"It’s a common problem. Roughly 47 percent of small businesses in California say they cannot provide coverage for their workers, according to a poll last year by the Small Business Majority, a Sausalito business group pushing for health care reform. Among the businesses that do provide insurance, 70 percent say they are currently struggling to make the payments. Among self-employed entrepreneurs, 28 percent nationwide cannot afford insurance, the group found.
“Small companies like ours have to decide whether to lay people off to keep up with our insurance coverage or to have more people out there without insurance, which we taxpayers end up paying for,” said Liz Parker, co-owner of Tulsa Rib Co., a barbecue restaurant in Orange. “The arrogance of raising premiums like this is just unconscionable.”
In the past several years, Parker’s insurance payouts covering 42 employees and dependents have jumped from $55,000 a year to $98,000, rising at a clip of between 15 and 66 percent per year. Her agent just warned her that her insurer, HealthNet, plans to boost rates by another 40 percent to 60 percent this year.
“And that’s for really horrible coverage,” she said, noting that even with full coverage, one of her employees had to pay $300 out-of-pocket for an appendectomy. “The market’s allowing insurers to charge whatever they want.”
In the meantime, "In a sober call to arms, Pelosi said lawmakers sometimes must enact policies that, even if unpopular at the moment, will help the public. "We’re not here just to self-perpetuate our service in Congress," she said. "We’re here to do the job for the American people."
Which leads me to believe she will try to round up the votes to pass the Senate’s house of horrors without anything more than assurances from ObamaRahma and Reid that the Senate will take up something the House thinks will make the Senate bill more amenable.
And while ObamaRahma is calling for a ‘simple up or down vote", it is noticeable that the ObamaRahma Admin is saying nothing about reconciliation bringing anything to the ‘table’ except the Senate bill.
"It’s unclear whether Pelosi’s remarks will embolden or chill dozens of moderate House Democrats who face withering criticisms of the health care proposal in visits with constituents and in national polls." which would lead one to think that the ‘progressives’ have already signaled to her their willingness to roll over and beg for a bone.
Which,IMO, is what the blue dogs should be subjected to, rolling over and begging for a bone.
There is but ONE rationale for why a robust public option is NOT being considered or put forth and that is the backroom deals the ObaamRahma Admin has made.
There is NO ECONOMIC OR MEDICAL reasons why -at the very MINIMUM- a robust public option is ‘not on the table’.
So AFAIC, those who are still supporting Obama’s ‘plan’ are doing nothing but perpetuating the corruption that is undermining this nation, despite Pelosi’s ""We’re not here just to self-perpetuate our service in Congress," she said. "We’re here to do the job for the American people.".
Uh, Speaker Pelosi, what do you need to hear from the ‘American people’ besides they think the Senate bill is a piece of shit and that a robust public option is what the American people want?
And BTW, I’m a single payer advocate.



8 Comments







If only, unbetcha, if only. Single payer was THE way to solve really the problem. Throw us all into one big pool.
I am really hoping that people in CA get fed up enough with the insurance company rate increases that they push to finally get single payer through here. Think about what that would mean to our state’s economy and to those who are working and out of work. Businesses can run more efficiently and consumers can consume something other than the fantasy that maybe an insurance exec will allow a procedure or two should they become seriously ill.
Nancy is trying to play that she is acting responsible when all she is doing is giving the insurance companies our cash.
Hey Nancy why don’t we tax the rich instead of force the middle class to buy crappy insurance at the same rates the rich do?
The rich got richer during the Bush years we got more in debt so they can afford it. 10% unemployment and you want us to buy insurance trust me Nancy your job is on the line.
I say a one time 10% tax on the assets not the income of the rich is called for to pay for the war, the national debt and healthcare.
Nancy is no innocent she knows what will happen old women doing the innocent little girl being bad smile is like the Joker smiling or a hyena’s laugh its troubling.
Sober would be to push for the Best Healthcare plan possible that we can afford and that’s the French or Japanese plans. Call to Arms? Nancy who are your troops the insurance lobbyists sneaking around your backdoor?
Don’t even pretend you have popular support Nancy. Compromise is your middle name Virtue is your last.
I think the reason is the insurance companies are broke they lost a ton of cash in the banking crisis AIG was not the only insurance company I’m sure that insured funny Credit Default Swaps and who knows what else.
Now with 10% unemployment the insurance companies are losing customers.
In fact I bet their costs have gone up healthy people let their health insurance go when they lose their jobs unhealthy people let everything else go before they lose their health insurance after they lose a job.
I would kill to see their real books in this economy.
I would too. There have been reports of tidy profits for ‘Big Insurance’ of late. But how long can this go on? They’re slowly pricing the majority of Americans out of the market. A couple of million last year, couple million this year, this can’t be sustained. What kind of business model is this? You can build ‘the greatest thing ever’, but if no one can afford it what good is it? And you can’t produce a product that is only profitable when it’s not used, can you? I don’t see a real future viability in the ‘for profit’ health care system. It just doesn’t make sense.
Agreed but we need some econ experts to weigh in on this.