Lao Tsu, an older contemporary of Confucius, was keeper of the imperial archives at Loyang in the province of Honan in the sixth century B.C. All his life he taught that “The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao”; but, according to ancient legend, as he was riding off into the desert to die – sick at heart at the ways of men – he was persuaded by a gatekeeper in northwestern China to write down his teaching for posterity.
- Gia-Fu Feng, translator, Vintage Books edition of the Tao Te Ching, 1972
In the past few weeks, one phrase in the above passage keeps pulling at my sleeve.
As the extent of corporations’ rapacious practices – which have been fully and eagerly aided and abetted by our “leaders” – have become clear in this Silent Spring, it is the only phrase that fully captures my feelings.
Far more than I can ever recall in my 50 years, I feel sick at heart at the ways of men.
The way we continue to pursue the unattainable – ever-increasing profitability for every for-profit entity in existence, along with those not yet created – is simply, undeniably, categorically wrong.
The way ideologues, through factless “fact” and rhetorical acrobatics – succeed in keeping us on this dwindling path, that’s wrong, too.
The way we delude ourselves. The way we ignore science.
“The way the camera follows us in slo mo…”
Wrong. All of it. So very, very wrong.
Our Mother stands violated in the name of our constant thirst for ROI. Toxins bleed into the womb from whence we crawled millions of years ago on our way to the canopy, from which we would in turn descend many millions of years later still.
All for a higher share price. Always a higher share price.
Hundreds of thousands of us have fought long and hard, for decades, to warn of this day.
In the end, we were ignored. Completely.
Sure, we raised a little consciousness – among our own choir. We even grew its ranks. We organized. We protested. We marched. We sang. We chanted.
But we lost. Big.
The proof floats in the Gulf of Mexico, and is washing onto our shores. Regardless what Haley Barbour has to say about it.
What happens next? We already know.
Nothing.
That’s what happened after Obama/Biden. After Clinton/Gore. After Exxon/Valdez.
Are we gullible-stupid-naive-hippie-pacifist-loopy enough to think things will be different now?
They won’t.
Not through “laws” (suggestions), “regulators” (whores), or “technology” (shortcuts). Nor through “Congress” (accomplices), “free market capitalists” (robber barons), or ”green incentives” (corporate welfare).
Until we make corporate crime – and rape is a crime – NOT pay, nothing will change.
The magnitude of the task is daunting; to make even a dent, we will need to succeed on two fronts.
First, we must frame corporate crime in the broadest possible terms: It must be nothing short of any policy or practice by any company which in any way limits any human from enjoying basic freedoms, rights, and access to opportunity. We must make the complete changing of corporate culture and business practice the social issue it actually is, on the same plane as Civil Rights, Gay Rights – in short, Human Rights.
Second, each of us will need to do whatever we can to profoundly change the way we live, and the way we work. We must see many of our ”conveniences” for what they really are: luxuries the Earth – and future generations – simply cannot afford.
We must take bikes, not cars. We must eat what we can grow, or what is grown within biking distance of our homes.
We should imagine and create new modes of transportation. How about super-lightweight passenger ”cars,” even buses, weather-tight and driven like our gas drinkers are now – but in which each rider pedals?
How about if we tell our employers which 40 hours of our lives they can have every week – rather than them telling us? Seriously, when was the last time there was a general strike in this country? And if not now – when?
There’s another option, of course.
Also at the core of Taoist belief, it’s stated in the notes of that same 1972 translation quoted up top:
Accept what is in front of you without wanting the situation to be other than it is. Study the natural order of things and work with it rather than against it, for to try to change what is only sets up resistance. Nature provides everything without requiring payment or thanks, and also provides for all without discrimination – therefore let us present the same face to everyone and treat all men as equals, however they may behave.
