Mr. Romney’s wife, Ann, has previously said Seamus survived the trip and went on to live to a “ripe old age.”
They embellished the story of Seamus to prove that he wasn’t harmed by Mitt’s callous treatment of him with a hose, leaving him cold and sick atop the car:
“Mitt and I love our dogs,” she said. “Seamus was our first — an Irish setter. When I wasn’t at home, Mitt let him sleep on the bed. And usually when he was riding in the car, his head was out the window. Seamus lived to a ripe old age, basking in the affection of a large family.”
So what happened to the dearly departed Seamus? The dog, which had a penchant for wandering away from the Romneys’ Boston home, ended up retiring to California with Romney’s sister, Jane, who had space for him to roam freely.
Jane Romney referred to him as “Mr. Personality.” She said he arrived at her home detesting cats and later turned into the loving protector of a litter of kittens.
But, apparently some Romney Bros are having a hard time sticking to the story their Auntie Jane has been corralled into supporting:
According to a trusted Politicker tipster, two of Mr. Romney’s sons had an off-record conversation with reporters where they revealed the dog ran away when they reached their destination on that infamous journey in 1983.
The dog is long gone, and we’ll probably never know how, where, or when Seamus passed to that Rainbow Bridge. But I bet Seamus isn’t waiting patiently there for Mitt.




72 Comments

i wouldn’t vote for mittens for dogcatcher. *shudders* Let alone any more responsible post.
I don’t think any of that clan can tell the truth about anything, ever. They’d just as soon lie as breathe.
Does the C.I.A. have a dog-torturer position that needs filling? Because he’s their man, if so. (hi there!)
I always wondered what happened to that poor dog.
Sounds like the Romneys have a story for you.
But I don’t believe them, since there’s more than one story.
I guess he ran all the way to California.
Not many people realize Mitt is a fan of early Pink Floyd:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdEiH6BbiDQ (Seamus, from “Meddle”)
I used to trip with him a lot back in the sixties…
Funny…and Seamus is not talking….
Incredible that any human being could be such a callous, uncaring pet owner. And how does anybody get to be such a crappy politician? Fuck Willard! What’s next with you? Why not simplify your message and just admit that you live to exploit and abuse the vulnerable? I’m waiting for one of his kids to come out and start telling the world the truth about who he is. Damned Sociopath.
Thanks Teddy. Recommended.
Seamus is long gone, no?
Why post about him.
Yeah, we’re not supposed to look backward.
Margaret,
He treated Seamus the same way he plans to treat the truly poor people of this country.
Mitt keeps slipping up on his real intentions with that mouth of his.
In different language. It seems there have been many more posts at FDL about non-human deaths and illnesses than human ones. This post is an example on point.
The U.S. has murdered millions of actually alive human beings in Iraq (to name but one outrage) and there is rarely a post on this matter but plenty out outpourings on a dog long gone.
Can you explain the relative values?
You miss my point which is made explicitly above in response to Margaret. Why are dead animals more important than dead humans.
My father was of the belief that you could tell a lot about a person based on how they treated animals.
Both are important, and both are tragic, but the animals were more purely innocent and never had any chance or choice about their fate. Somebody might avenge the humans, but who will care enough to ever even try to avenge the animals?
The dog ran away because he was so thoroughly traumatized by the trip, and was probably anticipating being put back on top of the car. Dogs don’t forget that kind of treatment. I hope Willard’s magic underwear catches fire.
The point is if he treated an animal he says he loved so callously how is he going to treat people he doesn’t know or care about? Seamus is used here as a predictor of Romney’s behaviour.
Dead humans are important. Politicians who have no concern for mistreated animals should be exposed. Sometimes we at FDL feel impotent to make changes that would protect either dead humans or mistreated animals. That does not mean we should stop trying.
Your projection.
Fact remains, no matter what rationalizations given, that there has been no outrage on Afghan/Iraqi/Yemeni, etc. civilian deaths as the fonts awarded to nonnhuman animal deaths.
I’m outraged at the deaths over a decade or more for the Bush/Obama “wars against terrorism”…..I’m appalled by the collateral damage of my country’s empire building. I’m also a voice in the wilderness. Ah, well.
That may be but I’m stickin’ with it.
Dunno what’s bugging you eCAHN but I didn’t write this post. Why are you demanding I defend it???
Just trying, in vain, to create balance. I do evaluate humans as having a higher life value than Seamus. I’m willing to be challenged and to defend my values, but it seems FDL is not the venue for that.
No outrage? What, were hundreds of thousands of us in the streets for years out there for our fuckin’ health? Just because we’re not screaming on the intertoobz every waking moment means there’s no outrage? Horseshit.
