Ok, so a little disclaimer: I have been educated here at FDL on a daily basis. And from the bottom of my brain, I thank you, one and all. But recently I’ve been noticing a lot of, shall we say, reluctance to acknowledge the “wonder” that is Perry/Bachmann 2012. First, no offense is meant. And second, rant to follow, … you have been warned.
(Switch to megalomaniac mad scientist voice …) But why do they defy me? Why, if even the Dawgs themselves have so bowed before my feet, do the minions of FDL defy me so? Do they not know? Are they not aware? Is it possible that I, more an idol for worship (Stewie voice: so worship me, worship meeee) than a Dawg, know something they do not?
(Normal voice.) Actually no. The answer is once again simple. So simple your complicated and over-worked brains can’t grasp such a simple level of thinking. This is where I excel. Where I live. This is my home bitches. Hooray for mediocrity. (Ya, it’s kinda sad, but it’s Amerika, and mediocrity is the in-thing to be).
You’re thinking too hard about it. Keep it simple stupid, just like the system and the rest of Amerika. If you must, if it makes it easier for you, then simplify to the point of absurdity and uselessness, because the rest of Amerika is doing so.
—————————-
Paul has as much chance to be nominated as my dog’s left testicle. And I don’t even have a dog!!! (that’s how likely that is) The corporate media ignores him. I mean they literally ignore him. They skip over his existence on the rankings, even though it’s right in front of them. A Repub who can’t even get the “balanced” corporate media to acknowledge him … DOA. Except for the Paulites, he’s got no one. Heck a bunch of Paulites came out here and alienated most FDLers. I tried talking to them, and they alienated me. For trying to talk to them. I mean WTF? I wasn’t sure, but at one point I thought these people can’t be recruiting for Paul when they go out of their way OVER AND OVER again to alienate anyone who has things in common to Paul (ie. supposedly anti-war, anti-Fed, …). If you’re recruiting for Paul, what kind of Fwit would alienate the people they’re trying to recruit. I’m still not entirely UNconvinced that those so-called Paul-lovers weren’t actually anti-Paul. Frankly they couldn’t have done a better job at alienating everyone here against Paul. Paul me once, … well you can’t get Paul-ed again.
So who else?
Romney? Magic underwear? RomneyCare, aka ObamaCare, aka insurance industry welfare??? Sure he’s rich. He’s not totally repulsive, at least superficially (aka if he accidentally surprised me in a dark alley, I wouldn’t shite myself, … who would?, think Rudy Giuliani, or Bachmann, … now people may think Cheney, but that’s not his style, if he wants to “get you”, he will find your family and rendition them, then rendition you as well so you can watch while they torture your family, … he only shoots his “friends” in the face). Hello? Romney’s a Mormon. He’s not even one of the many Xtians subtypes. And this is still Amerika, home base of the Xtians. Romney’s there for playtime with the other candidates. Because unless it comes out he has JC’s picture on his magic underwear, he’s also DOA.
Pawlenty is out. Too bad, when it was nap time, we could have brought him out. Think of all the sorely-needed beauty sleep he could have generated …
Huckabee, they’re only true contender, said no a long time ago. BTW, Huckabee likes to “burn” public records (1, 2, 3). It’s OK, he’s a Xtian. They burn things they don’t like. Like books. And witches. Or do they just drown them??? Sorry, haven’t kept up on my research on how to tell if they’re a witch (or not). And the reason he declined is simple. Huckabee serves one and only one master – MONEY. And that Fox gig and all his other “enterprises” pay him a pretty penny. (I guess he hasn’t read that part about the threading a needle, … beware of the monied men, … and rich people totally suck parts of the Xtian book.) On the plus side, President Huckabee would have changed education permanently by requiring his “video teachings” be taught as required Gospel in Amerikan Chruches and schools.
Cain, … don’t make me laugh. I don’t want to elect the pizza “king”. On the down side, we could have changed the military slogan to “Kinetic action, anywhere in the world, in 30 minutes, or the first drone attack is on us”. Kinda catchy huh? No? Well consider changing first drone attack to first nuke attack … still not catchy?
“The Other Mormon Dude” Huntsman? Frothy Santorum? Backtrack thrice-married Gingrich? 3 blind mice? See how they run … behind the others. I’m sorry but it is a waste of my time to even consider, yes consider, these jokes, when the other jokes can be considered. And I don’t care what the straw poll said. That poll is about as much a joke as O’s “spinelessness” (he ain’t spineless, he’s getting everything he and his masters ever wanted, … the joke is on us). And if someone mentions Jeb one more time, I’m going to get very angry, … and you don’t want to see me get angry, … and you definitely do not want to see my pony get angry.
