The White House, the FDA and the Louisiana Seafood Promotion & Marketing Board are teaming up with a group of celebrity chefs September 13 to promote the eating of Gulf Seafood.
It isn’t "sexy news" to discuss a higher percentage of cancers for small children who eat Gulf seafood more than once a month. But pointing out to the media that the FDA has flawed testing protocols and have ignored safety concerns is news. NOAA using only 12 shrimp to prove the safety of 5,000 miles of the Gulf should be news to the media.
This Monday the media will be shoveling shrimp into their mouths and they might be concerned for their own health if they aren’t concerned for others.
It’s not my job to care about the little kids and pregnant women eating Gulf seafood. Nine years from now when questions are being asked about sick kids the folks at the FDA can say, "Nobody could have anticipated…"
Where have I heard that line before?

Here is my letter to a couple of the people who are trying to break through to the FDA with their concerns.
Dr. Gina Solomon, Senior Scientist, NRDC
Paul Blanc, M.D., M.S.P.H. Professor of Medicine Endowed Chair,
Occupational Medicine Chief, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Hi Gina and Paul:
According to the blog Obama Foodorama, this Monday White House Executive Chef Cristeta Comerford and FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg will continue the unprecedented White House campaign to promote Gulf seafood. When they talk to the press will they mention concerns for "pregnant women, young children, and communities that rely on Gulf seafood as their main source of food [who] are most vulnerable to chemicals in the oil, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metals."? In Dr. Solomon’s August 17th blog post she voiced these concerns and wrote to the FDA and NOAA about them.
Dr. Solomon’s letters to the FDA and NOAA about the flawed testing protocols of Gulf seafood were very powerful. Her letter titled Gulf Shrimp Testing: Is a Dozen Samples in 5000 Square Miles Enough to Reassure You? was alarming.
Unless the FDA and NOAA have changed anything based on Dr. Solomon’s meeting with them last Tuesday, the "White House, the FDA and the Louisiana Seafood Promotion & Marketing Board are proceeding full steam ahead promoting the safety of gulf seafood" Monday September 13 in New Orleans.
I spoke to Dr. Blanc at his book reading in Marin. He mentioned that it wasn’t until Gardiner Harris of the New York Times did a story about a 53 year old Denver man who got "popcorn lung" from eating artificially flavored popcorn did the industry finally stop using the chemical diacetyl in microwave popcorn. Do we need to wait until hundreds of pregnant women give birth to children with neurological damage to push back on the promotion campaigns of the FDA and White House?
Whose job is it to push back on these marketing programs? Whose job is it to look out for the health of the small children whose parents have been told, "Eat More Gulf Seafood!". Because it is the job of the Louisiana Seafood Promotion & Marketing Board to look after the economic health of the fishing industry. They will use the media’s ignorance of the science and its guilt over the economic destruction of fishermen to push seafood consumption.
If you believe that the testing protocols aren’t sufficient and that eating Gulf Seafood presents a "clear and present danger" to the health of Americans then I hope that you have coordinated an aggressive response to this event. Because if you haven’t, then the most that the media will do is give a one line mention about "safety concerns" that will be dismissed by FDA Commissioner Hamburg. The articles will feature photos of shiny happy people eating safe gulf seafood prepared by celebrity chefs.
Do the chefs want to be feeding potentially toxic food to their customers? No. But they do not have anyone to back them up if they refuse. They can’t say, ‘Unless I know that this is tested for heavy metals and Corexit components I refuse to serve it." They are told it is safe by authorities, so they cook it.
I covered the pet food tainting story in 2007 and I remember hearing the painful stories of people who killed their pets or gave them kidney problems because they were feeding them food they were told was safe by the pet food industry and the FDA. The FDA was using flawed testing protocols then too.
I know it’s hard to push back in the media on food safety when you can’t wield the threat of immediate sickness or death. It isn’t "sexy"news" to discuss a higher percentage of cancers for small children who eat Gulf seafood more than once a month. But pointing out to the media that the FDA has flawed testing protocols and have ignored your concerns is news. NOAA using 12 shrimp to prove the safety of 5,000 miles of the Gulf should be news to the media in New Orleans. They will be shoveling this shrimp into their mouths on Monday and they might be concerned for their own health.
Am I overreacting? Possibly. I’m not a scientist. I’m not in a regulator. However I do know something about political pressure and how people promote things in the media. After 9/11 the White House pushed to declare the air around Ground Zero safe to breathe. Nine years later we see thousands of health problems. If you were to travel back into time and try and change that outcome what would you do? Might this be a similar opportunity? If so, could you help the media and public out with better information about the risks? No time travel required.
