This is a follow-up to the two great threads on the Sibel Edmonds matter posted by plunger (http://seminal.firedoglake.com/) and Watt4Bob (http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/8408#Respond).
Brad Friedman says, "As part of a bombshell cover story interview by former CIA officer Phil Giraldi, as published on Tuesday in The American Conservative magazine, Edmonds finally named the Congresswoman involved in the affair as Schakowsky, along with offering a great deal of startling insight on many of the bombshell allegations she’s been unable to speak about publicly for so many years."
This is the letter that Sibel sent to Congresswoman Schakowsky in response to her "vehement denial" of the Edmonds’ allegations, and it is on Sibel’s website, http://123realchange.blogspot.com/.
———————
Thursday, September 24, 2009
In Pursuit of the Facts
Inviting Ms. Schakowsky to Join…
Dear Congresswoman Schakowsky:
It is an age-old tactic, when one cannot refute statements with facts, to attempt to discredit the witness. Rather than exchanging accusations, let me just go on record with facts and detailed citations.
When I became aware of incriminating evidence against high-level U.S. officials—elected and appointed—I filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and fought for five years in court. I bore tremendous cost, financially and emotionally, to make this data public. Here is the court case identification: C.A. No. 1:02CV01294 (ESH).
Few citizens have gone this far in a FOIA case to make covered-up information available to the public. No one gains financially from fighting this kind of thing in court, and I am no exception. You have called me a fantasist, but would a fabricator pay as dearly as I did to have her claims investigated?
I fought another court case to expose government criminality through key witnesses and documents. As in the FOIA case, I bore tremendous costs and was again blocked by the invocation of the State Secrets Privilege and National Security. The court case identification is Civ.No.1:02CV01448(JR)).
No other citizen has twice had the State Secrets Privilege invoked. But why would the government, with the support of congressional representatives, go to such lengths to quash, gag, and classify the files and operations in question if they were “fantasy, lies, and nonexistent” as you say?
I complied with the whistleblowing rule and took my case to the Office of the Inspector General and provided all of the information they allowed me to. They interviewed dozens of witnesses and reviewed hundreds of pages of documents in their investigation of my credibility and the validity of my case. Here is the link to their confirmation that I and my case have merit: DOJ-IG Report. Here is the redacted report that shows how our government censored more than 90% of this report to the public: Redacted DOJ-IG Report. Very few national security whistleblowers have been granted this level of validation and vindication. The Justice Department’s own Office of the Inspector General disagrees with your characterization of me and my case.
Several senior members of Congress—from both sides of the aisle–have also investigated and publicly confirmed my credibility and the grave nature of my disclosures. This is what Senator Leahy had to say: Leahy Statement. This is what Congresswoman Maloney said: Rep. Maloney Statement. Here are the assessments of Senator Lautenberg–Sen. Lautenberg Statement—and Senator Grassley–Sen. Grassley Statement. By attacking my credibility, you are also attacking your colleagues, including many on your side of the aisle. Are you accusing these senators and representatives of being fantasists too?
You have been described as a “true blue” civil libertarian, so it will surely interest you to know that the ACLU has declared me “the most gagged” person in the history of this great nation. Are you also attacking the ACLU and calling their characterization of this case a fantasy?
I have testified under oath, and my public biography will provide you with information about my educational background, financial background, and family life. I am fully aware of the consequences of perjury, and as you can see, I would have a lot to lose were that the case. I am sure you are familiar with my sworn testimony, but you can review it here.
I’ve done more than my share through the courts, IG offices, Congress, and media. I don’t have your power. You sit on the House Intelligence Committee, and you are one of the members of the majority party in Congress.
Here is what you can do: Call for an investigation and a hearing before your committee on this long covered-up case. Subpoena the files and call the witnesses. Bring in retired Special Agent Gilbert Graham and have him testify on the official report and complaint he filed with the DOJ inspector general in 2002 regarding the FBI counterespionage investigations involving Turkey and Israel in which targeted US representatives were illegally wiretapped. This is not fiction. Here is the official and signed public version: SA Gilbert Graham Report.
Also bring in former FBI Counterintelligence Operations Manager & Espionage Investigator John M. Cole and have him testify under oath regarding espionage cases involving State Department officials, Pentagon officials, and Congressional members. Here is a preview of some of the information disclosed and confirmed by Agent Cole: Interview and Radio Interview.
