[Ed. note: see the fun fact at the end which I missed the first time I read this piece -- worth a chuckle over these chuckleheads.]
The hard-core homophobes in the House GOP caucus have revealed themselves, and they are a sorry lot indeed. These are the people American history books will cast into the dustbin: bigots, haters, the sorry folks who see civil rights as a zero-sum game. If you get your civil rights, I lose mine.
A group of conservative House Republicans on Tuesday introduced a resolution in Congress to condemn the recent federal court decision overturning Proposition 8 in California.
The introduction of the non-binding measure is one of the most prominent moves against the ruling from Republicans, whose response has largely been muted, or in some cases supportive of the decision.
Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) is sponsoring the resolution, H. Res. 1607. The measure is pending before the House Judiciary Committee.
A quick reminder here: Lamar Smith is the Ranking Member of this Committee, and would become its Chair should the GOP take over the House this fall.
The resolution goes after Judge Vaughn Walker directly, and makes the incontrovertible statement that the decision is "wrong:"
The resolution offers findings faulting U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker’s decision for engaging in improper conduct during his consideration of the case. It says Walker “failed to conduct himself in an impartial manner” and “attempted to illegally broadcast the trial in disregard of the harassment such broadcast would invite on witnesses supporting Proposition 8.”
The resolution concludes that the sense of the U.S. House is that:
• Walker “failed to conduct himself in an impartial manner before striking down California’s popularly enacted Proposition 8 and thereby redefined traditional marriage to include same-sex relationships;”
• and Walker’s decision to overturn “California’s popularly enacted Proposition 8 is wrong.”
Here is the full text of the hate-filled screed.
And here is the list of the hard-core homophobes in the House, GOPs all, who want their body to reject Judge Walker’s reasoned decision in the face of foolish non-evidence that gays are icky:
Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. JORDAN of Ohio, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. AKIN, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. LATTA, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. PITTS, Mr. JONES, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. FLEMING, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. MARCHANT, and Mr. ADERHOLT)
Fun fact: I do believe the resolution mis-names the case decided by Judge Walker. Mr Smith calls it Hollingsworth v Perry and not Perry v Schwarzenegger. Maybe this is the revenge of a gay or lesbian copy-editor in someone’s office on Capitol Hill?



8 Comments







wow. our ‘Rep’, John Carter has aligned himself with this group in the past – wonder if he’s been advised to avoid them this cycle – not exactly a winner in a district where unemployment is climbing a point a month
or is it just a case of a different set of bigot sugar daddies
I suspect he can read polls, and with approval for marriage equality hitting the magic 50% number in many spots he must be holding his fire.
The ones listed above are always among the usual suspects. They belong to the H8ers caucus. Don’t know how they live with themselves.
Or how their constitutuents put up with them.
I thought you were talking about Tyler Perry.
Frank of Az is my rep but has never been (that I am aware of) to where I live.
Gay republicans, they can’t marry so they settle for being battered spouses.
the use of “homophobes” shows the same stupidity as those that use the racist branding iron on those who want the borders controlled and the existing laws followed.
People are not a fearfully phobic of gays they do not accept it as a normal lifestyle. i do not spend much time thinking about it. but it disgusts me when i do.
people have right to their opinions even if they are not pro gay or pro open borders