John Walker’s already written a post covering some of the basics. I thought it’d be good to write up a follow up for those interested, or ex-patriot Canadian firepups who haven’t been keeping up. Before I get started, I should note I am a member of New Democratic Party (of Canada). Anyhow, I’ll do my best to inform you readers with my personal take on the election, and how it’ll end. I’ve also included my thoughts on each of the different political parties vying for seats in the Parliament of Canada.
In polling, the Conservative Party sits in first place, while the NDP has vaulted into second place, taking many by surprise. The Liberal Party has slid to third place, which has shocked the electorate, and possibly demoralized its party supports. The final member party of parliament before dissolution, and fourth place party (in polling), is the Bloc Québécois, which has also lost major ground in the latest polls. There is also another major national party, the Green Party, which is polling a little under its results from the 2008 election. Aside from these parties, there are a number of minor parties that either aren’t contesting all ridings, or have no seats in parliament.
The final seat count could vary quite a bit, since the polling has been so volatile. The Conservatives will finish with 130-165 seats. The Liberals with 40-70 seats. The NDP, however, could finish anywhere from 50 to 100 seats! The Bloc could finish with 10-40 seats. The numbers are so volatile and unprecedented, that who knows how it’ll end? Let’s all cross our fingers for a high voter turnout as that would be most likely to upset the status quo of Canadian politics.Alright, here is some background, and the basics for those who are interested in Canadian politics:
I’ll skip the history and structure of The Parliament of Canada, and concentrate on the House of Commons, since it’s the only level of government that actually holds any power in Canada. The House of Commons has 308 ridings. Any party that wins a majority of seats (154+) takes control of the cabinet, where all the political power in Canada is concentrated. The leader of the majority party of parliament becomes the Prime Minister. Any party polling above %40 is likely to gain majority status. However, if no party wins a majority of seats, the party with the most seats can control cabinet, unless two or more parties with more seats either reach an accord or form a coalition. However, a minority parliament is tenuous and uncertain, but the Canadian electorate has favored it over the past few elections in lieu of trusting any party with too much power.
An accord is a simple agreement where two parties with more seats combined than any other party promise to not vote down the government, but cabinet power is not shared in this scenario. A coalition is a far more complex agreement, whereupon two parties agree to share cabinet power.
There are quite a number of limits placed upon political and third parties in regards to donations and election spending. Only people can donate to political parties, and only up $1100, maximum, yearly. Candidates, depending upon their riding, have a hard limit placed on their election spending, whereas parties have a hard limit placed upon their national advertising. The party limit is based upon how many ridings in which a party is contesting. Third parties can only spend up to $188,250 nationally, and $3,765 within any single riding.
The Conservatives are a right wing party, and the only (major) conservative party in Canada. Although they’ve inched leftward in order to appeal to more Canadian voters, they continue to poll at less than the necessary magical number to gain majority status. In comparison to US political parties, they’re similar in ideology to conservative Democrats and, and more especially Republicans. Barack Obama would be a moderate Conservative, while Ron Paul would be quite comfortable, too. The party proposes hard line justice, tax cuts, military spending, and deregulation as its major policies. The party also wants to continue involvement in the Afghanistan conflict. It is hard-line federalist. The party leader is Stephan Harper whose favorite line is, “You won’t recognize Canada when I get through with it.”
The New Democratic Party is a left wing party. It is a social-democratic party. Traditionally, it has been Canada’s third place party, often affecting politics only in the rare circumstances of a minority party parliament. Its policies are social justice, progressive taxation, and strengthening the social safety net. It has socialist leanings toward what it considers public interest, meaning it may nationalize a corporation or create a government agency to provide what it considers necessary services for the public. The party also allows for the Keynesian view of regulating industries, with further support of such policies as cap and trade. It supports unionization (and receives in kind strong union support). In comparison US political parties, is quite a ways left of the Democratic Party; Dennis Kucinich and Bernie Sanders would be quite at home in the NDP. It is soft-line federalist. The current leader is Jack Layton.
The Liberal Party is a centrist party. Depending on circumstances, depending on the party leader’s leanings, the party when in governance has expanded and contracted differing government services. It is moderately progressive in taxation, but also supports tax cuts. Half the party opposes deregulation, whereas the half other accepts it. It is either pulled left or right depending on the motivations and strength of its supporters, which changes and fluctuates as time progresses. However, lately, the party has had unstable leadership, with its third new leader in seven years. Compared with US politics, Nancy Pelosi would at home in the Liberal party, but so would Barack Obama. It used to receive much support from corporations, but when the electoral financing rules were changed, it adapted slowly to the changes, which even now effects its grass roots organizing, which has contributed to its slide in the polls. It is hard-line federalist. The current leader is Michael Ignatieff.
