The new status symbol for vapid talking heads who parrot the conventional Beltway political wisdom, or conservative talking points in the case of Faux News, is the in-home television studio. Equipped with a Cisco Telepresence camera or HD monster, as well as potent totems and signifiers to appear on-screen behind the personality, the in-home studio has replaced the Town Car that used to carry talking heads to the news network’s nearest uplink. Now, the Important Opiners who’ve rushed to the corner of his/her own study from a child’s flute-o-phone concert or soccer match, donned suitable apparel, and gotten a powder-dusting from a minor child in violation of television union rules and child labor laws can share their Important Opinion with viewers who can’t get through their news day without knowing what their Favorite thinks!
It’s such a status symbol that the Washington Post Style section article leads with a ‘green’ justification for bestowing home studios on cable network favorites:
Of the many categories of waste in American politics, consider the resources that go into cable-TV live shots. Thousands of barrels of fossil fuel are expended hauling a person to where the cameras are or a camera to where the person is.
More silly than the supposed environmental gains by keeping pet pundits at home and out of Town Cars racing to their appointments is the list of who’s featured in the article. Now, I’ve no way of knowing if this is the total universe of Preferred Pundits in whom networks have invested by placing a studio at their homes. But it sure is a list of pedants and establishmentarians who’ve been favored with this perk:
James Carville and Mary Matalin are examples of an apparently better way. A new cable-news luxury allows them to comment, live on CNN, whether the topic is exploding oil rigs or imploding candidacies, without ever leaving the splendor of their New Orleans homestead.
.
.
.
Some pundits have a camera peering into a Harvard office (CNN’s David Gergen) or Philly radio studio (MSNBC’s Michael Smerconish).
.
.
.
Cisco newcomer Ari Fleischer, a former White House press secretary, recently welcomed a CNN-paid crew to his house in Westchester County, N.Y.
.
.
.
MSNBC just provided a camera to Steve Schmidt, Sen. John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign manager, and Schmidt’s daughter is also learning how to apply the powder.
.
.
.
From the banks of Lake Lucille, Palin can digitally commune with Greta Van Susteren or Sean Hannity or any other Fox News host who books her.
.
.
.
A few decades ago, Cokie Roberts allowed NPR to install a microphone in her husband’s study, just off their bedroom. Many a Monday since then, she has gone on air at 6:15 a.m., often still in her nightgown, broadcasting her view from Bethesda.
(Offhand, do the unionized makeup artists know they’ve been supplanted by scab minor children in pundits’ homes armed with a powder puff to take the shine off Chromedome?)
Consider that list and wonder not as these pampered establishment denizens appear more and more often on America’s cable chatfests: the networks have made the investment with these folks, so why send a Town Car for a more divergent view? Cokie Roberts described the Golden Handcuffs, and America’s Golden Earmuffs, best:
And as with all technology, there’s that status thrill of getting a V.I.P. perk before anyone else. After all, who cares about getting comforts-of-home niceties at the office, when you can have the actual comforts of home? But when there’s a give, there’s always a little take.
“The minus is,” Roberts explained, “they can always find you.”
Another minus? We can always hear and see you!




17 Comments

This list is so discouraging, and means that we’ll be hearing from Matalin and Carville forever, as well as Fleischer, Schmidt, Palin, Gergen and Smerconish.
Not to feed the ‘party duopoly’ mindset, but does anyone else notice how that list swings? A little Right, maybe?
A-yep.
I would be happy to be wrong: studios in the homes of Dean Baker, Robert Reich, Michael Moore, Naomi Klein and Janeane Garafalo would go a long way.
Considering the fuel used to launch the satellite uplinks required by these in-home studios, I’m not sure the green justification pans out. But it was funny to see it lead.
On the bright side, who watches television?
I gave my last one away years ago. The thrift shop guy couldn’t believe I was donating a working television.
Young people spend more time on-line than watching television, and when the “watch” it’s mostly on for background noise. It would be interesting to see where they get their information – I bet it’s not television.
I think that’s where Gore made his mistake with Current – it’s television. He should have gone with a web-distributed news network more along the lines of Russia Today. A name (Olbermann’s or otherwise) who would draw some viewers away from television would have given it a nice start.
Somebody is going to do this and own the news cycle for the young, and they won’t start watching television blowhards and anchor-actresses just because they turn 30. Television is going to go the way of newspapers and AM radio – an anacronism for the elderly.
You are right, I think.
But these studios can also be used to link ‘content’ to the web. So these pernicious Opiners pollute our polity nonetheless.
Television is a passive medium. The Web is an active medium. Who is going to sit and watch Ari Fleischer on the Web instead of clicking on something else? Everyone under 40 in this country seems to have ADHD. Not one of these clowns is a draw for eyeballs. They are pushed on the public by network execs who want to build a narrative.
I gave up TV years ago. I’m happy to watch Daily Show, Colbert Report, Rachel Maddow, Chris Hayes, Lawrence O’Donnel and the Soup on my computer.Letterman’s monologue and musical guests. I’m done. Notice? No right wings freaks or hacks. Good for my blood pressure.
Speaking for myself, the MUTE button is never far from hand when liar Ari shows up on my teevee.
Meh, pretty smart. I mean seriously: what else is a liberal person to do?
Next thing ya’now ‘newscasters’ will be reading teleprompters.
What is going on with the world anyway?
I personally only trust NPR. All this crazy rightwing/leftwing gooblegook is just so annoying.
I of course take comfort in the ‘old school’, Marx, lenin, satan, you know, the foremothers and all that.
Can’t wait for the collapse. We will be proven right at last! Glorious day’s ahead comrades, glorious days.
This should have been a TBogg
And its great to see that the most comfortable mwmbers of society can “work” for their millions without so much as leaving home …
Well, we can’t leave him to do all the heavy lifting, now can we?
Besides, I’ve no exclusive on it, so tip him off. Let’s see what he can do with it. No doubt better than I.
I wrote Current two emails about streaming. No reply. So, I stick with FS, RT and Al-Jazeera English TV.
I try never to miss Lauren Lister.
dinosaurs
Current is prohibited from streaming or offering their programs later on the net by their agreements with cable distributers. Another fail.
Literally not an issue.
RP, LH2 and LOX are dirt cheap in the quantities launch vehicles need and don’t amount to more than a bit of noise in the bottom line of total launch costs. And the satellites themselves tend to last.
Nope, telepresence is truly greener than studio time.
But, sadly, it can’t do a thing about the brown-nosing punditry for the <1%…
As for the R/L tilt… the corps will go for the brainless id every time regardless of party affliation.
The tilt is just a sad reminder of what was lost when the Dems were assimilated by the <1%.