
"Remember Lawrence King" by KaroliK on flickr. A handful of No on Prop 8 people representing. Lawrence King was murdered in cold blood by a classmate in his homeroom class here in Oxnard in February 2008. He was 14 years old.
Score another victory for blame-the-victim gay-panic defense strategy.
A jury has been unable to reach a verdict in the murder trial of Brandon McInerney, the 17-year-old accused of shooting a gay classmate to death in 2008.
The jury began deliberating Friday, weighing eight weeks of testimony in a trial that included nearly 100 witnesses. Many of those testifying were students and teachers at E.O. Green Junior High School in Oxnard who saw tensions on campus rising after 15-year-old Larry King began coming to school dressed in makeup and girl’s boots.
Because, you know, wearing makeup and girl’s boots means you deserve two bullets in the back of your head, point-blank range.
Over eight weeks of testimony, the prosecution laid out a case of premeditated murder by McInerney, who prosecutor Maeve Fox described as a bright boy from a broken and violent home who knew what he was doing when he brought a .22-caliber gun to school.
McInerney was upset that King had come up to him at school the day before and said, “What’s up, baby?” Fox said.
He told a defense psychologist that he found King’s attentions “disgusting” and “humiliating” and that King would have to pay for it. He told a school friend that he was going to bring a gun to school the next day, and he did, Fox said.
I fail to see what is unpremeditated about this pre-planned crime.
Oh, and according to his defense, the monster McInerney was a child when these events “occurred” and therefore shouldn’t be prosecuted as an adult. No mention by them of the lost childhood of Lawrence King.
Defense attorney Scott Wippert and co-counsel Robyn Bramson didn’t dispute that McInerney killed King. But they argued he was pushed to an emotional breaking point by King’s attentions toward him and the school’s failure to rein in King’s conduct.
They also appeared to reach out for jury sympathy by calling several of McInerney’s relatives to the stand to testify to the abuse the young boy suffered at the hands of his drug-abuser father.
If every parentally abused child killed a gay kid, we wouldn’t have any gay kids left on the planet. Plenty of people overcome parental abuse; their struggle shouldn’t be degraded by allowing a murder defendant use it to justify what he did to Larry King.
Our criminal justice system is entirely broken if the unsettling behavior of homicide victims is allowed as a justification for their murder, in middle school. This jury needs to do its job, not moan about how hard this decision is. It wasn’t hard for Brandon McInerney to get a gun and kill Larry King.
It shouldn’t be hard to convict him of that murder.
UPDATE: Mistrial
From GLSEN:
NEW YORK – The following is a statement from GLSEN Executive Director Eliza Byard about the mistrial declared today in the trial against Brandon McInerney, who was 14 when he murdered 15-year-old Lawrence “Larry” King at E.O. Green Junior High School in Oxnard, Calif., on Feb. 12, 2008.
The jury could not reach an agreement on whether to find McInerney guilty of first-degree murder, second-degree murder or manslaughter. The prosecution and defense could reach a plea deal, or the prosecution could pursue a new trial.
“The mistrial declared today is hardly a surprise. This was always destined to be a case with little resolution and no winners, whatever the verdict. The central facts remain the same: homophobia killed Larry King and destroyed Brandon McInerney’s life, and adults failed both young men because of their own inability to deal forthrightly and compassionately with the multiple challenges they each faced. The jury’s indecision is a sad reflection of our collective inability to find common ground and invest in a better future for all youth and a culture of respect for all.”



73 Comments

We need a Sister of Perpetual Indulgence circle around this courthouse. This simply cannot stand. No justice for Lawrence King????
jeebus teddy this is horrifying and certainly not justice
tweeted and recommended
Thought experiment: what if Brandi McInerney brought a gun to school and killed her classmate after he’d said “What’s up, baby?” to her in the hallway? Would people excuse her Het Panic?
Just…ugh.
America’s schools and workplace will never be the same again, if a legal and proper response to sexual harassment is two bullets in the back of the head of the harasser.
Do we really want to go down that road?
UPDATE:
Mistrial possible in gay student slaying
A judge has ordered jurors in the high-profile murder case of an Oxnard teen accused of shooting a gay classmate to keep deliberating even though they have been unable to reach a verdict despite repeated votes, The Times has learned.
The judge has indicated a mistrial is a possibility.
Jurors in the case, in which Brandon McInerney is accused of fatally shooting 15-year-old Larry King in the middle of a junior high school computer lab, were ordered to continue deliberating until 2 p.m., when the judge will meet with them and determine whether to order a mistrial, according to Ken Corbett, a professor of psychology at New York University who has sat through all the proceedings.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/09/mistrial-possible-in-gay-student-slaying-case.html
I really thought Larry King would get justice here. What are these people on the jury thinking? Their minds have been poisoned by the gay-panic defense.
and it really isn’t a defense. It’s an excuse.
