Overlooked in the discussion of the Catholic Bishops’ heartfelt moral compulsion to intervene in the health care reform debate to ensure no woman assisted with federal dollars ever gets an abortion is the business assist the Bishops get from Stupak-Pitts.
What the Stupak-Pitts amendment does for the Catholic health care system is omit a competitive advantage secular and other religiously-affiliated hospitals without doctrinal restrictions can use to simultaneously market their services to both the expected influx of newly insured patients and the outpatient medical professionals who will treat them.
By restricting insurance coverage of women’s reproductive health care, the competitive barriers faced by Catholic institutions will be eliminated — provided the amendment is not stripped out of the final bill that emerges from House-Senate health care reform conference committee. Which is why pro-choice advocates should expect nothing short of a full-frontal attack by the Vatican on conservative Senators.
And in the case of an industry that accounts for 18 percent of the gross domestic product and is expected to double in less than 10 years, it’s absolutely critical to follow the money.
Eliminating a competitive advantage of their hospital competitors is not small change.
The Denver-based Catholic Health Initiatives is now the largest of the church’s hospital systems in the country with 78 hospitals and 40 long-term care facilities in 20 states and operating revenues exceeding $9.6 billion ranking it sixth among all for-profit and charity health care networks.
Now consider that there are 60 some Catholic-affiliated hospital systems in all 50 states — representing 13 percent of the nation’s entire in-patient health care system. That’s easily tens of billions of dollars flowing through the business arm of the Catholic church that continues to grow through mergers with private and other religiously-affiliated hospitals.
Isn’t it wonderful when business interests coincide so completely with theology and its focus on the unborn?
For the business arm of the Catholic church it’s a theological and economic two-fer.
The bishops can extract abortion care from the private insurance benefits of millions of American women that are federally subsidized ten ways to Sunday (with the blessing of conservative lawmakers’ corporate welfare earmarks) and they level the competitive playing field without having to revise its medical doctrine to modern standards of care.
Analyzing the bishops’ lobbying efforts from a cold, calculating green eyeshade perspective adds a very different dimension to their motives that may help spur secular business interests to protect both a woman’s right to choose and their own bottom line.
Our lawmakers need to understand that the muscle the Bishops brought to bear on this amendment isn’t simply based in doctrine: their accountants and business planners surely laid out for them the business argument for eliminating a primary competitive distinction for non-Catholic hospitals.
As always, follow the money.
via digby



23 Comments







Isn’t it wonderful when doctrine and accounting coincide?
You know, I was thinking about this the other day; because this is the same issue that gave Lieberman his “Short Ride” nickname.
I just hadn’t made it all the way to the money piece;I was only thinking of the RC hospitals operationally. Duh on my part.
Good post Teddy!
All credit to Digby for recognizing this argument on RHRealityCheck. Of course, I can’t imagine the Bishops are motivated by anything as worldly as cash flow and competitive positioning of their billion-dollar hospital business, can you?
Heavens, no! That would be uncivil.
And since churches aren’t taxed, why should their leaders have such an outsized voice in how tax dollars are spent anyway?
They shouldn’t; but the bishop’s outfits are dazzling!
As the drag queen remarked at her first High Mass as the bishop proceeded down the aisle, miter, crozier and incense swingin’:
“Darling, your drag is simply DIVINE, but hunny, your purse is on fire!”
They think they own Christianity, or at least control it. At least that’s the way Benny-the-pope seems to think the system works.
The sooner they get investigated for crossing the church/state separation line, the better.
(I’m willing to let them have exemptions for church buildings, as long as they’re not used for non-religious purposes at any time. Everything else should be treated as if there was no church involved. And if they go bankrupt, tough.)
The pope thinks that Protestants are not real Christians; only Catholics are worthy of his version of heaven. What do you expect from the man whose previous job was taking care of the records of the Inquisition..’g’.
Well, since I don’t get to vote on who gets to be pope, I don’t figure the pope gets any say in how I run my life. It seems to be fair to me.
JFK would have agreed with you.
********
“I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute, where no Catholic prelate would tell the president (should he be Catholic) how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for whom to vote; where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference; and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the president who might appoint him or the people who might elect him.
I believe in an America that is officially neither Catholic, Protestant nor Jewish; where no public official either requests or accepts instructions on public policy from the Pope, the National Council of Churches or any other ecclesiastical source; where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials; and where religious liberty is so indivisible that an act against one church is treated as an act against all.
Finally, I believe in an America where religious intolerance will someday end; where all men and all churches are treated as equal; where every man has the same right to attend or not attend the church of his choice; where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote, no bloc voting of any kind; and where Catholics, Protestants and Jews, at both the lay and pastoral level, will refrain from those attitudes of disdain and division which have so often marred their works in the past, and promote instead the American ideal of brotherhood.
But let me stress again that these are my views. For contrary to common newspaper usage, I am not the Catholic candidate for president. I am the Democratic Party’s candidate for president, who happens also to be a Catholic. I do not speak for my church on public matters, and the church does not speak for me.”
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16920600
Hey! You sound like You should have lived in the forefathers days, what You believe is much of what they tried to lay down for us.