You probably have a response ready. I do not want to underestimate the work of your communications people. If you have a response planned please write about it on your blogs so concerned people like me can help you alert the media and the general public.
Sincerely,
Michal Spocko
P.S. I’ve copied this letter to Dr. Murphy and a few other people I have been talking to about this issue.
cc:
Eric Young, Senior Press Secretary, Washington DC, NRDC
Daniel Hinerfeld, Deputy Director of Communications, NRDC
Dr. Kirk Murphy
Michael Whitney, FireDogLake
Andrew Maynard, University of Michigan
Eddie Gehman Kohan, Obama Foodorama:
Bill Marler, Marlerclark
Mary Siceloff, Outbreak, Inc
Marylee Orr, Louisiana Environmental Action Network
Jim Stiles, Boston Chemical Data Corp.
Marco Kaltofen, P.E., , Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Stuart H. Smith, Smith Stag, LLC
Wilma Subra: Subra Company
John Vidal, environment editor, Guardian UK
Ariel Schwartz, Fast Company
Elana Schor, Greenwire
Elisabeth Weiss, Science Writer, USA Today
George Williams, NOLA Rising Tide
—The chefs scheduled to attend the day of events include:
New Orleans chefs John Besh and John Folse
From New Orleans, in addition to Folse & Besh:
Chip Flanagan, of Ralph’s on The Park; Drew Dzejak, The Grill Room; Greg Reggio, Taste Buds, Inc.; Chris Lusk, Café Adelaide; Christopher Lynch and Barusch Rabasa, Meson 923. Washington, DC: Victor Albisu, from BLT Steak; Robert Weidmaier of Marcel’s, Brasserie Beck, Mussel Bar, BRABO and Jeff Trunks, of Acadiana, Ceiba, DC Coast, PassionFish, and TenPenh. Chicago, IL: Rick Tramonto of Tru, Tramonto Steak and Seafood, Osteria di Tramonto, RT Lounge. Miami, FL: Peter Vauthy of Red The Steakhouse; Michael Schwartz from Michael’s Genuine Food & Drink; Michelle Bernstein from Michy’s and Sra. Martinez. Seattle, WA: Dan Bugge and Chester Gerl from Matt’s In The Market. Los Angeles, CA: Brandon Boudet from Dominick’s. Phoenix, AZ: James Siao of Taggia.



73 Comments




recommended spocko — thank you for all your work on this important food safety matter
I haven’t eaten fish or shellfish since RFK, Jr talked on his Air America radio show about getting a mercury level run and having 8 times the safe level of mercury in his bloodstream from the fish in his diet.
If RFK, Jr. can’t find seafood that’s mercury free, then some boob like me is just screwed if I even touch it.
recc’d!
Spocko rocko!
We’re dead meat.
Good for you!
Alabama is sick and tired of the dog and pony show our state officials and environmental regulatory agencies trot out every chance they get to try and convince us that the “seafood is safe to eat.”
We also hear a lot of “C’mon down and swim in the ocean and enjoy our beautiful beaches.” That would be the same beaches that have BPs crud 10-15 inches below the surface.
The press keeps pushing it, but reader’s comments to media stories aren’t buying it one bit.
Interesting that it is all over. No doubt there is a group doing the promotion in your state too.
What I wish I could do would be to follow around the media talking to the chefs and see if the chefs knew that this shrimp wasn’t tested for the dispersant Corexit and it wasn’t tested for the heavy metals found in deepwater crude. I would like to have someone like Dr. Solomon or Riki Ott with me as we went with the officials from the FDA to tour the testing facilitiey so the media could heard the FDA explain why they ignored the NRDC concerns.
I would like them to admit that the testing protocols are not designed to take into account the weight of children. That they didn’t adjust the protocols for people who eat seafood more than once a week.
Instead the PR people from the White House, the FDA and the states sea food board will push the message that the seafood is safe.
Freshwater fish for me and my family only since April, and for the foreseeable future.
There’s no reason at all why the government couldn’t have been working on aquaculture alternatives to replace jobs lost or changed by the BP oil disaster. Aquaculture development would likely create more new jobs as well as safer seafood.
Instead this administration is going to try to save old jobs based on now-toxic seafood and spend money on lying to us instead. Pathetic.
