A note to the reader:
Though she calls it her “Labor Day Message,” Jill Stein might just as well have titled the below, “How the Democratic Party Killed the American Labor Movement.” All who push the (patently false) “fact” that workers benefit from supporting these corporate colluders should pay particular attention to the second set of bullets. It details the selling out of Labor by every Democratic administration since Truman – despite majorities in both houses of Congress. (A PDF version of Stein’s message is available here.)
-agn
Labor Day Message
by Jill E. Stein
I welcome and endorse the AFL-CIO’s campaign to finally fulfill President Roosevelt’s 1944 call for a second, Economic Bill of Rights, including the rights to jobs, living wages, labor unions, voting rights, health care, education, and retirement security. As the Green Party candidate for President, my Green New Deal platform already has specific proposals to secure these rights.
- Jobs: Employ the unemployed in public works projects and federally-supported community-controlled cooperatives and other enterprises; create 25 million green and public service jobs.
- Living Wages: Raise the federal minimum wage to a living wage.
- Labor Law Reforms: Repeal the anti-labor Taft-Hartley Act, outlaw permanent striker replacements, and authorize majority card check union recognition.
- Voting Rights: Pass the Right To Vote Amendment to establish an affirmative constitutional right to vote and accurate vote counting.
- Corporate Power: Pass a constitutional amendment to repeal the corrupting court-ordered doctrines that corporations are people and money is speech and establish that corporations and election campaign finance can be regulated
- Health Care: Enact single-payer Medicare for All.
- Education: Forgive student debt and provide tuition-free public education from pre-school through graduate school.
- Retirement Security: Eliminate the cap on Social Security taxes for high incomes in order to secure Social Security’s indefinite fiscal sustainability.
The AFL-CIO leadership are demanding that the two corporate-financed parties, the Democrats and Republicans, adopt the Economic Bill of Rights in their platforms at their conventions this year. They must know this a lost cause with the openly anti-union Republicans. They should know that a real commitment to an Economic Bill of Rights is as much a lost cause with the Democrats, who have taken labor’s political support for granted for many decades with no significant pro-labor reforms to show for it.
If they didn’t know that, it should have been clear on August 11 when a 40,000-strong AFL-CIO sponsored rally in Philadelphia called for the Economic Bill of Rights. The rally heard by video from President Obama, who made no mention of the Economic Bill of Rights. Meanwhile, in Detroit, the platform committee of the Democratic National Convention put the final touches on the platform to be adopted over Labor Day week that has no planks to secure any of these economic rights.
The great victories of labor have always been won by independent actions that pressured the political establishment to make concessions. The landmark National Labor Relations Act, which finally established workers’ right to collectively bargain, was adopted in 1935 under the pressure of independent labor political action in the factories, shops, and streets by the ascendant union movement and in the electoral arena in the form of many union resolutions calling for a labor party. The labor party resolutions had credibility because the labor-backed Farmer-Labor and Progressive parties in the Upper Midwest already had two governors, three Senators, and 12 Representatives in their camp in 1935 and they were considering an independent presidential campaign in 1936.
But after the AFL rejected the labor party and went into the Democratic Party in 1936, labor lost its independent vision and its leverage in the political system. It was now part of a coalition dominated by big business.
The anti-labor Taft-Hartley Act passed in 1947 with majority support of the Democratic majority in Congress. Every attempt at labor law reform since then has failed [even] when there was a Democratic President with Democratic majorities in both Houses of Congress.
- Under Truman in 1949, the Democrats failed to repeal Taft-Hartley.
- Under Johnson in 1965 and 1966, the Democrats twice failed to repeal Section 14b of Taft-Hartley, the section that enabled states to outlaw union shops (so-called “right-to-work” laws).
- Under Carter in 1977 and 1978, the Democrats failed to pass one bill that would have repealed the Taft-Hartley prohibition on solidarity picketing at construction sites and another bill to reform the National Labor Relations Board whose long delays and inconsequential employer sanctions had made it a shield for union-busting.
- Under Clinton in 1993, the Democrats failed to pass a ban on permanent striker replacements.
- Under Obama in 2009-2010, the Democrats failed to pass the Employee Free Choice Act for majority card check union recognition [link added by diarist]. Worse, unlike any previous period of Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress, the Democrats failed to even bring the bill to a vote.
