He was
totally
totally totally totally
totally
in love
with the sky
and he wanted
to fly
so his country said come
you want wings, we’ve got some.From the sky the earth became a wonder.
not mere real estate to plunder.
and the young man flew, pretending to assault the earth.to fly, he was so far from where men die.
to focus only on the task
and not the questions earth might ask
of why her lover, her dear son could
drop his wretched load and run.(today I say theres a new game to play,
with drones in the sky – a target to spy
oh my a gamers delight – such fright)– craftysue
This Memorial Day we need to remember once again those who were killed by conscription and those who were killed by seduction. A volunteer army in peacetime depends on seduction or on economic pressure in order to recruit youth. The primary factor in the seduction of a military career is the illusion of immortality held by youth, the idea of tempting death but never succumbing. But there is another seduction involved as well — that of shiny things, things that make loud noises, and things that are puzzles. Technology seduces as surely as drones kill.
To be a young patriotic American boy at the beginning of the 1960s was to be fascinated by science and technology, appalled that a society like the Soviet Union existed, and convinced that the United States of that time was the very embodiment of Thomas Jefferson’s, John Adams’s, and James Madison’s hopes and dreams. And to see the astronaut corps as the great American adventure. And to see that as the first step in a career whose pinnacle was being like the cosmologist George Gamow.
There was however one minor step in the career path to the astronaut corps. At that time, all seven Mercury astronauts were military test pilots. You had to enter the military in order to go into outer space. But there was a peacetime draft; you had to enter the military anyway if you were male. What better way than to go to the Air Force Academy (then brand-spanking new), major in physics and astronomy and go to pilot school. Of course it was not to be. I lacked the political connections to get a Congressional appointment and at 108 pounds and 6 feet tall was both too underweight to qualify for the Academy and too tall to ever be a test pilot. But I did get a feel for how the military operates in two years of mandatory ROTC in college. I chose not to take the scholarship and complete the remaining two years to be commissioned as a lieutenant. I chose to transfer to a prestige school that had a degree in international relations because in my naive view there was somewhere a career path to waging peace.
Joe Ruzicka was one of the folks who did complete his ROTC training.
The closest thing to a counter-culture at 1964-1966 Clemson University was the Jabberwocky Coffee House, which was run as a co-op. There was weekly folk music, and it became the place for name musicians to hang out when they were performing in the then cultural desert of Clemson SC. Van Cliburn spent until 3 am one night regaling Jabberwocky customers with ribald jokes. Other musicians would come to jam.
Joe Ruzicka was one of the folks who helped make the Jabberwocky happen. Stereotypes of who does what are so misleading. Joe was no more than an acquaintance to me. But for two years, the Jabberwocky was a cultural home to me.
Joe was a bomb navigator in one of the B-52s that cratered Southeast Asia.
The tragedy is that Joe will be remembered this Memorial Day for the wrong reasons. It is very Lewis Carroll. Jabberwocky indeed.
I do not know his motivations for deciding to enter the Air Force; I just know the zeitgeist and how it affected us.
My experience in an international relations curriculum was that it was designed to train the diplomatic wing of the military industrial complex. My first clue came when I found out the chair of the department was BA US Naval Academy, MS, PhD Naval War College. As the Vietnam War and the resistance to it increased, I moved steadily toward the date of my pre-induction physical. For those not of that generation, the pre-induction physical was the prelude to a letter that began “Greetings” and told you that your friends and neighbors of your locally controlled draft board had decided that you were to be conscripted. If seduction fails, there is conscription.
I was not conscripted either. Even in 1968, the military did not want severely flat-footed conscripts with long and narrow shoe sizes tromping around jungles. Oh the ignominy of never being in the military in America!
We no longer live in quite a techno-frenzied society. The seduction of the military has turned to the traditional sales pitches of instilling discipline, developing leadership skills, and proving yourself. And to the promise of jobs and education.
But the techno-weapon imagination still lives in the stories and games promoted and consumed by youth. And the privatized space program (and its military counterpart) seduces.
And then there are the unmanned aerial vehicles (drones). And dreams of private armies.
The militarist culture pervades American life more than ever.
And yet (from Wikipedia):
Memorial day has its origins in a Decoration Day, which began during the civil war among Freedmen (freed slaves) and other Black American families … as a celebration of both black and white Union soldiers who fought for liberation and justice. Together with teachers and missionaries, Blacks in Charleston organized a May Day ceremony in 1865, which was covered by the New York Tribune and other national papers. The freedmen had cleaned up and landscaped the burial ground, building an enclosure and an arch labeled, “Martyrs of the Race Course.” Nearly ten thousand people, mostly freedmen, gathered on May 1 to commemorate the dead. Involved were 3,000 schoolchildren newly enrolled in freedmen’s schools, mutual aid societies, Union troops, and black ministers and white northern missionaries. Most brought flowers to lay on the burial field. Today the site is used as Hampton Park. Years later, the celebration would come to be called the “First Decoration Day” in the North.
