Yesterday, I wrote a rather passionate (and I admit, rambling – I have no recession of words)diary about the fact that I felt, instinctively, from reason posts at other sites, that the way we measure the economic health of this country just…doesn’t…work. And I said there:

"I’m not an economist, so I don’t understand how the NBER can miss all of these outsourcings, job losses, home foreclosures and people at homeless shelters. But they did. It is obvious to me that our system of ‘taking the economic temperature’ of this country is completely broken and perhaps never worked in the first place."

Meltdown Diary

Interestingly enough, CBS reported today that the AP has done some number crunching and…hey…I think I am on to something..I really do:

"The Associated Press analyzed economic data from the 2,000 or so cities and towns across the nation with populations of 20,000 or more, comparing the 2005-2007 data to figures from the 2000 census.

Among the findings:

# Median household income dropped in 79 percent of the cities and towns. Incomes dropped in the wealthiest communities as well as the poorest. Charleston, Ill., home to Eastern Illinois University, saw the biggest drop – 31 percent – to a median household income of just under $21,000.

# Nationally, incomes dropped by 4.3 percent during the period, to $50,007.

# The poverty rate increased in 70 percent of the cities and towns. Athens, Ohio, home to Ohio University, had the highest poverty rate, at 52.3 percent, in the 2005-2007 period.

# Nationally, the poverty rate increased from 12.4 percent to 13.3 percent since the start of the decade.

# The unemployment rate increased in 71 percent of the cities and towns. Muskegon, Mich., a city of about 40,000 near Lake Michigan, had the highest unemployment rate, at 22.1 percent.

# Nationally, the unemployment rate increased from about 4 percent in 2000 to 6.6 percent in the 2005-2007 period.

# Median home values increased in 92 percent of the cities and towns studied – doubling and tripling in many cities, mainly in California. Nationally, the median home value increased 26 percent, to $181,800.

It’s not surprising that many communities were doing better in 2000 than they were mid-decade, said Scott Hoyt, senior director of consumer economics at Moody’s Economy.com.

"The year 2000 was at the end of an incredible boom that lasted a decade," Hoyt said.

Incomes were up, unemployment was down and the dot-com bubble had not yet burst on Wall Street.

"We just didn’t have enough years of expansion" this decade, he said."

AP crunches the numbers

There is a very nifty interactive feature that will tell you on a state by state basis how this is all playing out.

How is my state doing?

Of course, again, this is a look at the macro level, using Census data; so individual cases are not seen. For those, I invite you to go back to read, as I do, "Blogging the Meltdown" at HuffPo.