The jury has been specifically instructed not to bring any of their own anti-gay bias to bear on their verdict, thanks to a 2006 law named for Gwen Araujo. This is the first time a jury has got instructions based on the law’s requirements:
http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/tag/brandon-mcinerney
UPDATE:
Questions from the jury. The judge has told them to proceed. They’ve taken three votes (!) and say they can’t reach a verdict. (I will say I recall many, many more votes on the murder trial I juried on.)
Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2011/sep/01/mcinerney-jury-unable-to-reach-verdict-in-3-a/#ixzz1WjwVOxrF
- vcstar.com
It sounds like there’s some nullification in play. If that’s the case it will probably stay put as such.
So another trial? And what about the gun?
Bullshit. Utter bullshit.
Next time someone says something flippant to me that I take offense to, I can just shoot them in the head?
Bullshit.
Not only should this be Murder 1 in California, but it should be accompanied by a hate crime enhancement. Life without parole.
Puppets: billionaires
Puppeteers: Sharon Angle, Jan Brewer, Lou Dobbs, etc. etc. types
Munchkins: Jared Loughner types.
this kind foreseen, if anyone:
http://goo.gl/G0qt1
Say a group does not deserve to live.
Associate any foe with it.
Anyone not anti-social being called
gay, then Jew, then immigrant cause nations were itegrated
serves the scapegoaters,
pacifiers, arrogant ones very well. The rest
get shafted, live in a darkened society, suffer
unfairly from transference of their own (passed on to them.)
http://goo.gl/G0qt1
Process self generated. Hitler feminine. JFK’s killers
included especially gay fascists, going by Oliver Stone.
The religious right / Tea Party has been replete with the type.
Yet, it occurred to me the East is the same as the West, so a
“control” may exist such that there may be a simultaneous
proof in science, morality and a new understanding of
history that is maybe demonstrably, deliberately
distinguishable from other observational science.
And, crazy as it sounds, it simultaneously informs, I’m guessing,
how to travel to the stars.
And look, Ma, I’m still allowed at FDL.
Meanwhile, back at the farm, it’s really people caring about their
money. Control. Judging is control before it’s scapegoating.
Sure, it’s lots of insulting, even threatening staring.
But it’s about creeps and their transportation / energy / water
rights / banking / war profits.
And Earth won’t take it much longer.
Justice left Amerika some time back, how sad for his family and friends. WTF
Unbelievably sick and sad.
Reminds me of the time I got my head bashed in and then I got arrested for failing to walk a half mile out of my way to avoid the bastards who did it.
Sounds to me like a homobigot or two got onto the jury panel.
The message a hung jury will send to homo-bigots everywhere is that it’s open season on gay kids, or those thought to be gay. This could unleash a horrific wave of violence in American schools. I hope they are prepared for this outcome.
This reminds me a little bit of the Casey Anthony jury. They met for 11 hours, couldn’t agree on anything except she lied to police, so they let her off on everything else. This is someone who probably chloroformed her little girl, then put duct tape over her nose and mouth and placed her in the trunk of her car where she suffocated, apparently all so the mother could party. The jury seemed both extremely dumb as well as uncaring. Maybe it’s the same thing here.
Prepared? My dear Teddy, many of them are hoping for it.
Wow Teddy, this one kind of just saps your strength no? California? Still?
As for the perpetrator? I was a victim of unending violence as a child. Left the house when I was 15. Felt I had no choice. Cost me a lot in some ways, in some ways it still does. But I have always been a leader, and always protected and fought for those who were the underdog for whatever reason. I understand it breaks some, and they hate and seek revenge on all forever more. That is weakness, and not an excuse for doing further harm in the world.
How could the judge allow this to stand given the facts of the case?
Very, very sad.
By “they” I meant “American schools.” It was a rather poorly constructed paragraph, though, so I suppose one could read “they” as “homo-bigots.” Who are, in fact, hoping for this outcome, as you say.
Yes, it does, and it excuses violence by those so abused. Which, to me, insults others such as yourself who’ve overcome such an adversity. Not everyone can succeed coming out of such horror at home, but there’s a long way between ‘not succeeding’ and cold-blooded murder.
Sorry. I misunderstood.
UPDATE: Mistrial
From GLSEN:
http://www.glsen.org/cgi-bin/iowa/all/news/record/2790.html
So this is why the person with the
insulting stare is actually likely
something like this (DISCLAIMER FOR HIM?