Also bring in the sworn testimonies of current FBI special agents in the Chicago and DC field offices who dutifully and patriotically led the counterintelligence operations on Turkey and corrupt US officials, only to see their investigations blocked and covered-up. Their names are public.
Order the Justice Department to release the two main Counterintelligence Operations Files on Turkey and “US persons of interest”—one from FBI Chicago Field Office-1996-2002, the other from FBI DC Field Office-1996-2001. These will help bring out the facts regarding your story too. I have documentation supporting the existence of these files.
Recall that I did not accuse you of any criminal or espionage-related activity.
The last time I saw a similar attack on my credibility was when Dennis Hastert issued a non-denial denial to information contained in a previous magazine article. He later gave up his seat, registered himself (under FARA) as an agent for the government of Turkey, and went on to collect $35,000 per month as a foreign agent. I certainly hope you are not planning to follow his footsteps by giving up your seat and officially registering with a foreign government. It would be far better if you used your position to bring out the facts. I will be delighted to assist you.
Sibel Edmonds



51 Comments







Sibel is quite intelligent and she also is a hero
Forgot to note that there are live links galore in the original at the 123RealChange site. Some follow…
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07…..ive:search
http://epic.org/privacy/fbi/fbi-ig_report.html
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/g…..50126.html
Have written to the Seminal editors asking if they could take mine down. Again I apologize
gone thanks editors
guess you did not see my comment to you on that diary that i was taking it down.
diary has been removed at author’s request
Really did not see it so sorry. Asked the editors to take my post down. Tried to. Again really sorry
No problem, and thanks for dealing with Jason. Probably a time lag in your post…I, too, was surprised that no one had posted it.
What is missing, and I knew it was, is Schakowsky’s initial responses. Have you seen those anywhere? I don’t dig Bradblog’s updating or comments protocol/appearance, so I would much rather have the discussion over here.
So, Leen, jump in and we can co-own this baby. I am sure that there will be many more on Sibel’s revelations, but hopefully they won’t be relegated to Diary status, right?!?!
Jason is the real deal, willing to debate and dialogue even when you may not agree with one another.
Anyway I think Schakowsky’s first response was through one of her aides
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7429
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL)’s office has vehemently denied serious allegations published by The American Conservative magazine on Tuesday, in which FBI translator-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds names the Congresswoman as having participated in a lesbian affair with a Turkish agent, and being secretly video-taped for possible blackmail purposes while doing so.
Her communications director also said this in the letter. I’m sure she knows what the letter said, even if she did not sign it. Stay classy Schakowsky and call for an investigation as Edmonds asked for in her letter above. Facts stand alone; it is way past time for them to be presented. Schakowsky should be happy to expose Sibel through a hearing..we’ll wait. Equating massive government corruption to little green men and right wing conspiracy theorists is rather unprofessional to say the least.
*******
“It would be just as accurate to say the Congresswoman was kidnapped by little green men and carried in a space ship to the planet Xenon.
Had The American Conservative, (which was founded by Pat Buchanan) adhered to normal journalistic standards it would have fact checked the story and contacted our office. Its goal was not apparently good journalism, but to fabricate one more story line for the right wing smear machine and conspiracy theorists everywhere.” “
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7429
Sibel Edmonds started by accusing the person working next to her of complicity with the Turkish government. It kept along pretty much that same whistleblowing theme until — suddenly, she’s attacking Illinois Democrats during an Illinois Democrat’s presidency when attacking that Democrat is Republican and Libertarian core policy including gun toters at rallies.
How coincidental!
I believe Sibel Edmonds. But she is not a personal witness to these neo-cons conspiracies. That is she saw classified surveillance of spies talking to other spies. So just because someone is intercepted on a wiretap does not make it a fact.
Who does not tell the truth more than spies? The real villain is Marc Grossman. He needs to be stopped from all the criminality that he is doing, along with the neo-con punks of DLA Piper.
Frank…
That’s BS and you know it…spies talking to other spies…complete crap.
Read her testimony, and stop trying to rewrite history.
As I said, I am not questioning Edmonds credibility at all. Just because she heard someone say something on a wiretap does not make it true.
Why are you calling my comments BS because I am trying to figure this out myself. I am not trying to rewrite anything. You say read her testimony. How come you do not have the links to it?
I do not know what Rep. Schakowsky has done wrong. “Lie detectors” are well known to be unreliable.
Grossman is an agent for IHLAS HOLDING, COHEN GROUP and who knows what else. You do not mention that rat who sold nuke technology to Turkey.
