Six members of the the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) Board of Directors have resigned, furthering the leadership crisis at that organization which began with letters from the now-fired ‘president,’ Jarrett Barrios, to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on behalf of corporate patron AT&T’s interests before that body. AT&T handmaiden and GLAAD board member Troup Coronado was not among those who resigned [politico link].
GLAAD board member Gary Bitner confirmed in an email to POLITICO on Wednesday that he had resigned. Five other board members — including Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers — also have submitted their resignations, according to the POLITICO source who is familiar with the matter.
In an email sent to POLITICO, Weingarten said her resignation “had nothing to do” with the AT&T/T-Mobile deal.
The six former board members submitted a joint statement to POLITICO that said they resigned from the organization’s board for “various reasons,” but declined to comment on those reasons because they say “there’s been too much unfair and false information spread about GLAAD” recently.
There may be other departures from GLAAD by week’s end:
The resignations of six prominent GLAAD board members comes as a blow to the organization and may be followed by additional departures from the gay and lesbian advocacy group. The person familiar with the resignations said about a third or half of the board may leave the organization by the end of the week.
The six GLAAD board members a source said resigned are: Bitner; Weingarten; Jocelyn Bramble, an associate at the law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf; Kelly Dermody, a partner at Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein in San Francisco; Humberto Mata, founder of nonprofit Fundación VIHDA in Ecuador; and James Walker, a commercial real estate executive.
Handmaiden Troup Coronado’s role in the AT&T-favorable letters to the FCC is laid out carefully in today’s Politico article:
Coronado, a former employee and registered lobbyist for AT&T, is said to have approached several gay rights organizations seeking support for the AT&T/T-Mobile deal. In May, he approached the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and the National Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce to ask representatives of those groups to sign a letter that voiced support for AT&T’s bid, leaders of those organizations told POLITICO.
National Gay & Lesbian Chamber of Commerce President Justin Nelson told POLITICO that Coronado presented his organization with draft text that other gay rights groups were also expected to sign.
It’s important to note that the promised statement from GLAAD regarding Jarrett Barrios’s departure still has not materialized.
And it seems GLAAD board members are unhappy, and leaving, because of the lack of transparency and policies regarding just this kind of conflict of interest:
In their letters of resignation, the six former board members expressed concern over the board leadership’s failure to enforce GLAAD’s conflict of interest policy regarding the proposed AT&T/T-Mobile deal, according to the person familiar with the matter.
Former Heritage Foundation employee Troup Coronado’s performance on a Human Rights Campaign (HRC) Business Council was reason enough for the organization to remove him.
Human Rights Campaign refused to support the telecom position by joining the sign-on letter, though Coronado also sat on HRC’s Business Council at the time. Coronado was later removed from the body in March 2010.
Meghan Stabler, a transgender LGBT activist, educator and Business Council member, said though Coronado’s departure was unrelated to the controversy surrounding the letter, his participation on the body was a factor.
“Each year the HRC Business Council reviews member participation and HRC Workplace Project objectives, doing so allows members to retire from the council and new members to be on-boarded as needed,” she said.



23 Comments

There are 23 board members still listed on the GLAAD website.
http://www.glaad.org/board
“The six former board members submitted a joint statement to POLITICO that said they resigned from the organization’s board for “various reasons,” but declined to comment on those reasons because they say “there’s been too much unfair and false information spread about GLAAD” recently.”
Hmmm, some knowledgable comments might replace some of the unfair and false information, ya think? Is this closing ranks or keeping out of litigation or what? And who/what will take the place of GLAAD? Damn, if it’s not a weiner it’s a grifter. With friends like this…
These people are limiting their liability for GLAAD’s unethical and possibly illegal actions. Otherwise they would stay and counter the ‘unfair and false information.’
You don’t leave because of unfair and false accusations; you leave because the accusations are true, and you want to protect yourself, your own organization, and your brand.
I just didnt’ understand the diary points, until I read your comment.
Now I think I get it.
What a blow to the LGBT ranks of those who fight for equality.
How bad a set back is this, for such a prestigious org to be in this pickle for these reasons?
Will Coronado be held accountable for supporting the AT&T/TMobile merger?
My 2:49 was to Teddy P’s 1:21, sorry if that wasn’t clear.
Rcc’d and great reporting Teddy, thanks, BTW.
Thanks, Larue!
Someone finally picked up the Heritage Foundation connection.
From June 14th…
http://firedoglake.com/2011/06/14/glaads-troup-coronado-helped-put-bush-judges-on-the-bench/#comment-2380655
All of them were bought.
