Clarifying his remarks yesterday that many thought played "hot potato" on Don’t-Ask-Don’t-Tell repeal with the White House, Senate Majority Leader took an opportunity to clarify his remarks in a statement to ThinkProgress.
While we do not have a Don’t Ask Don’t Tell bill introduced in the Senate yet, a number of Senators are working on an approach to get it repealed. We would welcome a legislative proposal from the White House on repeal so as to provide clear guidance on what the President would like to see and when. Working together, I believe we can find the time to get repeal done in this Congress.
Because of the prevailing bipartisanship religion on Capitol Hill, the bill "requires" an apparently elusive GOP sponsor. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe have not stepped up, and no neanderthal GOP will break ranks (or expose his personal foibles). I suppose if Arlen Spectre was still a Republican, he might be prevailed upon to sponsor DADT repeal, but that ship has sailed. Lindsay Graham, as a Reserve JAG Officer, would be a wonderful candidate to co-sponsor DADT repeal. Has he been asked, one wonders? Or does his military service present a conflict?
UPDATE: The Advocate and the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network focus on the "this Congress" aspect of Harry Reid’s statement:
Reid’s comments are the first intimations from Congressional leadership on a time frame for accomplishing repeal, and are in line with those made earlier this year by Rep. Barney Frank.
"I believe we should and will do ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ next year," Frank told Roll Call in April. "We haven’t done the preliminary work, the preparatory work. It would be a mistake to bring it up without a lot of lobbying and a lot of conversation."
The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, a group that lobbies for repeal of the military’s gay ban, embraced Majority Leader Reid’s statement.
"This clarification on DADT repeal from the Senator Majority Leader is most welcomed," said Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the organization. "SLDN has had positive, ongoing DADT meetings with the Senate leader’s staff for several months, and I know from conversations he is committed to repeal of this discriminatory law.



15 Comments







After you, Alfonse!
Cautiously optimistic, but with Harry’s arms around this thing…
Just exec the thing, Barack.
OT – I just heard the Afghan supplemental passed in the House…
Somehow I think Harry’s mind is occupied with how he’s going to help his friend John Ensign. Gotta keep up his bye-partisan cred you know.
Sen. John Ensign of Nevada should step forward and be a co-sponser. It might make some news for him besides his being the latest Republic forced to admit that he had an extramarital affair with a woman.
At least it was a woman. Let’s not forget Foley….
That’s probably one of Limpy Limbaugh’s themes for tomorrow’s show.
this is snark, right?
Will Palin now demand that Letterman apologize for Ensign’s affair?
Right. Because 16 years of DADT (passed in 1993) is nowhere near enough time for evaluation, lobbying, and ‘conversation.’
No guts, no courage. They just want to kick the can down the road a ways further.
Damn right. What’s to “study”? I’m so sick of them playing kick the can down the road. Do they have to be pushed to do EVERYTHING? It is going to become exhausting herding these do-nothings.
Jane is upstairs!
Whip Count: The Final Total, or How We Went from 0 to 32
It’s obvious military people should be consulted, but shouldn’t somebody also ask the GLB community how they would like it to work?
I feel certain they’ve given it a lot more thought than most anybody else.
How about this: A person’s sexual orientation is their own business. Otherwise, as it is with heterosexuals serving in the military people are supposed to keep their hands to themselves.
Lots of other countries have no problem with this.
More of a kabuki religion?