Federal prosecutors have revealed that a US employee they call “Bill Smith” contacted alleged ‘Portland Bomber’ Mohamed Mohamud almost a year prior to his actions with another FBI co-conspirator that led to the so-called ‘failed bomb plot’ at Portland’s Christmas tree ceremony last November.
Federal prosecutors acknowledge that a man they identified as “Bill Smith” sent emails to Mohamud in late 2009 and that he was working on behalf of the government. But they say the emails were unrelated to the attempted bombing.
“On the contrary,” Mohamud’s defense team wrote in court papers, “the correspondence between Bill Smith and (Mohamud) demonstrates that Smith was acting as an agent provocateur, attempting to encourage (Mohamud) to engage in violent activity in this country.”
It’s beginning to seem as if the Feds knew they had got their man, and only needed to generate a violent plot around him to save thousands of lives from danger they managed to make up for Mohamed to implement, with their extensive assistance. Fixing data about an alleged crime around an identified alleged perpetrator, if you will.
Mohamud’s defense team contends that Smith began an email exchange with their client on Nov. 9, 2009, initiating a discussion of violence in the U.S. But Mohamud took no action, they wrote, which shows that he wasn’t predisposed to violence when first contacted by the government agent.
Mohamud’s lawyers are clearly preparing to mount an illegal entrapment defense. One way to do that is to show their client was steered, from his first conversation with the FBI, into a crime he ordinarily wouldn’t commit.
Since the subsequent July conversation is no longer available due to battery failure in the FBI device used to record it, and since the initial conversation with a government agent is critical to the prosecution’s contention that the suspect was not entrapped, this newly revealed email exchange with a government employee acting on the FBI’s behalf, to which Mohamed made no response of a violent nature, could be very important to his defense.
It certainly is looking as if the FBI’s showcase “apprehension” and prosecution (initially timed with Portland’s decision to rejoin the Joint Terror Task Force on the Feds’ terms) only has run into trouble.



22 Comments

“Bill Smith” must not be the best motivator, eh?
Couldn’t get the little terrorist wound up.
Heh.
Thank you for the update, TeddyWan. “Bill Smith” needs to get a life and an honest job.
When all the jobs go overseas, we are forced to manufacture terrorists? Somehow does not strike me as a “jobs” proposal.
Guess we can’t have all those FBI agents sitting around doing nothing. Pretty disgusting stuff.
All the terrrisss plots since 9/11 have been manufactured by the FBI.
From the manufacture of false econometrics to “terrorist threats,” agnotologic capitalism means it’s a glitzy disinformation campaign substituted for real governance is that is neither their competency or interest.
I say watch out for the next false flag attack, designed to rally us around the flag, and steal what remaining freedoms and money we have.
also heard that WH going to release OBL home videos and propaganda messages they found at the compound. Releasing a pix would incite violence, but releasing home videos of OBL have no impact.
Me thinks WH desperate. Obvious that so many do not believe their stories, and msm no longer controls the information the masses get fed.
I love when one challenges OBL story, posters say well if he was still alive he would show himself. Nope he is dead, and has been dead a long time. Bhutto said so in a 2007 frost interview, which was quickly edited from clip. loads of people cried foul, so had to put it back in, and say it was an honest mistake. Bhutto died a month later
U.S. policies overseas, including especially brutal military occupations and citizen assassinations, are essentially terrorist recruitments.
news report
US military support increases terror attacks on American citizens study shows
US military support for foreign governments encourages terrorist groups to attack Americans, demonstrates a new study from the London School of Economics and Political Science and the University of Essex.
Terrorist attacks on Americans are more likely to come from countries where the US provides military aid, stations troops and sells arms finds the study – the first to show a statistical correlation between American foreign policy and terrorism against its citizens.
The paper, ‘Foreign terror on Americans’, is published in the new edition of the Journal of Peace Research and explores the systematic patterns which appear to govern terrorist action. The authors are professor Eric Neumayer, from LSE, and professor Thomas Plümper, from the University of Essex.
It’s good for business whether it’s done at home or abroad.
Kevin makes some excellent points here which boil down to “we’re feed up with your BS stories. The burden of proof is upon you. Prove your case”! Also note the upcoming presentation announced in “2011-05-07 This Week in WikiLeaks – @MichaelKBusch on the Pakistan Cables, bin Laden & the Gitmo Files” (May 7, 2011)
Here’s the first link I didn’t get included.
the FBI and local police did a similar thing in seattle the past few years
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/the-long-con/Content?oid=7989613
it’s a good read
I’m betting he gets convicted anyway. Americans don’t care if he was entrapped, he was gonna “commit an act of terra” and he is a muslim.
Right along with this, in Seattle, same time, SPD along with the feds spent years infiltrating a hipster art and party group looking for domestic terrorists (and targeting democratic Seattle City Council members). I read this last night with disgust.
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/the-long-con/Content?oid=7989613
There’s no case if the initial entrapping conversation can’t be included somehow; the government seems to now think the judge will let other feds attest to what they heard during that conversation. Of course, those other feds on the operation would have NO reason to misstate what happened.
I believe that’s one reason this one needs to be unraveled publicly. It follows the template of the others that have created our security state.
Why is the police station located in between Hawthorne Vintage and Hawthorne Vision not marked as such? It presents as bright orange store front, it is entered by officers with a key, but the blinds are completely drawn, there is no City of Portland signage identifying it, it has signage for the surveillance cameras trained on it and there are two reserved spots for cruisers right outside it. What gives?
One wonders what else he’s up to.
Can’t wait to hear “Bill Smith, large mocha?” called out at my coffeehouse.
It’s worse than doing nothing in the case of Portland — they are unable to coordinate (and intimidate) the local police bureau since Portland pulled out of their little Fibbie playground mid-decade.
I’d love to have a diary on this, with photos, if you have a chance sometime, mz.
P2OG?
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Proactive_Preemptive_Operations_Group
http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dod/dsbbrief.ppt
They’ve been in the business of manufacturing terrorism even before their psyops P2OG went into operation.
http://prenzlauerberger.wordpress.com/2010/05/22/operation-gladio-1990/
Thanks, Teddy, for keeping abreast of this.
It’ll be interesting to see the emails. Is the trial still set for June 17?