. It is that simple.
The floor is yours.




47 Comments

great thoughts, Bill, recommended and tweeted.
Krauthammer–perfect name–for the mixed bag that this man is. Imagine a hammer made of kraut nailing the points home with blows of sourness.
The man is a contributing editor to The Weekly Standard which just about says it all right there in regard to his true roots.
Then on the other side of his schizophrenic coin of self, he has worked for the Carter administration and served as a speech writer to former VP Walter Mondale. When Bill Clinton called Krauthammer “brilliant” in 2010–Krauthammer replied that now his career was toast.
He has been described as a conservative and a neoconservative by many on matters of foreign policy, yet he supports abortion and opposed the death penalty.
All in all, I would say that he is a perfect fit to join Obama’s administration–especially since he has the blessings of the Corporate Centrist Godfather, Bill Clinton. But the only problem is: Krauthammer doesn’t want anything to do with them. LOL
The start of the major assault on labor in this country was when Carter was president and he started the deregulation of airlines, railroads, and trucking with the help of almost every Democrat in congress. That, plus the encouragement big business received in the form of tax breaks to move to right-to-work states thereby abandoning factories and workers hurting communities across the northeast in the process.
That’s the Democratic party legacy as far as I’m concerned – a concerted “Fuck you” to the people who supported them. We should always remember that even though LBJ signed the Civil Rights and Voting Rights bills, the Democratic party supported slavery and preached bigotry since before the Civil War. The Democrats worked hand in hand with southern politicians to make sure that Reconstruction died and got painted with the brush of failure.
He’s the most usless POS I’ve ever seen and Ive seen alot in 62 years.
The start of the assault on Labor was Taft-Hartley in 1947. Only for brief intervals have Democrats even tried to slow the slide to fascism. Its been kabuki all along. No party and no politician can possibly advance policies resulting in more jobs and higher wages when beholden to those who demand fewer jobs and lower wages. Even Jesus knew you couldn’t serve two masters. Yes, Krauthammer is a liar and vomit worthy. But the real question is when will Labor decide its had enough of the rigged game and put its energies and resources into forming a political party of, by, and for working people to counter the current system “of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%”?
excellent points mattcarmody
As long as people don’t mistakenly think that voting Republican will make things better.
All the things you said are true: Carter did deregulate airlines. Then Ronald Reagan came along and busted up the air traffic controller union and in his first term took our nation from being an international creditor to being an international debtor–and Reagan didn’t even have a war to support.
AND speaking of flipflops, the Republicans swooped in on many of the angry racist Dixiecrats and took them in under their wings into the Republican Party in the 1960′s. Just another version of the “two” party good cop/ bad cop games.
The leadership of BOTH parties are enemies of the people.
soon I hope. They have one already. They just need to put energy into it.
It was formed in June of 1996
http://www.thelaborparty.org/a_index.html
Ugh I don’t even know why I bother to read the Washington Post editorial page.
Writers block:) ?
What has Krauthammer’s undies in a twist? A couple of things; first off there is the NLRB’s decision to take Boeing to court over the union busting attempt they made by building a factory in South Carolina, which is a right to work state. To be clear (since everyone including Chucky misses this point) it is not about the fact that Boeing decided to build a new plant in a management friendly state, it is their intentions in doing so. You can build wherever you like, but if you do it with the intention of busting your union at your primary facilities, that is illegal.
Boeing had to buy a factory in a Right to Work State because they could not deliver parts as needed Boeing has had problems with many suppliers on this and has had to delay their new plane so often some countries now want their money back.
What *cough * logic do they use to justify building a plant down there if they could not find workers to build what they needed before?
On March 28, 2008, in an effort to gain more control over the supply chain, Boeing announced that it planned to buy Vought Aircraft Industries’ interest in Global Aeronautica;[56] the company later agreed to also purchase Vought’s North Charleston, S.C. factory.[57]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Dreamliner#Production_and_delivery_delays
My bold its so sad that Boeing had to take over and buy a subcontractor’s factory in an American Right to Work State, what ever Boeing’s problem’s with all its Non Union subcontractors apparently the problems in a Right to Work State Non Union factory were even worse.
http://my.firedoglake.com/thingscomeundone/2011/06/08/i-heard-this-line-before-it-didnt-work-before-so-why-does-time-think-it-will-work-this-time/
Bill, I think you have just not thought about it or you wouldn’t do it.
