The move has been subtle – almost imperceptible – but increasingly, the mainstream, corporate-owned media are blurring the line between austerity and taxation. In so doing, they are changing accepted notions of what tax revenue is for, to the detriment of working people the world over.
As the prime funder of government-sponsored stimulus, tax revenue will play a key role in creating new, sustainable, effective, accountable economies. But in more and more reporting on the “European debt crisis” – as that “crisis” plays out in “too-big-to-bail-out” countries like Italy – taxation is being increasingly (and I’ll say it right here: intentionally) lumped in with the “austerity measures” such countries are pushing through parliaments and forcing on their populations, that MPs might continue to line the pockets of their corporate benefactors “reduce their nations’ sovereign debts.”
In an interview this morning with European correspondent Sylvia Poggioli, Steve Inskeep of NPR (which, like our politicians, is corporate owned – simply listen to their roster of sponsors at the end of any program segment) asked about increased taxes as part of the austerity measures under consideration – against the bogus backdrop of Standard and Poor’s (read: Wall Street’s) “threat” to drop the “credit ratings” of Euro zone countries.
It’s a key distinction, one we must fight to maintain: Increased taxes are only “austerity measures” for people who – thanks to the devastating effects of unregulated industry and the politicians that corporations own – cannot afford to pay them. For the captains of industry, tax increases are merely a political football, kicked back into the faces of those honest enough to tell them it’s time to pay up, already.
Sadly, Poggioli followed Inskeeps’ lead. She mentioned protests in Greece, then said Italians are likely to protest property tax increases because higher-than-Greece home ownership rates in Italy mean more middle-income people would be adversely affected by higher taxes. To her credit, Poggioli noted that Italians would like to see the Church taxed on its real estate holdings, but by failing to make further distinction among the classes of Italian citizens, or even to mention whether the notion of increasing taxes on the country’s most wealthy has been discussed, she glossed over the reality that is driving the protests all over the world: The rich own us.
This is particularly surprising since Poggioli, according to her biography, is “[t]he daughter of Italian anti-fascists who were forced to flee Italy under Mussolini…”
The line between ill-advised government “austerity programs” – which afflict the working classes by slashing unemployment, education, and health and safety benefits – and taxation, which, done justly, would not only preserve social programs but enable huge stimulus initiatives to build new economic models from the ashes of the fossil-fuel economy, has nearly been erased. To re-establish it, protestors the world over need only begin chanting three simple words:
TAX THE RICH!



1 Comment

Italy’s black market (sales not paying a VAT tax) is a major part of the economy – so they are going after real estate taxes because they are harder to avoid. The folks that collect the VAT but then do not send it on to the gov are not about to take the hit to their net income that being honest would require.
Greece has a tradition of 1/3 – 1/3 – 1/3 on the tax bill with 1/3rd being the set aside for bribes and 1/3rd being the amount paid the gov after the bribe.
As to Italy “tax the Church real estate holdings” – if those holdings house commercial ventures they should be taxed – and as I recall they are already being taxed when used for commercial purposes. So the statement is a cheap shot meant to avoid “TAX THE RICH”.
However there is a real controversy in Italy, fueled EU atheists – called humanist and secularist organizations in the EU press – who see that the Church avoids paying tax on about 100,000 properties, classed as non-commercial, including 8779 schools, 26,300 ecclesiastical structures and 4714 hospitals and clinics and wants those taxed in addition to taxation of commercial ventures. Currently church-run businesses not considered commercial are being chased by the atheists in the EU who have some European Union authorities probing the new 2005 tax exemption that was more generous as to what was not a commercial enterprises and liable to taxation.
The fact that much of Italy was stolen from the Church with minimal compensation over the years complicates the ownership/taxation discussion – indeed some areas have villages on land still owned by the church but upset over paying anything to the Church in return for that use of church land – thinking payment is a “tax” to the church. Very complicated..
In any case – much of the above is just blue smoke meant to allow the rich to avoid paying higher taxes.