I’ve been an activist all my life, but at this moment – in the face of corporations’ near-total control of the air we breathe, the food we eat, the water we drink, the health care we get, the way we work – and yes, the leaders we elect – I’m as close as I’ve ever come to giving up and pulling a Henry David Thoreau. Retreating to the woods. Leaving The Grid behind. And giving myself over to the joy of neither knowing – nor caring – exactly how bad things are “out there.”
Not to mention the joy of doing an honest day’s work – for nobody but me.
And the time, now and then, to do nothing at all.
Cross-posted at The Malcontent.



52 Comments




I’m feeling the same way, and trying to decide how to go forward.
I keep going back to the Mario Savio speech:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOPuUlpp238
And the buddha said that attachment to desire is the source of suffering.
Beautiful in its truth, dhfsfc. Thanks for the link.
As you probably know, ubetcha, Buddhism grew out of Taoism; desire truly is the source of suffering. From Chapter 13 of the Gia-Fu Feng translation:
Accept disgrace willingly.
Accept misfortune as the human condition.
What do you mean by “Accept disgrace willingly”?
Accept being unimportant.
Do not be concerned with loss or gain.
This is called “accepting disgrace willingly.”
What do you mean by “Accept misfortune as the human condition”?
Misfortune comes from having a body.
Without a body, how could there be misfortune?
Surrender yourself humbly; then you can be trusted to care for all things.
Love the world as your own slef; then you can truly care for all things.
Withdraw and find contentment. Take Lao Tsu with you. Its your best move.
We must take bikes, not cars. We must eat what we can grow, or what is grown within biking distance of our homes.
It is bad. I cannot get accross the street, too many cars. Too many cars,
Each and every litte snit is a magic carpet guy. HE/she rides the carpet: ( my term for what the personal automobile really is: It is the equivelant of the magic carpet, which is in the story books. over the landscape… no need to take any effort to put one foot over the next, as in ” one, two, three, four, one, two… etc
The automobile is the worst thing ever for the life of the planet, and the planets most egoistic inhabitant, to date!
Confusus said, a man who rides bicycle pedals legs off to give ass a ride.
Man who drives car works ass off to pay for car and gas to give ass a ride.
Man who rides horse pays for hay and oats to give ass a ride.
MORAL- If man wants to give ass a ride he in some way pays for ass to ride.
There’s no more a free ride, than a free lunch.
Thanks Mal, but I heard it all before. Please help me learn something I don’t know yet.
You’re right, geoshmoe, but the car is only partly to blame. It again comes back to spineless politics: As we’ve developed our cities and suburbs and now even our rural areas, there is no connection. You can’t ride your bike – let alone walk – from your neighborhood to your market because your market is now a 40,000 sq. ft. monstrosity located on a commercial “island” next to a bunch of other outsized stores – all because your local pols hadn’t the guts to stand up to developers who wanted to build as cheaply as possible (or were too busy having their pockets lined by them).
So you’ve heard it all before. What have you actually DONE about it?
I’m not asking for a free ride, oh great expert at reading things into diaries that were never there. I’m asking for a little sanity. Because it’s pretty much disappeared.
Mal, there is a third option; retire from the battle for a time, then come back when you are recharged and rested.
All of us have to take time to feed what makes us activists. It is one of the reasons I always argue against people using outrage to motivate themselves or others, in the end it burns out. The struggle is a long one. I know it feels like business is more in control than it has ever been, but I’d refer you to the history of the beginning of the 19th Century as an example of how far we’ve come.
Which is not to say there are not problems, and hard challenges. There are, but there always will be. There is never going to be a time when we have a society that is perfect, it is unacheivable by humans. There will always be a need for those who struggle in the name of the voiceless, who fight for the powerless. It can’t always be done by the same people.
If you are burnt out, then take some time off, a year, two, or as long as it takes until you are ready to fight the good fight, as you define it, everyday again.
We who remain will carry on the fight, and still be here fighting when you get back.
Cheers,
Platitudes, Bill? Seriously?
At the end of the 19th Century we did not have world-around communication in an instant, and so many other advantages we now have, which should be giving people the power over these criminals. If this is the “progress” we’ve made in a little over 100 years, how freakin’ pitiful is that?