Lewis Carroll would understand how we turned liberation into jabberwocky.




102 Comments

“We no longer live in quite a techno-frenzied society.”; gotta disagree with you about that.
“There are many stories as to its actual beginnings, with over two dozen cities and towns laying claim to being the birthplace of Memorial Day. There is also evidence that organized women’s groups in the South were decorating graves before the end of the Civil War: a hymn published in 1867, “Kneel Where Our Loves are Sleeping” by Nella L. Sweet carried the dedication “To The Ladies of the South who are Decorating the Graves of the Confederate Dead” (Source: Duke University’s Historic American Sheet Music, 1850-1920). While Waterloo N.Y. was officially declared the birthplace of Memorial Day by President Lyndon Johnson in May 1966, it’s difficult to prove conclusively the origins of the day.”
I’ll accept your first disagreement. I just don’t have enough knowledge of youth culture these days to see how it plays out in the seduction of the youths into the military. The economic pressures seem much more influential.
I was struck not with the exclusiveness of the Charleston event; such sentiments during and after wars are common but the context in which it occurred and the meaning that was ascribed in this instance to the day.
Military recruiting on tv does emphasize technology and the chance top work with it; just saying. And then one can look at all the video games that are military/war oriented.
Thanks. I guess I should start watching TV again, eh.
At your own peril :->); still the ‘vast wasteland’; if I didn’t have a dvr and satellite, I wouldn’t be watching anything but the NFL -a soap opera if there ever was one- and ‘masterpiece’ on PBS and TCM.
BUT it is the ‘drug of the nationn’.
…And then there are the unmanned aerial vehicles (drones). And
dreams ofprivate armies.The militarist culture pervades American life more than ever…
No doubt, Tarheel…!
Aloha, Tarheel, so when do we get to hear the gory details of Chi-town…? *g*
The New Zealand counterpart to Memorial Day is Anzac Day (Australia-New Zealand Army Corp) in February, and fabric poppies are handed out (as grow amid the crosses row on row in Flanders Fields). I always remember my handsome uncle who died I am pretty sure without firing a shot just weeks after arriving in Tunisia where he is buried, when I was about three years old. He had a girlfriend named Kathleen, and I can remember the family saddening as that was played on our big radio – “I’ll take you home again, Kathleen.”
Other wars just haven’t meant what that one did to me. I think you only have room in your heart for one great sacrifice maybe. Then, you simply keep asking it not to happen again. I was actually glad when my sons dropped out of public school. They were saved from peer pressure and indoctrination. They did not sign up to kill or be killed.
Soon enough. See tarheeldem.posterous.com for a sketch of my time there.
Technology is capitalism’s savior and the faithful lay their lives at it’s beck and call.
He will betray.
In the US, the American Legion used to sell crepe paper poppies in the lead up to Memorial Day to finance their veterans programs.
Flanders fields had a significant imaginal impact on both the memory of World War I (and by extension World War II) and on the development of the anti-war movement prior to World War II.
Your comments about great sacrifice are not only apropos but point out how war is transmuted into a religion by making losses “sacred”.
Mahalo, Tarheel, for all your efforts…!
I’m glad to see that you’re home safe and sound…! *g*
Technology laid the basis for civilization’s pentagon of power (Lewis Mumford).
And I guess David Graeber would argue that it also laid the basis for 5000 years of debt economies.
Don’t let Ludwig fool you – he loves technology so much so that he comments here.
Can’t be all bad or totally comprador-ish, because Ludwig would NEVER be a comprador, now would he?
Ludwig a comprador? Comrade Karl will burn in hell first!
Yep, I found this in Wikipedia:
Seems like a $50 Marxist word for “pimp”.
And from Merriam’s dictionary: “1: a Chinese agent engaged by a foreign establishment in China to have charge of its Chinese employees and to act as an intermediary in business affairs
2: intermediary
LOL
Gotta newsflash for ya hunny – your a comprador, whether you like it or not.
You have some sort of internet connected device, and some sort of internet service. How you got it or pay for continuing service -Who Knows!
But you are participating in the system you loathe, or pretend to loathe, or whatever it is you do in terms of your gobbledygook lecturing of others.
It makes it very easy to ignore or mock you.
I mostly choose ignore, but this case was irresistible, comrade.
Ho ho. Compradors love to blame everyone a comprador.
Participation in a system one loathes is not compradoring, my sarcastic rectifier. Doing the bidding of the masters for fee is.
Is that what you are willfully doing, comrade?
Ah, you don’t understand how technology is capitalism’s fix.
Beware, comrade.
Hey, don’t you have a history of acting like an ass?
Not quite.