——————————
So let’s get to the main event … Perry/Bachmann 2012. Booyah bitches. Slogan: Back in black? The bitch is back? How you like me now? Who’s your daddy now, biatch? Texas, … ya you remember us don’t you? It’s 3 am, and the phone rings, it’s Cain, he has your pizza, who do you want answering that call?
Perry, JUST LIKE O, is the ultimate politician. What you see is NOT what you get; he can be whoever you want, kinda like role playing. Don’t worry about what you hear, in fact ignore it, just verbal excrement, rose-scented, amounting to … nothing … or everything depending on what you want. Chameleons. They can change at will. Change their appearance, minds, will, or anything. They have no core self. Their core self is as flexible as ether. They are brothers from another mother. Perry was a D once. O was also. Both switched parties for the money. One did it out in the open, and the other did not. Perry, also like O does have charisma. If you don’t listen to his words (imagine the teacher from Charlie Brown), then you can see it. Most Amerikans have no idea what any of them are saying. They don’t know and they don’t want to know. I can imagine when they hear Perry or any politician speak, their brains tune it out so it resembles Charlie Brown’s teacher. That’s why when it’s just slogans or talking points, they nod their head so vigorously, because they’ve heard that before, oh yes they have (probably from Beck or Rush), and so now they feel like they’re part of the conversation and as smart as the speakers, which is probably not that far from the truth in most cases.
Perry has “governing experience“, and boy does he have “it”. He’s rich. I like me the richy rich whitey, I sure em do. Oh ya, he’s white. And he’s a he. So we got rich, white, male … so all 3 GOP qualifications have been met. He’s got the Texas miracle (1, 2, 3). My Dawg it rains money in Texas. And all because Perry prayed it to. If he want the same “miracle” we need him to pray in the WH, so money will fall on all of us, from the sky, from Dawg himself (with that much money, and everyone having it, won’t it be next to worthless??? … don’t worry Perry will pray that problem away as well). He does Bush better than Bush himself. See one of his interviews, turn off the volume, and just watch … tell me Amerika doesn’t want to have a bear with this guy? Because the Amerikan standards for elections are is this guy “beer-worthy”? It may be sad, but reality is what it is.
So to recap, he’s rich, white, and male. He has the ability to raise as much campaign bribery as O. Did I say he was white?!?!?!
And what can I say about Bachmann? Love her or … well be scared the shite out of her, she’s got play. A separate piece should be done on her quotes (1, 2, 3, 4), and of course the “cure“. But can’t top,
“If we took away the minimum wage — if conceivably it was gone — we could potentially virtually wipe out unemployment completely because we would be able to offer jobs at whatever level.” Michele Bachmann, Jan. 2005
And the scary lady still has play. Now that’s some serious play. You can’t roll out that much bat-shite crazy, year after year, still be in the game, year after year, and not have play.
So we have the dream team: Perry (the “sensible one”) / Bachmann (you haven’t seen bat-shite crazy yet) 2012.
(Stewie voice) Well my minions, I have laid out my reasoning, more or less. I did warn you it was a rant. Now would either of them had a chance a year ago against O? And things have gotten worse and their chances have also increased. In one year, will things have gotten worse? Will their chances have increased further? And there you have it. Discuss.



31 Comments

Darn i was hoping for Bachmann/Cain, All Crazy All The Time.
Still better than Zero/Biden, Zero/Clinton, Zero/Anybody.
Do not worry, my friends (imagine McCain saying that), because Bachmann brings enough crazy for a whole country. She’s the epicenter of crazy, from which ll crazy originates.
Ya, but my dog is better than Zero, so …
Comparing to the lowest common denominator, ie. the lesser of evils, is the problem. The same BS excuse those so-called “Paulites” used a little while back. Of course if Paul is so pathetic he needs to compare himself to O, then … well that’s just sad and pathetic.
Ricky & Michele’s theme song
No, it will NOT be Perry/Bachmann in 2012. Perry and Bachmann appeal to exactly the same subset of the Republican base and disappeal to the other part of the base. Therefore, Perry does not strengthen his ticket by putting Bachmann on it. In fact, Bachmann will have much of the same de-attracting effect that Palin had.