Who the Hell said dead animals are more important than Human beings? Why are you picking on me? I didn’t write the post you hate so much! All I said was Romney is cruel to weaker entities. WTF???
What is so special about humans that they’re above any other sentient being? Is it because we kill each other over pieces of paper or other any of a multitude reasons? Because we’re the only species on earth that fouls our nest, poisons the air we breathe, the water we drink and the land that grows our crops? Is that why we’re so special?
Fact is that I don’t know who you are. You practically accuse me of
A) writing this post
B) believing abused animals are more important than abused people
And clearly I did neither. Don’t know what’s eating you tonight but I don;t deserve to be treated like shit by you or anybody else. All I did was make a comment and now suddenly I’m not outraged about the human slaughter. Please. get some sleep.
Well the post is about about one, and my point is about millions.
Francis Boyle, professor of International Law at University of Illinois talks about his section mate at Harvard Law.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duJIYjkxwR4&feature=related
At the 11:40 mark he specifically talks about Romney.
“That dog will Seamus in the end”
If Reptile Romney told me the sun rises in the east, I would still go to the window to verify it.
Interesting studies have been reported that show a linkage between abuse of animals and future abuse against humans. Also studies have reported on the aeons-long linkage between humans and canines.
Perhaps eCAHN will find time spent researching and reading up on those studies of value.
As for the charge that nobody’s said anything about the toll on innocents, that’s just flat bullshit, eCAHN, and you know it.
And as one once blessed to share time with a beautiful Irish setter name of Sage, who was our first family dog, I say shame on the Romneys. The wrong one in that partnership was on the roof of that car.
We are all Seamus. Woof!
Maybe a harrowing 12-hour ride to you, but to Seamus it was like 84 hours or 3 1/2 days.
That clearly is not factual…there have been lots of comments, laments, criticism of stupid wars, the carnage, waste, all the evil…You have certainly been around long enough to know all of that….what gives that you have apparently forgotten?
What about the innocent children killed by obama’s drones and by our killer troops? Have you ever seen photos of their innocent eyes?
I love dogs, they are so innocent and loving, but between them and children, I choose children.
So attack me – I don’t care.
Whoa everyone.
We’re talking about WILLARD and can’t let him blow us up over his treatment of his dog. This bastard has a 1/2 ton wheelbarrow filled with steaming shit.
Pick some of that up and fling it outward . And his given name is WILLARD and we should be formal with the republican running for POTUS by calling him WILLARD from here on out.
It’s not a matter of choosing. I think the message is that an animal was mistreated and that’s wrong. And it was done by a candidate for president who simply didn’t care. A wild animal might fight back but our pets usually don’t. The diary is about Mitt and HIS dog.
FWIW it turns out that dogs can understand human hand gestures but the other non-human great apes can’t understand human hand gestures. Go figure.
In case anyone missed this cartoon:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/01/28/1059410/-Animal-Nuz-81?via=blog_792316
Showed this to a dog-lover friend of mine the other day who actually thought it was fiction. I prompted pointed out (along with supporting documentation) that it was factual. The response was, “Wow!”
Another satisfied Willard customer.
Has the whole fucking world gone insane? Jeezuz Reebuz…
x2
Looking at this thread makes one think so…,Gone insane, that is…What a silly dust up when there was no implication that animals are more important/valuable than humans…just have a big ol’ shouting match anyway…What’s that called? Strawman, I think. Surely ran everyone off….
I’m a bit off-the-hook tonight anyway, due to the fact that I was stupid enough to try to battle some teabaggers over at Huffpo. Like trying to teach calculus to a fire hydrant…and that’s when the comment actually makes it through the rigorously insane screening / censoring process.
That whole censoring thing is a major hot button with me. I can only hope there are enough like-minded individuals to create a quantifiable business problem over there. And speaking of censors, this one made my blood boil:
http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/01/gasland-filmmaker-arrested-at-capitol-hearing/
Precisely. It’s not a matter of choosing. It IS just another indicator of the type of person Willard actually is. If he’ll do this to the family pet – and make no mistake, this is animal cruelty, plain and simple – then guess what he’ll do to the mere peasant class (read: well over 100 million Americans, etc.)?
Yup, Willard just creeps me all the way out. Gingrich? I can almost take him because he’s obviously clinically insane, and he makes no bones about it. Willard, however, sort of flies under the radar with his insanity, and he seems to have the nomination pretty much locked up.
We’re living in some really weird times…
OK – a higher life value
Save the baby, not the dog, if given “Sophie’s Choice”
reasonable
But then we do not have a Sophie’s Choice situation, so you want more angst over Human destructions of humans than human destruction of dogs.
OK again – but you presume angst is measured by the number of posts on a given topic, rather than by the information that floes that is new on a topic. The Armenian 1.5 million killed rarely gets press because it was nearly 90 years ago – what is the official approved way to score these things so we can match our posting frequency to the required angst level?
