Check out this double-speak in Politico as an uber-lobbyist lawyer describes why his firm won’t be charging by the hour any longer:
For years, firms have struggled to attract senior aides — particularly nonlawyers — who aren’t interested in tracking their every move for billing clients.
But now, firms like Holland & Knight are saying bye-bye to the billable hour.
The switch for its lobbying division is part of an emerging trend in Washington that some observers say could usher in a new era of competition between lobby shops and law firms for top talent.
“I think if you look out 10 years, this will be a very large trend … and we could either lead or follow,” said Rich Gold, head of Holland & Knight’s public policy and regulation group.
The firm, which reported bringing in $9.5 million for federal lobbying during the first six months of 2011, is not only getting rid of the billable hour, but lobbying professionals in the firm will no longer keep track of their time at all.
“This has the potential to be a real game breaker in law firm recruiting because it opens up a new vein of talented folks who have previously shunned law firms like a fruitcake at a Christmas buffet because of the billable hour,” McCormick Group headhunter Ivan Adler said.
What this means:
“Our elected-official targets are so amenable to our corrupting influence, we can accomplish what our clients want so quickly, that the hourly rate system is outmoded. Congresspersons are so eager to meet our demands, and in such record time, that the actual moments involved no longer accurately represent the value to our client. Going forward, we’ll take a percentage of the cash value to our clients instead. If we save a client one hundred million dollars in taxes over ten years, we’ll take ten percent. If we game the system so that our client earns that sum in one year, we’ll take our cut all at once.”
Back to Politico. These three paragraphs near the end of the article explain why:
And while the burden of documenting their every move is over, that doesn’t mean the firm will be able to completely dismiss how much time a client is taking up.
“You still need to manage a little bit of what you are doing, but there is none of the mechanics of feeling like you are over the retainer or feeling like you can’t bill time to this client because there is too much else going on,” Gold said.
Instead of billing time throughout the year, Holland & Knight allocates a percentage of the monthly retainer on the front end to each person working on the account.
Not every client is willing to allow its lobbyists to simply charge by the number of staff assigned to their projects:
Six months ago, Bracewell & Giuliani switched to a nonbillable accounting system. The firm — which has 12 professionals in its government affairs operation — also created a wholly owned subsidiary last month for its lobbying operation in order to allow nonlawyers managerial positions.
Bracewell & Giuliani’s Scott Segal said that the practice has almost entirely done away with billable hours, but there are some specific cases that make doing away with the billable hour completely difficult.
Clearly, K Street is moving away from accounting for its time, since the time required has become so miniscule. Congresspersons are so amenable to their pitches on behalf of clients that the pitch is brief and unaccountable.
Bought and paid for is a rotten way to run a democracy.




33 Comments

Good evening.
Teddy!1
Just another way to game the system and take our country away from the people and give it to the corporate thieves!!
Recommended!!
Yeah, and this makes double- and triple-billing their time to their rapacious clients that much easier, so it’s WIN-WIN!
Charging for lobbying for a percentage of the take just about defines the word “corruption.”
Soon they will just lobby by phone in their pjs with a martini in hand. Sleazy stuff. Thanks, Teddy.
In my day the fruits of that practice were called “kickbacks”.
I’m not sure how else they are going to account for their ‘results’ now that they aren’t billing by the hour, though. I mean, you save your client five hundred million dollars, aren’t you “entitled” to some fixed percentage of this.
I kid, but yeah, it’s really only a matter of degree of corruption, I suppose.
Oh, but K Street loves its $5,000 suits too much.
Candidate Obama implied that, if elected, the day of the lobbyists would be over.
OTOH, President Obama loves Lobbyists. He lets them write their own legislation – just the same way that Dubya Cheney did.
Shorter lobbyist: Today, when politicians are bought they stay bought.
Ah, but President Obama isn’t actually responsible for what you thought you heard Candidate Obama imply. Just ask him.
“Bought and paid for is a rotten way to run a democracy.”
It ain’t a democracy Teddy, it’s a corporate fascist kleptocracy.
GREAT read, thanks for this one.
Eliminate hourly guidelines, overtime, billables, hide and cook the books, pay bonuses without any trail of accountability.
I wonder how this will deprive our govt of needed tax dollars, yet further . . . . so the difference can either be pulled from social service needs (cops, fire, roads, water, electricity schoold n such) or levied on new taxes on the lower 99%.
Rcc’d, but man, LeFuckingSigh it never ends, does it.
This guy Nahant, I love the way he tawhks!
