The Associated Press has a breaking investigative story out today revealing that the Obama Administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) censored a smoking gun scientific report in March 2012 that it had contracted out to a scientist who conducted field data on 32 water samples in Weatherford, TX.
That report, according to the AP, would have explicitly linked methane migration to hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) in Weatherford, a city with 25,000+ citizens located in the heart of the Barnett Shale geologic formation 30 minutes from Dallas.
It was authored by Geoffrey Thyne, a geologist formerly on the faculty of the Colorado School of Mines and University of Wyoming before departing from the latter for a job in the private sector working for Interralogic Inc. in Ft Collins, CO.
This isn’t the first time Thyne’s scientific research has been shoved aside, either. Thyne wrote two landmark studies on groundwater contamination in Garfield County, CO, the first showing that it existed, the second confirming that the contamination was directly linked to fracking in the area.
It’s the second study that got him in trouble.
“Thyne says he was told to cease his research by higher-ups. He didn’t,” The Checks and Balances Project explained. ”And when it came to renew his contract, Thyne was cut loose.”
From Smoking Gun to Censorship: Range Resources Link
The Obama EPA’s Weatherford, TX study was long-in-the-making, with its orgins actually dating back to a case of water contamination in 2010. The victim: Steve Lipsky.
“At first, the Environmental Protection Agency believed the situation was so serious that it issued a rare emergency order in late 2010 that said at least two homeowners were in immediate danger from a well saturated with flammable methane,” the AP wrote.
AP proceeded to explain that Lipsky had “reported his family’s drinking water had begun ‘bubbling’ like champagne” and that his “well…contains so much methane that the…water [is] pouring out of a garden hose [that] can be ignited.”
The driller in this case was a corporation notorious for intimidating local communities and governmental officials at all levels of governance: Range Resources. Range, in this case, set up shop for shale gas production in a “wooded area about a mile from Lipsky’s home,” according to the AP.
As DeSmogBlog revealed in November 2011, Range Resources utilizes psychological warfare techniques as part of its overarching public relations strategy.
Due to the grave health concerns associated with the presence of methane and benzene in drinking water, the Obama EPA “ordered Range…to take steps to clean their water wells and provide affected homeowners with safe water,” wrote the AP.
Range’s response? It “threatened not to cooperate” with the Obama EPA’s study on fracking’s link to water contamination. The non-cooperation lead to the Obama EPA suing Range Resources.
It was during this phase of the struggle where things got interesting. As the AP explained,
Believing the case was headed for a lengthy legal battle, the Obama EPA asked an independent scientist named Geoffrey Thyne to analyze water samples taken from 32 water wells. In the report obtained by the AP, Thyne concluded from chemical testing that the gas in the drinking water could have originated from Range Resources’ nearby drilling operation.
Despite this smoking gun, everything was soon shut down, with the Obama EPA reversing its emergency order, terminating the court battle and censoring Thyne’s report. The AP explained that the Obama EPA has “refused to answer questions about the decision.”
“I just can’t believe that an agency that knows the truth about something like that, or has evidence like this, wouldn’t use it,” Lipsky, who now pays $1,000 a month to have water hauled to his family’s house, told the AP.
“Duke Study” Co-Author Confirms Veracity of Thyne’s Study
Robert Jackson, a Professor of Global Environmental Change at Duke University and co-author of the “Duke Study” linking fracking to groundwater contamination did an independent peer review of Thyne’s censored findings. He found that it is probable that the methane in Lipsky’s well water likely ended up there thanks to the fracking process.
Range predictably dismissed Thyne and Jackson as “anti-industry.”
Americans Against Fracking: An “Unconscionable” Decision
Americans Against Fracking summed up the situation best in a scathing press release:
It is unconscionable that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which is tasked with safeguarding our nation’s vital natural resources, would fold under pressure to the oil and gas industry…It is again abundantly clear that the deep pocketed oil and gas industry will stop at nothing to protect its own interests, even when mounting scientific evidence shows that drilling and fracking pose a direct threat to vital drinking water supplies.
There’s also a tragic human side to this tale.
“This has been total hell,” Lipsky told the AP. “It’s been taking a huge toll on my family and on our life.”
Image by pingting under Creative Commons license




17 Comments

So: The Obama Administration is Conspiring to Poison the citizens of Texas, right?
Corporate whores do what’s best for their masters.
We voted for a New World Order, replete with drones, Bush clones, and now moans, when we learn that even Romney might have been kinder to the environment. Too many will never oppose the great prophet, the orator, the bringer of good tidings and bad results.
Rec’d, Steve.
“Too many will never oppose the great prophet, the orator, the bringer of good tidings and bad results.”
It’s cognitive dissonance. One of the hardest things for people to do is to admit they’ve been stupid enough to be fooled, so they double-down on their erroneous beliefs.
This from the POTUS that told Lisa Jackson that politics had to step aside for science several months ago with respect to EPA enforcements and decisions.
Yeah, right! Obama has not missed a single mistake, has he? He blows everything so far as the public is concerned.