$49.95 then
Technology was feudalism’s aid too. Consider the stirrup. And the compound bow. And the watermill. And the windmill. And domestication of animals like oxen, water buffalos, and horses.
It is too easy to read technological determinism into the words “means of production.” That is a mistake.
But this has been one huge tangent to point of the diary.
Thank you, TD, for this thoughtful and important perspective.
We are of a similar age, so your experience and your words resonate for me with a time-transporting energy.
We have not yet, as a society, moved much beyond thorough infatuation with our technological “toes” … I look at today’s young men who join the military for adventure and the means of further education, after they have experienced a steady diet of violent video games and the “need” of being constantly “connected”, but not really “in touch”, and I wonder.
Our collective bemusement seems to overwhelm a broader purview and understanding of implication, dire and perhaps terminal … or so it seems to me, as the militarization of society is shifted into ever higher gears, ramped-up into a holy frenzy which will lead no one knows quite where – although we may guess, and likely, among us, with some deft precision.
Like CTut, I await your insights and the recounting of your recent adventures in Chicago … at the very center of a particular insanity and mindlessness.
That said, I recommend this diary to all at FDL, for it speaks to a number of realities, entwined and co-dependent, which deserve the thoughtful and continuing attention of anyone capable of sustained and conscious thought.
DW
Thank you, friend DW, for understanding the complexity of memory and the problematic nature of moral thought.
I am still processing what the Chicago Spring says about where we are as a nation.
But I am increasingly convinced from that experience that the kids are OK. At least to the same extent we were in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
The lost generation IMHO is the Reagan generation — the folks who went to college post-Kent State with their parents’ warnings against activism ringing in their ears. Who put their head down and focused on supporting a family. Not all of them mind you, but the generational composition of events in Chicago was striking.
Most of those video games are the same games the military uses to train their people. The difference is, when working with a “game” in the military, there is someone there to reprimand you if you screw up…out in the civilian world, kids get to play war without the over-sight. Kinda convenient, a whole generation of people desensitized to the killing and atrocities of war.
Dispelled immediately when one’s mate’s blood and gore are splattered on you.
If you read Capital and some of Marx’s other writings you’ll find the two parts of capitalism he liked was innovation and technology.
I am not so certain the players of violent video games are desensitized, 1Freerein, so much as convinced, in their immaturity, that they are “tough”, the bravado of self-illusion, quickly dispelled, as SD suggests, @26, by actual battlefield experience …
Our myths are killing us, and many other innocents, as well …
And those myths provide quite a “killing”, in the treasured economic sense(?) for the few and self-determined precious one$ …
DW
Hello, TarheelDem. Glad you are OK and (assumedly) back home again. Watching the military seduction ads on TV, the emphasis definitely is on technology, proving yourself and developing leadership.
The ads neglect to mention the reality after one gets out, the difficulties in finding a ‘real’ job in the real world.
Well, I guess the atrocities in Syria are propelling US to another war front.
I feel like I live in Rome about 2100 yrs ago ( except when I look at the sky, that is)
Yup, the body count has reached critical mass over there and here we come. Is there oil?
Happy Memorial Day!
This is a day they’ll never cancel, although Labor Day seems to be on it’s way out
Joe Ruzicka (1946-1972) was a Jabberwocky Coffee House Player, a Husband (He married Miss Muck), a father, an Episcopalian, and a Bomber (Crashed in a storm – en route to a Bombing Mission). The tailgunner, alone successfully ejected the nose-diving aircraft. Thai villagers scavenged the useful bits.
Thank you for that clarification. In some of my sociology classes a few years ago, we discussed the social, financial, spiritual and psychological implications of those video games. What you said was considered as a potential outcome of the game to the person playing. Anyone who has ever had to be in a real war zone loses…That being said, perpetuating the myth of glory and heroism does provide huge economic incentive and profit for a few.
Lure of technology, no jobs for the youth of the country, no hope of higher education. Perfect fodder for this countries war machine.
x2, THD.
In the sort of capitalism we now practice, everything — innovation, technology, charity, even morality — are put in the service of maximizing profit for those in power.
A comprador is neither pimp nor whore and maybe a little of both.
The point you miss is that capitalism turns technological innovation into a faith – you must believe because it is our profit and that cannot end (or if we don’t push it, someone else will and then we will end).
There is no alternative.
Technology is the one true god.
The robot religion.
I missed the military completely in 1955 for physical reasons as well…bad eyesight. No Navy man could wear glasses with the numbers I needed for correction. And the Navy wanted me (and I the Navy) because I understood how to build and run communication gear, licensed by the FCC in 1954.
I had many of the same illusions except mine were sea bound. I did wrest an agreement that, since the Navy would not accept me, I would not be drafted.
They weren’t lost, they were spent in battle.
And do you suppose he would evangelize the singularity, comrade?
He’s dead.
How many times to I have to ask you not to call me comrade?
I agree.
