Romanoff is known in Colorado for his love of dogs, and today he got the endorsement from the Big Dog himself — President Clinton.
In endorsing Romanoff, Clinton is bucking the national party, who has made no secret of it’s support for any incumbent (i.e. Specter).
Here’s the whole email
PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON
June 29, 2010
Dear Friend,
I first met Andrew Romanoff in 1992, when he was a student at the Kennedy School of Government and I was a candidate for President. Four years later, I was running for a second term, and he had just been elected to his first — as one of Colorado’s representatives on the Democratic National Committee.
I was proud to carry Colorado in 1992, but you should be even prouder of what Andrew Romanoff did to turn the state blue. He worked harder than anyone in Colorado to put Democrats in positions of power — and to use that power to benefit every single citizen.
Andrew led the effort to win a majority in the Colorado House of Representatives for the first time in 30 years, and to keep that majority for the first time in more than 40 years. He built the largest Democratic majority since John F. Kennedy was President.
Even more important, Andrew took on Colorado’s biggest challenges and made enormous progress. As the first Democratic Speaker of the House since 1976, he:
* Put together an Economic Recovery Plan to bring good jobs to Colorado and balance the state budget.
* Passed the largest investment in school construction in state history — a billion-dollar plan to repair, rebuild and modernize schools, especially in rural Colorado.
* Protected Coloradans from the threats they face every day: insurers who deny their claims and refuse to honor their policies, scam artists who prey on seniors and bilk them out of their life savings, polluters who destroy the environment and expect somebody else to pay for the damages.Andrew won. Colorado won.
In 2008, the editors of Governing Magazine honored Andrew as "Public Official of the Year." They recognized in Andrew the same qualities that the National Conference of State Legislatures, the Council of State Governments, and more than 50 other organizations had already seen — integrity, courage, compassion. Simply put, Andrew Romanoff is one of the best legislative leaders in the United States.
Colorado is far better off today because of Andrew Romanoff’s leadership. America will be too.
As a Senator, Andrew Romanoff will continue to stand up to special interests and fight for working families. We need Andrew’s leadership in Washington — especially now, when so many Americans are losing so much. "It is not enough," as Andrew put it at the Colorado Democratic Assembly last month, "to put a President of real talent and vision and leadership in the White House if the same qualities are not matched at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue."
Andrew won the state assembly by 21 points. With your help, he’ll win the primary and the general election.
Andrew brings to this race both an extraordinary record of public service and an extraordinary capacity to lead. I believe that those assets, as well as his deep commitment to Colorado, give him the best chance to hold this seat in November.
I support Andrew Romanoff, and I hope you will too. Please make a generous contribution to his campaign today.
Sincerely,
Bill Clinton
Regardless of people’s view of the former president (I know some people love him, some not so much), this is a HUGE win for the Romanoff campaign. Clinton is willing to put his name on the line (and probably catch hell from Obama and the DSCC) for a real progressive out here in Colorado.



12 Comments







As an activist out here in the great squarestate (also the name of our local progressive blog), I’m thrilled to see this. The campaign sent out an email that they are about to go up on TV (ballots drop mid July even though the primary is in August — it’s almost all mail-in). Andrew is a big advocate for the netroots, and could use any support you can send.
Kind of bucks the idea that Clinton just does what Obama wants…
Got that in my email today, and I was SHOCKED!
I want to know what’s going on; Bennet is Obama’s chosen stooge, where Andy clearly won’t be. So why is Bill getting involved?
This wasn’t whimsy or an idle endorsement on Clinton’s part. I’m verrrrrry curious!
“I want to know what’s going on.”
The Clinton’s are starting to distance themselves from Obama.
O.’s numbers are going down, and while political approval of a president bounces around some, the auguries for Obama are pretty lousy. A lot of shitty chickens are going to be coming in for a landing.
I’ve been saying for the entire 18 months of Obama’s stint in office that if his numbers get way low, like, in the 30′s, There’s a 50-50 chance that Hillary will bail out of State to run against him in 2012.
Obama’s hole card is that a lot of democrats are so afraid of the republicans and their loons, that they will stick with Obama no matter what he does, but I think there are limits to that.
We’re only 16 weeks from the mid-terms. I think very few democrats running in November will be asking Mr. Centrist to campaign for and with, them. That will be a pretty good yardstick for how much political manna he has left, after squandering an Exxon-Valdez of it, in 18 short months.
Romanoff was going to win anyway, right? Clinton’s just doing a free favor he can call in for Obama sometime. Corpodems are noticing their candidates aren’t winning, so now it”s plan B, endorse the candidate who’s about to win.
I enjoy it when anyone goes against the conventional wisdom. The Dems in DC are hopeless and have trouble picking a winner.
So, let’s see. We’ve got Wall St. shill Obama endorsing Bennett, and DLC Kingpin/NAFTA/Wall St. deregulator Clinton endorsing Romanoff.
Hmmmm, does it really matter which Democrat wins? I think not.
Either one will be just as contemptuous of the American people.
I’m with Kelly, what in bloody hell ?
although transparait’s explanation sounds about right.
wow
thanks, rec.
Um, Andrew was a DLC Fellow (whatever that is) in 2009:
http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=254587&kaid=450017&subid=900179
What exactly in his record qualifies him as a progressive?
His work at Southern Poverty Law Center for starters.
Plus he’s doing the Grayson model fundraising, unlike Bennnet; only small donors, no PACS, no Corp money.
I know and like Andy – he’ll compromise like they all do, but he won’t be bought. That’s a hell of a contrast with Bennet.
frang-
I know the Bennet campaign has tried to say there is no difference between Bennet and Romanoff, a message that helps them because they have raised more money. They don’t want people to know what those differences are.
While Romanoff was part of the DLC some years ago, I think we need to look at who he is and what he has actually done.
Kelly is absolutely right in that Romananoff is funding his campaign without the special interest money. He has labor endorsements – he could be raking in the PAC money too, but he said that he wants to lead by example. It’s not enough to say you’re going to clean up washington — it’s another thing to live by your own words.
Romanoff is a single payer advocate (very publicly). He’s come out on the side of progressives like Feingold and Kauffman on financial reform (Bennet votes to help BP with tax loopholes).
I know both candidates; I’ve spent time with both of them. The differences are stark and very real. Romanoff is a progressive and if we send him to Washington he will be a voice for people.
Kelly Canfield and strykerk2 -thank you for the information. Perhaps even actual progressive politicians feel that they have to portray themselves as more conservative than they actually are in order to get elected in certain states. That Romanoff is very much for single-payer, sided with Feingold and Kaufman on financial reform, has labor endorsements, and is going the route of small donors says a good deal about his character and commitment.
I guess I get a little knee-jerky whenever I see “DLC”. My apologies.