The Bloc Québécois is a regional party that only contests riding in Quebec, Canada’s only native French-speaking province. It is a hard-line Québécois sovereignty party, which means it proposes to the electorate of Quebec that their province becomes an equal partner to Canada as an independent state rather than a province. It is an even more pronounced left-wing party than the NDP. However, in the current election, it is losing support to the NDP, which is fast gaining ground in the province through younger voters, who seem to be considering the NDP’s soft federalism appealing. The current leader is Gilles Duceppe.
The Green Party is actively trying to win a seat, running as a centrist party. Its stance on taxation evolves as time progresses. It supports a moderate progressive tax system, but also proposes tax shifting to better identify and demonstrate how tax dollars are being spent. If the party wins a seat this election, it’ll be its first in the federal election level (it has won on the provincial level). The current leader is Elizabeth May.
A few other issues parties contest are immigration, diplomacy, and First Nations (or American Indians) issues. On immigration, the Conservatives are hard-line, but have proven arbitrary, depending on your skin colour and last names, whereas the Liberals prefer the status quo, and the NDP are for loosening rules regarding refugees (the BQ are a regional party, so they really add nothing to this debate). On diplomacy, the Conservatives and Liberals are hawks, whereas the NDP and Bloc are doves.
First Nations (or American Indian) policies, though, are something close to my heart (as I am Secwepemc), and something the USA will probably begin to realize as necessary for its own population of First Nations as more and more time passes. Registered First Nations make up about one percent of the Canadian population, and perhaps there’s just as many unregistered First Nations. However, First Nations own a considerable amount of land, which is called reserve (just as in the USA), and contest far more lands as stolen by the Canadian government through its court of laws. Also, First Nations have considerable organizational power and political influence, punching above its weight on the national level for public attention. First Nations policies by the government is something that does affect elections on a humanitarian level. The Conservatives and Liberal are both hard-line federalist parties, and so dismiss First Nations land claims, whereas the NDP accepts First Nations self-determination arguments, and sides with First Nations leaders on arguments for specifically alleviating First Nations poverty on reserves and in the cities (the BQ’s stance on First Nations’ self determination is evolving to grudging accept the argument).
Anyhow, if you’ve read through the whole post, and still have questions (I wouldn’t be surprised), here are some helpful links for further reading:
http://www.progressivebloggers.ca/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_of_Canada
http://www.sfu.ca/~aheard/elections/laws.html
http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=ele&dir=41ge&document=index&lang=e
http://www.electionalmanac.com/canada/projections.php
http://www.threehundredeight.blogspot.com/
http://www.sfu.ca/~aheard/elections/polls.html
http://www.electionalmanac.com/canada/
http://www.democraticspace.com/canada2011/



15 Comments

Leo Gerard predicts an NDP victory…!
Polls Show Canadian Election Surprise…
Bye-bye, Harper…!
I think it’s a lead-pipe cinch that, at the very least, the Tories will fail to win 150 seats.
Why do I think this? Because if Harper and the Tories were doing well, the US media would have made a point of saying so. But instead, US media hasn’t said diddly about the Canadian elections.
I’m cautiously optimistic regarding an NDP victory. I can’t safely predict what Harper’s fate will be after this election, either.
I can voice my hopes, though. I hope the NDP wins 100+ seats, and I hope Harper, for again failing to win a majority government, is savaged by own party for being such a perennial loser, and left in Ottawa’s back allies where he can make friends with Ottawa’s other favorite whipping boy, Alexander Daigle. And I hope the Conservative Party implodes, and become embroiled in constant leadership contest after contest, ala the Liberals.
Well, I’m not gonna make any certain predictions, but I think the Conservatives will only win about 130 seats, which is what they had before Parliament’s dissolution. They simply haven’t made any gains with the Canadian electorate.
What remains to be seen, though, is whether Layton and the NDP can win enough seats from the Liberals and BQ to become an alternative government whether through an accord or coalition with the Liberals to unseat Harper.
CTuttle April 30th, 2011 at 8:15 pm «
Happy, Happy, Happy DANCE that ANYone can say that!!!!!!!
Woo Hoo!
Harper’s campaign was awful from the getgo, threatening and anti-democratic … but that hasn’t seemed to matter before. And it’s much worse now ~ tee hee.
Several Conservative scandals “unveiled” during the campaign on top of all the earlier scandals. Harper said “SO?” Lovely. Just lovely.