And that there is your Obummer. If he’s any different than Romney, it’s in ways that do not matter one bit. You can all drink poison, get cancer and die for all he cares—-he and his millionaire business creeps got theirs.
Noticed today that the producers of the pro-fracking film Frack Nation, started having Sean Hannity do live ads for the movie today. Hannity claims over 12 million listeners.
If only someone could mention this study on the air, it would force the industry toadies to get on the record – why do they pay to suppress science?
In NY state, it was revealed in hearings on fracking that drillers have bought the silence of landowners for decades, effectively erasing the incidents from official consideration in crucial studies.
Why in God’s name are we allowing this? FEDERAL LOOPHOLES, carve outs and exemptions from everything from pollution regulation to liability and future clean up. This was a Dick Cheney special, done while breaking a law called the Federal Advisory Committee Act which required lawmakers to reveal any corporate “advisors” present in legislative committee meetings.
Cheney took this to the Supreme Court and won the right to keep secret who met with lawmakers in creating policy. The 2005 Bush-Cheney Energy Act gave fracking a huge advantage over oil and coal, exempting it from the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, Superfund clean up liability and much more.
If you love your kids, leave them solar panels and not hundreds of thousands of holes in the ground – they will have to pay forever to monitor and repair the spent wells as erosion and land shift endangers the precious water supply.
Recommended!
For more documentation see also Environment – http://newprogs.org/blog/2011/11/08/environment-under-democraticrepublican-uni-party
Recommended, and thanks for posting on this.
However, I can’t help but wonder why activists are not doing a better job on this issue, and using it not just to deal with fracking, but also, simultaneously, using the issue to deal with our corrupt system of government that allows the common good to be sacrificed for the $$ of the few. Who is transforming fracking revelations into reform candidates, and reform-minded citizens who are pledging to vote for the reform candidates, if and when they appear?
I think that fracking, and also GMO’s, are the issues par excellence, which can be used to galvanize the torpid and demoralized American sheeple into aggressive voting blocs – left and right. Furthermore, fracking and GMO’s can be used to build alliances between left and right – and I do mean sooner, rather than later.
The reason is that the dangers are a) emotional b) easy to grasp (thanks to disturbing visuals of flaming faucets and grossly tumerous rats c) near at home d) threaten you and your family’s life sooner rather than later and e) aren’t prone to ideological skewing. (c) is important because, human nature being what it is, people care more about horrors that threaten them and their family. There are stunningly aweful pictures of deformed Iraqi babies from Fallujah, compliments of American Depleted Uranium and other chemical horrors, but they don’t threaten American babies, and thus, unfortunately, the public that becomes aware of DU deformities tunes it out.)
e) means: no matter your ideology or politics, you are unlikely to evaluate GMO’s and fracking from an ideological perspective. This raises intriguing possibilities for developing transpartisan alliances.
I’ve made the point, previously, and I’ve since noticed that Naomi Klein has made the point, that disaster activism should shadow disasters, as surely as disaster capitalism looks to exploit disasters though for selfish purposes. Since we are fated to suffer disasters, compliments of our dysfunctional society, we may as well use those unfortunate events to turn “lemons into lemonade”.
There are no shortage of issues to concern people, but the sorts of issues that satisfy the conditions a) through e), that I list above, are few and far between.
======================
I’ve made similar comments in a diary or two addressed to Green Party supporters during the last election, but just talking about GMO’s. See What Would it Take for Stein/Honkala to Break Out of the 2% Ghetto? Hint: Go Nuclear.
See also Mediocre Ado About Quite Something (CA Proposition 37 – Mandatory GMO labeling)
Similar to the corruption involved years ago, in the addition of tetra-ethyl lead to gasoline to stop “engine knocking”
corruption and money allowed the used of lead, which of course was well known to be poison.
and so who knows how many people were damaged by that corrupt decision.
Doesn’t matter. industrial collateral damage
The problem really is the loosening of environmental standards over the years and the collusion with industry that has been ongoing for quite some time.
Don’t miss the work that ProPublica has been doing on these issues also:
Poisoning the Well: How the Feds Let Industry Pollute the Nation’s Underground Water Supply
http://www.propublica.org/article/poisoning-the-well-how-the-feds-let-industry-pollute-the-nations-undergroun
“Supreme Court Justice”
Oh, and let’s not forget MTBE (Methyl tert-butyl ether) another octane boosting additive that was used as a replacement for tetra-ethyl lead. It is a particularly nasty water contaminant and is no longer in use (phased out and replaced with ethenol). For more see the wiki article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methyl_tert-butyl_ether
Shouldn’t we be making efforts to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and move towards alternatives that are less destructive to the environment? There are places for petroleum, gas, and coal. Do we have to use so much though? Just askin. Oh wait, I have my answer. Too many wealthy and powerful people have a vested interest in the status quo.
♫ Looks like we all got took:
The President is a crook!
http://youtu.be/SnzVqb1JZ4o
Can Keystone XL be far behind?
I’m confused on this. If the epa was suing for contamination, and the eveidence was coming back in favor of their position, why shut it down? Why even bother suing in the first place?