Forget them go the other way on this go to every sea food joint in town eat a meal something safe maybe the clam chowder. Ask the waiter about the shrimp ask them if the shrimp tastes funny because of all that oil that spilled in the Gulf.
I did this at Red Lobster I wanted to eat sea food one last time before the Gulf Shrimp starts to come in. The waitress swore none of their shrimp came from the Gulf. She talked about fish farms etc it was obvious Red Lobster
had her Prepped ahead of time on this issue.
How many other big Sea Food chains do you think have Prepped their employees?
Get a list of the big sea food chains and see how many of them swear they are not serving Gulf shrimp how many grocery stores swear they are not serving Gulf shrimp.
It does not matter if they are telling the truth or not. Why?
Because your next story is Despite WH PR biltz to convince people Gulf shrimp are safe restaurants and grocery stores swear they don’t/won’t sell Gulf shrimp.
Why can’t the WH get people to believe them? Maybe because we heard this about the air after 9/11 maybe we saw our cats die from mercury poison maybe we remember Bush refusing to test our beef for mad cow disease.
Has the WH finally run out of trust.
It would also be interesting to see a list of restaurants and grocery stores that refuse to tell you if they serve Gulf shrimp or brag they serve Gulf shrimp especially if they are far away from the Gulf.
I suspect these places to be near poor areas rural and urban poor areas where people are less likely to sue. Can we find out who is buying Gulf shrimp and where they sell it?
I call it criminal negligence and potentially reckless homicide likely engineered by the president in yet another opaque backroom deal, this time with BP to save it and it’s shareholders, especially its majority shareholder, J.P. Morgan & Chase, from probable bankruptcy. Call it a nice gentlemanly gesture from Obama to Jamie Dimon.
I obviously don’t know this for a fact, but it’s exactly the conduct that I expect from a man like Obama who so delights in backroom deals, sellouts to the kleptocrats, and slaughtering innocent women and children with Hellfire missiles that rain down on them from drones as they clutch each other in terror hiding inside their homes.
Absolutely incomprehensible that any responsible human being would support a policy to deliberately not test Gulf seafood for the presence of known carcinogens present in oil and Corexit.
President Obama is a war criminal and a psychopath. He should resign now for the good of the country.
very informative post.
An eye opener for me a few years ago, was the story of the deal making (covered by a very good article in “the nation” )
to use lead in gasoline, way back when.
which resulted in fifty years or so of spreading lead around North America.
These are the things that reveal very clearly the low regard of many of those in power for health and welfare of the people of their own and other countries.
“I looked these 12 shrimp in the eye, and I can tell that it’s safe to eat them”
Excellent coverage. Recommended!
After reading this it’s clear that the differences between Obama and Bush continue to shrink each day.
If the shrimp is so safe will the FDA encourage private testing of the shrimp to help reassure people its really safe?
After that Englisf farm minister fed his kids beef on tv to prove it was safe a few months before England decided to kill all its mad cow infected cows nobody really expects any government to stand up to Big Food lobby over people’s safety.
I think the differences are expanding, rather than shrinking, as Obama passed Bush long ago on the highway to Hell, and with each passing day he resolutely marches onward to become the most hated and despised man on the planet.
I think he is doing what Bush would have done if he won a third term. He is getting worse than Bush but he is building on the foundation Bush built. I don’t see anything original Obama.
Would you like a side of Corexit Sauce with that? – The Obama Administration
This is one of those times I’m rather glad that I don’t like to eat crustaceans, including oysters, shrimp, crab, lobsters, and clams. And tho I do like most of the lighter types of fish, I’m willing to limit myself to the occasional fresh water fish and be done with it.
I try to discourage people from eating arthropods anyway. Mollusks too.
Oysters and clams are mollusks. Shrimp, crab and lobsters are Crustaceans which is of the Phylum Arthropoda. Oysters and clams are of the phylum of Molluska and the class of bivalvia.
What concerns do you have in general re: human consumption of healthy (not poisoned with crude oil, natural gas, byproducts and corexit) arthropods?
And yes, that means when you are eating any crustacean, you are essentially eating a giant bug. No thanks, not for this girl.
Well, whatever they are, I’ve tried all of them and pretty much disliked the lot
Nothing at all except for what is in my comment #22. :)
excellent work, spocko. I’m glad you’re staying on this important issue. Recommended. Glad to see this hitting the front page.
I remember that story about lead! Very sick. You have to wonder about the people whose job it is to promote stuff they know to be dangerous. I know some of them. I know a guy who did PR for the tobacco industry. He had all sorts of rationalizations, just like a lawyer who defends killers and thugs.