The AFL-CIO leadership has taken a small step toward independence by saying they will not give money directly to Democratic committees and candidates but instead spend it “independently” on their behalf. Unfortunately, this often means supporting the very same Democrats who are collaborating with the anti-worker forces that dominate Washington. The words “political independence” are just that –words– that have no power unless it involves running labor candidates who can challenge both corporate parties.
Imagine if labor had spent the over $15 billion they spent on the Democrats over the last 40 years instead building an independent labor party and movement. Today we would have scores of labor party organizers in every state supporting a broadly based party of the working class majority. We would have blocks of independent labor representatives in municipal, county, state, and the national legislatures. We would have a national labor daily newspaper and labor networks on radio and cable. The two corporate financed parties would no longer monopolize U.S. politics. Democrats like Obama would not dare to force new free trade treaties upon workers. Badly needed labor reforms would be back on the table. And halting the decline of real wages and living standards would suddenly be more of a priority than protecting the big Wall Street banks.
The labor movement in every other industrial nation has formed its own party that is independent of corporate money and control. They have been able to organize the working class majority to take political power, exercise it for the benefit of the working class majority, and secure economic rights, including universal health care, affordable public transit, free public college education, secure pensions, four to six weeks of paid vacation for all workers, paid maternity and family sick leave, and labor laws that protect their rights to organize and strike.
Labor has suffered a crushing series of political defeats in recent years and continuing a losing strategy is clearly unthinkable. It is time to practice the politics of courage rather than the politics of appeasement. Labor unions must offer reliable support to labor candidates running against both the corporate parties. And rank-and-file workers do not have to wait for the leadership to disentangle themselves from establishment politics. They can vote this year for Green Party candidates who refuse corporate funding and are campaigning for a Green New Deal that already incorporates the Economic Bill of Rights. Vote by vote, we can raise the voices of working people until we have overcome the corporate domination of politics, and set our country on a progressive course.
To date, Jill Stein, Rocky Anderson, and 43 other candidates in 21 states – running for offices ranging from United States President to Monroe County, Florida District 1 Mosquito Control Officer - have endorsed the Unified Platform, an amalgam of the work of two legacy and four current Progressive organizations.



45 Comments

The NWO does not recognize a Labor component. It is an externality. Rec’d
Organized labor is shooting itself in the foot by giving to the democrats. That should have been painfully obvious when Clinton supported NAFTA. When will the unions start seriously fighting for workers again?
Unfortunately,
Most of the labor bosses are nothing more than puppets for the Democrats. The corruption is system wide and deep. I don’t see labor saving itself, just like I don’t see the dupedvsupporters of the Democratic Party being able to salvage demcracy.
Thanks for posting this Anthony. I could not agree with it more.
Corporations by default suck and need to be regulated. Corporations buy politicians and law. Corporations can be banks or unions. Corporations reflect the values of people/officers in corporations and can do considerable good and irreparable harm.
Adopt Jefferson’s Madison’s original 11 amendment and cut the balls off of corporations and kill “Citizens United” once an for all. The undue influence of money in policy making, which is more than often merit-less bullshit!!!!!!!!
After voting for and supporting Democrats as the alternative to Bush, I’m very open to voting third party this year. I hope many others are as well!
Goddamit, she is the best candidate, but with no freaking chance to win
Thanks for posting, Anthony. Recommended.
Recommended. I’ve already decided that Jill Stein has my vote.
X2.
And then there are the rank-and-file union members who are voting for Republicans.
I understand that Jill Stein is now on the ballot in 40 states, and only completely shut out of two. And either pending or set up for write-ins in the rest.
Does anyone know in which states Rocky Anderson, Stewart Alexander, Roseanne Barr, or other third party candidates, will be on the ballot?
Thanks for posting, Anthony! We desperately need Jill’s candidacy this year. Today, I saw liberal Democrats arguing that we are better off than we were four years ago in part because the stock market is up. The fact that median family income has declined by 4.8% in the first three years of the “recovery”, which is more than during the recession is simply ignored.
