I have held off posting on rare earth minerals because Obama had a meeting with China in November then the Chinese Premier came to Chicago recently but there was no news about a deal to solve the trade war so I’m posting this Diary.
In mid-2010, China announced export reductions of 72 percent, Sims says. Then in September, it embargoed rare-earth exports to Japan, following a territorial dispute over small uninhabited islands in the East China Sea.
In December, it set further export cuts of 35 percent.
And on Dec. 30, the People’s Daily, the Chinese Communist Party’s newspaper, hinted at more tightening. It quoted “experts” as saying recent cuts “did not seem deep enough.”
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/s_720470.html
Why are these islands so important oil and natural gas.
The specific development in dispute is China’s drilling in the Chunxiao field, which is three miles west of the median line, but which Japan contends may be tapping natural gas reserves which extend past the median line. The Chunxiao gas field in Xihu Sag in the East China Sea is estimated to hold reserves of more than 1.6 tcf of natural gas and is expected to become a major producer in the next ten years. Commercial operation was expected to begin in mid-2005 at a production rate of 70 bcf per year, rising to 282 bcf by 2010. Sinopec Star has reserves of 7 tcf of gas, 1.9 tcf of which is held in the Chunxiao area. China has proven reserves of natural gas of about 53.3 trillion cubic feet (tcf). Most of China’s gas fields are in the the western and north-central parts of the country, though offshore basins are becoming increasingly important.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/senkaku.htm
I can find no estimates of how much oil the islands might have but in response to this dispute China temporarily cut off Japan from getting any rare earth minerals last year. Which is there right but tell me why did they cut exports of rare earth minerals to the rest of the world?
The Obama administration has included China’s export restrictions on rare earths in a broad investigation of whether China has violated World Trade Organization rules to help its clean energy exports; the United Steelworkers union has accused China of limiting exports of rare earths to force manufacturers to move their factories to China, an accusation supported by comments in 2009 by Chinese provincial officials saying exactly that.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/21/business/global/21rare.html?src=mv
The article above suggests one possible motive
China’s control of 97 percent of the rare earth market gives it tremendous power. Over the past year, it has reduced its exports of rare earths, shrinking them from 50,000 tons per year to 30,000 tons. Then in July, the government announced it would export only 8,000 tons for the rest of the year. At the same time, it has raised export taxes for the minerals.
No rare earth minerals no missile parts, no advanced solar cells, no windmills, Ipods, Missile parts etc. So tell me just what is China doing with all those rare earth minerals they used to export? I can find no mention on the net of China laying off the miners who mine rare earth metals so I assume the Chinese are still mining rare earth metals
Could China be using all its rare earth minerals to green their economy and make it less dependent on oil? If so why keep this a secret unless they plan to short oil futures?
Or maybe China wants to dominate all industries that make products with rare earth minerals and force foreign companies to build their factories that make products with rare earth minerals to move to China?
Also Bill Gates and Warren Buffet are invested in a Chinese made electric car rare earth metals are used in the batteries of electric cars and the motors. The Chinese are paying factories to make these cars, building charging stations for electric cars and installing a smart grid.
With about 35 cars per 1,000 people in China’s 1.3 billion-person population, roughly 80 percent of car sales in the country are currently made to first-time buyers. As Josie wrote for GigaOM Pro (subscription required), this potentially lowers the barrier to adoption of alternative vehicles. Nearly half of the more than 5 million electric vehicle charge point installations anticipated worldwide by 2015 will happen in China, according to Pike Research. In addition, the government-owned utility State Grid Corp. plans to invest $586 million in a smart grid buildout over the next five years.