Finally a full argument. Thank you.
Technology does become a religion in capitalism, beginning with the doctrine that all of creation must be measured by “efficiency” (the technological counterpart of “cost-effectiveness”). Scientistic technical language becomes the incantations of capitalist rituals.
Marx himself participates in this appeal to science, if only as a mechanism for framing his argument amidst the many odes to “Progress”.
So?
Yep. That pretty much gets to the tragic nature of Memorial Day.
I thought money was the One True God; have I misses something?
Nice piece, THD, and welcome home. (Check your WePay; it’s up $660 since your arrest, thanks to the generosity of many Firedogs.) ;o)
And what do you suppose Comrade Marx would say of the singularity?
We’ll never know, will we?
That’s in the low church.
But why be evasive?
Droney
They’re already teaching the kiddies to love the drone on PBS. Surprised?
How right to have your diary frontpaged this Memorial Day, Tarheel. Thank you, FDL!
“I am still processing what the Chicago Spring says about where we are as a nation.
But I am increasingly convinced from that experience that the kids are OK. At least to the same extent we were in the late 1960s and early 1970s.”
This is my conviction also, Tarheel. I am so glad you came away with this. I saw you kids streaming towards Chicago on the interstate in ’68, as I was raising or attempting to raise my family then, and I saw the campaigning and turnout for the presidential election in 2008. I saw Occupy.
The kids are indeed OK. Even after such an onslaught of propoganda and a diminishment of educational and work possibilities channeling them to become slaves of the corporate military machine – and maybe also because of that. The kids are OK.
I agree; and it was simply incredible to me that while some of us Oldies were busy arranging October2011, the kids said the hell with this noise, and headed to Occupy Wall Street. Spontaneous Innonvation, no?
This Kids Indeed Are Alright. (only version I could find with the iconic first chord: briinnng!)
Thanks for this post, THD, and so glad to see you back again.
This is the first of all her birthdays that Little Momma is not here to celebrate, and in honor of her and the many fallen, all over the world and in every human era, I have taken the morning to listen to and read the words of those who have told the tale in every way, that war is really no good.
Perhaps it was Colin Powell who remarked that it is those who have not been to battle who are the first to start wars. I am sure he is not the first to note that, and maybe it applies mostly to the recent crop of our “leaders.”
I think it was in the link from Lakeside Diner that had someone saying that Memorial Day is every day for many.
And that is when the cost of war really comes home.
“… a whole generation of people desensitized to the killing and atrocities of war.”
Anyone read “Ender’s Game“?
Great series of books.
The kids are alright … it is the “older ones”, our contemporaries, who are the authors of destruction, madness, and endless, forever war …
DW
Loved it.
why is it, though, that the “authors of destruction, madness and endless, forever war”, were all once kids, and alright?
What happens to “us”?
War Is a Racket and the military more so.
The only thing any of our military conflicts have accomplished since WWII has been to keep the contractors in business and make them rich.
I am fairly certain that had our military spending after WWII returned to the pre-war levels, we would have sunk back into depression.
We enlist children to do what adults can’t or won’t.
The rite of passage. Kill for the next generation.
It’s insane.
Ah, Om ALi …
Let us consider:
“Greed is good.”
“Political Expediency.”
Or simply psychology: those who wish to run things, who lust to be President, Congress members, RICH, “influential” … or “in charge” should NEVER be permitted unchecked power OR limitless acquisition.
Until and unless civil society fully understands and has mechanisms to protect itself not merely from “outside” predation but “inside” “ambition” and avarice, from internal fascism and the deliberate protection of the elite status quo as the fundamental “purpose” of the law, which we Americans may readily see in the Dred Scott decision and “Citizens United” as well as the notion that “money is speech” and that “corporations are people” …
It is not some mysterious “thing”, it is rather, all too clear and even obvious. However, hypocrisy and deliberate and enforced ignorance are the “order” of our day …
Consider that those who are destroying everything are wealthy beyond ready understanding, yet for them, it is still … not enough, while those of us who seek and actually build something better, something human-sized and sustainable, something just and reasonable, which celebrates life and not death, must “finance” our dreams with our own blood, sweat, and tears.
We have not legions of think tanks, and mercenary armies, we have no armed forces, no drones and battleships, no “public” media that pushes our perspectives … nor do we want or seek these things.
We do have the truth and time, as much as we have, is on our side.
We need not “defeat” the masters … as they are hell-bent upon destroying themselves … it is simply that they have no qualms with destroying everything along the way … indeed, destruction is their primary “accomplishment” … which truth becomes more evident and undeniable each and every single day.
The sad truth, the psychological truth, is that the masters are very small beings consumed by doubt and fears … at heart, most are timid bullies who send others to do their dirty work … or else they destroy at a distance … and always they seek to hide what it is they do … that is why state’s secrets are so important to the ruling classes … until they assume they no longer need hide their actions … which, despite what they imagine is not a sign of their power, but evidence of their failure and weakness… for they build and create nothing and have wealth and power ONLY because they control the law and have NO scruples in putting “down” the many.