So, if it IS Perry OR Bachmann (and we know which one of those two is most likely) the other half has to be someone who appeals to the OTHER part of the base.
Example: Perry / Huntsman or Perry / Cain.
“Somebody’s got to be unafraid to lead the freak parade
Somebody’s got to be unafraid to lead the freak parade
Somebody’s got to be unafraid to lead the freak parade
To lead the freak
To lead the freak
To lead the freak parade”
http://www.cowboylyrics.com/lyrics/big-&-rich/freak-parade-16634.html
“blow your whistle,
bang your gong,
roll up something,
to take along …”
Niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
Interesting, but you forget:
“Now would either of them had a chance a year ago against O? And things have gotten worse and their chances have also increased. In one year, will things have gotten worse? Will their chances have increased further? And there you have it.”
You see 2012 will not be like the rest. Unemployment will be in double digits. And that’s just the official.
And Perry and Bachmann do NOT appeal to the same “base”. There is overlap. But Bachman gets the bat-shite crazy. Perry gets the money and is seen as the “sensible one”. There is significant difference in their “bases”.
Huntsman? Ok, that’s a good point. Possible. But he worked for O – strike 1. Huntsman may be seen as moderate – strike 2.
But!!!, (http://www.deseretnews.com/article/700175767/Tea-Party-group-FreedomWorks-and-Wall-Street-Journal-both-laud-Huntsmans-economic-plan.html) he’s got some decent backing. So he’s a tough one. He could have some play. Good point.
Cain, no chance in hell. My dog’s left testicle has a better chance. Who you gonna call … for pizza? Cain.
Well maybe they can use that as their campaign slogan (which is what I think you meant by this comment).
Apt slogan.
It what point will “we” BOZOs figure out that this relationship isn’t working out? In order for them to win, we must lose. For we bleeding heart tree-hugging liberals to have our way, the other side must reject most of, if not all of their core values. Who here in their right mind would remain in such a relationship???
So, be it Perry, Bachmann, on the right Or Obama on the fake left we lose! I say, bring back “Jim Crow” (Separate but equal).
Oh it will get worse. Much much worse.
They’ve ensured it. Tent cities will be popping up in every city in this country. I know we have them now, but what’s coming is going to dwarf by several orders of magnitude the current situation.
It’s going to get bad. Really really bad for those of us at the bottom.
Those who are comfortable in their upper middle class lifestyles need not worry … YET!
But it will eventually reach them too.
They’re delusional if they think killing all of us will “solve” their problems.
They basically want the same thing India has, a codified slave class and corruption and theft unimagined here.
Romney?
You forgot he makes gaffes like corporations are people, he is a hedgefunder who destroyed jobs and most of all he is boring in a race with Michelle Bachman and Ron Paul the man can’t attract a crowd can’t whip a crowd in an election where the GOP voters seem to want excitement more than anything.
Still I agree Mitt has no chance. But if he and Huntsman both are not on the ticket then Mormon GOPers will cry racism or religious persecution and stay home.
This makes Utah a possible pick up as well as a few Western States with Mormons. Mormons before this election were reliable GOP voters who always turned out to vote in high numbers.
If the GOP disses them then the Dems have a chance in states I would never dream we would pick up. Remember Mitt and Huntsman are both descended from Mormon Elders.
Elders who I suspect very well might be pissed that one of their own Elect did not get on the GOP ticket. Elders who very well might not tell their voters to stay home but certainly won’t preach to the flock to vote GOP this year.
Huckabee? Paroled a cop killer who had killed a Mom and her two daughters
“Dec. 2, 2009 The former religious leader and Presidential candidate in 2008 for the GOP, Mike Huckabee was the Governor of Arkansas in the year 2000, and he was the man who pardoned Maurice Clemmons who was arrested for robbery.
Maurice Clemmons already had a arm’s length rap sheet full of previous and numerous offenses and charges and was a hardened career criminal. These are not the type of offenders you let out on the street again as we say with the Connecticut slayings of a mom and her two daughters by Steven Hayes. See CNN Trial Sept. 10, 2010.”
After he was pardoned by Huck he killed 4 cops roads were blocked as far as Seattle I remember every cop in the state volunteered to find this creep and we had helicopters flying over Seattle looking for him non stop even though we heard he ran away on foot.
“Clemmons at the time of Huckabee’s pardon, had been given 95 years in prison which is where he should have been on Sunday November 29, 2009 when he shot in cold blood four police officers in Lakewood, Washington.