The complete transcript of Sibel Edmonds’ under-oath testimony, may now be downloaded here [PDF]. The complete video-taped testimony follows, in five parts, below…
*******
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7374
Read what Sibel says about Rep. Schakowsky. I think Sibel made a mistake by naming her specifically. It does not add to the narrative but when you accuse someone you have got to be absolutely certain of your facts. There needs to be an independent investigation of this. But please no neo-cons such as Zelikow, or anyone associated with DLA PIPER and all those other puke lobbyists.
I wish I could rewrite history, It is neo-cons that have been doing that. If you are interested here is a Sibel interview that you may not have seen.
http://www.hairenik.com/weekly…..l-edmonds/
Thanks..I had not seen that interview with the Armenian reporter. He interviewed her in April 2007, also. I don’t remember why Sibel named her, but I doubt she would say anything if she was not sure. It would be lying under oath for one thing. For 3 years of the history of Sibel trying to get her story told, read this blog of Lukery’s. Here is one section that stood out.
*******
“However, the possibility of destruction of evidence is something that came up in Sibel’s case.
In the summer of 2002, Senator Patrick Leahy, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Senator Charles Grassley, Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Crime and Drugs, held some hearings into Sibel’s case. In August 2002, they jointly wrote to then-Attorney General John Ashcroft, urging him to ensure that the evidence in Sibel’s case was not destroyed.
Leahy and Grassley wrote:
“We are concerned about the most crucial evidence in the case — the recordings that were allegedly improperly translated. Because these bear directly on the veracity of Ms. Edmonds’ allegations, we seek your assurance that the recordings will be properly maintained, turned over to the Inspector General’s Office… “
Here we have the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee warning the Attorney General of the United States not to commit, enable, or allow, a felony. I presume that this would normally go without saying (particularly back in 2002, prior to all the accumulated evidence of administration malfeasance coming to light.)
Why would Leahy and Grassley say such a thing? Because they knew the details of Sibel’s case. They realized that many powerful people in Washington would quite likely attempt to destroy all the evidence.
As far as we know (so far), no documents were destroyed, but Ashcroft went one better. In October 2002, Ashcroft invoked the State Secrets Privilege, “the nuclear bomb of legal tactics.” In fact, Ashcroft went one step further, eventually even retroactively classifying this letter from Leahy and Grassley. “
http://lukery.blogspot.com/200…..on-of.html
Are you pissed because FDL doesn’t start a blog for all things Edmonds, or are you pissed that Congress does not give one damn hoot about this?
If you cannot get the House of Representatives to open this up, why are you here pounding on people who simply want to pursue their own public policy interests?
You sure have a lot of shouting to do – I think you should be clear as to who you want to focus your ire at, and start a blog about it.
You could start here.
Hey newtonusr…
You are the same twerp who jumped in on the 8/22 thread I ran re Sibel, and do you recall what you said?! I’ll refresh your memory…
Pie, meet face!!
You are fronting for a guy hiding behind a paid firewall, who wouldn’t expose his sources. Madsen is not covered in glory, and you suggest that commenters here should take his word for it. We malign the major papers and television networks for the same thing. Please explain why Madsen should be held to a lower standard.
That said, while you post these diaries and invite the public to comment, you regard disagreement with your take as unworthy conversation. I have now read the testimony you mention, and somewhere I viewed video of depositions, and I still have the same questions, including – Ms. Edmunds has no first-hand knowledge of the content of the surveillance tapes, and that is a valid line of inquiry, is it not?
And, if you have your ducks in a row, you can combat disagreement with facts instead of invective. Do not let others’ temper force you out of your contain. Fight arguments with facts.
Dude,
STFU, please. You are so obviously a right-wing shill/obfuscationist…we are not talking about Madsen now, because his assertions of 7 weeks ago have proven to be true.
Don’t engage me, because I think you are disingenuous, at best.
Wrong, and clearly beside the point, with regard to my political proclivities.
You are now backpeddling, and it is one of your more unattracitve postures. You are either a truth-seeker (as you would have yourself thought of), or you are a provocateur.
Either you have an answer for it, you do not have an answer for it, or you are afraid to even look for an answer.
Ms. Edmunds has no first-hand knowledge of the content of the surveillance tapes, and that is a valid line of inquiry, is it not?
Yes or no?
Do you have an answer, Styve? Yes or no?
Answer the question, Styve.
