A few weeks back, news broke about the Washington Post essentially trying to sell favorable coverage to the health care industry in exchange for $250,000 checks. The sickening mix of power, fame, and fortune that is the beltway media stew essentially shrugged this story off; it was the fault of a new account manager, and didn’t really reflect on the ethics of Village Journalism.
Saturday, Glen Greenwald and Ana Marie Cox noted that Richard Wolffe has left the practice of journalism to join the staff of Public Strategies, Inc, a public relations firm headed by former Bush Communications Director Dan Bartlett.
Public Strategies is contracted to provide services to several companies or organizations that have a direct stake in the outcome of the health care debate. Public Strategies advertises its effectiveness by citing its success in defeating property insurance reform in Texas:
"The insurance industry was under fire in Texas for raising rates and suspending sales of new homeowner policies due to a significant increase in mold claims. Policyholders, consumer groups, and legislators representing both sides of the aisle were calling for a rate freeze and further regulation of practices such as credit scoring.
Despite entering the 2003 Texas legislative cycle with significant opposition on both sides of the aisle, insurance industry-supported legislation passed through the legislature free of mandatory rate reductions and any limitations on credit scoring."
Wolffe has reported, or commented on, health care reform for Countdown on numerous occasions. He has interviewed Obama confidant David Axelrod. Wolffe asked Axelrod banal questions like, "Have you lost control of the framing of this debate?" without disclosing that his full-time employer had accepted $60,000 in 2009 to represent the interests of Bristol-Myers-Squibb, one of the nation’s largest pharmaceutical companies.
Further, Wolffe didn’t mention the fact that the US Chamber of Commerce, which is leading the charge against health care reform, paid his employer $60,000 to represent their interests. On July 21st, Wolffe parroted Chamber talking points as an "analyst" on Countdown:
"I mean, one of the worst numbers he has is on his handling of health care. Well which piece of health care? It‘s so vague and nebulous. I think, at this point—at this moment, it‘s really processy (ph) to focus on approval ratings for issues people don‘t fully understand."
This is just business as usual in Washington. People like Wolffe, who may have entered journalism for the right reason, but have become famous, wealthy, and influential and forget the real purpose of journalism: to accurately inform the public about the objective truth.
Though it’s hard to blame individuals like Wolffe for the rot of the beltway Village Media culture. It’s a small step to go from accepting expensive cocktails and h’orderves in order to "maintain access" to office holders to accepting a high paying job at a lobbying firm and then proceeding to report on issues which directly affect clients of your firm. Inside Washington, where everybody is chummy with each other, and where status matters more than results, there is nothing wrong with this unethical behavior.
But out here in the real world–far away from the soothing music. fine wine, and cheese plates of Washington cocktail parties–unethical behavior like the behavior of Wolffe is one of the main reasons we do not trust the media. We want to be told the actual truth–if there is a bill which has been released, we want the specifics of it to be summarized. Instead, corrupt "journalists" like Wolffe tell us the bill is vague and nebulous. It works out great for "journalists" like Wolffe. They don’t have to work (i.e. read the bill) and they get paid handsomely by industry financiers who are happy to have cronies in the media.



36 Comments




This didn’t really fit in my piece, but I think that bloggers are the only “real journalists” left. There was a time not that long ago when journalists were generally just regular people. Then came Broderism, and we got guys like Wolffe. Inside the cocoon of the beltway, real life problems are theoretical.
But bloggers tend to actually be in the field–i.e. anywhere but Washington or New York. We see the real problems–the sick neighbor who can’t get treatment, skyrocketing premiums and prescription drug costs, etc, etc. It’s why we support reform, and tend to tune people like Wolffe out.
If blogs eventually put big media out of business, count me as happy–just as long as blogs don’t become big media.
Hey, Bag!
Now, isn’t that interesting…Wolffe’s also been guest-hosting Countdown for Keith Olbermann while the latter’s been on vacation.
See, I knew Wolffe was a complete ass!
His new affiliation needs to be trumpeted loudly. He’s no longer credible as a disinterested commentator…if, indeed, he ever was.
FunnyWheelieDiva
Spotlit to Keith Olbermann. This is a really huge conflict of interest, and he needs to deal with it up front.
FWDiva
oh my.
Nice post (Jim White over at Greenwald’s blog linked to it).
