Today’s exciting release of the long-awaited Pentagon report for the Secretary of Defense on the effects of repealing Don’t-Ask-Don’t-Tell will say that allowing gay and lesbian military servicemembers to serve openly
would have little lasting impact on the U.S. armed forces, a major Pentagon review has found, several sources familiar with the results told CNN Tuesday.
Putting an end to “don’t ask, don’t tell,” would have “some limited and isolated disruption to unit cohesion and retention,” the year-long study found, but the effects would not be long-lasting or widespread.
Results of polling the military reflect America’s stance on DADT repeal:
Overall opposition throughout the military was about 30 percent — roughly the same as it is in America as a whole, according to recent findings from CNN/Opinion Research and the Pew Forum.
There are places where some early trouble might be expected.
There will be some strong minority opposition, particularly in the Marines and some combat arms specialist units, said the chairs of the study, Defense Department General Counsel Jeh C. Johnson and Army Gen. Carter F. Ham.
As many as 40 to 60 percent of troops in those units were against changing the 17-year-old policy that lets gay and lesbian troops serve as long as their sexual orientation is secret.
The survey is one of the most extensive ever conducted, and completes a nine-month process commissioned by the President for his Secretary of Defense:
Defense Department General Counsel Jeh C. Johnson and Army Gen. Carter F. Ham will face intense scrutiny this week from lawmakers and advocates for and against ending the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law, which bans gays from openly serving in uniform. The future of the ban rests largely with 10 moderate senators who want to read the report before voting on a defense policy bill that would end it.
Johnson and Ham led a 66-person review team that met with gay rights leaders, social conservatives, military chaplains, service members discharged under the policy, the same-sex partners of closeted gay troops and gay veterans. Hundreds of thousands of troops and spouses also provided feedback through written surveys, an online dropbox and town hall meetings at bases around the world.
Finally, a report from AmericaBlog’s Joe Sudbay from a conference call organized by a major advocate of DADT repeal, the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network:
Just got off a conference call organized by SLDN. The call was billed as a preview of the week ahead “to discuss repealing DADT in the Senate’s lame-duck session, the release of the Comprehensive Working Group Report and the U.S. Senate hearings this week.” It gave a good overview of what we can expect moving forward. I tried to capture the highlights.
SLDN’s Aubrey Sarvis began the call by saying, “I think we’re going to see a very historic day unfold before us.” He reported that briefers from the Pentagon were on the Hill this morning to brief Senators and staffers for Armed Services Committee on the report. Aubrey noted that the Executive Summary will be released at 1 pm with a Press Briefing at 2 PM.
Aubrey also said,”We think that this report will be overwhelmingly positive and very constructive.” And, he added, “It will be one of the best tools that repeal advocates can use in the lame duck session.”
“Historic” and “helpful” were the operative words.



16 Comments

Thank you, thank you very much Teddy.
Good News. And we need some.
Now, can we kidnap McSame and keep him in an undisclosed location until the repeal passes?
I don’t see how having the facts thrust in their faces will change any of the opinions on Capitol Hill.
This has never been about the facts and has always been about prejudice and you don’t change prejudice by taking a survey.
Sorry to be a wet blanket but if the Republicans have no problem blocking unemployment benefits, no problem blocking the Russian nuclear treaty, no problem blocking anything that would help the Democrats in 2012 then I don’t see why they will suddenly have a problem blocking the repeal of DADT just because the facts say it is relatively harmless. I fully expect DADT to be stripped from the defense bill and I expect very little fight from the Democrats.
I’ll wait until I see some action before I set myself up for another emotional punch in the face. We are no further ahead then we were yesterday so lets keep up the pressure and wait to celebrate for another day.
Of course it won’t change anything about the prejudice. But what it does is force the ones who claimed that they would follow the will of the active duty and vote to repeal if the survey showed it was acceptable to either do so or leave themselves twisting as contortionists as they try to flip flop without being called on it.
What are the right-wing blogs saying about this? Anybody checked them out? I have blood pressure problems, or I would do it myself.
Well we had a rightwing troll on an earlier post about the results of the DADT survey. Said troll *insisted* that the survey was wrong or lying or something, and *insisted* that the vast, vast, vast majority (I believe it was something like 95%) of those combat troops who were actually in combat (not sitting at desks) hated teh gheyz like crazeeeee & dint went them aroun.
Well, you get the picture. Suffice it say, I believe one can extrapolate what they’re saying on rightwing blogs about this, except it would make the troll who posted here look extremely civilized. Of course, that’s just my conjecture, but…
Agree. I certainly hope for the best & correct outcome on this, but I sure won’t hold my breath. Facts & reality matter little to the PTB. I keep thinking that money is being made somehow by maintaining homophobia as a predominant theme here, so that’s why they are all a-skeeeered to let it go.
The figures being quoted from the survey need to be looked at in a way that also recognizes that only 28% of those who were given the survey actually completed it and returned it. Thus, one could make the argument that 72% of those who were sent the survey didn’t even find the issue compelling enough to bother to fill it out.
Since when have the Repubs cared about being called on their hypocrisy? They do this all the time and there are no repercussions whatsoever. In fact, many Republicans seem to take pride in being hypocrites and getting away with it. Just look at the tax cut extension debate. Republicans have very successfully argued that the deficit must be addressed while simultaneously arguing that the tax cuts for the rich must be extended.
I hear what you are saying – but they still have to contort their records and lie – and occasionally they get called on the lies.
It’s called little victories.
John McCain is having no troubles calling this survey inadequate and flawed and despite saying he would follow the will of the commanders he is now calling for more study.
We are no further along today than we were yesterday.
I wish I had your optimism. Even when people get called on lies, the electorate’s attention span is so small that those things are largely forgotten when it comes time to vote.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/30/dont-ask-dont-tell-despit_n_789935.html
“Sen. Susan Collins, a centrist Republican from Maine who says she wants the ban repealed, still plans to vote against the repeal if there is not more time for debate, her spokesman said Monday.”
If the US keeps rattling the war sabres at North Korea, Iran, and anyone else they please, DADT will be moot if even discussed at all. They’ll need all the bodies they can get to fill bodybags.
The repeal of DADT will have a very long lasting effect on the military irrespective of those who write that it will not.
It’s effect will be as forever lasting as the Civil War and the Civil Rights movement lead Dr. Martin Luther King and others had.
It will also, finally, fulfil the portion of the US Constitution that those in the military defend. And I quote from the conclusions of the Witt case: “The application of “Don’t’ Ask Don’t Tell” to Major Margaret Witt does not significantly further the government’s interest in promoting military readiness, unit morale and cohesion. Her discharge from the Air Force Reserves violated her substantive due process rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”
I rest my case!