Huckabee took it upon himself to have a schedule of clemencies while the Governor’s office that worked out to 1 pardon every four days of his term.”
http://www.politicolnews.com/huckabee-pardoned-cop-killer/
“None of the prosecutors were ever told why Huckabee felt compelled to have a hand in freeing so many prisoners, though all of them speculate that his deeply religious nature led to a strong belief in repentance and forgiveness. In some cases, prosecutors say, evangelical leaders attested that a prisoner had found Jesus and that seemed to influence the governor’s thoughts.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/29/multiple-police-officers-_n_373119.html
If Huckabee ran the GOP would have lost the Cop vote the scared of crime vote, the scared of Black people vote and discredited the all the Christian Fundies.
I think Huckabee not running was Obama’s biggest disappointment.
But Huckabee was funny rare for a GOPer and could have brought in moderate votes. Without this scandal he is the one GOPer I worried about most about actually being elected.
“Oh it will get worse. Much much worse”
You got that right tambershall. I’m an extremist. I say shit like “we are rapidly being impoverished and enslaved”. To me that’s the only political issue there is. So how is the Republican election related to my issue. Is their Primary even relevant?
Your right about Perry too. I don’t know about Bachmann. My money is on Perry to be President. Is everybody OK with that? I think y’all should at least consider participating in that election. If the next Republican is gonna be president, shouldn’t you take the Republican Primary seriously?
The Corporate wing of the GOP might have to settle for Perry he seems there best shot. Michelle is the logical choice the GOP needs someone to rally their flying monkey 20%ers its either her Sarah or Ron and I agree that Michelle beats them both in approval from the GOP’s Corporate wing.
Still Mitt and Huntsman don’t make the ticket Mormon support from the Church will be lacking as will Mormon money and in the West that could turn local races.
Also the GOP’s Corporate Wing does not like the idea of the Fundies actually getting anywhere near the WH anymore than we do.
Just how desperate are they to win? Logically a moderate GOPer to balance Perry and bring in Moderate voters would help them win the election but I don’t see any Moderate GOPers out there.
If the Corporate GOPers think Perry can get the Fundies they might try and push to get another Corporate GOPer on the ticket.
Perry is a Corporate GOPer who plays Fundy but I have yet to see him whip up a crowd like Michelle can.
Unless Perry can whip up a crowd like Michelle can Michelle should be VP.
I was not aware of the elder issues. Very interesting.
Excellent knowledge base.
Of course my question would be does this matter? Is this significant, as you describe? What are they going to vote D?
And yes I’m serious about those questions, ie. not rhetorical. They’ve never had a Mormon president. And they offer these guys? Ok, I get why Romney. But Huntsman?
Personally, IMHO, I think the Mormons will still vote R versus those godless “Ds”.
I have to disagree with this.
I don’t think it would have mattered in the grand scale of things. JUST my personal opinion.
I see him currently, after all the stuff you describe, and I can see he’s got “true followers” who don’t care about that stuff. And I’ve seen him talk. He’s got that “thing” that fools idiots. And I think he may actually believe most of his own BS.
Maybe he didn’t want that stuff out. But I still think he’s smart enough to wait for 2016. Of course by then it won’t matter what happened before … RAPTURE.
“I’m an extremist. I say shit like “we are rapidly being impoverished and enslaved””
WTF? You’re an extremist? I say that stuff all the time. I look around at reality and say “mofo, shit-kickers, SOB, Ahole”.
If you’re an extremist, I guess so am I. Frankly, if you’re not an extremist these days, you’re not paying attention (most people aren’t with their heads buried in the sand).
I got money, albeit fake Monopoly money, on Perry/Bachmann 2012. Perry is “solid” for a R. And she literally scare me. SO R dream team.
Can’t wait till they abolish the minimum wage and we all have jobs. Sure they pay the same as the worker in China, $3/day, but darn it I get a job, woohoo.
I think the Corporate paymasters would really prefer Jeb Bush at Prez, and Huntsman at VP. It is difficult having a crazy maker at the top of the ticket, principally because they have to exist in a political world beyond the US borders. Our international friends and enemies would just loose their lunch having to deal with chicken-heads like Perry-Paul-Bachmann [I'm not including any of the others who are nominally in the running because they are wasting their time and ours].