“. This is a tired old meme from a tired old man.”
Please do not use old man or old woman as a pejorative. I am pleased I don’t often see ‘adolescent’ used that way here, I hope they find FDL a congenial place as I do. Thanks.
There is a reason that Chucky is called Craphammer.
Charles as long as even right to Work States are not putting up suicide nets outside their factories then American workers are being paid to much according to your logic.
i wish the American Right would stop being cowards and say what they really mean before they are elected rather than after words like Gov Walker did in Wisconsin.
Although to be fair I am sure thats what Gov Walker has in mind next!
Sorry it was a literary thing. I’ll try to be more sensitive in the future.
“The start of the major assault on labor in this country was when Carter was president”
It was one of those ‘seemed like a good idea at the time’ sort of things. One of my friends was instrumental in introducing the shift to deregulation under Carter. It came out of the economics we learned in the mid-60s, and not in Chicago, but at Yale. There was a presumption (mostly unexamined) that the American economy could be made more efficient by dismantling the constraints on free entry created from the late 1920s (in telecommunications) through the early 1960s. No one saw it as union-busting; rather, it was the kind of marginal change that it was believed, would leave just about everybody better off except those who were getting a monopoly rent from governmental protection.
This turns out to have been a narrow and terribly mistaken view of the relation between policy, power, and efficiency. The generous interpretation–which I believe to be correct for the Carter administration, though not for the Republican ones that followed it–was that we were terribly naive. I was not personally involved in any of this, but I don’t recall opposing deregulation. The paradoxical aspect of this is that academic economists live in the highly protected world of tenure, and extract huge rents from it.
Charles Krauthammer is spot on. The Democrats and Unions have long held a sick co-dependent relationship, because neither could survive without the other. The Auto Companies should have filed bankruptcy and dismantled the unions..Survival would have been assured and the taxpayer would have saved billions. The Boeing complaint is nothig more than an assault on Free Mkt. Enterprise and Capitalism and it is shameful.
National Education Association. Membership: 3.2 million; assets: $216 million. $3.7 million NEA spent on political activities in the last election cycle, 98% went to Democratic candidates.
Service Employees International Union. Membership: 1.8 million; assets: $187 million. Over the past two years, SEIU gave almost $2 million to Democratic candidates.
United Food & Commercial Workers. Membership: 1.3 million; assets: $157 million.Of the $1.9 million the union donated to political candidates over the past two years, 99% of it went to Democrats.
International Brotherhood of Teamsters: Membership: 1.3 million; assets: $175 million.Over the past two years, the Teamsters have donated $2.3 million to Democratic candidates
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees. Membership: 1.5 million. Over the past two years, AFSCME has donated $2.3 million to Democratic candidates.
Laborers’ International Union of North America. Membership: 633,000; assets: $134 million.Of the $1.7 million donated to political candidates over the past two years, 95% went to Democrats.
American Federation of Teachers. Membership: 887,000; assets: $115 million.Of the $2.4 million donated to political candidates in the past two years, the union gave all but $10,000 to Democrats.
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. Membership: 613,000; assets: $147 million. Over the past two years, the IAM donated $1.98 million to Democratic candidates
United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America. Membership: 538,000; assets: $1.2 billion. Over the past two years, the UAW donated more than $1.6 million to political candidates, and all but $3,000 went to Democrats.
Sometimes words we do not like can be quite accurate….He did not say “all” old people are tired…but many certainly are and have a right to be. Lighten up.
Kraut….belongs on that list with some others who only raise the question why would anyone care what he thinks?…..Drivel, in a word.
“To be clear (since everyone including Chucky misses this point) it is not about the fact that Boeing decided to build a new plant in a management friendly state, it is their intentions in doing so. You can build wherever you like, but if you do it with the intention of busting your union at your primary facilities, that is illegal.”
The company has an intent?
Allow me to offer some advice for effective trolling: Try to get your facts straight
Unions by law must report their assets and other financial information to the DoL. By law, unions are not allowed to make direct contributions to candidates. Therefore, to draw a connection between a union’s assets and political contributions is specious, at best.
It’s best not draw on the “info” published at various right-wing websites, because they rarely concern themselves with facts. Far better to actually read up on the subject and do your own analysis.
He is a shilling, bloviating moron, I need only read the title of this blog to make a comment.
You missed the point Rev and please don’t do me that lighten up stuff, that’s a bigots favorite.