WHAT THE HECK–WHATEVER HE IS, I GUESS,
AND I CAN’T KNOW:)
http://goo.gl/vtMtd
(If you don’t return here you miss the best
stuff and I’m mud at FDL.)
http://pages.citebite.com/o1h0u2j6c9iom
(is FDL)
And so now finally we really know
THE FEAR OF BEING WRONGLY FERRETED OUT AS GAY
IS THE FEAR OF FASCISM, IS PART OF A PROCESS THAT
UTTERLY TURNED HISTORY, JUDGING, CONTROL AND SCAPEGOATING
BEING AN ISSUE EVERYWHERE, yet now
(my theory, you can leave now I guess) possibly confirming
a simultaneous lesson in science, morality, history.
And if there are bad gays, then it’s just the
“bad” gays. Otherwise, of course, we’re looking at
optimal numerical genetic advantage for the group,
of course, especially after so many generations,
at least in the East, where I think everything is the
same otherwise, and thus is a control.
” but there’s a long way between ‘not succeeding’ and cold-blooded murder.”
Teddy, you put words together so perfectly sometimes that I just shake my head and marvel. Nothing fancy there, but damn partner, that is just plain good.
I think you need to go ahead and just give up some time and write the next great American novel. We haven’t had one in a while you know?
Heller?
Thanks for the post,Teddy. It’s a tragedy on so many levels.
We’re in for a rocky road, America. “I’m having a bad life” is not a legal excuse.
That’s a Reality TeeVee excuse.
Well another Fed up situation in the Fed up States of Amerika.
Gay panic? Really?
How about Muslim panic? “I thought he was a T, … how could I know he wasn’t, … Fox says so, …”
How about good old brownie panic? “I thought he was a T/Muslim, … how could I know he wasn’t, he’s a foreigner and they’re taking our jobs, … Fox says so, …”
I honestly had no Fing idea you could literally use gay panic as a defense. I mean what kind of person does that? What kind of defense attorney does that? What kind of legal system allows that. That’s not justice. When someone kills another person in braid daylight, premeditated, with witnesses and then walks free, that’s injustice.
BTW, this can be turned around so it looks like a circular firing squad.
Why not? How about hetero panic? “I thought he was hetero and thus was going to get panicked and kill me, so I feared for my life, … you know heteros can kill gay people with impunity, … so I panicked, … so I’m using it for my defense, … works when heteros kill gays and do so in broad daylight with witnesses and get away with it, so why not?”
How about a little whitey panic? “I thought he was looking at me with suspicion, and you know he’s white, … so I thought he might think that I was a brownie, a Muslim, a T, and I feared for my life, … you know the “whities” rendition brown people without cause, on purely suspicion alone, and then torture them indefinitely in hell holes across the world, … heck they even do it in Poland, … so “whities” are known for killing brownies with impunity, … so of course I was afraid, I mean they do this regularly to anyone they want, so I panicked, … and that’s my defense, and the panic defense has been used before, so why not for this?”
Interesting legal system we have here. What exactly prevents someone from shooting gay people in cold blood in the streets? Now there’s precedence. Premeditated precedence. Precedence with no significant or IMMEDIATE harm to the shooter.
How is this justice? WTF?!
All I can say is that some nutjob starts gunning down brownies in the street in broad daylight and uses this as a defense, I guarantee that in this nation of gun-lovers, many brownies will retaliate immediately.
Jury members better speak up. AND SOON!
This sets a precedence for any person to be “panicked” and days later bring a weapon, any weapon, for the purpose of killing someone, walk up behind them, lift the gun (or nay weapon) and …
POP, POP
to the back of the head. Then place the gun down, turn themselves in (or wait for the cops to come), claim the panic defense, and walk away with impunity.
Tiller’s murderer could have used this defense. Any murderer could have. Heck, this is basically the defense of the US to kill all those Iraqis.
This goes beyond being gay. Any minority, especially the brownies (this includes Latinos, Indians, Pakistanis, … any “brown” person), is now a potential target. This kind of “justice” has a way of causing people to react.
If it comes down to a race war, well the sides have already been decided. They want blood in the streets, then so be it.
Pam Spaulding offers her take as well.
Such a tragic waste of life.
Margaret, how awful! I’m really sorry about it.
Yes, it’s such a tragic waste of such a strong young person’s life. And yet, throwing away lives is something we’re good at: USA, Propaganda, USA, Numbing Down, USA, We Rock The World!!!!
I long for a simpler life with people who can see when another person is in pain, and help them to another path. Yeah!
Oh, things I’ve recently learned….did you know that there is a wide and scary accessory list to the shells you can purchase legally, on-line for your 12 gauge shotgun?