It may not fit with the power of positive thinking that so many liberals consider so imoprtant to success – but a little realism, please? Could we?
as a taoist-christian i say that the imperative is to fix the excesses in society. taoism has a special place for excesses, as does christianity.
This may seem heartless to write, but here’s a suggestion for all those who are sick at heart over the actions of our politicians:
STOP VOTING FOR THE CORRUPT HEATHENS! START VOTING FOR GOOD PEOPLE, PEOPLE WHOSE RECORDS SHOW THAT THEY REALLY DO REPRESENT YOU!
This is common sense, but every election cycle the above admonition goes ignored. People claim to want change, but they vote for a Chicago politician who epitomizes everything that is wrong with American politics. People complain until they’re blue in the face about what goes on after they’ve elected corrupt politicians who never did and never will represent them, but at the end of the day they shut up and vote how the powerful tell them to — and no one with any real voice in the media, be it mainstream or in the blogosphere, dares point out the necessity of voting against corrupt politicians and for good ones no matter how small the good guys’ chances are claimed to be.
You want to know why people give up? They give up because they’re denied good options, allowed only bad options in elections, and that perpetuates the cycle of disillusionment. A lot of people ridicule Ralph Nader and Cynthia McKinney and Dennis Kucinich, but they’re the ones who represent us against large business interests — even when it’s not politically convenient. Yet the likes of Obama, Clinton, and McCain are the ones you vote for every time. Look in the mirror and ask yourself if it isn’t long past time you stopped this abusive cycle and started voting for the Naders, the McKinneys, and the Kuciniches. Ignore the naysayers who ridicule, threaten, and insult you for voting your beliefs. No, your vote won’t be counted. But it will be registered, and sooner or later those registered votes will be of such number that they’ll have to be counted.
Until you break the abusive cycle, you will continue to be disillusioned, continue to give up, and continue to be ignored.
Not by me, El Dude. I’ve not voted far more than I have voted, due to the very lack of “good” people you decry. That said, I think it’s a bit disingenuious to say that people “voted for a Chicago politician” blah blah blah. They – we – all bought into his “change” yak, and it turned out to be bullshit.
Fact is, I was a Kuchinich supporter. I’ve also voted for Nader (full disclosure: it was a protest vote. I think he’s an egoist who couldn’t captain a rowboat!)
But Kuchinich sold out on health care, just as Weiner did, and just as Grayson is doing now on other issues. (Did you get his e-mailed plea for money for Weiner two weeks back? Pathetic.)
I’ve been preaching non-voting and NOTA for a long time, and I’m back to it. “Challenging from the left” is just the latest game of bait and switch, IMO, designed to perpetuate the broken system. If any of these pols really wanted change, NOTA would have been instituted nationwide a long time ago.
I’d suggest retiring until a time that the tactics and strategies have significantly changed. Such that the end game of them isn’t certain defeat, and exercising of them doesn’t materially enrich the opponent.
In other words, retire permanently, because we’re not going to see the tactics and strategies change. It seems it’s always going to boil down to panhandling for cash, and then using it to buy into a game that’s rigged against us.
Beautifully said, Nathan. Thank you.
Is this even possible?
First, American electoral politics grossly favors opportunistic narcissists. Elections are an exercise in shameless self-promotion to win a glorified popularity contest. “Good people” tend not to be either very adept or very interested in such pursuits.
Second, any representative will betray your interests. It’s inherent in the fact that they represent more than just your prerogatives. They represent their own, and supposedly everyone else’s in your district/state/etc.
Third, the elections themselves are horrific points of accountability. There’s no method for popular recall, so once elected they can do pretty much whatever they damn please. No matter what they said, or what their record was before. Even if they lose their seat, it’s not a huge loss to them. Often they end up materially better off.
I wish I could take credit for this line of thinking, but many of the founding members of this nation were astutely aware of the fallacies of proxy representation, and how specious it was to consider it a sound implementation of democracy.