Part of the reason that the O admin is encouraging citizens to eat from the Gulf is because it lowers BP’s threshold of liability. I just sent this post to my family in New Orleans. Hey! family!
Catfish is safe to eat. Most of it is farmed raised in Belzoni, Ms. and shipped all over the country.
Bugs are good for you. Ask any Cajun.
Yep we all rationalize things. I used to rationalize when I worked for DoD and support contractors that I was mostly working on communications systems so maybe with good comm, it could stop something bad from happening.
Farming any fish is VERY bad for the planet. :)
I AM a Cajun or technically half a Cajun. Bugs are good for YOU, not me. ;)
Well I “rationalized” working on F-14s by the fact that it was what I was trained to do and when I joined, I needed a job. I don’t get why most people would rather offer a lame rationalization rather than the ugly truth: It pays and it’s what I know how to do.
I know but at least we have something to eat. Was reading yesterday about the exploding populations around the world and what will happen because of the shortage of food and water. Truly scary.
I made a point of going into an “admin” field with the AF and wound up working in Accounting and Finance, paying bills. Fifteen months each in MI and HI paying Commissary (grocery store) bills then 2 1/2 years running the accounting system and dealing with the data processing shop in HI.
Thanks NDFG! On one hand it seems so pointless. This is a multimillion dollar effort to get people to consumer gulf seafood. As I said in my other posts, the media need the deaths of at least 300 white children to go from “balancing” the health of the people with the health of the fishing industry.
5000 people die a year of food poisoning, yet they aren’t the right people so things don’t change.
The PR campaign is very well organized on their side. There is no one calling up all the chefs and saying. “Hey, don’t serve this stuff to kids or pregnant women!” *My friend MD suggested I do that.*
No one is calling the press and saying, “Did the FDA tell you why they aren’t testing for heavy metals? Did they explain why they are using a looser standard for this oil spill than the others? Ask em.”
The media is actually raising some questions. Many are doing the ‘on the one hand on the other hand” but they don’t have powerful enough questions and data to puncture the spin of the FDA. And that is a problem.
You have to go with your strengths. I would have been a crappy administrator.
What do we want? Birth Control! When do we want it? Now!
That is exactly right Mary. Hi to your family! I have a group of friends there, including chefs. I hate to get them in the middle of this. This is BP’s fault and the FDA isn’t doing their job.
It pisses me off that the FDA can simply ignore data and use weak science to put kids and pregnant women at risk. That whole ‘protect the unborn’ deal should kick in for the right.
As I said, this isn’t drop dead next week stuff. This is “your kids who eat a lot of Gulf seafood have a greater chance to get cancer or have neurological problems in the future. It is like mercury poisoning.
We saw what happened with 9/11 and the EPA. This is an opportunity to change the future. Too bad our time machine only goes one direction.
They are called entrepreneurs.
It kind of shocked me to learn that dealing with the numbers became a bit of fun. Especially tracking down the transposition errors and such when accounts didn’t balance.
I guess that was part of the same semi-anal attitudes that made me learn to love QA.
There’s a right way and a wrong way to do most of these jobs and seemed easier to do things the right way.
Something the EPA, NOAA, and FDA and a lot of other organizations need to learn
Did you know that in France there don’t have a word for entrepreneurs?
The FDA has been the number one target of the Libertarians even before the environmentalists came along.
fascinating.
I would move to France in a New York minute if I could.
You know if they actually opened up their data to the public and the scientists were could have people like you point out the errors and hidden problems. But they don’t. They are going to wait until someone files a FOIA request and then 4 years from now find out the truth.
Wish that would happen but with the Catholic Church controlling so many people, it’s not likely to be soon. Also lack of education and availability.
really? all this time I thought that entrepreneurs was a Frenchy kinda word.
I hear their Freedom Fries are delicious.
It’s like the French have a different word for everything.
/Steve Martin.
Hi Spocko – it’s me, CPM….
Fantastic work all around. I particularly like the part about “guilt over economic destruction” because that is a potent issue that NOBODY wants to talk about, least of all the WH. They’re too busy being friends with criminals like BP instead of vilifying them and truly making them pay. Which we all know won’t happen. How much, at the end of the day, did Exxon pay out? .10 on the dollar? A penny? There’s what BP will pay.
Hi!
See my comment 36. I get tired of balancing the health of kids with the profits of the oil and shrimp industries.
Late to the thread….Kirk Murphy wrote a post more than a year ago about farm raised fish, and that was the end for me. I will eat only wild caught seafood.