;-)
In my time in kitchens, there were lil white envelopes brought round to the back door by the vendors every Friday between lunch and dinner serve. Only the chef got to handle them envelopes.
The maitre’d and the owners got theirs at the front door.
Politics is worse. ;-)
N thus it was, and always will be.
Newt, it is figured, was paid $30K/hr by Fannie & Freddie.
Even for DC, isn’t that one hell of a price for a whore?
Great catch Teddy! Recc’d.
Ain’t no degrees of corruption tho’ Teddy.
Is you is or is you ain’t my baby is how it works. Alls er nuthin’.
IDK.. without billing for and tracking time, they will surely become more slothful and return less work for the buck.
By the by Teddy, thanks again for real, this is just too rich.
Absent the acuity of your attention I never would have caught this, as I despise Politico, and don’t seem to be nearly as diligent when it comes to holding my nose and drilling for the truth.
It’s not work. They just walk in, hand over the money and leave. The Congress critter then gives thanks to his god for lobbyists.
Thanks for your kind words, Larue.
I really appreciate what you wrote here.
It’s odd, though — no one seems to be terrible exercised, at least in DC, over the rate he was paid. So perhaps not so out of the ordinary?
I don’t read Politico, and wouldn’t have seen it either but for a great email list assembled by a friend. His comprehensive work enables me to write a post like this without ever having to click on the link!
Ah but there is a set of data points missing:
In a act of analysis, I downloaded the Open Secrets data, and ran some analysis to isolate “private donations” from corporate donations.
I them ran some statistical analysis to determine the mean, variance and distribution of “donations”. Nope I call them bribes.
To my amazement the start of the distribution plotting amount received vs number of donors was a straight line, with a few outlyers at the high end (leaders with large influence, Eric Cantor stands out in my memory).
What this meas is: The lobbyist have a price list. There is an amount for each congressperson, and it is invariant of topic. That is: A pay scale.
My conclusions:
1. Our representatives are victims of price fixing (one can be sure that the bribers do not want to overpay the bribees (hollow laughter).
2. A briber can buy the whole house for $1 Million, and the whole senate for $500,000.
Our reps are both venal and cheap. Our senators only less cheap.
I do wonder when one of our reps will complain about price fixing to the FTC….
And you are quite welcome!
That reminds me of Duke Cunningham’s price list, scribbled on a cocktail napkin. I’m always amazed at how cheaply they are bribed.
Well……tell your friend thanks, and to keep it up, and I’ll keep readin’ your posts.
“Bought and paid for is a rotten way to run a democracy.”
But it is a perfect way to run a Banana Republic or any other totalitarian authoritarian right-wing fascist country. Mission Accomplished!!!
I’d add that the change to the billing model means that the firms’ are also changing their accounting models and likely their business models/plans as well. Chock it up as another “win” for the Falangist 5 on the SCOTUS.
What I mean is that in the post-CU world, the real money will flow into the machine from secret or shielded sources and not from “legacy” officially registered (and regulated) lobbying activities. The move away from billable hours is in reality the first necessary step to cleave regulated from unregulated influence peddling.
Teddy, your work at FDL and in comments inspires beyond acolades, so thank YOU for all you do. sir.
It is easy to complain about the corporate corruption of our nation. However, if one continues to vote for it, does one really have the right to complain about it any more?
Stop complaining and start supporting and voting for candidates whose actions speak louder than their words.
Replace Obama- Rocky Anderson for President
Hand-in-hand with lobbyists not “registering” as lobbyists any longer, to evade restrictions and time-outs for lobbyists, this all should work out very well for them.
If I were a Corporate CEO I would look at this and start thinking. And then I would look to see how I could hire the person to work Congress for the same rate and benefits that say Holland and Knight pay them, forget percentages. I mean why should the partners of Holland and Knight get a huge amount of money for doing little or nothing when that money could come to me. I mean profits are getting harder and harder to come by, and the rank and file employees have been squeezed pretty hard. It is time to look at the vendors and figure out how to Walmart them. And here is a ‘vendor’ who has just admitted to padding the bill.
Indeed. And for the dimmer bulbs among those within or aspiring to the K-St cell, Newt provides a “business case” as to how to be an “un-lobbyist”.
I’m curious to see if firms keep their standing as “registered” lobbyists or not. I suspect that keeping the “formal” component of their businesses current (with legal & policy requirements) is of value to them for several reasons. Among these reasons is the benefit of having “official” cover for the firms’ clandestine activities. The model I have in mind, for this example, is the “bulge” banks that exploit the regulated components of their businesses to fund, obscure and protect the “shadow” side of their businesses.
Wasn’t democracy fun?!?!?