I just gathered from your diary that you don’t lack passion or motivation in pursuit of reconfiguring governance, and pressing society to actively engage in at least defining our social compact (even if we conclude there isn’t one, because then we know where we stand), but that you’re experiencing debilitating frontal-lobe trauma from running headlong into the same brick wall over and over again.
New means of organizing come along, new means of fundraising, etc. But the end result is the same. We try and raise more cash than the massive established money-machines, so that we can try to temporarily corrupt our own fickle politicians for a brief stint. We even dump cash directly into the coffers of big media to buy ourselves meager pittances of broadcast PR. We “organize” people to do things that are utterly ignorable; letter writing, petition signing (unless it’s a petition to get something on a ballot, it just goes in the trash), calling low-level functionaries whose job it is to shield their boss from our voice, rallying around the next hero (candidate) who will fundamentally betray us, weekend-warrior protesting, and so on.
Rather than getting out entirely, I’d advocate that you just retire from all those dubious pursuits. Instead, refocus your efforts and resolve on the populist institutions that you do have available to you, and if you don’t have any where you live, then move someplace where you will. Of course always do as you suggested in your diary, and take on the mantle of your prerogatives by example by doing, “whatever we can to profoundly change the way we live, and the way we work. We must see many of our ”conveniences” for what they really are: luxuries the Earth – and future generations – simply cannot afford.”
Despite being anointed as resident Wet-Blanket in Chief by Ms. Hamsher, I’m not interested in squelching your motivation or ambition, but I do think we would all be better served by fundamentally harnessing our inner-activist differently, such that we don’t continually beat it to death by engaging in pursuits that started out on a footing of certain defeat. I’m talking about the systems and mechanisms, not the political issues themselves.
One of your quotations included this:
Probably true when written, not true now.
I certainly understand how you feel. thanks.
Again, well put. And don’t take (what you perceive as) your annointment as Head Wet Blanket too much to heart. I continue to believe Jane is very bright and sincere in what she is pursuing. The question remains, how do we institute the sort of direct democracy we deserve? As you infer, there is simply no good reason anymore for electing representatives AT ALL. Technology makes it eminently possible for each of us to take a few minutes each morning to propose new laws and on vote on other proposals, without these money-grubbing intermediaries gumming up the works.
You know it, I know it, and they know it – and that last is precisely why it will never happen.
I am involved locally in quite a number of efforts, and don’t expect to disengage from those anytime soon. But tossing the TV out the window, consciously limiting the amount of time I devote to learning about/thinking about national/international events, the energy I put toward trying to change what, indeed, proves unchangable a little more each day – these are no longer options but necessities for a happy, whole, balanced existence.
How so? Get out in the woods and you may see things differently.
Mankind is the only animal that doesn’t know enough not to shit where it eats.
We, mankind, will eventually poison the planet. It is our nature. We will probably find a way to survive, living in domed enclosures and creating some sort of food out of chemicals.
In the meantime, all you can really do is try to invest your energy into making a difference where you can. For example, I help run a no-kill ferret shelter. We rescue abused or abandoned animals that the dog and cat rescues would just euthanize. It is hard to get donations, people don’t seem to empathize with ferrets the same way they do with doggies and kitties, so we collect cans and recycle them to buy food.
The point is that there are a lot of things we can all do to help — but if you’re looking for a way to prevent mankind from ruining the planet, you aren’t going to find it.
All you can do is ease its passing.
Well put, geraldo. Thanks.
You missed the point I tried to make to Your diary.
You spell out, bitch about, and ask for alot.
Yet You like all Americans have supported everything bad in this Country by not noticing it while it was developing.
Yes You took the free lunch that was handed to You by Corporate America and Our Government, maybe in ways You can’t see.
Looks like we’re on the same page, and I couldn’t agree more with the diary you linked.