Can anyone imagine that if the same thing had happened under President McCain, liberals would have said “Well, the stock market is up! That means we’re better off! We’re just not going to talk about incomes”? When the left is silent as the stock market booms while incomes decline, what is the point of even having a left? Silence as a political strategy is absolutely killing the left in this country. Jill and Cheri are speaking up for the 99% and have earned my vote.
TD, Rocky will top out at 16 states at most. He’s currently on in WA, OR, ID, CO, UT, FL, MN, MI, NJ, and CT. He’s trying to get on the ballot in RI, VT, TN, MS, LA, AR, and NM. I’m surprised about NM, because I thought that he already had the nomination of the Independent Party in that state.
Roseanne Barr is on the ballot in CA and FL, and probably will be in LA. All it takes is a $500 filing fee to get on the ballot in LA as an independent.
I’ll have to find out more about the Socialist parties.
I beg to differ.
The Corporate Sponsors do give you 2 choices: Crunchy Evil or Smooth Evil.
Now Pick!
Heh. What the heck is a liberal Democrat? Based on the track record of the Democratic Party, the two word have no right getting within ten feet of each other :)
When “liberal Democrats” extol the virtues of the corporate casino known as the stock exchange as an indication of the economic health of USA,Inc., they reveal their captivity by the oligarchy. They no more represent the interests of the 99% than their partners in crime, the Republican party.
Or if you prefer: Stealth Corporatist or Blatant Corporatist.
It’s downright oxymoronic.
Her web site shows they are a write in at three states, seeking ballot access in 14 more and it appears not in one (OK).
Go figure. But it’s always been that way.
I prefer, they’ve got us by the balls
Of course maybe the People could say this government is defacto illegitimate–it does not represent the People–look at the numbers who like it.
We’re going to form a legitimate government that uses the original founding documents. New Congress, New Supreme Court, New presidential candidates.
There is no easy way out of this, unless one intends to go easily into the nightmare state being completed.
Thanks for posting I recieved this email and will be voting for Jill in Nov.
The battle in Seattle and Nader wouldn’t have been catalyzed if the unions had still represented the rank and file as opposed to being a fund-raising arm of the dems .I can remember Amy mocking Sweeny when asking why workers’ money was being siphoned into the dems ‘corporate coffers .His response was “at least the dems return our phone calls” . .Amy’s response was ,”that’s a lot of cash and sweat equity to get a courtesy call saying ,you lose” .
I hope progressives support Jill ,because ,obviously the message must antedate any national success ,and she has a bigger electoral megaphone than R and R .
Thanks for bringing this, Anthony Noel. It’s an easy choice to vote for a third-party candidate, and Jill either Jill or Stuart Alexander will get my vote. That said, I’m putting my faith and energy into the democracy movement and parallel movements to discover a way for new models of people-centric democracy.
Is she right about this? “The labor movement in every other industrial nation has formed its own party that is independent of corporate money and control.”
Trumka. Oh, yes; his big launch outside the Dems…turned into this Debbie Wassermnan-Whatever dreck pretty quickly. Hard to imagine what it might take to have a strong, UnCaptured Labor party for now, and some folks are trying to create alternatives and break-away groups, but even those groups have seemingly failed to make common cause, kinda like Stein and Anderson. ;o)
The final outcome at the Port of Longview strike was not encouraging for the future of unions, imo. Things will arguably have to get worse before workers take a stand independent of the Dems and the big union leaders.
@ vagreen: ‘Libruls’ are now being Confidence Fairies for Wall Street, even about the ‘burgeoning housing market’. What goofiness! My stars.
Bingo.
Anthony Noel: Thanks for posting this.
Ballot access
Stein http://www.jillstein.org/ballot
Anderson http://www.voterocky.org/ballotaccess
Johnson http://www.lp.org/2012-ballot-access
Wow, just had the chance to check back. Thanks for all the comments, and please keep ‘em coming.
Re Stewart Alexander, NPA has tried several times to get his endorsement of the Unified Platform, but no response yet. Historically, DSA’s ballot access efforts have been wanting, and that’s being generous. I think it is interesting that Alexander has been pretty silent. Maybe because Cornel West honorary chair of DSA, is looking more and more like he will endorse Obama?
(FYI: West’s membership on the NPA steering committee was recently suspended pending his announcement of whom he intends to support in 2012. We’re fully prepared to tell him not to let the door hit him in the ass if he jumps back in the veal pen. And at the rate he and his once-princilpled organization are going, Bill McKibben/350.org are probably next.)
