David Boies begins re-direct of Plaintiffs witness (and asked-to-be-withdrawn defendant-intervenor Dr William Tam.

Boies: When did the campaign phase for Prop 8 begin?
T: In the fall

B: Here’s a memo dated July 2008, was that in the campaign phase?
T: Yes, that was the beginning of the campaign

B: And here’s a memo from August 2008, shows you attending a grassroots weekly meeting, this was part of the campaign phase, yes?
T: YEs

B: You told Moss on cross that you only met with people from Schubert Flynt a few times, do you remember that?
T: No

B: You said "rare, only a few times"
T: YEs, I said that

B: BUt these weekly meetings were run by the SFlynt folks, right?
T: I did not know who ran them

B: You participated every week
T: NOt every week, but six or seven

B: But SFLynt was on these meetings?
T: FRANKLY I DON’T KNOW WHO WAS ON, THEY ALL SOUND ALIKE, ENGLISH IS NOT MY MOTHER TONGUE

B: Announcements of the calls came from SFLynt, right?
T: YEs

B: Minutes of the mtg came from SFlynt?
T: Yes

B: Exhibit 2599, please. This is minutes of a grassroots weekly meeting during the campaing phase, that came from SChubertFLynt?
T: Yes
B: And this talked about 1man1woman.com, means .net I think
T: YEs it does

B: PX2504, 10/29/2008, during the campaign phase, correct?
T: Yes
B: Communications between you and PM.com, correct?
T: Yes

Walker: There have been some redactions here, is that material?
B: They might be material to permit the court to evaluate, and I would ask the court to look at in camera.
MOss: We would think we’d have to see it to tell if we can provide a unredacted copy.

Boies: Look at 2185, please Dr Tam? TFC News Bulletin, correct?
T: YEs
B: This follows the passage of Prop 8?
T: YEs
B: "TFC was allied with PM.com" Do you see that?
T: Could you point to where I could see that?
B: Look at the box on the side?
T: YEs
B: Where is says "allied with Protect Marriage.com"
T: Yes

Boies: PX2187, wrt you assertion that you were not closely working with PM.com, October 2008 is the campaign phase, yes?
T: Yes
B: and this flyer was cosponsored by PM.com and TFC, your group?
T: YEs
B: Did PM.com reimburse you for tv, radio, and print ads?
T: They reimbursed not me, the people, the organization that placed the ads.

B: I;m sorry say agian please
T: They reimbursed some people who ran tv ads and print ads.

B: Did they reimburse Traditional Families COaliition?
T: No, these were Chinese people who wanted to place ads in favor of Prop 8, but they didn’t know how to do it, so , yeah….

B: Look at 2627 (?) Email you got from Mr Pugno, 10/27/08. This is addressed to TFC, right?
T: Yes
B: It says, at the top, "Bill & Peter" and the Bill is you, right?
T: Yes
B And it says "Your organizations are spending $50,000 for print and media ads…." And this means your organization and Peter’s?
T: No, just Peter, I introduced Peter to Andy because I didn’t want to be involved.

B: But it says "your organizations." Was that wrong?
T: YEah
B: Did you correct that? Did you send back an email?
T: Once again –
B: I’m just asking, did you?
T: I never knew that as a Chinese person I would be facing a lawyer asking me all of these qustions.

B: But when you get emails sometimes you reply?
T: Sometimes
B: Is there anything to support your testimony, anything written down?
T: No I did not reply to correct hium aabout how many organizations were involved

B: INCIDENTALLY…. You worked closely with Peter, did you not?
T: Only in organizing the rally, but he runs a lot of the show.
B: What show?
T: The rally, the flyer, the publicity….
B: But you and he were both the press contact.
T: That’s true.
B: And your organization sponsored the rally?
T: Yes

B: Two more wquestions: IS it your testimony that you were not involved in campaign messaging and strategy for Protect Marriage dot com? IS that your testimony?
T: Yes it is, I did not.

B: During the break did you speak to anybody about your testimony?
T: My lawyer
B: Your lawyer
B: What did your lawyer say about it?
T: I said I felt like a naughty boy being put in front of a classroom and mocked,
B: And what did he say?
T: He laughed

B: You are aware ofAmerican history when Asian Americans could not marry the person they loved?
T: Yes
B: And you would feel very aggrieved by such laws
T: Yes
OBJECTION: Speculation
B: He has answered anyway
Walker: Overruled

Walker: Very well, tommorrow, counsel?

Boutrous: Tomorrow, our last witness Mr Herrick. And then we may have to call Mr Prentice to authenticate certain documents.

Walker: And you have met with opposing counsel with regard to that authentication?

Boutrous: YEs, and we hope to resolve things, we are working on that.

Walker: Very well, we will see you all tomorrow at 8:30 am.

VODKA-THIRTY!