Some shells can penetrate steel. Some shells can just penetrate normal household walls and then blow up. Some shells have nasty little shrapnel designed to do the most damage in it’s short glory on this Earth. And other explosives by the pound, designed to explodein a major way when you hit them in a target, apparently.
USA,USA,USA; are we fucking out of control or what?!
Well said OH.
An illegal one, too. Under AB1160, signed into law almost five years ago in California, juries must set aside any anti-gay bias they might have, and gay-panic defenses are prohibited. I don’t understand how the judge permitted this defense, although he apparently did read the jury the required instruction:
AB 1160: Gwen Araujo Justice for Victims Act
Lead Author Assemblymember Lieber, D-San Jose
AB 1160 would amend jury instructions to state that the use of societal bias, including so-called “panic strategies,” to influence the proceedings of a criminal trial is not permitted. It would also direct the Office of Emergency Services to develop materials for city and county prosecutors explaining how to prevent bias from affecting the outcome of a trial. This legislation is named in the memory of a transgender teenager from Newark, California, who was attacked and killed in 2002.
STATUS: Passed by Legislature. Signed into law by Governor Schwarzenegger on September 28, 2006.
ahhh, thank you, RAD.
Gay panic has been so successful as a defense against murder charges that the legislature passed AB1160 to outlaw it as a defense (see above). Not sure how this judge allowed this defense while still reading the required jury instructions to this jury.
Isn’t it odd that a Writ of Mandamus would be completely appropriate in this case, and isn’t used; yet it isn’t appropriate but IS used in Dan Choi’s case.
It’s open season in America.
On whom, you ask?
On all of us.
thanks for the update teddy… re-tweeted it and wish i could super-recommend this
I wonder what “rein in King’s behavior” exactly means. Was the school supposed to tell him not to wear “girl’s”
boots and makeup? Girls wear guys’ clothes all the time. I can’t think what the defense means since no one was attacked or harmed.
Unless I’m missing something, I don’t think we should jump to conclusions and assume it was the “gay panic defense” that brought about the mistrial. The jury’s failure to decide between three competing guilty verdicts could have owed to a number of things, including poor instructions from the judge; one juror could have held it up. We don’t know. As the son of a gay man who suffered his share of ugliness, I also wouldn’t alter my view that children shouldn’t be tried as adults, whatever the crime.
Saw your response to me on earlier thread. I have absented myself from FDL for the most part since it is a shadow of its former self. So I have already done what you dictated.
One thing that the news reports are almost certainly not mentioning is that Ventura county is as far to the right as Riverside and San Diego counties. So this is about what should be expected.
Have the authorities said anything about a 14 year old being able to get his hands on a gun?
Larry spoke to him the day before, saying “What’s up, baby?” This, apparently, gets you two bullets in the back of the head.
Well, the problem is that the gay panic defense was allowed, and it is illegal in California. So, whether the jury paid attention to it, they heard it — and they shouldn’t have. There’s really hardly any defense at all, except horrible parental abuse, remaining.
So, the gay panic defense worked. Whether it deadlocked the jury or not, it was heard. And the jury deadlocked.
I was astounded to see you counter a well-reasoned argument with unlinked assertions and opinion. It didn’t seem like you at all, e. So, yeah, I guess something here IS a shadow of her former self.
Adding: we all need a break sometimes. I hope you enjoy yours.
I was unclear, actually. Re-reading what I typed, there were entirely too many possible antecedents.
I don’t know.
But it seems to have been lost in the discussion, and in the trial. Such is the gay panic defense: its outrageousness obscures everything else.
Let’s separate the two things out: a) gotcha on the gay panic defense and the idea that it should be inadmissable (although gay panic is real, right? And we have a decision to make, as citizens, whether we think that people should be PUNISHED for crimes, PAY for their crimes, or be REHABILITATED after committing them–things we as a society have zero clarity about). There is some real possibility, then, that this defense clouded the minds of the jurors–I stand corrected on this point. But b) (and I am arguing not just with your diary but with the tenor of some comments here) we still don’t KNOW that, don’t have any evidence, yet, about WHERE the jury was hung up.
Also, reading over your diary, do we really want to call the child who shot him a monster? I don’t. If we, as progressives, end up in exactly the same seat where conservatives usually sit–demanding retribution for the crimes WE find most heinous–we’re just not much different. For me, this is one of those “square one” incidents where you have to say: where do we even start? A country with 2.5 guns for every adult; schools where no one is even mildly capable of talking through such events (a kid coming out with an agitated flourish) with kids. Etcetera. I’m not arguing against punishment, but you don’t fix endemic corruption, societal failure, and moral failure in a courtroom.
