I’m not sure which is more disturbing:
(1) That this news has yet to be covered AT ALL by ANY major news outlet;
(2) That one outlet (the relatively low-viewer CNBC) did post it (as the screenshots at the linked page show – scroll down the page to see them) and removed it within hours, or
(3) The very real possibility that the children of an executive at CNBC were made to pay for CNBC’s publicizing the suit.
This is very, very troubling, ladies and gentlemen.



18 Comments

Recommended!
Also disturbing:
-from the report:
-The Attorney General of the United States is hiding major criminality.
-Civil Rights – http://newprogs.org/blog/2011/11/09/civil-rights-under-democraticrepublican-uni-party
-Economy – http://newprogs.org/blog/2011/11/10/economy-under-democraticrepublican-uni-party
–Catherine Austin Fitts
http://solari.com/articles/quantitative_easing/
–Catherine Austin Fitts
http://solari.com/blog/financial-coup-d%E2%80%99etat/
–Catherine Austin Fitts on the death of her mother.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0408/S00265.htm
What’re the lawyers’ fees on a $43 trillion suit?
Estimated time lapse before the court throws out the suit as frivolous?
IMO, the suit has merit. But is too threatening to the PtB to ever see the light of day. Even when it is thrown out, there will be no news coverage.
Within one week after the election or at Christmas/New Years. I agree the press won’t cover it even though it is a significant case with merit.
Another person who is not surprised at election spending exceeding $1B. Me. Not even a mere drop in the freaking $43T bucket. Read this and have passed it on, but, needs to be repeated before it can be disappeared.
Woah. I shouldn’t be surprised, but I still am. CBS is saying the nanny is alive, btw, but not responsive yet.
long history here…. not really “frivolous” – something else…
http://mandelman.ml-implode.com/2012/10/spire-law-groups-mass-torte-lawsuit-seeks-43-trillion-from-banks-former-ag-says-its-a-fraud/
http://silvanetblog.blogspot.nl/2012/10/some-quick-notes-on-43-trillion-nutcase.html
Thanks for these links, Gen. This whole story has been fishy from the start, its good to have some backup on that.
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2030901/pg1
More grist for the mill. It appears Spire Law Group isn’t quite above board and that the “reportage” about the law suit taken down was just a press release authored by the firm.
Smells a little off.
That’s a step in the right direction.
I guess my share is about $143,000. Ya think I can get a little advance on it?
The lawsuit is a step in the right direction, not the rest of it.
Thanks for this.
Yes, GenKnoxx, thank you. I shared Kit’s sense @8 as I composed the post. I’m more than happy to admit my error and to thank you for providing these links.
Fool me once, fool me again, I’m occasionally exercising full blown wishful thinking.
That depends. Are they working by the hour or on contingency?
Sorry. That was poorly and lazily worded. Of course they are working by the hour.
I should have said it depends on whether the arrangement to compensate them is to pay by the hour or whether they took the case on a contingency basis.