I didn’t this about Wolffe until I read Greenwald today. I don’t typically watch much political stuff on television, but I know a great many people do. And, as Greenwald noted, the choice by NBC/MSNBC not to reveal Wolffe’s conflict of interest–not to mention Wolffe’s own refusal to do so–is not dissimilar from NBC et. al.’s refusal–to this day–to not mention the military contractor connections of their military “analysts.”
Thanks. Wolffe told Politico that he wouldn’t comment on issues related to the firm’s clients. I think that health care reform is an issue which is pretty related to Bristol-Myers-Squibb and the US Chamber of Commerce.
An excellent complement to Greenwald’s post at Salon.
Jim White’s link to it there sent me back here today.
Ain’t it the truth!
Back from link to GG – already read the Times piece yesterday (and commented on it here) — this is just depressing.
At first I thought well, Wolffe must have just changed jobs…(actually, I noticed he referred to a Newsweek reporter as a “former colleague”, and wondered). But, April 13th? And he continues to appear without a single mention of his new job?
Unbelievable.
Will we hear anything from Keith on his return next week? If not, my depression will ratchet up some more.
Cannot trust anybody – the only hope of something like truth is to cover multiple sources and weigh their trustworthiness over time. Which is why I stay here at FDK.
I think (or at least I hope) that KO will give Wolffe a limited Milbank.
It’s out in the open now, and discussion about the conflicts will haunt his show going forward. Either way, it will tell us a lot about that relationship.
This from an Olbermann fan.
And Fuck General Electric.
“And Fuck General Electric.”
As a former employee of the General, I heartily agree! I left because I took exception to the way they did business. It was very likely the worst career move I ever made, however, I can sleep at night…
Hoo boy. Well that explains MSNBC putting Dr. Howard Dean on early in the week, followed by Wolfe in Olbermann’s chair — it’s their lame idea of balance, an actual doctor married to a practicing doctor, followed by a paid shill for the health care industry.
I left instructions for contacting GE’s investor relations back in Greg Levine’s post about GE squelching Olbermann. Go for it, smack them up for their abuse of the public’s trust.
Rep. Doc Hastings (R-Wa) has a really slimy push poll using disinformation on health care reform on his website:
“Do you support health care reform if it means you might be forced out of a plan that lets you see your current doctor?”
Kind of like asking if you support health care reform if it means your dog will die. I answered yes just for fun. I’m thinking if we can get the “yes” vote over 50%, he’ll take it off of his website. If you want to join me, here’s the link to his website:
http://hastings.house.gov/
We’ve doubled the yes vote total since this morning. If it gets above 50% we’re going to call the paper and see if they will call his office for a comment.
I must be getting old and losing patience…
That’s Glenn Greenwald.
It’d be nice if those who seek credibility could give a little care to some of the smaller details, lest the larger issues be held with suspicion.
Or, perhaps, I’ll simply begin referring to Jane Hamsher as Jayne Hamster. No doubt she’s been called worse.
i just took the pushpoll. it’s at 44% “yes” right now.
Bet Judy Miller wished she thought of this scam.
So any word on what if anything KO is going to do about this he does have connections to the Lefty blogs right?
Just another dick in deecee….
YES up to 55% now.
Why do the Rethugs and Blue Dogs want to force those who have insurance to be dependent on the plan their employer may be able to afford with no choice of their own?
‘cept we knew Dr. Howard Dean was a doctor… paid shill, coverup.
I guess I’d be more worried about it if there were serious wages on the table invested in professionals with J-school cred along with copy editors pouring over all the copy here and missing these little things. (Or if some corporate interest had purchased that kind of perfection.)
But since this piece is representative of pro bono work of activist volunteers borne of real passion, the best thing readers can do is concentrate on the content and not the typos.
So let’s recap: corporatist interests in the health care industry are buying access in media while the corporate-owned media short-shrifts the needs of the public to provide bought-and-paid-for coverage of the health care industry’s agenda, while failing to disclose their conflict of interest. Now did you have anything substantive to say about the content?
Yes, many of us know he’s a doctor, but I think the corporate-owned media is still trying to paint him as they did in 2004 as a wild-eyed crazy man. They’d rather not ensure the public sees him for what he is, a well-educated professional with experience in both the financial and medical fields, who managed to provide a government health care program for all children and elderly in his state while balancing a budget for 11 years. If we were to ask the average Joe what they knew about Dean, would they say he’s a doctor, or would they refer to something else the media has accentuated and highlighted about him?