That’s a horrid, ignorant and factually challenged presentation to the case you allude to.
So yer a homophobe, too?
Or just ignorant.
That’s some batshit crazed crap I can’t follow.
Not sure who’s nutz anymore.
Likely too many of the population.
I don’t know what to say other than this hurts my heart.
People, flag this schmuck . . . it’s proven batshit crazed.
Disgusting.
Yep, all of us . . . no truer words ever spoken.
Dawg help us all . . . n thanks for all you do.
I got no words at this injustice.
Fuck the judge. Fuck the jurors. Fuck justice. And fuck us.
We live in a very very sick society.
Oh ya, and fuck the corporate media and their corporate whores who don’t report this or report it as a “balanced” piece.
We’re out of our fucking minds.
This country is a shadow of its former self. Shite, it’s a fucking joke of its former self.
I think I may throw up.
When there exists a junior high student shot dead with two rounds in the back of the head that is sure the fuck where you start.
l remain angry, hurt, wounded, and more.
I have no words to speak of this child’s death at the hands of another child (idiot tho he seems to bea0.
It’s just horrid.
I wish justice WOULD prevail . . . 14 yrs or not.
I wish a lesson to homophobes everywhere were to be constructed.
I fully detest this sitch, n the one’s judging it, n the shooter.
I hate them. May they rot in the hell of their own making.
All of them.
I DO have faith that this shit will NOT be endured nor propagated n I dearly wish it’s demise will be in my lifetime.
I got some 20 years.
Dawg help any fuck that goes homophobic in my presence in the next 20 years.
I will not be kind.
Sometimes, a man has to take a stand.
My feelings include any hate actions to women, people of color, or those unable to stand for themselves.
N once again, I pity the fool who exposes them self in my presence.
“I’d fill up my shotgun, with rock salt and nails.”
Song was just playing, bless Utah Phillips.
But to my edict, my fist is clenched, at the ready.
Our backs are to wall, indeed. I’ll stand.
Two bullets in the back of the head and the jury does’nt think that’s murder! Jesus Christ. I guess I can blow away anybody I don’t like and get away with it.
The case was tried in Chatsworth, which is in LA.
This is a couple miles from where I live, so I’ve followed the tragedy closely. I used to teach high school, and I was one of the few teachers who would not allow students to use “gay” as a pejorative. I continue to support Ally Action, which works to make schools safe for all kids, regardless of orientation or gender identity.
But there is no way I could ever find a 14 year old guilty of first degree murder in adult court. Period. If he was 16 or 17, maybe. Eighteen, definitely. But a middle schooler? No.
The facts of the case are abhorrent. The kid is obviously guilty exactly as you say.
My problem with the situation is that the kid was obviously a kid. Not an adult. Now, of course, they do this to kids who murder all the time … especially the poor ones. So, why not do it to this kid too? I fully recognize that contrasted with those cases this certainly highlights a double standard in society (not sure if class plays in too, but no question sexuality is front-and-center).
BUT. That doesn’t change the fact that in many (most?) of the situations under that standard, I am generally uncomfortable with the idea of trying a 14 year old kid as an adult and slapping them in to the prison system for eternity in those cases as well. There is more to it when this kind of stuff happens during developmental stages … external influences are so damn strong while experience in dealing is so damn weak. I can’t help but wonder if the case didn’t largely fall because the prosecutor demanded the jury convict under the process for handling adults.
This is completely not a proper outcome. I don’t feel for the assailant at all. But I do feel for the jury somewhat … the facts say murder-1, but convicting for that that as an adult requires accepting that the 14 year-old’s thought processes and understandings are equivalent to a 30 year old’s. What a mess.
One role model for the shooter may have been our country’s [nominal] top authority figure, President Obama: President Obama claimed that he will quit firing Gays from the US Military on 9/20/11; he claimed that he is allowed to order the killings of bad people. I think these often-repeated propaganda points make the entire nation mentally ill, and some who were already there go over the edge.
Also want to add that this is similar to lynchings in the old South.
Did they use a panic defense? Did the big black man/woman scare them? NO! Because in that time assassination and murder of people considered “lesser” was quite OK. In fact various cases, those that actually went to court, were not found guilty because to them it was simply a white person against a black person and that’s an easy choice for them.
And just like here, an easy choice for a jury. And on top of that, they use the panic “defense” as an excuse because now we’re so much more “civilized”.
“someone who probably” big difference! This kid was seen pulling the trigger. There is absolutely no doubt he killed King.
Why is it there are always mitigating circumstances when white kids kill, but abused black or Hispanic kids are usually tried and convicted as adults.