A few days ago I decided to make a change. Every time I comment, or have the impulse to comment, on something here at FDL; I force myself to also do something at least as time-consuming for a localized initiative, or just forego the commenting entirely and use the impulse as a reminder to do something constructive.
For instance, as a result of the time spent responding to this particular diary, I’m now more thoroughly acquainted with the distinctions between what it takes to pass an initiative statute vs. an initiative amendment in the State of Oregon. Information which I’ll later use when drafting multiple pieces of initiative language for different formulations on a state-owned and operated bank.
That’s giving up. That’s part of the problem. Is there a write-in option on your ballots? Write in someone’s name, organize efforts to get many people voting for your write-in candidate of choice. But don’t stop voting. It’s the same as voting for someone who doesn’t represent you, in that it signals to the powerful that you are not discontent enough with the system to do anything to really change it.
From what I observed in 2008, far too many people did exactly that: they bought into the Lie that was and is Barry Obama. He became such a source of hope to some people that to even question him was to invite scorn (see the Daily Kos for the biggest and worst examples). Worse, far too many voted for Obama in spite of knowing what exactly what he is and always has been. Shall these people be forgiven when they continue to attack those of us who voted our beliefs, such as when we voted for Nader or McKinney or Kucinich?
And that’s what finally drove me to officially re-register as a member of my state’s Green Party, despite its failure so far to organize into a strong competitor to the Big Two. When even Dennis gives up and caves in, it’s time to admit that the effort to reform the Democrat Party from within is a lost cause and that it’s time to move on.
I disagree for the reason stated above. There are only two kinds of wasted vote, and they both send the same message: the one not cast, and the one cast for someone who doesn’t represent you. Yes, the electoral system is corrupt, possibly past all redemption. But short of outright physical revolution, which hasn’t got a snowball’s chance in hell of rising up let alone succeeding against a well armed and organized military, casting an informed ballot is the only tool we really have for making needed changes. Why wouldn’t you want to go on the record voicing your dissatisfaction, your anger, your frustration? Why wouldn’t you encourage others to do likewise, until there are enough of you that you actually make a difference however small? It’s because you gave up and stopped caring enough to do something beyond just complaining. I understand why you did. I’ve been tempted a lot of times to give up, too. But I still refuse to let the bastards defeat me. This is my country too, and by God, I’ll die trying to make it better.
Yes.
And whose fault is it that we keep letting Democrat leaders put up opportunistic narcissists every election cycle? We don’t have to accept it. We can and should leave any political party that puts up such monsters. Yes, it’s ridiculously tough. But we’re not going to change anything by throwing up our hands and giving up on the system we pay for with our tax dollars.
Most will, yes. But you have the power to control when, how, and to what degree this eventually happens. You’ve simply been conditioned to think you don’t, and conditioned very well. The system as it now stands is very good at disillusioning people.
Depending on the state and the municipality, it is possible (albeit very difficult) to recall politicians between election cycles. Cleveland almost did that to Kucinich back in the day, and California did it to Gray Davis. I suggest we look to the Republican Party for examples of what we can do to politicians who betray our principles and our trust. If the GOP can develop an effective system for punishing dissenting members, then the left can do likewise — in fact, I submit that it must do so if it has any hopes of making any changes to the system. Don’t be fooled into thinking that such partisan methods will drive people to some mythical political center. There’s no such thing as a fixed political center, no political middle. That’s another lie crafted by the powerful to make the existing policies seem normal and dissenters as fringe lunatics.
That’s why they invented the Senate. They didn’t want direct democracy for good reason: mob rule is as dangerous to liberty as rule by an individual. 51% of a population getting its way all the time means that 49% must live by the dubious whims of the “majority.” That’s why calls to eliminate the filibuster are so dangerously foolish.
http://www.progressiveparty.org
http://www.gp.org
Look these and other leftist parties up. If they don’t exist in your area, or are poorly organized, then take the initiative and lead efforts to get them up and running. You’re where many of us are right now: disillusioned with the Democrats but perhaps conditioned to think no alternative exists but to simply give up. But there are alternatives that the general public is conditioned not to see, or not to see as being viable. Don’t accept that. Reject that conditioning. It can and has been done. There is only the lack of will.