Fascinating. I felt sorry hearing about the set up with Schakowsky, especially since Sibel maintains she did not know if JS succumbed to the blackmail.
Sibel’s story is compelling and profound. Sibel was circumstantially thrown into a situation her intelligence and integrity recognized as illegal and amoral and she was a stand up person and went to the supposed legal and functional governmental authorities. And her reward was to be stifled for these many, many years. It must be a trying destiny for sure.
And she has endured so much. And has been a catalyst for so many of us to recognize the saturation of corrupt cronyism in our government.
Google “Dennis Hastert FBI investigation” and see the cornucopia of entries,and the scope they entail. Amazing!
I’m afraid too many big worms are in the can.
Does the name Janet Conforto ring a bell?
Her stage name was JADA. She was one of Jack Ruby’s strippers. She had seen Ruby and an Oswald together at the Carousel Club.
She didn’t exist as far as the Warren Commission was concerned.
Same same 9-11 commission. Same same, I’m afraid, Sibel Edmonds.
Obama wants to bury the past. He doesn’t understand about zombies.
Your purpose here is not to tell the truth.
Your purpose is to be a slug who crawls along the moist tile.
Non sequitur much?!
Styve,
Apologies for my ineptness.
My use of the second person was not meant for you.
It was a clumsy attempt to express frustration and anger at how those in power view the rest of us.
Your diaries, comments, and writing are great.
newtonusr…is ART45 your alter-ego here on FDL?? Just asking, because you both seem to spew the same RW garbage…
Sibel and her revelations are too important to play games. I will repeat, Rep. Schakowsky’s alleged blackmail is a distraction to the important issues of neocon nuclear proliferation. It was a mistake for Sibel to make her name public and it was a mistake to for her to be a topic of this post. But She did vote against the Iraq War. So until proven otherwise she is one of my Peeps.
Mr. Styve, I do not appreciate your style, such as it is. I and other folks presented comments here and you started insulting people. This is no Freeper type site. We need a warm and fuzzy place to try to figure out the latest neo-con conspiracies.
You call people names and you say their ideas are BS or RW and STFU and DUDE? Your vulgarity calls your sincerity and knowledge into question. Also I like to think FireDogs are also my peeps, and you are not behaving in the syle of this site. Perhaps let us say you are acting as a “agent provocateur”. We need some background on you.
Fine.
In any case, when you present content based on anything but first-hand experience, why would you NOT expect healthy skepticism? I would bet that you view much of what you see reported – sourced or not – with a sceptical eye.
If I were ‘diarizing,’ I would hope that my readers question the truthfulness, reliability, and sourcing of any information that I present as fact. And if I am secure in those facts, I am in a position to argue my point, instead of name-calling and scurrying away from a tough question.
This information isn’t so much thin, as it is pushed. And is there not a point at which your avoidance of the most elementary questions may become detrimental to your core assertion? I think we are rapidly approaching that point.
“First we have a new interview with Sibel Edmonds, the former FBI translator turned whistleblower who has been the target of the most draconian “state secrets” campaign in American history. A few weeks ago, Edmonds was allowed to tell part of her remarkable story in public, under oath, for the first time.
It should have been the mother of all media blockbusters: a scandal encompassing Congressional corruption, executive branch bribery, international espionage, warmongering skullduggery, nuclear proliferation – even bisexual honey traps! The headlines practically write themselves, in one-word tabloid screamers: “Sex! War! Bribes! Spies! Treason!” What journalist could resist such a feast? Alas, there are no more journalists in the editorial offices and corporate boardrooms of America’s media conglomerates. And so Edmonds’ testimony was buried many fathoms deep.
Get the picture? It’s play for pay. Nukes, drugs, guns, war, terror — our Establishment paladins will peddle them all, if the price is right, if there’s a slice in it for them, if it suits their personal agenda.
And on it goes. A war of aggression in Iraq — avidly sought by the profiteers and propagandists in the network revealed by Edmonds — kills more than a million innocent people while engendering perhaps the most gargantuan corruption scams in world history: loot which sloshes back into the coffers of America’s elite, enabling them to tighten their grip on the nation’s politics even further, buying candidates — even the most “progressive” ones — who will ensure that any “bailouts” or “reforms” will serve the privileged first, and that the militarist agenda of endless conflict, burgeoning arms sales, and bottomless expenditures for the war machine will continue unhindered. “
http://chris-floyd.com/compone…..kings.html
Which is why any outsider’s attempt (a) to work within the system, or (b) change the system, is doomed.