It, ultimately is a choice.
“They” have made theirs.
What shall we make of ours?
DW
How Amity Shlaes of you, CMaukonen; guess that meme ain’t ever gonna die and go to hell. ;o)
One cannot deny the sociological dimension, comrade Bartoo. The mores and myths that cohere and defend the comprador strata is more devilish than the collective psychosis and conspiracy of the masters.
False religions are our enemies.
Hey, doesn’t the Krudman now admit the WWII buildup was critical to our crapitalism?
Krudman is paid to learn slowly.
Not art all. My take is that military spending is simply corporate socialism by another name. Wrapped up in paranoia and patriotism.
Can’t let those (commies, Islamists, terrorists…pick one) win and take you stuff cause corporate Amerika needs it.
Of the religions, false and otherwise, the most “grounded” in reality on the simple face of it, Ludwig, is worship of the essential star, for such “recognition” intuitively perceives the actual nature of most earthly energy and its fundamental source.
Consider, who among us cannot be moved to genuine awe at our collective good fortune, just the right distance “away”, not too close and not too far, on a wee small “planet” which, for our practical intents and noble purposes, is nothing short of paradise?
One does wonder if that salient truth, all of it, might ever, someday, inform our actions and our dreams?
However, we seem, too often to scurry from the light to hide in whatever darkness may take our minds off higher things and focus them on besting our fellow beings, beating our chests, and (ex)claiming EVERYTHING for “God and Country … (or now, the corporate class and money)!”
Ah, well …
DW
cmaukonen, I saw your comment upthread concerning war. I am one of those individuals, like many of the folks here at FDL, that in addition to memorializing those who have sacrificed, I like to pause and reflect on Memorial Day as to why we have sent so many of our fellow citizens to war. Ran across a quote that I wanted to share with you:
“Make wars unprofitable and you make them impossible.” ~~A. Philip Randolph, leader in the civil rights and labor movements
There were those who sacrificed for fame, fortune, and power. The rest of us either were not so lucky or stuck to our principles, or likely both.
Priests, having the task of shepherding the herd, will never be allowed such pruning, comrade Bartoo until they sequester themselves monastically, a la the medieval, as comrade Berman has been saying for some time.
One wonders what torch will be taken to Barker, Dawkins & Dennett’s Clergy Project which is cleansing the rot in the Kwistian Kingdom.
In Sol’s religion it is sacrilege to horde his bounty. You can divine the corrupt on that article of faith. Their wickedness is ever defensive against the truth.
That is the product, I contend, of the comprador’s religion and not some cynical original sin.
Here’s a quote I’d like to share with the P5+1 diplomats who are in talks with the Iranians:
“I destroy my enemies when I make them my friends.” ~~Abraham Lincoln
Here Here !
Good stuff TD. Pretty sure Joe agrees.
But thanks as much or more for your actions to get into the face of the machine the rest of us just rant and rave about. Your speech is louder than our mere words that, although are important, don’t actually interfere with, or clog the machine.
Were at least occasional pains in their ass, (unless we were all show up to vote, then we’d really scare ‘em) but you inspire us to put our ass’ on the line and become like you, a cause for they’re serious concern.
We more humble types have to believe our speech has merit, but your impact is exponentially more meaningful, putting real skin in the game, and so necessarily comes with more risk; thicker file, cold cells, etc.. Hope the cuffs weren’t too tight. Salute. And accept the hermit’s “skin in the game” medal!
He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare,
And he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere.
– Ali bin Abu-Talib, cousin and son-in-law of Muhammad, as well as the first Shī‘ah Imām.
X2!!
TD is certainly a worthy recipient of your medal and a heartfelt salute!
Indeed, the “scurrying away” is inculcated, it is NOT our true nature.
That is why the “discussion” around human nature is always circled back upon … the masters must convince the many that we are all equally at fault … just as it is claimed, today, that the financial debacle is the fault of everyone and that and the foul Iranians seek world domination.
If the elite may “transfer” their own twisted motivations and fears onto the many, then they legitimize their usurpation, as not merely “necessary”, but “natural”. Call “that” their “religion”, Ludwig, and it is comparatively easy to see why paradise is lost to us … until we have had enough … or our supine and enforced turpitude allows paradise to no longer support our existence.
Extinction is very common on this planet, and humankind must come, either in time or much too late, to grasp that our “tenure” … “here”, is neither guaranteed nor subject to any successful semantic evasions … If the generations alive today, do not take this truth to heart, then those who come after … will despise us, and worse, pity us, for our empty, selfish, complacency and addiction to the empty comfort of “free enterprise” masquerading as “democracy”.