I bet Kraut the Krip avails himself of all things Democratic whenever he wheels himself up and down ramps. What a asshat.
Shilling? Isn’t that a coin?
The Unions and Dems found some common ground here:
http://www.netrootsnation.org/sponsors
Labor unions #1 culprit in driving U.S. manufacturing jobs overseas. How the democratic party can stand by and reward something so unamerican is beyond comprehension
Right on Matt and the others who responded to you. I would also go back to JFK and Saint Robert going after the Teamsters. I was a Teamster under Hoffa and strength like that had to be taken down a notch. Let’s not forget that Reagan duped the Teamsters into supporting him in 1980; unions really were instrumental in his victory. Krauthammer forgets that Ronnie and Heston were union presidents for god’s sake. Just because unions were able to get laws enacted (like overtime, etc.) does not mean we can sit back. The Kochs are certainly one reason laws are not enforced (see my column on him), but Obama’s lack of action is also quite troubling.
lol, unintended double entendre
Huh? Are you retarded?
Troll Alert!!
DITTO!!!
DITTO to Headed West, that is..HW, You are spot on..
You are entitled to your arrogant opinion, but please do not imply that I am a bigot. Completely inaccurate and name-calling is not permitted on this site.
Sarah? Is that you? Michelle?
Bill, you make a lot of very sound, good points in picking apart Mr. Pinched Face’s arguments. However, you have to acknowledge that organized crime did infiltrate and control many unions back in the 1960′s and 1970′s, especially in the northeast. I can’t take exception to any efforts to remove that cancer.
My take on the decline on the unions (and I was a kid when these events took place, so I may not know the whole story) was that they largely provoked a backlash that resulted in right-to-work laws being passed in the 1970′s, starting with Southern states. This backlash was a response to the unions getting too powerful and greedy.
Starting in the late 1960′s and lasting until the recession of the early 1980′s, the US economy was caught in a wage-price spiral that caused high inflation (exceeding 10% in some years) for over a decade. This spiral was caused by the unions pressing for wage increases that were not tied to increases in productivity. Thus, the result was inflation.
The unfortunate result of the decline of the unions is that technological advances that started in the 1980′s have led to large increases in worker productivity over the last 25-30 years, but worker pay–when adjusted for inflation–has remained flat. The only time the median wage rose above 1974 levels was during the second half of the 1990′s, but those gains were reversed over the last decade. All the gains went to the people at the top. The loss of union power also meant that the Democratic party (think: Democratic Leadership Council) began supporting the corporate agenda of globalization and the export of US jobs.
I’m generally pro-union, but it seems to me that the private-sector unions became arrogant and are largely responsible for their own demise.
by driving up the labor costs they are 1) putting people out for work 2)forcing U.S. manufacturing jobs overseas so these prices remain competitive with similar goods. If you you want to know what happened the manufacturing middle class, its union policies that killed them not tax policy, wall street or whatever other scapegoat you want to come up with.
Intent to break up the Union is there because Boeing wants to set up in a Right To Work State SC the same state where they had to buy a subcontractor because they could not produce parts up to Boeings Specs.
Why go and built a factory there if the workers can’t do the job?
If we had tariffs losing jobs to Outsourcing would not be a problem. Right now the problem is Boeing is late delivering planes as promised thanks to outsourcing and non Union labor and if more countries start asking for their money back because they are tired of waiting for their planes then Boeing will go under because of outsourcing and non union work not because of Union wages. Charles needs to go back to school.
You make it sound as though the UAW got screwed in the bailout, the UAW got a far better deal than without a bailout. The only ways unions survive are government handy me outs funded by taxpayers one way or the other.
Boeing WAS late delivering planes because of constant long term strikes by union employees. Boeing said it held “extensive” talks with the Machinists about potentially placing the additional production in Washington. But that failed amid demands “that would have hampered the company’s competitiveness in the increasingly competitive global market for large commercial airplanes,” the company said.
Boeing said the Machinists ultimately have suffered no job losses from the decision because the company has increased employment in the Puget Sound area by about 2,000 workers since deciding to expand in South Carolina in October 2009.
You know, why don’t we just take down the entire company. That way we’ll be done with the unions altogether..then Boeing can move it’s operations overseas..Less regulations, no unions, less taxes..
