You may have a hard time finding it in the mainstream American media (seeing as it’s duty-bound to continue tripping over itself in trying to convince us that our upcoming presidential erections elections have any bearing on national policy) but this weekend is shaping up as a big one for the future of – well, the world as we know it.

Photo: Maged Helal / Flickr

Yesterday, Egypt’s Supreme Constitutional Court, which is packed with military leaders from the ousted Mubarak regime (you know, those nice men who only stopped cracking heads in Tahrir Square when the U.S. finally agreed Mubarak had to go) set the stage for a GENUINE (as opposed to Facebook/Twitter) revolution in that country. It ruled Mubarak lackey former prime minister Ahmed Shafiq could stand for president in this weekend’s runoff election.

The “court” so ruled despite a law forbidding members of the deposed government from seeking office for 10 years, a thorny little chunk of reality neatly circumvented when the (surprise! Mubarak-era) “judges” also decreed Egypt’s first freely elected parliament in decades, seated in January, be dissolved.

In case all that wasn’t enough to scare the bejesus out of Egyptians who fought so doggedly last year to rid the country of Mubarak and his cronies, the court’s rulings were accompanied by another ominous announcement. The ruling (supposedly interim) Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (sure sounds like a peace-loving, for-the-good-of-all-Egyptians kinda org to me, how about you??) says it will now oversee the drafting of the country’s new constitution.

Oh, and this: One day before its rulings annulling Parliament and boosting Shafiq toward the presidency, the court ruled Egyptian citizens could be indefinitely detained at Guantanamo by the Egyptian army.

Al Jazeera’s Evan Hill reported the sequence of events “immediately raised fears of a thinly veiled military takeover.”

Ya think?

How stupid do our DoD, Joint Chiefs, State Department, and Commander in Chief think we – let alone Egyptian citizens – are? Call me a conspiracy theorist, radical, paranoid, whatever. But if you actually have doubts of America’s involvement here, ask yourself which, in each of the following two-part scenarios, seems more plausible, based on what we know about how our government operates:

Read the rest of this entry →

The move has been subtle – almost imperceptible – but increasingly, the mainstream, corporate-owned media are blurring the line between austerity and taxation. In so doing, they are changing accepted notions of what tax revenue is for, to the detriment of working people the world over.

As the prime funder of government-sponsored stimulus, tax revenue will play a key role in creating new, sustainable, effective, accountable economies. But in more and more reporting on the “European debt crisis” – as that “crisis” plays out in “too-big-to-bail-out” countries like Italy – taxation is being increasingly (and I’ll say it right here: intentionally) lumped in with the “austerity measures” such countries are pushing through parliaments and forcing on their populations, that MPs might continue to line the pockets of their corporate benefactors “reduce their nations’ sovereign debts.”

In an interview this morning with European correspondent Sylvia Poggioli, Steve Inskeep of NPR (which, like our politicians, is corporate owned – simply listen to their roster of sponsors at the end of any program segment) asked about increased taxes as part of the austerity measures under consideration – against the bogus backdrop of Standard and Poor’s (read: Wall Street’s) “threat” to drop the “credit ratings” of Euro zone countries.

It’s a key distinction, one we must fight to maintain: Increased taxes are only “austerity measures” for people who – thanks to the devastating effects of unregulated industry and the politicians that corporations own – cannot afford to pay them. For the captains of industry, tax increases are merely a political football, kicked back into the faces of those honest enough to tell them it’s time to pay up, already.

Sadly, Poggioli followed Inskeeps’ lead. She mentioned protests in Greece, then said Italians are likely to protest property tax increases because higher-than-Greece home ownership rates in Italy mean more middle-income people would be adversely affected by higher taxes. To her credit, Poggioli noted that Italians would like to see the Church taxed on its real estate holdings, but by failing to make further distinction among the classes of Italian citizens, or even to mention whether the notion of increasing taxes on the country’s most wealthy has been discussed, she glossed over the reality that is driving the protests all over the world: The rich own us.

This is particularly surprising since Poggioli, according to her biography, is “[t]he daughter of Italian anti-fascists who were forced to flee Italy under Mussolini…”

The line between ill-advised government “austerity programs” – which afflict the working classes by slashing unemployment, education, and health and safety benefits – and taxation, which, done justly, would not only preserve social programs but enable huge stimulus initiatives to build new economic models from the ashes of the fossil-fuel economy, has nearly been erased. To re-establish it, protestors the world over need only begin chanting three simple words:

TAX THE RICH!