The time has come for revolution. The power elite know that — witness the riot police in Pittsburgh. They did not materialize out of thin air or overnight.
The time has come to fight back. The only effective peaceful way to fight back I can imagine is for progressives to vote against bad Dems in general elections. I can imagine other ways to fight back, but they’re not suitable for posting on the internet.
Vote them out one by one. Slow, but sure. Until then, anyone that can make it should get out and support the mad as hell doctors. If you don’t hit the street in large numbers, no single payer for Americans will be the result. A big march will force MSM to cover it and let your senators know that they will not get your vote next time. The doctors have requested a meeting with Obama..no answer yet from him.
*******
Washington Meet-Up #1
September 30
Location: McPherson Square
Place: Corner of 15th St NW and K Street
Arrival Time: 3:00 pm
Departure Time: 3:30 pm
3:30 GROUP MARCH TO LAFAYETTE PARK!!
Washington Meet-Up #2
September 30
Location: Washington, DC
Place: Lafayette Park
Arrival Time: 3:45 pm
3:50 Winnie arrives at Lafayette Park with smaller Care-A-Van and circles The White House.
WHITE RALLY RIBBON PROGRAM BEGINS @ 4:00p
Styve’s style is a bit abrasive at times, but take it from one who reads a lot..he is on the side of right ie Sibel’s side. He posts at bradblog and other blogs on the subject of Sibel. He also posts directly to Sibel in the comment section on hers.
I just recently read the Vanity Fair article interview done a few years back with Ms. Edmonds. Quite interesting and provided much more contextual info that I found useful. Including non-Edmonds related incidents involving other “whistleblowers’ in government service,and the repercussions from their efforts to address what they deemed questionable activity in the FBI.
David Rose on Sibel Edmonds | vanityfair.comAn Inconvenient Patriot. Love of country led Sibel Edmonds to become a translator for the F.B.I. following 9/11. But everything changed when she accused a …
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/fe…..onds200509 – Similar
“Vanity Fair has established that around the time the Dickersons visited the Edmondses, in December 2001, Joel Robertz, an F.B.I. special agent in Chicago, contacted Sibel and asked her to review some wiretaps. Some were several years old, others more recent; all had been generated by a counter-intelligence investigation that had its start in 1997. “It began in D.C.,” says an F.B.I. counter-intelligence official who is familiar with the case file. But “it became apparent that Chicago was actually the center of what was going on.”
Its subject was explosive: what sounded like attempts to bribe elected members of Congress, both Democrat and Republican. “There was pressure within the bureau for a special prosecutor to be appointed and take the case on,” the official says. Instead, his colleagues were told to alter the thrust of their investigation—away from elected politicians and toward appointed officials. “This is the reason why Ashcroft reacted to Sibel in such an extreme fashion,” he says. “It was to keep this from coming out.”“[Excerpt]
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/fe…..onds200509 – Similar
This is from one who took forever to learn how to do links..are you maybe hitting cut instead of copy? Do you use a Mac? I know there are some differences in how links are done.
http://www.vanityfair.com/poli…..onds200509
http://www.bing.com/search?FOR…..+and+paste
Frank…
I am sorry I said your “spies talking to spies” line was crap, but it seemed that you were trying to discount Sibel’s observations in order to lay a foundation for the forthcoming cover-up.
I have been using FDL since it first went live, and I have been fighting the good fight to reveal the truth about the events of 9-11-01, to end these illegal wars in the middle east, and to jail Bush Administration accomplices complicit in the shredding of our Constitution and the commission of war crimes that led to the death of thousands of American service members and over 1 million Iraqis.
Newtonusr,
I just posted Sibel’s challenge to Schakowsky to relate news on a topic that was important to enough people that there were over 200 comments on Plunger’s and Watt4Bob’s threads. Your style of a. attacking the messenger and b. taking items out of context to challenge and redirect discussions…seemed more suited to a right-wing obfuscationist, so I said so. I am sorry to have offended you, but you don’t seem to have read the American Conservative article, nor her testimony. Thus, when you make statements like, “Ms. Edmunds has no first-hand knowledge of the content of the surveillance tapes, and that is a valid line of inquiry,” you seem to be throwing out falsehoods (she was a translater of surveillance, ergo first-hand), I won’t engage in that sort of run-around.
Art45,
I misinterpreted your post…sorry!
