Over the weekend, Sen. Al Franken (D.-Minn.) made the corporate takeover of our media, and the government’s acquiescence to these corporations, frighteningly clear.
Franken told more than 2,000 bloggers and organizers attending the Netroots Nation conference in Las Vegas that our media system is at risk everywhere we turn – from our free speech online to the growing power of companies who own a massive number of media outlets.
"Tonight I want to tell you that I believe Net Neutrality is the First Amendment issue of our time," Franken said during a closing keynote address to conference-goers. He went on to warn of the looming merger between cable giant Comcast and NBC-Universal, saying:
If no one stops them, how long do you think it will take before 4 or 5 mega-corporations effectively control the flow of information in America not only on television but online? If we don’t protect Net Neutrality now … how long do you think it will take before [they] start favoring its content over everyone else’s?
With the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision giving unprecedented rights to corporations over individuals, Franken said these merged, powerful media conglomerates will have untold influence over our democracy:
And if Citizens United is allowed to stand, how long do you think it will take for these monoliths to buy enough elections so that they effectively have veto power over anything Congress tries to do to regulate them?
Franken pointed to a grim, but realistic picture of the future, where media companies decide what we watch and read on every media platform, and control the information we’re able to create and disseminate.
If corporations takeover the Internet, the incredible Web-based political mobilization of the last 10 years would no longer exist. "And it’s not just about politics," Franken added. "After all, the Internet is more than just a foundation of the community we progressives have built. It is an incredible source of innovation, a hot bed of creativity and unbelievable producer of jobs and wealth."
This value comes from the fact that Net Neutrality has created an equal playing field on the Internet, where anyone can connect, create and innovate. Without Net Neutrality, Franken said, "It would become just a ‘series of tubes‘ through which money could flow into the pockets of private corporations."
And if the Comcast-NBC merger is approved, it will be the first "domino" in a series of other moves that will wrestle further control of the media from the people’s hands. "If it falls, the rest will soon follow. It’s almost too late to stop this from happening but not quite," he said.
The government now has a role to play. Congress can mitigate the influence of corporate money on our elections. The FCC can enact rules that would protect Net Neutrality and free speech online. And the FCC and Congress can block the NBC-Comcast merger, or in the very least, put strict conditions on the company to protect local and diverse journalism and information.
But Franken also said that the real action needs to come from the public.
"I can tell you first hand that the government, the White House and the FCC have been hearing plenty from corporations on the other side of these issues and not nearly enough from you," Franken said in closing. "If you want to protect the free flow of information in this country and all that depends on it, you have to help me fight this!"



12 Comments







Franken’s speech was inspiring, and he’s 100% right.
Franken is a “make me do it” kind of guy…very inspiring. I was riveted by the -’we know we screwed you ( progressives/liberals ) but if you work extra hard for us again we’ll change, we swear this time pinky promise ‘.
You’re absolutely right. When the time for the big vote comes, Al will fold just like he did on HCR. What a lying sack of shit pig.
i don’t enjoy watching you smear-merchants operate. I wish you would contribute to the community, instead.
Ah but that would require doing some thinking about ways to actually affect change. It’s so much easier to just rant without coming up with workable ideas doncha know
and dakine01@9
“Smear-merchant?” “ways to actually affect change”?
How about we start by admitting that politicians are what they do, not what they say? Then we can move to determining exactly who is, and is not, a geunine, principled progressive.
Although Franken made all kinds of great liberal/progressive statements about the public option, when push came to shove he folded in order to be a good Dem and give O a big “win” with a bill that was straight out of the McCain/Clinton campaigns and which contained none of the key provisions and promises that Obama campaigned on.
Then there’s little bit from a Marcy Wheeler post in late 2009:
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/10/08/frankens-fleeting-fourth-amendment/
Remember this stunt? It was just two weeks ago that Al Franken was reading the Fourth Amendment to David Kris. Franken made a good point about how you should identify individuals before collecting their data.
Of course, two weeks later, Franken voted with eight other Democrats to continue to allow the government to collect information–things like shopping histories–about people without first identifying whose information they want to collect. Just collect a list of everyone in Aurora, CO who bought acetone, Franken seems to be saying, and too bad for the guy with an Arabic name who becomes an FBI target because he’s painting his house.
Just two weeks later and it seems someone needs to give Franken the lesson he was trying to give Kris.
————-
And maybe we should all remember that Jason Rosenbaum got paid — made his living — as an employee of OFA pushing all of us here to accept the myth that the HCR bill Obama demanded and finally signed wasn’t a colossal corporate sellout but the best thing since the birth control pill.
How’s that for a “contribution to the community” here?
Here’s the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ODV5U87yps
Thanks for that!
Next time, we schedule Al as Opener, then brainstorm the rest of the time how to implement.
heh, not a bad suggestion.
With all the tax dollars that have gone into connectivity infrastructure, corporate ownership is theft from the tax payers.
You wrote:
“With the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision giving unprecedented rights to corporations over individuals. . .”
I wouldn’t really say Citizens United gave rights to corporations over individuals, I think it’s more accurate to say that it gave corporations the same rights as individuals. I think even the critics of the ruling would agree this is a more accurate characterization of the case.
Political fundraising… as well as Congress, the Presidency, political parties, the media and many other institutions and practices, both formal and informal are the ‘machines of representation’ by which we determine our course.
The imbalances which have brought corporate/financial dominance is the product of unattended mechanisms of representation backed by a Randian Objectivist philosophical justification.
There are solutions which were aborted with the financial crisis awaiting implementation:
Money and the Machinery of Representation
http://culturalengineer.blogspot.com/2010/07/money-and-machinery-of-representation.html
Personal Democracy: Disruption as an Enlightenment Essential
http://culturalengineer.blogspot.com/2010/06/personal-democracy-disruption-as.html
(Thanks to recent additions to my LinkedIn network at least some attention may be finally forthcoming.)
That’s what’s on my mind tonight…