It’s ALL a “democracy movement” IMO, wendy. I think Occupy’s (potentially) fatal flaw is its belief that elections as we know them will end anytime soon.
That being said, elections must ABSOLUTELY be restructured. Bucky Fuller said years ago there was no reason we should not anticipate EVERYONE voting on issues for a few moments each day with their morning coffee. He was (and remains) correct.
Representative democracy isn’t democracy at all. But if the entrenched parties see the ascendancy of alternative parties as the end of their worlds, we should do all we can to hasten the realization of their nightmares.
Don’t know about the money piece, but you gotta admit, this is impressive.
Nice to see this myFDLdiary being showcased on Front Page…after the last few days of Clint Eastwood Bashing.
Thanks AN for putting it up…the last sentence of this @30 comment you made says so much so very well.
We Americans have been presented with a wide array of choices to pick and select from as consumers in a capitalist run society and economy. Consumer products as simple as corn flakes,denim jeans or coffee are not ever done on a binary this or that basis. Software for computers and source inventory for home video/audio not done on you get to pick from 2 only. Cars and trucks are made and presented across a wide spectrum of choices. Americans seem to get it.
Americans seem to understand multiple consumer choices. But when it comes to American national politics? Pick R or D or R vs. D or elect Obama or Romney are the choices? It is nonsense.
General American politics and the R or D two party regime we Americans condone/allow to serve those politics to us in most ways/all ways regarding who gets to be in the U.S.Congress or the WH is alien to the plethora of choices/levels of choice American consumers see and function with each and every day.
An American Labor Party? An American Socialist Party? Surely two notions that get lots of guffaws and laughoffs at WashingtonDC social events and with KStreet funding/pay to play political doings.
The R vs. D junk is being pushed now again during this 2012 election cycle fast and furious. As tho whether Obama staying as POTUS or Romney becoming POTUS are two very different,genuine outcomes.
It is not too hard to get/be attacked for suggesting a Not Voting For Obama Or Romney point of view.
Worthy to see what you present about Jill Stein above.
Thank you Anthony Noel. I concur with that last sentence 100%.
I can’t; I’m allergic to nuts. (keep teeing ‘em up 8o) )
Recommended!
Anthony is absolutely right that democrats have not been good for labor in a long time. For verification see Unions – http://newprogs.org/blog/2012/02/05/unions-under-democraticrepublican-uni-party
[Image] “Safe Water Roseanne 2012” and more great posters.
Yours is a self fulfilling prophesy, is it not? So, then you imply that you will vote for Obama, a candidate who has a four year track record of opposing most of what you stand for politically? And yes, I know his excuses are wonderful.
Yes, I concur that that Dr. Stein has no chance to win, yet voting for either of the only two candidates who do is really selling out ones conscience and ones commitment to self professed ideals.
Voting for Stein, and even more importantly, for the slate of Greens running for the Legislature is really a step forward and far, far from the wasted vote you imply it to be.
Tony, a very important post! You refute the big lie that too many progressives still spew about the Greens, that they are an environmentally-obsessed middle class party that cares not a fig for working and poor people.
Their nomination of Cheri Honkala, National Coordinator for the Poor People’s Economic Human Rights Campaign, who has spent nearly three decades working directly alongside the poor to build the movement to end poverty, and has organized tens of thousands of people to take action via marches, demonstrations and tent cities, is a stirring indication that the Greens are charting a new course for us all.
Honkala, as their vice-presidential candidate.
Yes, I’m honestly not sure who impresses me more. When was the last time anyone said THAT about a presidential ticket!?
great post.
Jill Stein has my vote. I hope many disappointed Dems will consider voting for Stein, and I hope she gets to participate in the debates.
And if she does fairly well, imagine the very loud and clear message that will send to the Dems nationwide. What a tremendous opportunity we have to send a message so much louder than petitions or even just protests…punishment and or abandonment at the ballot box of the corporatist Dems.
However you see it, that message will shake the Dems to their core.