Jeb Bush could probably raise the kind of money to give Barry-O a….run for the money. Oddly enough, Barry would probably prefer debating Jeb, if for no other reason than Jeb can actually form cogent thoughts and talk about them without sounding like a crazymaker.
That is assuming the the Repubs actually do want to win the WH in 2012. See this Rich Lowry 2/2011 article http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/259099/bush-2012-rich-lowry.
“people can’t be recruiting for Paul when they go out of their way OVER AND OVER again to alienate anyone…” “Paul has as much chance to be nominated as my dog’s left testicle.” “If you’re recruiting for Paul, what kind of Fwit would alienate the people they’re trying to recruit.”
Gee, I wonder WHY people who are supporting Paul are so reluctant to say anything? “Paul is a racist! Paul is sexist! He wants issues like abortion to go back to the states!” Well, how about supporting Paul in the general and fighting like crazy to get Democrats in at the state level?
Well, no. It’s too much fun to scream about how bad Rick Perry and Obama are going to be instead of doing something.
Did you read the Wikileaks release of how an entire family–including a five-year-old and an infant–were handcuffed and shot in the head, and they called in an airstrike to cover it up? THAT’S why I’m supporting Ron Paul. Anti-war? Is that issue even on your radar? Have you ever dreamed of how much better our lives would be, how many people would come forward to tell what atrocities were committed, if we could bring about an end to war?
But, no. Go ahead and rant. Say how Paul can’t possibly win. I’d rather fight the fight and lose than do nothing but bitch. At least, I can say I cared enough to try.
Meanwhile, while you’re discussing every single thing Rick Perry has said and done (SO productive, don’t you think?), the Ron Paul people are starting to organize for the caucuses. So, go on. Stay negative. What will you tell your kids when they ask you what you did to help stop the wars? “Well,” You’ll say. “I talked and talked and put down the only anti-war candidate available.”
Sadly every time I try to start up a conversation about Paul with his fans, it devolves into a fighting match. But how is that helpful? Productive? Conducive to a conversation?
I did give some solid reasons that Paul is unlikely to win the R nomination. And yes I added humor to the mix. But because many of these points are covered and I wanted to write something that was mildly interesting.
Either way, we can agree to disagree. Good day.
Nice link.
Thanks.
I agree that he could raise the money and give O a fight. I still don’t think he will do it. If he’s going o do it, he has to jump in like today.
I think Merkel (and Sarkozy) would pay to avoid a Perry/Bachmann administration. Hugs, anyone?
If Barry can somehow keep from letting the Repubs wack him down to a talking-head, he’ll win. If the Repubs really want to win, and rekindle their moderate center, then they need to functionally pay Jeb to enter. He is not tainted by the war mongering, crazy talking, race-baiting blather as very many of the current congressional Repubs are. And he is obviously a better kind of difference than his brother GWB.
I’m not boosting for Jeb. Rather, considering what a more positivist winning tactic the Repubs could employ other than the death-loving hard-right gang that is currently in power.
I agree that President Perry will probably soon be sitting in the White House, and probably we will still be commenting about our misery, because Perry and the rest of the Republicans are on the same page with Obama on most issues, so we’ll still be slowly headed down the drain.
Ron Paul is just as bad as the rest of them on many important domestic issues. But he is the only one who has consistently advocated for the following:
ending the foreign wars, ending the Patriot Act, ending NAFTA and GATT, etc., ending the War on Drugs, ending the two-tier justice system, and ending the corporate control of our government, ending our “special relationship” with Israel. Ron Paul is the only candidate who doesn’t get corporate contributions. The corporations fear him, and the corporate media methodically marginalizes him.
Maybe we should stop letting our overlords play the “divide and conquer game” with our lives. We are in the same sinking boat as the “rednecks” (many of whom support Paul) we are encouraged to disdain, so why do we identify with the guys on the yachts? Wasn’t it “rednecks” who were beaten and killed fighting the great battles to organize the unions? Which side are we on, anyway? No, Ron Paul is not a fan of unions. I’m just saying we might want to stop identifying with our oppressors, and make common cause where we can with the people we have been encouraged to despise and ridicule.
Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich, and Bernie Sanders seem to like Ron Paul; maybe we should take a closer look:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/04/28/is-ron-paul-more-progressive-than-obama/
http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/08/24/in-praise-of-ron-paul/
http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/black-democrats-go-israel-ron-paul-puts-democrats-shame
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8S8N2OG7sU – Ron Paul on ending the War on Drugs
Ron Paul and Ralph Nader — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwIZ4syCFLc
Ralph Nader on the new political dynamic of an alliance between Bernie Sanders and Ron Paul on cutting the military budget and corporate welfare –
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE4-nmR3fiM
http://www.counterpunch.org/2008/01/02/the-left-and-ron-paul/
Tambershall, I’m not a Ron Paul “fan.” All I want is for my country to stop killing people all over the world. Whoever wins the 2012 election, two things are certain: The president will be a Democrat or a Republican, and the misery in this country will deepen.
There are several good things that could come out of the 2012 election that are possible only if Ron Paul becomes president, and I will be satisfied if only this one good thing happens: our bombs and drones and soldiers stop killing people overseas.
Tambershall, here’s an excerpt from an interesting essay on why Ron Paul can be nominated and elected. The complete article is here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robin-koerner/ron-paul-can-win_b_939993.html
“It’s hard to tell if the idea that Ron Paul cannot win in 2012 is more ignorant, in its complete lack of historical sophistication, or more arrogant, in its claim to certainty amid all the complexity of 300 million lives and the myriad issues that affect them.
“Sometimes, perhaps once in a few generations, a nation can undergo what a mathematician or physicist would call a “phase change.” The classic example of such a thing is a pile of sand. Every grain you add makes the pile slightly steeper and slightly higher without moving any of the other grains inside the pile, until eventually one grain is added that causes an avalanche of sand down the sides of the pile, moving thousand of grains and changing the shape of the pile.
“Such behavior can be exhibited by all complex systems, and a nation — it should be obvious — is much more complex than a pile of sand.
“The important point for those who would presume to make such grand predictions as “Dr. Paul cannot win” is that no examination of the pile of sand before the point of avalanche would tell you that, or when, the avalanche will eventually happen.
“But happen it does; indeed, happen it must.
“And there are numerous examples of abrupt and dramatic phase change in the politics of great nations.
“The U.K., the country of my birth, provides a compelling and closely relevant example. As every schoolboy knows, Churchill led Britain to victory in the Second World War. Indeed, he did as much as any man on Earth ever has to save civilization as we know it.
“Three months after the entire nation poured into the streets to cheer this great leader (the man a few years ago voted by Britons the greatest Briton of all time), Churchill went to the country in a general election to retain his position as prime minister. There was simply no way he could lose. The best slogan the Labour party, his opposition, could come up with was, “Cheer Churchill. Vote Labour.”
“And amazingly, that is exactly what the nation did. Churchill was defeated. No one anywhere — including the people of Britain who voted in the election — had even thought about the possibility. …”
Thank you or the links.
I’m still checking them out. Good stuff.
BTW, stop Fing comparing Paul to O. My dog is more progressive than O. My dog would be a better president than O. But who the F cares? Are we going to vote for my dog as president?
Comparing to the lowest common denominator does not help Paul!!! It makes him look sad and pathetic that the only way he’s “better” is by comparing him to a war criminal.
Don’t care if you are NOT a fan or whatever. Stop comparing him to O. Every time I hear that comparison I feel sad that Paul is such a pathetic candidate that the only way to make him look good is to compare him to a war criminal and wall street pawn.
For your own argument, stop comparing him to O. It hurts your position TREMENDOUSLY!
Thanks, tambershall.
I compare Ron Paul to Obama and the other Republicans because one of them will win the Presidential election in 2012, and it is very hard for most of us to imagine voting for a Republican. We have to remember that Obama will continue the killing, as will every other Republican but Paul.
Before I could make myself put my “Ron Paul for President 2012″ bumper sticker on my car, I had to give myself a little pep talk–reminding myself that I was doing it for all the grandmothers, grandfathers, mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, babies–all those innocent people who will be killed by the bombs, drones, and soldiers that my taxes support. Unless Ron Paul is elected.
I remember the news in Seattle I’m sure that Huckabee will never carry Washington State. I agree 2016 he looks like the most electable GOPer out there.
But I’ll be around too and this scandal will hurt him otherwise he might be a shoe in.
Imagine Catholics voters if priests could get married and 2 son’s of Bishops got shutdown after trying so hard I don’t think the Mormons will turn out in force. The question of just how important even a 5% drop in Mormon turnout is in Western states is something MyDD or Nate Silver can answer bet than I can but if the race is close it will be a factor.
You see how when you say it that way it doesn’t seem pathetic.
That I can see. That I can even understand.
But just comparing him to O does not help PAaul.