And they WILL fully understand the depth of our collective and prideful depravity.
DW
DWBartoo
This should be carved on plaques and stitched into a samplers and spray-painted on overpasses and read again and again and again.
Thank you, DW. May I quote you?
This too, comrade Bartoo, is the product of the Panglossian comprador society, manipulating the collective through the professoriat until a crisis demands a new reaction and deceit.
That best of all possible societies belies the contempt of humanity occultly enshrined. The threat of extinction will not dissuade the superman and any survivors of their madness will pity us our delusions and slaughter.
They would know the waste of the supermen’s contagious madness and the compradors’ stupefied collusion.
Here madness still reigns.
THD — I’m going to ignore all the back-and-forth and just say that I admire what you did in Chi (and going there in the first place), and am glad that you are back, safe.
Before you get too effusive about my clogging the machine, understand that I was just a citizen journalist sleeping on the floor of an apartment. I believe the term these days for that is “collateral damage”.
See @82.
LOL! Dunno, Ludwig; Krugman seems to say it a lot, but he may also say too much about everything, imo.
But Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes(maybe?) wrote a paper exposing that lie, and he does still talk about it a lot. Easiest link to find was about Iraq.
Still, I admire the effort you took to get there. Not to mention, your serendipitious/fortuitous element of being in that apartment on that day.
I would have liked to join you, but for better or worse, I lack the requisite passive gene for non-violent protest. Much too confrontational and impulsive, esp. when someone else puts their hands on me.
Which lie, comrade davis?
I feel a need to veer a bit away from my bright agreement with ‘the kids are alright’ agreement. A very personal event caused me to consider the other side of what I’d said so hopefully earlier, picturing the OWS kids.
Our daughter lives in Colorado Springs, famous for three things: Pike’s Peak gold rush tourism, Military bases galore, and fundie Xianist mega-churches and their political machines.
Many of A.’s friends enlist, and some re-enlist, all because the signing bonuses are so attractive, and the military really does amount to a sick and twisted de facto jobs program. This problem has become epidemic in the US, of course, and certainly negatively impacts communities in many ways, including when soldiers return with violence in their blood, and often PTSD from explosions and other traumas.
A. called to say that a former friend of theirs, on leave from Afghanistan, provoked an altercation, and bit off part my SiL’s ear. Now he and his wife are leaving early to head back to the ME, so no one, either civilian or military will prefer charges, so no restitution for surgeries, no accountability for his actions, tra la la …
But listening to her speak of it, the effect on their young children, and above all…the language of violence that laced her conversation, made me realize how far we have to go to unwind violence as a reflexive response to so many sorts of conflicts. It’s going to be a long road to teach and learn peaceful resolutions throughout our society, and schools are only in the beginning stages of that, sadly.
I had a bit more to share on that theme, but real life just whistled me back to it. (Saved me (or y’all) from a 2L2R 2-earnest comment, prolly) ;o)
Quote away, HotFlash.
‘Tis nothing profound, merely a simple likelihood, that many human beings must, by now, fully perceive … in fact, I suspeculate that a vast percentage of our fellow sentient human beings understand on a level heretofore impossible.
Just as there is physical evolution, so too is there evolution of consciousness … our species is proof of that reality even if we choose to pretend that it is not so.
DW
The question is, is there an evolution of consciousness or a revolution of consciousness?
Exactly. They kids are not alright. Can’t let compradors off that easily.
Now THAT is a rather profound question, Ludwig.
And, given what “we” collectively face, it will be both an intentional shift and one that threatens the status quo unlike any since the invention of agriculture.
As you know, it was women who revolutionized our relationship to nature in that instance (which probably was a looooong “instance” requiring scores of years, if not hundreds, and many participants) and they were able to do this because their consciousness was “receptive” …
A need was perceived, was self-evident, beyond the surface and observation led to understanding.
Now, we are talking not about the world and universe, and making it amenable to our needs but the inner universe of human consciousness and seeking to make ourselves amenable to the world and universe.
Have we the humility, and more important, the courage?
So, your question is not merely germane … it is of primary essence.
However, revolting that “answer” might seem …
DW
But comrade Bartoo, couldn’t an evolution of consciousness be consciously pursued? And wouldn’t a revolution re-enfold the unfolding of the evolved?
The Panglossian professors at least claimed there is no evolution left; would it not be more more derisive to demand it be refolded?
Isn’t it curious that “revolt” is imprisoned by revolution?
And when those women unfolded agriculture, how could they have foreseen unleashed the violence of tribes and the theistic hogwash to imprison them?
No, comrade Bartoo, I do not long for a managed “revolution” of consciousness but if ours doesn’t evolve that’s what we will get.
Ah, Ludwig …
Power to the people!
There is NO other way forward.
There is no other means to dignity and justice.
There is no future otherwise.
Period.
Get out of your head, off of your ass, and into the street!