China has been investing in a green economy across the board, including clean power, energy efficiency and plug-in cars.
http://gigaom.com/cleantech/the-key-to-chinas-electric-car-market-partnerships/
To reach 15 percent of total electricity-generating capacity nationwide by 2020 would require ramping up the industry to build in the neighborhood of 210,000 additional megawatts of wind capacity. It would mean building at twice the pace of the best year wind installations have ever been built in the United States – which was 10,000 megawatts in 2009. Too big a reach? Depends on how can-do we’re really willing to be. The Chinese installed more than 15,000 megawatts in 2010, a 62 percent increase over the previous year. They’re planning to do it again this year.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/1/27/939201/-Sputnik-moment:-Reenergize-America15-20-by-2020
China very well might need all its rare earth minerals if they keep planning on increasing wind production and electric cars.
the best (rough) estimate of annual cost to the U.S. economy due to power outages: $100 billion or nearly 1 percent of the economy (pdf: page 4). For a fraction of that cost, investment in modernization of the grid (smartgrid and otherwise) would nearly eliminate that cost and provide other benefits (such as more efficient use of energy) that would boost the economy.
In conclusion China seems to be engaging in a trade war to force foreign companies to build factories in China. They also seem to be greening their country with green power who is to say China won’t increase wind turbine production another 62% the year after next? They are creating green jobs by using government cash to build electric car charging stations and using government cash to make electric cars more affordable. I don’t know how much China will save with a smart grid but we could save 100 billion a year plus create jobs if we followed China’s example. Imagine what $100 billion dollars extra a year would do to jump start the economy?
China may say they support free markets but their government is calling the shots and I wish that America had an economic plan to create jobs, clean energy, electric cars etc like China has. A trained educated government bureaucracy not beholden to political pressure or special interests can implement plans like this FDR, the Sun King, the Prussian Government under Bismark, Egypt building the pyramids all are examples of Government bureaucracy working.
We need an educated well paid bureaucracy not influenced by lobbyists with real power to implement change or at least present options to the politicians and people directly.
Maybe an internet economic simulation could help educate people and politicians they could run the simulation with various proposals like the ideas China is doing and then see the results. It is amazing to me just how dumb our politicians are whether its global warming, Chicago or Austrian school economics, charter schools etc we need to educate both the people and our ruling class about the issues and real world examples that work (no more NeoHoover nonsense about tax cuts creating jobs!). We need to make learning fun I suggest
A revamped version of Budget Hero on Steriods



18 Comments

Great article and interesting suppositions. No question most of our ignorant uninformed masses have no insight into the importance of rare earth metals. There is another saddening chapter to this story. In the search for metals to break the Chinese monopoly nations have looked elsewhere. A potential source of rare earth metals is near Lake Victoria Africa. To make mining more lucrative, Tanzania is planning to build a road through the heart of the Serengeti Park. This is an ecological travesty of monumental proportions. See the Oct 30th 2010 NY Times article at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/world/africa/31serengeti.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1
The real, core problem that no one has the political will to address is that the world has too many people. If our population was 1/10 th of what it is today, scarcity of resources whether oil, rare earth metals, food, etc. would not be a problem. Our success at breeding will be our undoing.
A good read Things, Thanks.
Lake Victoria Africa Great maybe its time the UN start creating a minimal standard for mining that doesn’t ruin the environment.
A one or two child policy world wide could help reduce our population and more importantly reduce war as the desire for more wealth will not be driven by the lack of stuff. Also less kids will make parents very leery of any war because kids will become precious.
More research on how much China advanced with a one child policy vs how much India with no such policy did is needed.
But it looks like any country that does a one child policy can advance fast.
Your welcome I tried to keep on topic this time:)
Breeding is not the problem. At least not in the heavy resource consuming regions of the world. The problem is that our economy is run by financial parasites. And they love to make malthusian arguments which frame population growth as the patsy for Wall Street’s failures.
If we went back to a system of national infrastructure planning, we’d clear out a lot of wasteful consumption. Bring back light rail and ditch the auto’s etc…
We can cut back our population but yes that would not stop the parasites from eating the host. A debate on China’s one child policy vs India with no such policy is needed though. We need to see what works.
The US has rare earth minerals and was the leading producer till the 1990′s.
What happened? We shut down the mine. To me it looks like it was the perfect storm of corporate mismanagement, predatory finance, kleptocratic politics and misdirected environmentalism.
