(UPDATED BELOW)
As I’m writing this it’s 11:30 pm PST here in SF. Occupy evictions are happening in LA and Philly. If something goes pear shaped at the evictions there will be a world wide coverage by the media. Like a good psychic, I want to get my predictions down and posted before the event so later I can say, “I predicted this!” I also want to suggest to people what they can do instead of just watching and shaking their head if my predictions come true.
I want to remind everyone:
If there is reported protester on cop violence DON’T ASSUME THAT IT IS TRUE.
Do not trust the official spokespeople from the police.
Do not trust the first reports from the media when they say OccupyLA or OccupyPhilly protesters fired a shot, threw a bottle, punched a cop, etc.
Do not trust reports that the shooter/rock thrower is an actual OWS member and believer in OWS goals and principles as outlined by the GA.
Remember what we learned in Oakland– when the media covers a chaotic event like this, they rely on authorities to tell them what happened. In many cases they don’t even trust their own eyes/cameras.
Why not trust media reports that some Occupy Wall Street protester shot at cops? Because anyone can come to the event. The Black Bloc Vandals clearly didn’t follow the non-violent principles of OWS and the methods that the group had decided upon. But when they started smashing stuff they became “The Occupy protesters” (Fortunately for us they wore black and masks and it was daylight.)
If some Black Bloc vandal, agent provocateur, Blackwater mercenary or random crazy person starts shooting, the first media reports will be that is an Occupy protester.
It will take time for the shooter to be identified, caught and brought in for questioning. Then we will need to find out and his intentions and his connection or lack of connection to the cause and their history of violence or inciting violence.
Hopefully we will have film of the shooting but it will be dark and chaotic. We can then look at the footage to see who did what when, but who is going to do this leg work? Not the media. They already have their story! They will run with the headline, “Occupiers shot at cops!” Because that is all they know by deadline time.
The “embedded media” won’t be out there trying to find out the truth about the identity of someone shooting, or throwing bottles because they will be part of the group advancing on the people.
What You Can do Following a Report of Protester on Cop Violence.
1) Challenge the assumption that the violent protester(s) are actually Occupy Wall Street protesters.
The media move fast, they don’t believe it is their job to know who started the violence, just that it started. If someone looks like an Occupy Wall Street protester, they are an OWS protester, even if they are an editor from the Right Wing publication American Spectator who is at the protest specifically to discredit the movement.
2) Scour all the footage and photos you can find of the instigators of the violence at the protest.
3) Crowd-source the images and ask for help identifying them.
4) Write a post about it on a blog with info on the person(s) and their background.
5) Contact the media and demand that they update their story when new facts are found out. Suggest they remember how to use the word “alleged” again.
We need to do this because the media won’t. And we need to act fast because the official story needs to be challenged or it gets solidified.
Remember during the Oakland police crack down the police spokespeople said, “We aren’t using flash bang grenades, the protesters are throwing fire crackers and M-80′s”? This was incorrect. Was that intentional or was the spokesperson just out of touch? We don’t know, but the media ran with that because that was the official story. They could have looked at their own footage, but that would be like calling the spokesperson a liar. That’s just not done.
It wasn’t until a blogger analyzed the video and then highlighted the police throwing the grenade that the official narrative had to be changed.
If it hadn’t been for that analysis and then distribution of that video to the world the media would probably still be running the police party line. The interesting thing was that it was KTVU footage that was used by the blogger, but KTVU didn’t break the story, they just ran with the official line.
The good news is that there are still lots of cameras and video at the Occupy events even if they are not “official media”, but the time between identifying the shooter and the finding out he will take awhile and in the gap it will be “OWS shoots at cops!” from the MSM. The right wing will be trumpeting how the cops had to protect themselves. (I mean look at how the cops said they were “cut off” up in Davis. That was clearly not true but they said it anyway. The video shows what a lie it was.)
This is my prediction. I’ve been 3 and 0 for predicting what will happen at OWS events. I’m not sure if this will happen at these two evictions, but I’m pretty sure that it will at an eviction and I want us to be prepared to be the media since the MSM aren’t on our side anymore. They haven’t been for years. They picked their side, they have embedded with the 1%.
UPDATED: 11/30/2011
So it’s 2:12pm PST after the event. It appears that in the case of the OccupyLA and OccupyPhilly evictions my tricorder looking into the future was wrong. (Probably because I had to use stone knives and bearskins to make the circuits in this century, but I digress.) Unlike other prognosticators I’ll admit when I guessed wrong. I’m pleasantly surprised and glad that someone didn’t hijack the event with violence. Violence that would be attributed to OWS protesters.
I respond further to Popeye below. I might just be early in my predictions, but my suggestions for how to respond to an eviction that does appear to be protester on cop violence still applies. We need to prep for the instant misinformation that will be slotted into standard news stories, and we need to do some quick research to help the media tell the truth. We now have the tools to do this.



12 Comments

Thanks, Spocko, your experience and hard-earned wisdom about official versions is appreciated
Thank you, spocko.