;~DW
Nevermind, DW. Got some more consciousness raising to do.
;~D
wendy, I am sorry to hear your story, and it is perhaps too much for you just now to be your positive self, hard worker that you are. It’s okay. But heading back for the ME is my idea of punishment, if that is a help at all. The violence and cultivation of it where your daughter lives would certainly make me want to leave that place – it sounds a bit like living on a toxic waste dump. (Which is sadly what a lot of Colorado is, massive though the mountains be.)
I was listening to the democracynow broadcast this afternoon, and actually the medal throwers which brought me to tears were the ones with such anguish in their voices for the terrible things they had seen and done. They had done these brutal things, and they spelled it out. Made you cry. The song at the end captured it perfectly. It isn’t just the initials ptsd – these kids have been raped. Even, and especially, the violent ones.
We know how much violence was brought home when Vietnam ended – remember “going postal?” When I agreed with Tarheel that the kids are ok I meant they feel, they react, they think. Some of them are like the folk you point to, I would say maddened by the culture and dangerous therefore. But there’s enough of the younger generation to make a movement, and enough of us oldie kids like Tarheel and OmAli and you to give them substantial moral support. It may not be our era any longer, we may just vicariously be cheering them on, but the torch has passed and young folk are making it their own. Their own way. Nonviolently. Bravo to them.
You know, it’s like birth, there’s all the puffing and blowing (or yelling if you are like me) and then there comes this change – women who’ve given birth will know what I mean. It’s called transition, and it’s when your body (who you never gave a conscious thought had a mind of its own) takes over. Okay, body, it’s your time to shine. Be my guest. You know what you’re doing.
We’re not their yet, but we are getting mighty mighty close. We’ve done all we could. The Chicago Spring built on Occupy, and it even built on Winter Soldier way back when. Those kids, I say again, are OK.
A day or two ago I picked up an old copy of “Dr. Zhivago” from the Salvation Army. Takes me back to when all the Soviet youth had was samizdat and that work had to be published in Europe. My copy prints out as a frontspiece the implosion of reprints from July 1958 to December. That’s like Occupy. It was a beginning.
This is the hard part and who knows how long it will take? I’m optimistic. Babies get born eventually.
“The lost generation IMHO is the Reagan generation”
Get to know us:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0679743650?tag=apture-20
For you, TarheelDem, as you remember that Spirit called Joe Ruzicka and your life’s intersection with his.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-thc-sWNcGU
Excellent links.
TD, your modesty speaks well of your character, but the truth is we, and you, knew you were going into a veritable war zone where anything could happen, at the option, direction, and control of some brutal people. You took that risk, and fully deserve to be admired and supported for it.
So kind of you to respond, dear Juliania. I sincerely wasn’t intending to extrapolate from this hideous happening to the kids in general, and not finishing the comment was ill-advised. But the event caused me again to see how vast and interwoven are the personal and socio-political narratives. I know that having taken up Arthur Silber’s challenge to read his essay archives on Alice Miller’s work (I’d read her before I’d read Arthur) has necessarily colored my lenses, but the subject of what are the underlying causes of both everyday violence, and limited empathy is one that we neglect at our peril, I think.
Sigh. I keep deleting what I type; I wanna write a goddam book here, picturing what it will take to turn this around:
“According to a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, 53 percent of self-identified liberal Democrats and 67 percent of moderate or conservative Democrats support keeping Guantanamo Bay open. Seventy-seven percent of liberal Democrats endorse the use of drones, which we know kill innocent civilians.” (hat tip uetchaiam)
It’s gonna be about the children of ‘the kids’, and what’s required to teach them well, nurture them so they are self-aware, cooperative, and kind. More deletions. I will say that I know from personal experience from having adopted our kids, that some things that happen to babbies will never be mended, and the new world we dream will need to include rigorous support for parents, children, and the best educations possible. Sorry if the Dark Place I’m in is hard for readers, but to me, it’s both healthy and necessary.
And yes, both the actual and metaphorical babbies will be born, and we’ll help as midwives. ;o)
Oh, and A. just called; the young man was arrested after a bit of a campaign of calls by family to the police, and I’m glad. Maybe he can at least pay some of the medical bills. ME as punishment: it sure would be for me and thee.
Actually, TarheelDem, did you ever consider *why* the US’s high-tech, low-combat-manpower military is structured the way it is? It’s actually pretty simple.
Today’s military is a response to Vietnam, pure and simple. Oh, Cap Weinberger tried to pose it as a response to the big, bad USSR, but in truth analysts whom I trust say if the Cold War had turned hot in the 1980s in Europe, after just 2 weeks of combat both we and the Soviets would have run out of high-tech stuff, due to the enormous anticipated losses and due to simple wear-and-tear and fatigue. We would have had to pull out our M-48s and M-60s out of storage in National Guard amouries in the US to make up those losses, while the Soviet likewise would have pulled out their T-55s. Both sides might have started out with high-tech stuff, but we would have ended up fighting such a war with a lot of 1950s and early 1960s hardware, stuff that could be crewed and serviced and built relatively cheaply.