Gitcheegumee and B-butterfly,
Thanks for the Vanity Fair piece…though I recognize the title, I don’t think I have seen the article. Amazing that she lasted as long as she did at the FBI…
She lasted until she complained up the chain of command.
Note I have referenced Sibel. However I think those sock puppets at CREW need some attention and criticism. Their Corrupt Democrats list is ridiculous and racist.
Frank…
Apparently there were no comments on your post of 9/24, yet you are showing wrath re CREW. Don’t know where you are coming from, so we’ll leave it at that…
Have you watched this video? A long one..2:27:46.
Core Of Corruption Volume 1: In The Shadows {Full Film}
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…..re=related
Blue~
I think it was Frank the was questioning my background. Sibel holds the keys to unlock quite a bit of the hidden stories behind the shadow government pressures on our Constitutional Republic, and thanks for recognizing that I am a very strong supporter of her mission.
Abrasive, huh…bummer?! ]-)
I just don’t always play nice with cliquish environments (e.g., DailyKos, and dare I say, FDL to much lesser degree, but for the most part, when not being attacked re- Madsen, etc., I get along with all but the RW opers.
Just a teeny bit..’g’. I admit it is sometimes difficult to react calmly at times without reaching the other guy’s level of discourse. I have someone who has over the past few months has called me an al Qaeda follower..a goat herder..told me I’m silly and crazy etc. and generally stalked all of my comments. One of these days I’ll tell him a big F.U. from me. Until then, I’ve put him on permanent ignore. Clickish, indeed. Once I answered my stalker after months of harassment and guess who the mod slammed? Sigh..You have noticed by now that 911 and Sibel are touch me not subjects around here. I’m pleased that this past week has shed some much needed light on her case. I’m sure you noticed that in her comments Sibel said an interview between her and Cole is due up next week. That should be interesting.
Blue~
I have seen most of it, and it sickens me, but we fight on, right?!
Blue~
Have you used 911blogger.com ever? Emanual Goldstein and Altruist are long-time bloggers there, as well, and there are some cutting-edge items on 911Truth, if you are interested…
What somewhat dismays me about the recent Sibel revelations is the lack of clear-cut info on 9/11, even though she implicates the US for being involved with Bin Laden right up until 9-11.
Hopefully, that is a taunt that the non-corrupt authorities will follow-up on…
Yes, I read the site. It’s a good one. Hmm..that is the only thing she needed to say for now to confirm that the official story is a lie. I’m not sure if she is still gagged. If she is, she’s really pushing the envelope as it is. A good cartoon at http://123realchange.blogspot.com/
“John M. Cole, a former FBI Counterintelligence and Counterespionage Manager, has publicly confirmed FBI’s decade long investigation of the former State Department Official. According to Cole, as in over one hundred cases involving Israeli espionage activities within the US government, this case too has been covered up and buried despite mountains of evidence collected.”
http://123realchange.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…..r_embedded
By Brad Friedman on 9/28/2009 12:56PM
VIDEO: Schakowsky Publicly Denies Affair With Turkish Agent as ‘Total Fantasy’, ‘Totally Made Up’
FBI whistleblower Edmonds stands by allegations, challenges IL Dem Congresswoman to ‘bring a libel suit against me’…
The Chicago News Bench blog cornered Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) at a Health Care Townhall event over the weekend, to ask her about former FBI translator turned whistleblower Sibel Edmonds’ allegation, as published by American Conservative magazine last week, that she had become involved in a secretly-videotaped lesbian affair with a Turkish agent.
In the brief video, Schakowsky is asked directly about the affair, and denies the allegations as “total fantasy” and “totally made up”.
continued at Bradblog.com
So, please sue her Schakowsky..and while you’re doing that..call for a formal investigation and then you can use the same documents for each hearing. Thanks for the link to the video. I wonder if she looked that tired and stressed before Sibel’s interview?
“Today we’re lucky if ten people turn out to protest for 9/11 truth. Does that make you sad? It makes me damn sad, too sad for words.
It’s not just that we consented to become livestock, it’s that, in doing so we made our world into a joke.
We diluted our passion, lost our dignity and even the possibility of ecstasy, accepting in return a TV simulation. We consented to become automatons, drugged with sex, sitcoms, junk food, vaccines, fluoride and all the rest…
And we pretended we were free – that’s the sickest part.
Nevertheless, one day the ship will come in. I know it. “
http://www.911oz.com/blog/m/8/y/2009