In September 1776, the Continental Army was pinned down on Manhattan, and its commander, George Washington, desperately needed to determine exactly where the British army was going to land. He simply did not have enough troops to guard every possible landing point and avenue of approach. Washington gathered his officers, and asked for a volunteer to don civilian garb and cross behind British lines to gather intelligence on just what the British planned to do, and where.
No one stepped forward. Soldiering was for gentlemen, but spying was for thieves, drunkards, brawlers, and riffraff. In desperation, Washington explained the urgency of his need to discern British intentions. If he selected a place to deploy the Army, and he was wrong in picking the location, and the British appeared somewhere else, the Americans would be easily outflanked, the Army crushed, the Revolution lost, the idea of a self-governing republic snuffed out before it had enjoyed a few infant breaths of birth. Was there not an officer present, familiar with the area, who would undertake the admittedly duplicitous and hazardous task of sneaking into enemy occupied territory and spy on the foeman?
With a heavy sigh, one man, a 21-year old lieutenant in the 7th Connecticut Regiment, stepped forward, and entered history. His name was Nathan Hale.
There are times when one individual is peculiarly fitted for a specific role in the great unfolding drama of human history. Hollywood mints money by depicting the lone hero, whose unique collection of skills, knowledge, and emotional quirks make him or her the “perfect” man or woman for “the job.” In real life, such historical burdens most often remain unseen beneath the sheer drudgery and apparent conformity to the norms of day to day life. It looks great on screen, but almost all real life heroes never walk away from “the job” with a soaring orange fireball in the background.
The republic faces a shortage of heroes today, similar to what George Washington faced that fateful September day in 1776. Today, the republic is prostrate, battered, bleeding, and bruised, at the feet of a new aristocracy of filthy rich blood suckers who think it sport to try to “negotiate” a $150 taxi fare down to $50. There really are only a handful of people, among the 7.06 billion souls on this planet, who understand the complexities of modern finance, recognize how evil it has become, have the contacts to gather the intelligence, and the cajones needed to make that intelligence intelligible for all the rest of us. I not-at-all humbly submit that stilling the voice of David Dayen is a setback our faltering republic – and all the human aspirations, past, present, and future, for good government free of the predators and parasites that historically have corrupted republics from within – simply cannot afford at this time.
Take a week or two if you must, Mr. Dayen. But you must return. It is your world historic duty.



9 Comments

Somehow, I don’t think David thinks of himself as Nathan Hale, and he shouldn’t. No one is stilling David’s voice, not even those of us here who honestly disagree with him from time to time.
His decision sounds like a personal one to me, and I respect that. So should you. He has no duty to the Republic that requires him to keep writing here. Let him go in peace. I’m sure he can always come back if he chooses to do so.
There are other good writers here on FDL. In fact, that was a very well-written piece by YOU, Tony. Maybe you should post a bit more.
why not?
Exactly. If it is to be, then it is up to me.
Despite all the “high faluting” that is Al Gore and his reported ownership of a television network, he–Al Gofer for all his public contretemps, should have ‘scooped-up’ David Dayen, and created a television show where David would have a platform of public discourse, but then, I never believed Al Gore was any kind of a Progressive.
And having a program with Dayen as the Host, he could have conceiveably brought in the multiplicity of progressive voices and move the Agenda forward, and as seen by the Native Americans and Chicanos here in the Sonoran Desert. So, when I hear anything about the Al Gofer, I just turn my face in the opposite direction.
Jaango
Among a variety of issues he raised, I think DDay’s point was that the frequency, volume and quality of his posts just weren’t sustainable. I think ew said much the same when she left.
He’s a towering talent and I trust his judgement to know best how to manage his career.
As did others before him.
Jack Parr left for good 2 years later stating he did not feel he good give what the people deserved and continue to be relevant and creative.
Walter Cronkite left for similar reasons.
David is in good company, I think.
David Dayen did a great job. I hope things go well for him. I hope we do OK here, now that we’re without him.
I’m a little freaked out, too. Here’s a radio interview from the 18′th where he explains his reasoning in depth.
http://majority.fm/2012/12/18/1218-david-dayen-exiting-the-liberal-blogosphere-social-security-back-on-the-table/
(Is it just me, or does he come close to implying Kos partially ruined the power of the liberal blogopshere? lol)
Anyway, I’m excited by the idea of him honing in on finance/WallStreet as his “one carefully crafted plate” instead of “spinning 20 plates.”
If he could come back with a “FDL Economic Warfare” page, OMG.
David Dayen has no duty to anybody but himself and his family, which represent the only oath he has taken. Our loss will probably wind up being someone else’ gain but to try to shame him into staying is not cool. Just my .02.