Heard an interesting commentary yesterday … negative campaigning, used heavily by the Conservatives even *between* elections against the Liberals is very risky in anything but a 2-party system because you cannot be sure what will happen to the un-targeted foes, like the NDP coming out of “nowhere” after being discounted.
NDP is staying relentlessly positive ~ good as contrast and appealing to the youth vote.
Youth (=environment and jobs both embarrassing files for Conservatives) vote has no use for Conservatives ~ I think that is a key element. Lots of get-out-the-youth-vote activism may be playing a part. Lovin’ the kids, I am!
Can. not. wait.
AND just yesterday, “police notes” were leaked to embarrass Layton about an innocent sports massage that he had 12 (TWELVE) years ago.
Now we even have dirty tricks!!!!!!!
And that’s how far back they had to go to find ANYTHING. Amazing. And that’s all they’ve got, apparently to fight Layton with at this point.
The guy’s a champ. An avid bicyclist, he’s beaten prostate cancer this year and is using a cane from recent hip surgery. Very strong performer at campaign rallies. Layton shows the kind of energy and crowd connection that Ignatieff is trying and failing to muster.
My thoughts are with you. I’ve seen a few articles here and there that say the Dems are gaining lots of ground. For your sake and ours here’s hoping you have a historical win!
And breaking this Sunday evening … WikiLeaks has released American cables about Canada including diplomatic assessments of Harper!!!!
Oh, yeah, that’ll help secure a Conservative majority: particularly helping to tie down those seats in Quebec! /s
Large spontaneous overflow at rallies for NDP today.
I hope the NDP does well. That would be cool. I don’t know that much about Canadian politics, but last night I was looking at 2008 election return maps at the CBC website here (it’s an interactive pop out map):
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/map/2008/fullscreen.html
From looking at individual ridings in Quebec and Ontario, I can see how the math can work for the NDP.
Question. My impression is that if the NDP did win something like a hundred seats it would be at the expense of the Bloc to a certain extent. Even so, say it was mathematically possible the NDP and the Bloc could form a government without either of the other parties. Would that be possible politically, in theory? I know it’s a stupid hypothetical, but I think the answer would be educational about Canadian politics themes in general.
Yesterday’s document dump, Wikileaks on Canada – #wlcan, does not reflect well on the current Canadian administration.
Also of note: Biggest Free Trade Deal Since NAFTA, Ghost Issue of 2011 Election (TheTyee.ca, by Katie Hyslop and Colleen Kimmett, Apr. 28, 2011)
Just saw this on CBC. People are getting instructions from somewhere to go to the wrong polling place. Sounds familiar.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canadavotes2011/story/2011/05/01/cv-election-wrong-polls.html
Been following this closely. Really excited to see the NDP rising in popularity, but still worried the Conservatives will gain a majority government. It isn’t the NDP’s fault, but rather the fact the left vote is split into 4 parties (part of the Liberals, NDP, Greens, Bloc Quebec), while the right is just one. Sucks for the 60-70% of Canadians who are being ruled by a party that doesn’t represent their will.
Even in a better case scenario, where there’s an option for a coalition government between Liberals and NDP, the Liberals are highly unlikely to cooperate, and I’m honestly worried they may form a coalition with Conservatives in that case to spite the NDP and those who voted for them.
So, yeah, even where electoral democracy is healthier than it is in the US, it still miserably fails the people (aside from the 30% who support the Conservatives).
While the Quebec referendum on sovereignty was over fifteen years ago, it’s still fresh enough for many voting Canadians to remember, and easily feeds into resentment the Conservatives use for their own purposes.
An NDP/Liberal coalition is popular, whereas an NDP/Liberal/BQ coalition is unpopular. There’s been no polling of NDP/BQ acting together, but the BQ remain distrusted in the majority of Canada, so if there’s any agreement reached, the BQ would probably only be part of an accord rather than a coalition.
However, the math as it is right now just isn’t in the Bloc’s favor, nor any of the other parties besides the NDP, as the numbers solidify going into tonight. The low/high seat count can be updated as being,
Conservatives: 130 to 155
Liberals: 30 to 60
Bloc: 5 to 40
NDP: 70 to 120
With the numbers as they are, the Conservatives are unlikely to gain a majority government, especially if there’s a high voter turnout.
The Liberals and BQ are demoralized, and will count themselves lucky if they finish on the high end of the polls.
That’s why third parties are all too often nothing more than spoilers. The only way they’re not is when ranked-choice voting is used.
Well, who is the “third party” then if the NDP is leading the Liberals? Now you can argue it’s the Liberals who are the spoilers. If it weren’t for that corrupt, neoliberal party, Canadians could have the left government they wanted.