MSNBC may be doing a better job with him now, but they’ve done their share to mask how far in bed they are with Big Pharma and the corporate side of health care. Their treatment of Dean until now has been part of the minimization process to keep doctors from representing the needs of their patients.
With the exception of NBC’s Nancy Snyderman, of course, who regularly pimps for Big Pharma. Thank goodness they didn’t lug her out against Dean. If I have to hear Snyderman pimping Merck’s HPV vaccine one more time as if it is news, I’m going to break my television set.
My editor that never sleeps says, “Please spell hors d’oeuvres correctly!”
Otherwise, great post and right on target! I hope KO addresses this when he returns.
just to clarify…Dick dickety dick would be the paid shill….
good for him
the idea in a capitalist system is to make money
the very heart of capitalism is materialism
he is playing the system
americans love their capitalism
they think capitalism is about freedoms
when most become lower middle class they will wonder where their freedoms went
time for gated communities in america and security guards
the have and have not society is coming
the very attributes of capitalism is a two class system
americas love affair with capitalism will cost them their standard of living
with communism man exploits man with capitalism it is the other way around
how few americans understand that simple but profound statement
how very few
moore does but few understand him very few.
This isn’t the first time GE has been accused of interfering with the news division:
It was widely reported that on election night 2000, Welch made a personal visit to NBC’s New York studios and used his influence to get NBC News to reverse its initial announcement that Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore had won the state of Florida. NBC was the second major network after Fox News to announce Bush’s “victory” in the early morning hours of November 8, only to retract the call later and declare Florida “too close to call.”
This quote is from the World Socialist Web Site Published by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI), so who knows.
That’s fair. There are a few cringe worthy typos in my post. I fixed them on my blog, but by the time I realized them, I could no longer edit my post here. I’m an amateur.
I’d be happy to edit that, but I can’t. (There’s also a period instead of a comma in one place and an “and” where there should be a comma. I strive for perfect copy, but when I had other things to do on a Saturday afternoon, and a quick “I wonder what I’ll find” turned into a 3 hour long post, mistakes happen. I’ll try to do better next time. Thanks for the feedback.
LOL. As you can tell, I never eat them, or even see them on the menu! :)
“Interference” is rather subjective. The entire point of GE’s acquisition of NBC was to provide the parent corporation with a friendly mouthpiece which would promote more favorably their position on tax policy.
If memory serves, it was Karl Rove who suggested to Jack Welch that GE buy NBC for this purpose. All Jack had to do was stack the management deck at NBC with people who thought his way, a la Chicago School of Economics.
And we know the last administration was absolutely certain of the kind of work NBC did, with Cheney’s aide Cathie Martin testifying to their ability to control the message on and through Tim Russert’s Meet the Press.
Don’t need to interfere directly if they already do what they’ve been bought and paid for.
I’ve been looking forward to Olbermann’s return, now even more so. I hope it won’t be bittersweet, because I’m willing to cut the cord if O doesn’t address the two issues in Greenwald’s column yesterday (a “limited Milbank” indeed!)
I do agree that Wolffe commenting on healthcare related issues should be off the table now that he’s started his new gig.
But am I the only one that sees the quote from him as not exactly proving the point of the post?
He is saying that one can’t really comment on Obama’s low poll nos. re his handling of health care because the question was nebulous. This quote is not damning at all, imho.
And, I’ve not heard anything from him that trumpets Bristol-Myers-Squibb’s interests or that of the COC… just because his company represent them doesn’t mean that Wolffe is a shill for them.
I’d like to know who HIS clients actually are before condemning him.
He’s been a voice of reason on KO as far as I remember.
I thought GG’s piece went too far in condemning Wolffe as well… wihtout giving any specific evidence that Wolffe had clearly shilled for Public Strategies’ clients… Glenn seemed to be particularly contemptuous that he wrote a glowing book about Obama keying off of his relationship with Axelrod that was developed during the election.
To me, that is a bit of a conflict, but not enough to hang the guy.
Front paged! Yeah, Bag!
FWDiva
Sorry I came so late. This has been tickling at the back of mind since I first saw this post. For those interested in what reporting looks like to Richard Wolffe here is a Glenn Greenwald post on him from February 21, 2007:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/g…..index.html
A short excerpt:
It is an excellent article and I recommend it to everyone.
Bob Somerby has been on to Wolffe for a long time, just check the archives.
Aug 3, “yes” is up to 51%.
David Sirota’s piece on Wolffe is good. …Corporate Spokesman on Air as “Political Analyst”