Because the President determined that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional, the federal government won’t defend it in court, including in front of the Supreme Court in March. But the GOP base is crazy because of that, in that they want the government to keep The Gheys down where they belong, or at least not married.
So the Speaker of the House, John Boehner, set up a lawyers’ group to defend DOMA, with a half-million dollar budget. Lawyers being lawyers, they blew through that budget while losing their cases at every appellate level. Now they have to put together their case before SCOTUS.
But that costs money. So far, Boehner’s got the BLAG (Bi-Partisan Legal Advisory Group) to agree (Democrats voting NO) to increase the lawyers’ budget to $1.5M. But they need more money! And every time he tries to get more money for DOMA defense, that darn Nancy Pelosi raises a stink.
So on January 3rd, when the House got organized, Speaker Boehner incorporated BLAG into this Congress’s rules. No one was quite sure why, but now a reason has become apparent. How about secretly raising the cap on expenditures? This time to three million dollars:
House Republicans secretly agreed to raise the cost for defending the Defense of Marriage Act in court to $3 million in the first week that the 113th Congress was sworn into office, according to a copy of the contract obtained by the Washington Blade on Tuesday.
The contract, signed by new House Committee on Administration Chair Candace Miller (R-Mich.), allows for expenses to pay for outside counsel to defend DOMA in court to reach $3 million — a full $1 million more than the previous cost cap agreed to in September. In a statement this week, House Democrats said the agreement was reached in secret and they weren’t aware of it until late Monday.
Predictably, Democratic members of BLAG who were kept in the dark about this are pissed:
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), the two “no” votes on BLAG, responded to news that the cost cap to defend DOMA was yet again raised and raised in secret with consternation.
In a letter to Boehner dated Jan. 15, they jointly renew their call on House Republicans to discontinue defense of DOMA — but also made a new call for Republicans to demonstrate their defense of DOMA more transparently — calling the actions a “clandestine commitment of taxpayer funds” as well as “highly irregular and objectionable.”
“Until Republicans decide to abandon this effort once and for all, we ask you to make your legal plans clear; to make public every contract signed with outside counsel in this case in a timely manner; to declare the total cost of this case to the taxpayers; and to abide by the highest standards of transparency and accountability,” Pelosi and Hoyer wrote.
Good luck with that.
Photo by NASA HQ in the public domain.




17 Comments

Government by sternly worded letter.
Where’s the offsetting spending cut, Mr Speaker?
Ask him here:
http://www.speaker.gov/contact
Let’s face it, drowning the government in the bathtub means no money for Sandy, or anything the Democrats support. There is no amount of money we should not spend to protect the sanctitties of marriage.
High ceilinged room, thick heavy dark oakwood doors, plush and lush red carpet and purple/maroon velvetine drapes.
Cigar smoke and the scent of hi end brandy in the air.
Dim lights, dirty deals.
And the Dem’s didn’t KNOW about this meeting(s)?
Well clutch my pearls . . . . great catch Teddy P, thanks.
Apparently this was done during a House GOP caucus, so whether the Democrats knew or not, they wouldn’t attend.
No money for Sandy until today, but money for Hate Promotion is always on tap!
Where does this 3million come from? Who pays?
And how much did Obama spend defending both DADT and DOMA for the first 3 years of his administration?
I’m shocked. Shocked, I tell you, to discover the GOP leadership hiding their hate behind closed doors.
But if you’re looking for a sign that Boehner is worried about keeping the ultrarightwing of his caucus happy, this is a big one. From Boehner’s POV, this is a cheap way to buy their support.
Day One work is the most important work — you’re right, Peter.
US taxpayers.
Which I know you knew already.
Here’s how the funding is described in the Raw Story article, linked above:
Raw Story (http://s.tt/1qfj7)
In keeping with the belief system, wouldn’t it be more cost effective to join the 700 Club and pay a little extra to have an on air “healing prayer” with RevPat? Throw in a few extra bucks and he could probably do something about all the unattractive wimmin as well as the gheys. Remember, he chased away a Hurricane, but I think Miami were champions anyway.
Nice catch Teddy.
There’s no need to let something like that that get in the way of a “mean ol’ Republicans” story. ;)
Thank you, Teddy.”Highest standards of transparency and accountability”.Don’t make me laugh.
So old people can eat catfood but Gays can’t marry despite a majority of Americans who think Gays should get married?
Congress needs to get its priorities straight why hasn’t Obama vetoed this spending?
I see plenty of political upside to this even if Congress puts the funding in a budget or defense spending bill.
Pork is pork by making a stand on this Obama gets points for supporting Gay Rights and slashing pork so why is he not vetoing the funding?
Does the Orange One have enough votes in the House and Senate to override a Veto?
No! So why isn’t Obama vetoing this?