Do you have a link to back up this assertion? A chemical analysis?
These are ALWAYS carcinogenic. Benzene, toluene, xylene, and naphthalene are some of these.
Those are Dr. Solomon’s words from that post. More data in the FDA and NOAA PDFs embedded in that link.
http://bit.ly/aM0Jv6
recommended spocko…
Book Salon up with Bruce Fein’s American Empire Before the Fall hosted by Glenn Greenwald
had me going there.
Many moons ago, my friend told me that he believed in interspecies and even interphylum dating. he said there was a little mollusk he had his eye on.
Minor nit to pick – of the chemicals you listed, only naphthalene is polycyclic. However, they are all aromatic hydrocarbons, and at least the monocyclics are ALL carcinogenic, although varying in degree of carcinogenic toxicity, with benzene being the worst by far, followed by toluene, then xylene. Toluene and xylene in high frequent doses – e.g., ‘huffing glue’ for toluene – will cause more immediately manifested types of damage long before any carcinogenic effects show up. Naphthalene may be carcinogenic for humans, but in high doses it causes other problems first, particularly destruction of red blood cells.
Yes, and the anti-regulation “libertarians” have scored some victories too, although not via open debate in Congress. The story of the Data Quality Act – formally known as the Information Quality Act – is a case in point.
That link provided above provides a pretty good and concise history of how the DQA/IQA came about. For more on the history of the DQA, a Boolean-type online search like this – ["data quality act" AND Tozzi AND Emerson] – will cough up more hits.
Last time I checked on Jim Tozzi, he was flittering around in DC, trying to get pot legalized, or at least decriminalized. I suppose that could help ease the suffering of cancer patients, who may be in their predicament thanks to his surreptitiously introduced Data Quality Act.
Seven-term GOP Congresswoman Jo Ann Emerson (MO-8) is now in the minority party in the House – at least through Jan. 2011 – but she’s apparently still a good li’l GOP trooper, who now has more seniority, so she likely gets assigned to powerful committees where she can presumably still do mischief, especially if GOP gains the majority in the next session.
Has anyone in the government responded to this? Have you tried sending this missive directly to Hamburg and some other high official? I don’t know the science involved but it sounds dire. Should someone e mail your letter or concerns to the fda? you have a lot of cc on your letter. Hopefully someone has taken it seriously and has responded. Have they even acknowledged it?
I doubt very strongly that Obama is feeding Gulf anything to HIS kids. I was with a party of 4 at a local restaurant here in Ann Arbor and a shrimp dish was on the menu. I asked the shrimp’s provenance and the waiter claimed ignorance. Needless to say, no one ordered that dish.
Since Aug. 17 I have written the FDA and called them. There have been no responses. The FDA and NOAA did meet with Dr. Solomon last week, but no word about if they are going to do anything different.
The event is going ahead as scheduled. What I’m trying to do here is amplify the work of the NRDC and other groups like LEAN (Louisiana Environmental Action Network) who just did some of their own independent testing and the results are grim.
It’s a nice trick to get the FDA to become the PR arm for Louisiana Seafood Promotion & Marketing Board. As maxshelby said in number 5. This action is going around around at all the states.
Imagine the FDA going on press tour for a drug whose testing protocols are in doubt. Imagine the officials being asked by the White House to push the new drug to help the drug company. Would the FDA need to at least put some disclaimers on their promotions.
Based on the excellent work by Eddie Gehman Kohan of Obama Foodorama, we can guess fairly accurately what Obama’s kids eat. But like any parent knows, kids don’t always want to eat what they are eating.
We DO know that Gulf Seafood and shrimp were consumed by Obama and Michelle.
Thank you, spocko. My guess is they’re yelling the lies long enough for the American public to forget recent history. Shouldn’t take much longer before Wild Caught USA shrimp are all the rage again.
Yet another example of why the free market doesn’t work.
(As if we needed one)
Well, anybody who avoids fish because of fear of mercury ought to look inside their mouths and count the 3 of “silver” fillings they have. Apparently, mercury is only safely stored in the human mouth.
A couple of French shysters came up with the recipe in the late 1800′s and the Dental Association in America went under because they wouldn’t put any of that harmful shit in their patients mouths…but the dentists saw an opportunity to “make money!” so the ADA was formed which has stood by their poisoning of the Aemrican people ever since.
Guess what, when those fillings are removed, they must, by law be placed in a hazardous waste container….so….