Recommended to the serious consideration of everyone at FDL.
This is a warning “label” which should be applied to EVERY “official statement” and every glib media “report” regarding alleged violence at any and every Occupy.
DW
Foreclosures and evictions R what they do. Move along folks nothing to see here.
Recommended Spocko. Why anyone here at FDL would trust the MSM is beyond my comprehension. Thanks for showing us how to fight back. We are all in this together. This is only the beginning.
Thanks Popeye.
So it’s 2:12pm after the event. It appears that in the case of the OccupyLA and OccupyPhilly evictions my tricorder looking into the future was wrong. Unlike other prognosticators I’ll admit when I guessed wrong. I’m pleasantly surprised and glad that someone didn’t hijack the event with violence. Violence that would be attributed to OWS protesters.
Or maybe, like my other predictions, I’m about two days early. (My predictions of agent provocateurs, undercover cops, police lying about their grenades and vandals were about two – four days after I wrote about them. So I’m not ready to say this was a failed prediction just yet.
But my suggestions still apply. I think one of the most troubling aspects of the OccupyLA eviction was the media “embedding” with the police. That is really messed up and it co-opts the media.
One of the other things that that I’ve learned is that when authorities overreact that is an opportunity to look at that story. Now the story has gone from issues of Occupy (Lack of accountability, the need for regulation of financial services, income being funneled from the 99% to the 1% to pay for gambling loses, etc) to issue of Free Speech and police militarization.
These are both worthy issues and issues that need to be addressed as well.
The parallel with me was when I was contacting advertisers about the violent rhetoric on talk radio. The ABC/Disney lawyers shut down my blog using a bogus cease and desist order. That become the issue. I was prepared for it, and I used that “news event” to remind people what it was that I was trying to point out as well as my methods and concepts.
The media like simple visuals and stories that they can tell that don’t require people to understand complex financial transaction.
It’s an easy, X vs. Y story to show and tell. But we can, and should use it to push both the new issues of police militarization as well as the original movement issues. “Why were these people out in the park in the first place? What has made them so angry and concerned they are willing to be arrested an pepper sprayed?”
“Why were these people out in the park in the first place? What has made them so angry and concerned they are willing to be arrested an pepper sprayed?”
That is the 100K question that the PTB either don’t care about or don’t realize. Your analysis is usually spot on. I have learned a lot from you. Yours is a respected voice here.
Recommended and thanks Spocko!!! Damn you give great advice!!!
Spocko—what you were right about was that it was an eviction and things would get violent—that is, if this post on Occupy LA’s website sounds credible to you.
It sounds credible to me, worth following up.
The “story” of the eviction of LA was masterfully controlled right from the beginning when they let all those people come down there and then didn’t do anything, right through to the pool reporters.
http://www.occupylosangeles.org/?q=node%2F2445
I just read that story Cindi. That is interesting.
I spoke to the guy was trying to stop the Black Bloc vandals from breaking windows. He told me, “Next time I’m going to get a Helmet Cam so that My hands are free and I can see the faces of people.
It sounds like they don’t have video or photos of the beatings, and that is too bad.
Helmet cam–good idea. No photo or videos, apparently, otherwise we’d probably have seen them…..
That doesn’t mean it didn’t happen, though..I don’t think anyone videotaped the beatings in MacArthur Park in 2007 but they got in big trouble for that.
I’ll be curious to see what other stories come out..
So did you write about your campaign with those advertisers..is it still online? I had not heard of anyone doing that to protest talk radio. Some of those radio performers are really crazy.
http://www.spockosbrain.com/2009/01/brief-spocko-story
Here are two stories about it in the MSM
http://articles.sfgate.com/2007-01-11/news/17225265_1_media-corporation-media-bloggers-association-digital-age
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/15/technology/15radio.html
Two of those crazy radio performers got fired, not for the crazy, but because I showed the management that what they thought was an asset,the hosts, was actually a liability. KSFO lost 32 advertisers and millions of revenue following my program of alerting the advertisers. I taught the techniques to the group hatehurtsamerica.org who used it on Michael Savage and cost him a million in revenue and 18 advertisers. I also advised Color of Change and worked with them on the program to get advertisers to leave the Glenn Beck TV show.
Glenn Beck did not provide the kind of revenue for his show that Murdoch wanted so he was pushed out. Economically he was costing them money and they didn’t want to subsidize them anymore.
Here is the story of when I called up Rupert Murdoch during his conference call and asked him how long will he keep subsidizing Glenn Beck. It turned out one year from the month I asked the question!
http://my.firedoglake.com/spocko/2010/05/12/rupert-and-me-i-question-the-newscorp-ceo-about-subsidizing-glenn-beck-5/
Sadly one of the K S F O hosts is still employed. I think the only reason he is is that he was the least expensive host. Also, after I caught him in an egregious comment and took it to the advertisers he sometimes apologized… until the next time he said it. I don’t what he had on the management, but they kept giving him a pass. The funny thing is that their covering for him eventually cost them their jobs!