They quit because they were found out and didn’t want to deal with the public outcry. Why would they, they already got paid by GLAAD and Troupe. They got paid, and that’s all that matters to them.
For those who want to give them the benefit of the doubt, just ask yourself why they didn’t stop that AT+T support, voice concerns on a public level then, or resign then???
And even now they don’t want to “comment on it”? Really?
And, WTF is this,
“Meghan Stabler, a transgender LGBT activist, educator and Business Council member, said though Coronado’s departure was unrelated to the controversy surrounding the letter, his participation on the body was a factor.”
So it was “unrelated”? But it was also a “factor”? So which one was it? Related (aka a “factor”) or unrelated???
Allow me to translate: “I’m covering my AZZ. I’m protecting my paycheck. So I can say things that are a complete contradiction, one after the other”.
This is jumping to conclusions I see no info or evidence to support.
Which is why I asked Teddy all them questions @2:49.
Till I hear from him, your suppositions are suspect, Tam.
Sorry to be so bold, but, are you a practicing member of the LGBT community?
If so, could YOU answer some of my questions?
If NOT, do you have links or inside info to support your claims?
Thanks in advance.
buh bye, buh bye!
If you’re GLBT, are you a “practicing” member? What are you practicing?
LOL. Larue, you funny!
I’m sorry but do you want me to answer the questions from you @2:49???
“Larue June 22nd, 2011 at 2:49 pm «
I just didnt’ understand the diary points, until I read your comment.
Now I think I get it.
What a blow to the LGBT ranks of those who fight for equality.
How bad a set back is this, for such a prestigious org to be in this pickle for these reasons?
Will Coronado be held accountable for supporting the AT&T/TMobile merger?”
Okay, so the answer to the first is – Who cares how “bad” the setback is? They were bought and now caught. It’s no longer a prestigious organization for LGBT after this for the same reason that the D organization is no longer prestigious for liberals.
The second question – No, he won’t.
No, I do not have evidence. Nor did I claim to have evidence. What I stated is that the manner of their departure is highly suspicious and I’m reading between the lines. It doesn’t make sense. Their actions are highly suspect.
Oh, and no I’m not a practicing member of the LGBT community, although I can’t understand how that would matter.
Hey, I’m trying to be pc here, as I’m straight.
And I think ‘practicing member’ is about as direct and forthright as I can get.
If I offend any LGBT’s, my bad, but my intent to flesh out reality and truths is sincere.
And truth be told, I hold more respect for LGBT practicioner opinions on LGBT issues than I do from folks I don’t know or know if they are straight or gay.
I can talk all day long about my thoughts and feelings, but I’m not LGBT. I relish Teddy n Kelly’s n others perspectives on this, as it’s a HUGE part of all civil rights for the masses.
As long as they are denied equality, we all are.
As long as anyone is denied equality, we all are.
But until I hear from the LGBT’s about how THEY feel, I can’t honestly speak of their issues, other than to generally support them.
When the LGBT community has fractures, and factions, I don’t have the reality of what’s going on to fully understand.
SO, I greatly rely on those LGBT’s who DO offer their thoughts and opinions.
It’s how I grow, learn, and become a better human.
Hope this makes sense . . . I’m rambling a bi.
But I have a new diary up on New York gay leadership that asks a lot of questions.
I guess I need to check in on that about now, I asked a lot of questions, and hope to have a lot of answers.
What a shame. And what a shame that the former board members chose to lie transparently about their reasons.
I think there’s about 22 other shoes to drop before week-end. Leaving Troup Coronado alone on the GLAAD board, most likely.
Six more with their names emblazoned on the Wall of Shame.
Awww. { sniff } Troup Coronado only gets the really pathetic, prematurely truncated karaoke version: “All By Myself.”
Yep. Unfortunately I don’t see Mr. Coronado leaving until GLAAD falls down around his ears. Nothing like destroying a good organization out of spite because they failed to appropriately stroke your benefactors.
Maybe this will turn into an Abramoff-type affair. Getting interesting!
Get Employment – If your trying to find employment. Here is the best deal for an online job. Surveys for cash!!! Online Employment
My question is; How did a Heritage / AT&T lobbyist get on the board of GLAAD board in the first place?
This is Amerika. The one and only priority is money.
Didn’t you get the memo?
Don’t worry I didn’t either. I guess those of us with nothing to sell out on didn’t get the special invitation to be corporatist pawns.