Start local and build a solid progressive foundation — a REAL progressive foundation.
Well said.
There are no patriots among elected officials, and those elected are corrupt or will be corrupted.
Self serving, power mad, money grubbing, vote sellers.
The whole system is a giant cesspool of human garbage.
There are no options. They’ve got it all covered.
Shutting them out is the only way to survive. The woods look damn good to me.
I think you’re missing my point. People who have compassion, altruism, and benevolence as primary moral imperatives are very, very unlikely to also be the kinds of people that can, or would want to, engage in a cutthroat contest of shameless self-promotion.
It’s not necessarily that the Parties only put those candidates on the ballots, it’s that candidates of any other stripe are exceedingly unlikely to come forward, and even if they do, they’re very unlikely to perform well within our electoral politics.
The ones who didn’t want direct democracy didn’t want it for one of two reasons. Either they were protecting their own landed-aristocracy from the “whims” of the governed, or they questioned the logistical practicality of it.
Is there any evidence that people are any better at selecting proxies for things they don’t understand, than directly selecting amongst the things they don’t understand. Can you pick between two strangers to give you the most complete and factual detailing of fluid-dynamics? Both claiming to be experts, both knowing at least enough to use terminology to obfuscate, and neither one having actually detailing fluid-dynamics to you being in their best interest?
Moreover, the bulwark against “mob” rule is an active and engaged judiciary. The machinations and procedures to prevent majoritarian reforms (60-vote rule, the entirety of the Senate, etc.) are to protect the government from the people, not the people from each other. Further, there’s nothing about direct-democracy that requires “51%” margins. One could require direct-democratic super-majorities to amend foundational documents and statutes. You’re confusing strict-majoritarianism with direct-democracy, and they’re not the same thing.
The only thing representation provides is a proxy for decision making. Full stop. So, all you have to do in assessing whether or not representation makes any sense is to ask yourself whether or not you can perpetually trust some other person to assume the responsibility of making your political decisions for you.
The Senate is a complete anachronism. It should have been abolished at the end of the Civil War. Once we declared we’re not a confederacy of states, once and for all, there was no reason to “protect” states from each other.
“As you probably know, ubetcha, Buddhism grew out of Taoism; desire truly is the source of suffering.”; please…..you’re referencing chinese buddhism, not the buddha.
And it is NOT desire that is the source of suffering but the attachment to that desire.
In that case, I want to be your banker, El Dude, because you wold clearly be willing to keep giving me your money even I left the vault wide open and placed a sign on the door, “Gone fishing, help yourself!”
That is exactly what we do when we continue to vote, believing that wasting a vote one way is somehow less worse than wasting it another way. At least with NOTA we’d have a documentation of our discontent with our choices. Voting Green right now and for the foreseeable future only further solidifies the and perpetuates the existing broken system. Whe enough of us stop participating – or can quantify our discontent through NOTA voting – it becomes a lot harder for the current system’s purveyors to claim it is working.
You’re splitting hairs.
You’re preaching to the choir, Duderino. Several of us tried (and continue trying) to begin a new Progressive party here. Turns out many pups talk a whole lot bigger than they walk.
You’re gonna need to enlighten me to those “ways I cannot see,” iremember, because it sounds like you’ve got nothing in particular in mind. I’ve worked a lifetime to afflict the comfortable and comfort the afflicted along with many thousands of others.
What the hell have you done?
If that were truly so, we never would have had the likes of Bob La Follette or Teddy Roosevelt gain political office, or FDR for that matter.
The “active and engaged” judiciary is selected by the executive branch and approved by one chamber of the legislative branch, so “active and engaged” has proven to be a two-edge sword that in recent years has come swinging in our direction. That cannot and must not be the only bulwark against mob rule.