But they will tell you it’s the alarmists who want to “make money!” by removing the stuff and putting safer material in your mouth.
Meanwhile Europe has all but banned putting the mercury fillings in people’s heads.
I had all mine taken out years ago and I recommend never allowing a dentist to put that stuff in your head even if you don’t rush to have it removed, don’t put anymore in there.
Amalgam (Mercury Fillings): The Great Dangers
Scientifically Proven Facts
About Dental Amalgam (Mercury Fillings)
It’s just crazy how our government allows the people of thsi country to be poisoned.
Here’s some more:
Corporate Meteors Strike US Gulf
(They Got the Whole World In Their Hands)
Yes. That’s one of the sheep’s clothes they try to hide there agenda under. Who can argue about palliative and curative medications being available as soon as possible.
What the libertarian/business community wants however is freedom to market to the public whatever poison they wish with no consequences. Think Lead, asbestos, tobacco and all those great carcinogenic plastics, cleaning agents. etc.
The marine biologists who discovered the plumes which were the size of Manhattan Island have now discovered that rather than evaporating, the plumes are coating the bottom of the gulf.
This will impact seafood quality.
“Yet another example of why the free market doesn’t work.”
Greetings doremus29. Your statement oozes with negativity. The free market works very well.
It just doesn’t work for the people. It only works for the ultra-greedy kleptomaniacs who run the country. But to say it doesn’t work, well look around you. I see a decaying, bankrupt wannabe third world country. We only have money for war and the wealthy. But to say that the free market doesn’t work, well look around.
Are the lawyers who defend killers and thugs entrepreneurs too? Or are they a different category of scum-bag?
(It was spocko’s observation, not yours.)
Mercury (Hg) is an element deserving of careful handling and great respect. However, I would dispute your claims about the dangers of Hg amalgam fillings, and counter your links with a few of my own – see below. Hg compounds – especially metallo-organics (e.g., methylmercury) and soluble salts – are a lot nastier than the pure metal, let alone dental amalgams, by virtue of their bioavailability. If ingested, inhaled or absorbed through the skin, they are highly toxic. The vapors from pure Hg are toxic as well; when Hg is “tied up” in a properly prepared amalgam, the vapor pressure of mercury is negligible at body temperature.
Bearing in mind that I’m not a biochemist or medicinal chemist, I will say that we don’t yet know all the possible genetically determined biochemical variations among people out there. So who knows, there may be one out of one million (or whatever) people who have a rare sensitivity to mercury at extremely low doses in its zero-valent form, as found in the pure metal, or even in a dental amalgam. At such rare frequency, clinical testing won’t likely find it. But I would say that possibility might exist for any medicinal treatment, whether natural or laboratory-developed.
As another example, it might be instructive to discuss the differences between barium (Ba) and most of its compounds, which are toxic (pure Ba metal is highly reactive and alkaline in addition); and barium sulfate, used to make the “milk shakes” that radiology patients have to chug down prior to X-ray imaging of their GI tract. Barium sulfate is an extremely stable, extremely insoluble compound, wherein the barium is chemically “tied up” by the sulfate to form an insoluble and unreactive salt, so it cannot dissolve and pass through the wall of the intestines and enter the bloodstream. Such would not be the case for many, if not most, other Ba compounds, and their hazards are rated accordingly; they certainly are not used in any medicinal treatments that I know of.
OK, the promised/threatened references that basically report no widespread problems with mercury amalgam fillings:
Good news you didn’t read on mercury fillings
Mercury Must Be Bad – If Not in Vaccines, In Teeth
The “Mercury Toxicity” Scam: How Anti-Amalgamists Swindle People
Mercury Fillings Held Health Harmless in Kids
Boyd Haley, a Professor of Chemistry who has gone full crackpot on mercury
Reckless lies and those who tell them – the case of the dishonest Australasian Society of Oral Medicine And Toxicology
As far as the banning of mercury amalgams in Europe goes, it looks like that happened in at least the Scandinavian countries, although it was apparently due to hazards posed to the workers in dental offices, rather than the patients. See comments in this post;* actually, danger to dental office workers would, in itself, be a pretty damn good reason for such a ban. Were the Scandinavian dental offices “doing it wrong”, or is this not getting attention in other countries? Beats me.
*There may be a bit of the Gish Gallop taking place there; an unfortunate but common practice – equivalent of Campaign of Attrition, as applied to arguments – frequently found in controversial medical discussions, and battles over evolution, atmospheric global warming, etc.
One more link:
Nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and mercury exposure among children with and without dental amalgam fillings