Came across this article via the editor of econintersect.com and thought I’d bring it to others attention.
Number one, remember how Germany was chiding the rest of Europe about meeting ‘austerity goals’?
If not see here.
And now there’s this article that sounds like it’s describing the U.S. Like these excerpts:
“It’s a paradox: At a time when the economic elites in the United States and Great Britain are turning to Germany’s recipes for industrial success as role models, the social structure in Germany is increasingly moving in the direction of a three-class society. This is a fundamental shift for a social market economy whose policies have long been aimed at ensuring that the country’s prosperity is fairly distributed to all echelons of society. That system now appears to be eroding fast.
These days, it is executives, with their compensation skyrocketing into the millions, who are at the top. The second tier consists of the well-trained and reasonably well-paid legions of white-collar and skilled workers in modern information and industrial societies. Bringing up the rear are professional groups that were once considered part of the core of the traditional working world: salespeople, cooks, waiters and teachers, for example, who often earn less now than they did a decade ago.
In his inaugural speech, Germany’s new president, Joachim Gauck, praised his country for “bringing together social justice, participation and opportunities for advancement.” But Germans, the president warned, should not accept “people having the impression that advancement is out of their reach despite their every endeavor.”
Sound familiar? As I’m fond of saying “All governments lie”.
Full article here.
Oh, and these links re the image you might find interesting:
“By 1899, Bayer was producing about a ton of heroin a year, and exporting the drug to 23 countries. The country where it really took off was the US, where there was already a large population of morphine addicts, a craze for patent medicines, and a relatively lax regulatory framework. ”
113 years later and U.S. culture is essentially still the same – or so it seems to me.
“Although Daimler-Benz is best known for its Mercedes-Benz automobile brand, during World War II it also created a notable series of aircraft, tank, and submarine engines. Daimler also produced parts for German arms, most notably barrels for the Mauser rifle. During World War II Daimler-Benz employed slave labour. The slaves “toiled eighteen hours a day; cowering under the lash, sleeping six to a dog kennel eight feet square, starving or freezing to death at the whim of their guards.”
But the Mercedes Benz cars ARE nice cars if one can afford them.




12 Comments

Oh, and one of the solutions for Germany specified would be to raise their minimum wage to $10.91 cents an hour (in today’s euro/dollar conversion); “If a minimum wage of €8.50 were introduced nationwide in Germany, 25 percent of all female employees would immediately earn more money, and some 15 percent of male workers would see their pay go up.”
See how similar the countries are?
Which is another reason I am in favor of a larger number of smaller nation/states. Easier for their citizenry to keep inline.
Isn’t that what the U.S. is? And Germany is composed of a bunch of smaller ‘states’(and that is how they are referred to btw).
National Socialism ain’t what it’s cracked up to be?
Supposed to be but the states have lost a good deal of their autonomy over the years.
I know I’ll piss a lot of people off here, but I find it curious that the same people who scream about Washington interfering with foreign countries are very OK with DC running rough shod over various states.
You simply cannot force or legislate behavior no matter how much it upsets you. It just pisses people off.
And personally I think this country has become fare to big and far to fractured to govern effectively as a single entity. Any more than any other empire. It has been suggested by more than a few that it it eventually fracture. Which to me would be good thing in the long term and possibly in the short term as well.
you suppose Obama agrees with you re “force or legislate behavior no matter how much it upsets you.”? Of course then his hypocrisy shows through,e.g.medical marijuana contrasted to marriage. BUT this country’s history is based on “force(d) or legislate(d)” behavior.
“I think this country has become fare to big and far to fractured to govern effectively as a single entity.” ; well, there was a civil war but I do understand your point as it applies to any system,e.g.past a certain size, entropy becomes dominant. There have also been other efforts to have the nation be broken into smaller components,e.g., Ecotopia, even if they were only fiction.
What’s missing is a sense of commonality and that has been assiduously undermined by the PTB’s over the past 50 years.
It truly is as Chomsky states: ” So, there was just a study that came out from the Harvard Public Policy Institute, found that—pretty scary results, I thought. Less than—this is kids 18 to 24, you know, college students, basically. Less than half of them think that the government has a responsibility to deal with things like healthcare or food, and so on. When they say the government doesn’t have a responsibility, that’s kind of an interesting concept. If people thought they were living in a democracy, they would say—they would ask the question whether it’s a public responsibility. But again, the propaganda system is designed to make you feel that the government is some alien force, and it’s against you. You know, you want to keep it away from your affairs.
In a democratic society, it would be quite different.”
I just don’t believe you can have a democratic society governed from a single group after you reach a certain size – both geographically and population wise. Especially one as culturally and ethnically as diverse as this one.
Even if the 90% of the population were the same ethnicity, there would emerge large regional differences that would increasingly diverge.
Each with it’s own agenda.
The marijuana issue is one.
And the media is a very good example of how too few large organizations will respond to those who pay the bills rather than the majority.
Humans do not handle big well at all. The bigger a organization becomes, the less responsive it becomes.
“This country is too large to govern democratically” and that’s why national security is it’s religion. Then the credible enemy bailed on us and we had to cook one up in the ME.
Every foolish tribe wants to claim it’s the virtuous one. Beware the epitome – it’s got a lot to hide. And doubly the one simultaneously crying for it’s liberty.
Maybe it’s hierarchy that doesn’t scale, not democracy.
I do not consider myself to be a tin-foil-hat conspiracy freak and I try to resist giving in to my occasional paranoid suspicions, but I’ll be damned if it doesn’t seem like the austerians, who are popping up like weeds all over the planet, are all being worked hand-in-glove by the 0.1% and the international banking cartel they own, including the World Bank and the IMF.
They are using austerity to dismantle safety nets, fire public sector employees, destroy public and private sector unions, create debt slavery and vacuum all of the wealth they do not already possess into their own pockets.
Why else would they keep doubling down on austerity, unless pitching countries and their populations into a vast global economic depression is their goal?
Obama is still talking austerity even though it has failed spectacularly to revive economies everywhere while succeeding beyond imagining to further enrich the filthy rich.
At some point, if it looks and quacks like a duck . . .
Good article, Ubet.
Recommended.
We know it does not. After economies of scale the are dis-economies of scale, where the overhead to manage become too great.
You’d be better off not waiting for quacking compradors to speak the truth.
The corporate media conglomerates, that are owned by the .01%, and politicians feed off of conflict within our society. for a country this large, media and education systems need to promote cross cultural and ideological understanding for considerations in promoting any agenda. All we know now is what we want, not is what is best for the nation. We are on the same road as the old Soviet Union. Russia just lost its satellites. We have no central country to fall back on. There will be about 5 different confederacies, competing with one another.