Sounds like a plan..9.1% unemployment just isn’t high enough
this always blows me away…the national Dems and Obama don’t give a rat’s ass about labor yet the right complains he is under labor’s thumb…what bull…I know GOP friends of mine who bitch that Obama is the most labor friendly president in history….hey Chuck and my GOP friends please look at Wiscon and see what Obama is NOT doing…
What has Krauthammer’s undies in a twist?
Simple. He wanted to be a surgeon.
One strike they could have settled anytime however look at my links several delays for the Dreamliner those other delays were based on the plane not being ready yet.
That means bad parts. Like the parts they got in the SC factory they had to buy and take over because quality was so bad.
The only way companies break unions is no tariffs. Tell me if the rich move their money and their jobs to china who will buy the stuff they make low paid Chinese workers working in factories with suicide nets because they are worked so hard they would rather die?
Or American workers who get paid enough to fly on airplanes for work and vacation and buy i pods etc?
Never mind that other countries are stealing our tech and learning how we make things when they feel confident they don’t need us anymore they will ignore our patents.
Oh wait that is already happening. Charles should really worry less about Unions costing companies and more about what patent theft is costing companies. Keeping work in America creates consumer demand how many Chinese fly or can afford an ipod and it keeps our tech and how we make our tech secret.
China is full of cheap ipod clones Apple is not getting the market share it should be getting, Microsoft gets ripped off too.
Boeing well maybe they would get ripped off if they actually had a product to rip off even thieves don’t want to steal untested tech.
Cheering on the race to the bottom, HW? How sad.
No one should be arguing here that the problem is that wages and benefits are too high. I mean, you know, if you feel guilty about the money you’re making and want to volunteer yourself for a pay cut, feel free. But that’s not true for the rest of us.
The answer should never be to lower pay and benefits for one group of workers, but always to lift the pay and benefits of the other. To the extent that is not within our nation’s ability, you level the trading playing field with tariffs. Trust me, China isn’t letting American goods into their country without high tariffs. So why are we letting their goods in here on a free ride?
Truthfully, I could make the case that America would be far better off not trading with anyone ever, but that’s another topic for another day. But unions did not destroy the American middle class. They built it. Every bit of data that exists shows that, when unions were strong, the middle class was strong and that the decline in wages mirrors almost exactly the decline in unions. In fact, wages rose commensurate with productivity increases until the age of Reagan. Precisely from that time forward, productivity exploded yet wages remained flat or dropped. That isn’t Labor’s fault. That’s exactly what you get when you don’t have strong unions protecting the interests of the workers. Your conservative talking points simply aren’t borne out by any of the empirical data.
http://epi.3cdn.net/3b7a1c34747d141327_4dm6bx8ni.pdf
As I’m new here, I seem to have used the wrong “reply” button. My reply is to the comment from HeadedWest immediately below. Apologies.
Someone failed economics I see. Businesses do not keep people around out of the kindness of their hearts. They hire to keep up with demand. No business is going to maintain and sustain losing people after throwing a hissy fit because they actually have to pay labor costs. Even conservative economists had to acknowledge that raising wages moderately did not cause the end of the world they had projected in the 90s. Why? Because barring technological advances business either has to choose to fold up their tent and go home or pay the additional labor costs.
The average wage of a union worker is $917 a week or $47,684. Hardly a huge sum of money particularly when you consider these people hold a stake in the profitability of a company and you consider the million dollar management packages. The average non union member makes $37,284 or a little over $3000 a month. With housing costs, health care, increases to utilities and what not that’s why the average guy is struggling in this economy. Frankly, I’d like to see you come up with a budget of $3000 monthly for a state like California. Is it any wonder people are tapping lines of credit when more and more is being put onto their shoulders(retirement, health care costs, huge increases in housing costs,etc,etc)?
Herr Professor Docktor Krauthammer takes a swipe at Dems and labor. Dog bites man is not news. As usual, his facts are wrong, too. His hackneyed rant that unions “own” the Democrats is about a generation past its sell-by date. Mr. Obama has as much allegiance to the union and Main Street vote as Mitch McConnell does.
Boeing already has moved a lot of operations overseas. That have a very specific production strategy of sourcing components worldwide and assembling planes at locations that allow them sell across the globe.
Oh, by the way, Boeing employs union labor at a lot of the overseas sites.
You know, alamode, none of this stuff is secret. All you have to do is read up a little instead of copying shit from RedState or wherever the hell you are getting the crap you are positing here.