Dunno what you mean by ‘It’s ALL a “democracy movement”, Anthony Noel, but my understanding is that a basic tenet of OWS is that electoral politics is beside the point for now, given: the hackability of black box voting, voter suppression and gerrymandered districts, duopolostic control of preferable (corporate-friendly) primary candidates for every federal office, corporate media news-otainment, etc.
And *that said* (lol), my guess is that few dedicated to the movement will choose not to vote, and all would vote third-party, for: the message it sends, a third-party as a potential place-holder until democracy and the voting system (including the personal-vote-neutralizing electoral college mess), and the public financing of elections is made law.
The efforts to make end runs around the Corporate Machine among the various stakeholders and affinity groups around Occupy continue to amaze me, and may be time better spent than actively working the same amount of hours on a third-party Presidential campaign, imo, unless:
There are enough, say in this case, Stein volunteers to go out into public venues to speak to her (and Honkala’s) issues, then dialogue with them as to a gamut of possible solutions, etc. In other words, run a true populist campaign, with a side benefit of changing the low (or wrong)-information-voter truism. I’ve run a lot of campaigns in my life, and I sincerely believe a good ground game is important. (It’s always nice to have some good printed material to leave, too. ;o) )
You and others here have been following Stein’s and the other third-party campaigns; I haven’t, obviously. So I dunno if this speech about Labor is a new addition since Cheri’s joining her or not, nor if either of them have enough cred with the issue to whistle workers their way or not, or if disaffected ‘Leftist’ workers would gravitate toward Stewart Alexander, or the others to Romney, as someone mentioned above (the ‘are you better off now than you were four years ago’ theme).
Some are saying Shamus Cooke at Counterpunch for one) that if the Chicago teachers do in fact strike, it may bring unions to the forefront of the debate again in short order. Teacher strikes are pretty hot-button issues, and not always in a good way, in communities who see teachers as ‘privileged public employees’, so I dunno if they’re right. But that union, given OBomba’s ‘race to privitazation of schools’ could be in the market for a new party to support if Jill makes a case to them.
Anyhoo, if what you meant by ‘‘It’s ALL a “democracy movement” is some of this that a third-party could be helping to do, I suppose you’re right, since you ended with: ‘if the entrenched parties see the ascendancy of alternative parties as the end of their worlds, we should do all we can to hasten the realization of their nightmares’. ;o)
Oh, and it was a good link you provided, I just wondered *how much influence/power* those Labor parties have was all. Sometimes, like a Socialist party, even one in power…doesn’t mean much to actual workers.
Just chiming in to remind everyone that Truman vetoed Taft-Hartley but that Congress overrode his veto.
Also, I’m as pragmatic as they come, and I’m another vote for Jill Stein. Roe v. Wade is already a dead letter in the states where it was supposed to make a difference, and the lesser of evils just isn’t lesser enough anymore to make me feel guilty for voting for a spoiler.
Exactly. I have big problems with the notion that there is only one way to foment change, because that (any) “one” way becomes far too easy a target for those bent on maintaining the status quo.
Occupy makes great points about the corruptness of the current system – yet it seems to believe that enough people in the streets will lead to fundamental change more quickly than other approaches. It won’t. It’s ONE of the MANY things we need to be doing, partly to ensure a decentralized movement that is difficult for the forces of evil to target, and partly because doing many things ensures reaching the broadest cross-section of society. When you do that, your message has the best chance of percolating throughout society.
For better or worse, there are millions of people who dutifully vote in every election. They begin paying attention right about now in each cycle (Labor Day). Ignoring them merely because the system is broken – and to be clear, wendy, I’m not suggesting that’s what you’re suggesting – rather than methodically awakening them to the fact that the system is broken, is not the way to change the world, any more than would be ignoring sports fans, opera fans, Nascar fans, whatever.
Wherever large groups of people are doing things they value, that’s an opportunity to explain that not everyone has the same ability, and to win them to our side because they want to right that wrong.
Not only do I completely agree with Anthony on this, I believe it also illustrates the biggest weakness of progressives. It appalls me how many on the left think it is unnecessary to talk to, let alone coordinate, with any other person or organization. Indeed, there is sometimes more hatred and venom directed towards each other than republicans. On MyFDL recently there was an article “Why Third Party Progressives are Racist and in Tacit Support of GOP Fascism.”
I do not have the answer, but the expression “United we stand, divided we fall,” comes to mind.