Anyway, it looks like the goon squad is getting their acts together and reopening the mine:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-01-14/rare-earths-producer-molycorp-rivals-seek-u-s-aid-as-china-chops-exports.html
http://blogs.forbes.com/nathanvardi/2010/10/18/the-money-man-behind-americas-rare-earth-minerals/
http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/moja/adhi8a.htm
As far as I can tell, our population growth amounts to a mix of immigration and people living longer.
But if it ever did become a problem, I wouldn’t be opposed to some type of optional deal where the government pays for education and healthcare in exchange for only having two kids. As long as we don’t make such a policy mandatory or take the Logan’s Run solution(kill the old folks).
China undercut our prices and forced them out of business this is what countries do during trade wars free market countries are sitting ducks against governments with trade policies that help promote business.
Now that the competition is gone China can cut off our supplies and charge us whatever they want by lowering supply to increase price. It might take a year or two before we can reopen all our old mines.
America got played on free trade Thomas Friedman and Alan Greenspan were wrong about free trade creating jobs and wrong about free trade benefiting us.
I am curious to see why India grew like it did they also had a big uneducated population like China but had no one child policy. As I said before this idea needs to be studied more.
As far as resources go on food production we can certainly increase food production just growing plants for food instead of growing them to feed to livestock alone would help a bunch. Of course we would all have to become vegans.
Another idea high tech greenhouse farming to raise farm output. Also all that food we throw away if it were collected and fed to worms then used either to fertilize crop land or as food for fish farms that would also help.
Increased power needs could be met by green energy the fuel is free.
Other natural resources well I don’t have answers for that.
This is really interesting. We really have some catching up to do.
Thanks TCU.
No kidding? Molycorp. That’s near Taos, near where I grew up. I didn’t know that was one of the rare minerals.
Dunno Taos, the mine is in the Mojave desert.
Free trade never works. It’s a scam to loot the country.
But there was a lot more than just free trade going on with molycorp.
As for China bashing. TBH, I think we should ditch our economic model and be more like China in terms of having a broad industrial plan supported by the government. The free market Oracle sucks at building an economy.
America was originally built on government planning and high tariffs! From Hamilton to Lincoln and all the way thru McKinley.
I think you’ve got several things wrong. 1) population is very key, it isn’t some kind of Malthusian shibboleth. 2) China’s economic policies are headed for a major crash because they are based on what are called “small island economics”. Does China look like a small island to you?
In response to ThingsComeUndone, India’s population turned around. It turns out the most persuasive social force on any population is female education (Kerala Study). However, it doesn’t matter in India’s case since its population momentum is still very high and will cause huge consequences. Likewise in China. Already, demand from China’s economy as it becomes affluent is causing the shockwaves that were predicted, and its efforts to continue developing nation growth after it matures due to the necessity of trying to bring along more of its citizenry are destabilizing. There is a brown cloud permanently formed in the atmosphere over both countries.
As for the rare earth elements, don’t be surprised if several countries’ productions of these minerals actually seem larger than they should be while wars proliferate in South Central Africa. It’s just as easy to forge papers of origin for China, Australia, or Canada as it is for Uganda or Central African Republic.
Population problems where? Certainly not in the western world. In the west, our single biggest problem is that the automobile/combustion engine economy does not scale.
As for China and small island economics, sorry but I don’t see it. You’d have to flesh that out.
This may be the next big issue the media is starts to try to drum up fear about. China is the primary supplier of these rare earth element now. China’s labor costs are so low they’ve driven drown the prices of these rare earth elements. Western corporation have shut down the production of a whole pile of sources for Rare Earths because China lowballed all their Western production.
It’s not an issue. The moment prices go back up, all that Western production will go back on line.
Wanna talk about Molybdenum? I can talk all frackin’ day about Molybdenum. Father did his PhD work on a Steel moly alloy that resisted accelerated corrosion rates in radioactive environments. In English… reactor pipes rust faster than normal pipes. My father’s designed a special alloy for GE that stopped most of that problem.
The US can be the leading producer of rare earths any time corporate America decides to reopen the mines. It all still in the ground exactly where it was when we lead the world in production.
How do you think the media will play this will they create an enemy of China over this issue? Is the goal war or just another scapegoat for the economy? If China becomes a scapegoat for the economy then that would be a move against free markets and for protectionism.