Wrong. I’d make sure you’re trustworthy with my money before handing over so much as a single penny, and if I can’t do it, then you don’t get anything. That’s where information is crucial. Never just give your vote to a candidate; make the bastard earn it. Make sure the candidate(s) you give your vote to are people you know you can trust. There ARE such people out there.
P.S.
There’s nothing stopping you from running for office yourself, by the way. I ran for precinct committeeman in my community on the Democrat ticket in 2006. I may decide, in 2012, to run for a paid position in 2012 depending on how events transpire between now and then. If you’re angry enough at the system and don’t see anyone else stepping up to the plate, then there’s nothing that CREDIBLY says you can’t try yourself.
Except these are statistical outliers. Do you think it makes sense to contrive a method of governance that relies on statistical outliers?
It’s okay if you do, I’d just be interested in architecting that doesn’t rely on crisis tipping-points to start looking like it has even the remote semblance of legitimate function. Legitimate function should be the norm, and corrupted atrocity should be the statistical outlier.
Then set popular super-majorities. Again. Direct-democracy is not in any way synonymous with 51% majoritarian rule.
Actually it’s not wrong, despite your borrowing a page from the GOP playbook and saying so, in an effort to make it so. It is in fact correct, as you yourself concede at #28, which I quoted in the comment you now say is “wrong.” To wit:
And to which I’ll add, refusing to participate is as much a tool – arguably more – than continuing to buy into the largely contrived left/right paradigm that only distracts us from the real issues, and which has fostered the gridlock now entering its second generation.
Go to the woods.
Dither no longer.
With luck, or design, we may cross paths, someday, in your woods, or mine.
When the woods all connect, together, the world and the soul of humanity will be healed.
DW
But you’re still sending, with your lack of participation, the same message as you would if you keep voting for Democrats: that you’re content to let the system go on unchallenged and unchanged. The powerful want you to stay home and not vote. They want you to throw up your hands and give up. That’s why they’ve spent so much time, energy, and money to make you and millions of other Americans not vote. If your vote didn’t have power, the powerful wouldn’t be so hellbent on making sure you either never use it or give it to their politicians instead of yours.
How were they outliers? Despite not winning the elections in which they ran, they did have the effect of reshaping the Democratic Party of their day into a more progressive organization. We never would have had the New Deal and the Great Society if not for the efforts of the unions or the leftist parties pushing the Democrats every step of the way.
“we tell our employers which 40 hours of our lives they can have every week “
Why must it even be 40 hours? That is a legislated standard not an edict from god
You have recounted the true history, El Duderino.
Unlike the “Official History” which Sunstein et al. would love, henceforth, to cram down our collective throats.
Those who know and share the truth of how we became what we have been and what we are now become deserve appreciation.
You have mine.
DW
They’re statistical outliers, because they’re a massive departure from the norm. I don’t think “statistical outlier” means what you think it does. It doesn’t mean they don’t exist, or that they don’t accomplishing things. It means that they’re anomalies. That the overwhelming majority of people with the will, the means, and the way to political aspirations are not Roosevelts of either stripe.
In the vast history of Presidents, and even especially the Congress, the number of “heroes” ought to vastly overshadow the number of do-nothings, know-nothings, and malefactors. Because, “hero” in this case means actually doing the job of protecting the Constitution and the public-trust. That’s supposed to be the norm, not the exception, nor the exemplary. Moreover, both of those men were narcissists as well, they just happened to the sorts that wanted the love and adoration of a different kind of person.
None of the machinations of our electoral politics are aligned to make altruism and benevolence the common condition of our political leadership.
If our vote matters so much, why are the policies enacted by the last two administrations – each of which enjoyed a hefty majority for an ample time with which to do something differently from each other – indistinguishable?
You’ve bought into the legend, perpetuated upon us since elementary school, that “Your vote counts!” and “Voting isn’t a right, it’s a privilege!”
I choose to call it out for the bullshit it is.
Good luck with that Green Party mess.
“If voting could change anything, if voting could make a difference, then it would be illegal.”
DW