To bad todays politics has ruined much of that, and hopes of returning to those days and ways are not in the wind.
Lots of Catholics=lots of votes. Remember the good old days when nobody thought there would ever be a Catholic president because people feared that Church dogma would rule the president’s choices? JFK didn’t let that happen, but Obama did without being Catholic. When this picture appeared, you were told in advance who would win in the clash between American’s pro choice and the Vatican’s no choice.
*********
“The Vatican is said to be fuming that President Obama, in his first days in office, overturned a ban on using U.S. dollars to fund abortions overseas. The Vatican also frowns on U.S. approval for the first human trials using embryonic stem cells. And of course Pope Benedict XVI has said that abortion-rights Catholics like Pelosi should not receive Communion. ”
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/02/pelosi-the-pope.html
They should have no more voice in it then any other citizen.
Using their position as church representatives to influence specific legislation clearly conflicts with our tax code. Are they registered as lobbyists or were their lobbying actions done illegally? This looks criminal to me.
If only Michael Jackson had become a priest.
protecting child molesters is pro-life, donchaknow. As is forcing women to give birth to dead fetuses, forcing 9 year old rape victims to give birth…
I told the story last week of the friend who while training to be a nun, found a cript full of baby cripts of babies born to fathers and sisters. Hundreds of babies probably didn’t acidentally die at child birth, and why aren’t the babies of priests and nuns running around the rectories.
My aunt was told if she ahd another child it would take Her life. The priest came to Her house and told Her it didn’t matter if She died it was Her duty to bare children for the Church.
I worked at a Golf course and Country Club, while cutting the practice green I kept hearing voices from the bushes, in investigating, I found a bishop having a porter pass double shot after double shots out the window to him. When He left I asked the porter what that was all about? He siad the old bishop was an actual lush but didn’t want anyone to know it.
Another friend was an alter boy and told the priest was always trying to get Him drunk on wine and chasing Him around the Church.
The Catholics were in on the crusades, with every spanish adventure to kill the natives and steal their gold.
Yet People still give the church credibility. They are slightly above the scum of the earth, but the world still ahs fell for their pagentry.
A bunch of old men in skirts and funny hats proves the true religion to the weak minded, and keeps the collection pates full.
So, what was the net profit of Catholic Health Initiatives in Denver for 2009 and who got the money?
iremember54: sorry for the plagiarism, but the parallels were so striking I just had to write it down.
I told the story last week of the friend who while training for a career in public service found herself down on her knees gobbling the Presidential Crank.
My aunt wasn’t told she’d die if she didn’t get out of the car: she was just left at the bottom of the creek.
I worked at a Georgetown bar and saw Congressmen and Senators drunk off their asses. I’ll bet there are some actual lushes in the group.
Another friend was an Congressional Page and told how the congresscritters were always texting him and trying to get him in to the cloakroom.
Congress was in on the Iraq crusade to kill the natives and steal their oil.
Yet people still give politicians credibility. They are slightly above the scum of the earth, but the world still has fallen for their con game.
A bunch of old men in clothes chosen by media consultants spout talking points of the true ideology to the weak minded, and keep the campaign chests full.
Aren’t Politics and religion the two things one should stay away from to have a calm conversation.
Could it be they are so much alike, that have become one in the same.
If people really knew what their so-called Reps. do when not on camera they would revolt.
The same is true if they knew what religions really do except they would forgive and forget.
Follow the money!
That’s what I say whenever someone says this is about abortion. It’s not.
It’s about the money in healthcare. Catholics are one of the largest players in the US healthcare market.
I think that’s why we have to be clear that abortion, and reproductive health services more generally, are obviously a part of healthcare. Saying they are distinct issues gives a license to the Catholic hospital franchises to make business decisions under disguise of religious beliefs–when the whole point is that the charity arm of religious organizations has to be separate from the religious arm.
Teddy Partridge: “As always, follow the money.”
washunate: “Follow the money!”
Okay, where did the money go? It shouldn’t be hard to find: as a non-profit organization, Catholic Health Initiatives has posted their Audited Financials for public review.
The Church has tax exempt status take that away because of their political actions and the Church is left high and dry. America and Germany give the church most of its money the other countries barely break even or cost the church.
Even if the freeze in tax exempt status is only temporary until an investigation can be done as to the church’s tax exempt status and political actions such a move would cause a run the next day on the Vatican Bank.
Someone might point that out to the church someone from the WH?
That is how you play Chicago Style Politics Rahm a quiet dinner with a Bishop and a brief mention of what God Forbid hypothetically might happen if situations are not put right.
Just curious, anyone ever find out where all the profit from the non-profit Catholic Health Initiatives is going? I’d hate to think that all this righteous indignation is baseless…
BTW: not all that long ago no US hospitals performed abortions. When that changed and the religiously-affiliated hospitals began to suffer from this “competitive disadvantage” shouldn’t they have declined? The fact that they haven’t — that they they actually seem to be growing — would tend to indicate the competitive advantage of performing abortions is insignificant.
Oh, forgot to mention: if you want a good laugh, go to Google and search for Abby Johnson planned parenthood