Meanwhile death and suffering – indeed being poor and not fed, warm, or protected and nurtured, is always wrong – as is being cruel to dogs.
Topic of the day is Mitt – he hasn’t killed anyone as yet, but he has harmed a dog – and folks are interested.
eCHAN – You may not hold dogs in high regard, you may be a cat person, or just into humans are my only concern, or you may feel you have the right scale for posting frequency on a given topic – and you may have that right scale – but meanwhile allow me to say I dislike Mitt for what he did to a dog.
Simple. It goes to character. If an (alleged) human person like Willard would do this to the family pet, then guess what he’ll do to the peasant class? (And from his fucked up, ruling-class perspective, we all fit in that category.)
I left the HuffPost months ago and never looked back.
Too much noise and fluff and too many of my comments were banned.
I always took a civil tone and stayed focussed on issues.
They seem to have an Obamabot filter that
needs to be dialed back several notches.
Good catch!
eCAHN
I can explain it. It is so much easier to talk about the death of an animal at the hands of eeevil Republican Mittens than human beings at the hands of Obama and the Democratic Party.
Sad but true. Pretty damning indictment of some “progressives” out there..
Veal Pen politics at its finest (or is that its worst?).
As an aside, having an Irish Setter with the name Seamus just makes my blood boil. Jaysus.
The Seamus story may well illustrate a few things:
– How Mitt treats entities with less power than him
– How Mitt lies to avoid consequences
– What Mitt thinks is praiseworthy (remember, this story was originally told to demonstrate Romney’s power of swift, calm, steely-eyed decision).
ECahn sounds like someone who is jealous of anyone who might be happier than her, because she sure seems to enjoy picking stupid, bitter fights with people who never did anything to hurt her — well, besides be happier than her, apparently.
Oh, puh-leez, beeyotch — have another cocktail and shut yer trap.
WHY DON’T YOU WRITE ABOUT THOSE THINGS THEN
Not just FluffPost.
Op Ed News, Common Dreams, TruthOut have all booted me off for making – sorry speaking TRUTH about Obama.
Thank God for The Lake.
Exactly. She needs to stop being such a friggin’ Energy Creature whose apparent main goal in life is making people bitter and vicious and afraid of living.
Somebody needs to have their likker cut off and be 86′d from the bar. She’s in high dudgeon mode and getting off on the reaction from the rest of us.
Leave eCAHN to stew in her own juices and make her own bitter pie.
Teddy
Veal Pen politics much?
She’s not only trolling, she’s contradicting what she posted about herself in a Late Night thread two weeks ago (emphases mine):
Oh, she doesn’t really care about humans — she’s said as much (see here). But apparently flinging poo just to fling poo is what keeps her from reaching for the rat poison.
I’m tired of eCAHN coming on to posts to distract from the point of them by making a spurious charge just to get attention in her lonely little life. I’m sorry the people close to you won’t take your calls or act nicely toward you, but that’s no reason to bring your bitterness and anger onto FDL threads that are harmless and playful, about dogs.
Go kick your beehive or something. But please stop treating Firedoglake like your personal litterbox. Shit elsewhere, lady.
Especially when the person who made that accusation is herself the biggest misanthrope imaginable.
Pheonix and Teddy Partridge.
Both engaging in Veal Pen politics.
Just be honest both of you. You are both just Democratic Party shills.
I am willing to be proven wrong but I have seen NOTHING to make me think otherwise.
Pheonix, it is not about who you do not support. It is about who and what you do support. If I am wrong, I will gladly apologize. However, if you two are what I suspect, Democratic Party operatives and shills than you should be exposed as such and just be honest about it.
I’m not going to get into this issue but I’ll just leave this here
http://dogsagainstromney.spreadshirt.com/
You don’t even know the meaning of the term, Michael.
You are a liar, Nursie.
You don’t know what Veal Pen means.
You don’t know what an operative is, or a shill.
And you are a liar to call me one.
Well the Teddie
Perhaps you can tell us what your version of Veal Pen politics is. From a Democrat apologist perspective.
Like I say Teddy, just have the common decency and honesty to be upfront about what you are.
I am calling you and Pheonix both on this. I have yet to see anything to make me think otherwise.
Veal Pen politics. Great visual.
Great link.
I’m tempted by the tote bag…
I wish it said ‘Dogs Against Obama’ on the other side!
Oddly, that accusation was a complete hallucination, imho. Pretty weird.
I’m buying into this point, as well. I see NOTHING that makes humans intrinsically more valuable than any other mammals. If wolverines had a blog, perhaps they would all be assuming that their inherent value was indisputably greater than ours. Think about it.
Indeed, tjbs. I ALWAYS call him Willard. Like the rat.