In so many ways, Vietnam was a tipping point in US history, and people learned different lessons from it. For some people, like Colin Powell (despite his later acts regarding Iraq), those lessons were fairly reasonable, about the actual need and use of military force. Inside the US military, there were some who detected problems with the US military’s too top-down hierarchal approach, a holdover from WWII. Some in the anti-war movement exaggerated their impact in ending the war and exaggerated the effect of dissent.
But for people like the Dick Cheneys of the world (who worked in the Nixon administration) Vietnam provided a different lesson entirely. One was that Nixon and Johnson did not move to stifle dissent and to spy and crack down on dissident groups. That they did not move more decisively to propagandize Americans using the news media and to prevent Americans from getting accurate information. And that using a large-manpower military was built upon conscripts in adventures overseas would result in too-many body bags coming home that would eventually cause the government’s attempt to control the narrative to spin out of control.
Ergo, Cap Weinberger and Reagan built the “shock and awe” military. Not good for fighting the Soviets, mind you, as it did not have much in the way of depth, but good in overwhelming technologically outclassed Second- and Third-world nations in wars to be fought over resource control. A military that would “win” (for them, not for us) without too-many body bags coming home to upset American mothers. In Iraq, this came close to biting them as they forgot that such a military is not well-suited for occupation duties. (An M-1 Abrams tank is only effective if it has the gasoline trucks it needs in abundance to keep it fueled, and while taking out the M-1 is difficult for a motley militia to do–though they did accomplish just that, on a number of occasions–it’s pretty darn easy to take out those trucks, especially when they lack sufficient protection that only a large manpower combat force can supply).
The modern high-tech propaganda campaign? That’s just a social corollary of having built this kind of armed force, especially in a country that has very little else to crow or chest-thump about.
The US has become a 21st century version of ancient Sparta with its military structure. It might surprise some readers, but Sparta was not particularly gung-ho compared to the other Greek city-states about engaging in military adventures, because the Spartan leadership realized its lack of depth and other internal weaknesses, and realized that getting involved in protracted military campaigns would actually provide its would-be enemies a chance to learn how to defeat its smaller, highly trained, specialized military. The Spartan leadership realized that its military was more effectively used as a threat, or in limited wars, rather than in constant war.
However, after Sparta’s victory in the Peloponnesian War, with it being thrust into ascendancy, and constant war inevitably happened. And guess what? With enough practice, Sparta’s enemies learned how to defeat its military machine. This seems uncomfortably close to the US’s situation after the demise of the USSR.
One last thing, about popular culture–in popular culture, in video-game and movie culture, what you see is the extolling of the exploits of the few heroes against the mass of people (I would recommend people see Eisenstein’s Alexander Nevsky to see the shoe on the other cinematic foot). But the funny thing is, in video gaming you usually end up getting ‘killed’. Quantity has a quality all its own, and in many ways the current military and our propaganda about it forgets the 1993 North Hollywood shootout where a couple of bank robbers, armed with automatic weapons and sporting body armor completely outclassing the police, were still brought down by the police because of mere numbers. Somehow we forget all that.
-stewartm
Excellent observations, stewartm, particularly this paragraph:
“But for people like the Dick Cheneys of the world (who worked in the Nixon administration) Vietnam provided a different lesson entirely. One was that Nixon and Johnson did not move to stifle dissent and to spy and crack down on dissident groups. That they did not move more decisively to propagandize Americans using the news media and to prevent Americans from getting accurate information. And that using a large-manpower military was built upon conscripts in adventures overseas would result in too-many body bags coming home that would eventually cause the government’s attempt to control the narrative to spin out of control.”
One huge lesson domestically from Vietnam was that a sustained conflict tips the scales in which guns and butter are both being pursued. It couldn’t be plainer since Johnson gave such emphasis to his War on Poverty as he took up Kennedy’s legacy, along with the civil rights movement which played such an important part in the memories of that generation. And we saw the war take precedence, along with press coverage of body bags and villages destroyed in order to save them.
President Carter was undone by precisely the strategies you describe – in particular the media which had helped enlighten the public during Vietnam, and so was immensely trusted by the American people, began to undermine instead of support his presidency. It has taken us a long time to distrust that vital instrument, but you can bet they knew we would eventually.
Control of the narrative is what makes the Occupy movement so important. Occupy says they do not control the narrative. The narrative is life.
[By the way, folks, after Cheney's heart transplant I hope you are thinking very hard about donating your organs. It's really only the 1% who will benefit from this macabre practise. I know, it seems altruistic. Think about it. Death is harsh sometimes, but organ donation give me the willies.]