For several months long trains of rail cars full of crude oil can be seen inching along, or stopped altogether, beside I-787 in downtown Albany NY. Other tankers fill the rail yards off I-90 not far from the SUNY campus.
All are waiting to offload into the tank farm at the Port of Albany for transfer onto barges for transport down the Hudson River to the New York harbor, and from there to Philadelphia and other East Coast refineries. There is simply so much oil pouring through Albany these days that the limited number of holding tanks, and the relatively small size of the river-going tankers, can just barely manage it.
The trains, up to 80 tankers each, originate in the growing Bakken oil fields of Dakota and Montana and have traveled over a series of states and down the old NY Central tracks through the Mohawk Valley without attracting much notice – in stark contrast to the huge political and public relations battle over the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada into Texas.
In “Rail It On Over To Albany – Moving Bakken East,” energy consultant Rusty Braziel describes the vast infrastructure in North Dakota sending out the Bakken oil across the country. Buckeye and Global Partners, the two companies active at the port, have maintained a very low profile about their role in transporting the crude from the Bakken oil fields of North Dakota and Montana. A couple of guys who work there told me recently that so few local jobs have been produced that the companies probably see no value in publicizing their heavy investment in the Port.
According to an October 27 article by Brian Nearing in the Albany Times Union, neither the state Department of Environmental Conservation nor the Coast Guard have seen a need to update plans for containing any possible oil spill resulting from the increased traffic. And these kind of shipments are unprecedented in this area, according to port manager Richard Hendrick, who said,” “I am not aware that a drop of crude was ever shipped out of the port until the Bakken oil showed up this year.” Nearing goes on to write:
Between Houston-based Buckeye Partners and Global Partners, located in Waltham, Mass., up to 395,000 barrels of oil a day could come into Albany on rail cars, and then move 150 miles down the river on tankers and barges to the Atlantic. That is nearly 16.6 million gallons of oil a day, nearly half the potential output of a massive field thousands of miles away that is estimated to hold more than two billion barrels of oil, or even more, making it one of the largest oil reserves in the country. Locked in shale rock formations, the oil became reachable only after new rock-fracturing drilling technology was developed in 2008.
As with so many environmental issues, public reactions are intensely local, no matter what the global effects. Drilling for natural gas is the issue in New York, not the oil that is passing quietly through our state – even though the same hydraulic fracturing technology produces both kinds of fossil fuel. The difference, of course, is that the profits and problems of potentially rich Marcellus shale gas fields under much of this state are right in front of us– and the oil is being pumped far way.
Andrew Cuomo, who has long held the line on fracking for natural gas in this state, appears to be moving toward approval. In response, A protest rally at the State Capitol has been called by New Yorkers Against Fracking for January 9, to coincide with the Governor’s State of the State message – but thus far there’s no public anxiety over the risk of oil tankers on the Hudson But there should be, given the casualness with which state and federal authorities have reacted to the millions of gallons of crude oil passing through our region. After all, in 1989 a tiny crack in the hull of one tanker bringing oil upriver released a mere thousand gallons near Coxsackie and that took weeks to clean up.
Cuomo’s silence on the oil shipments and his expected willingness to okay natural gas fracking in the state are in sharp contrast to his frankness about the reality of climate change following Hurricane Sandy. Like Obama, Cuomo seems committed to an “all of the above” energy strategy – as if we could invest in wind, solar, oil, natural gas and nuclear – and somehow the greener varieties of energy will win the race. But the relatively low cost of shale oil and gas will mean that this country will keep pumping it and burning it until we are long past the point where disastrous climate change can be averted.
(A version of this post with illustrations can be found at Upstate Earth)
Photo by Valatius, all rights reserved




11 Comments

I’m in southern Minnesota and 2-3 trains a day go through with long lines of tank cars headed east. A few years ago everybody was upset that the rail company was going to do this with coal trains from Wyoming but that got scuttled due to the EPA cracking down on coal plants.
Yup. And guess who owns BNSF, the railroad that services North Dakota? Warren Buffett.
That is why I never became to giddy over having more oil possibly than Saudi Arabia.
Until we tax carbon, its a lose/lose scenario.
Buffett was against Keystone XL? Explains why.
So was the next bad guy everyone should know, Harold Hamm. He’s bought politicians and scammed his way out paying his fair share of taxes
Then there’s the harmful environmental, infrastructure
And poor quality of life impacts
Recommended (FDL)
Tweeted
Recommended (FB)
Book Salon up with L. Randall Wray’s Modern Money Theory: A Primer on Macroeconomics for Sovereign Monetary Systems hosted by William K. Black
He was officially for it, but he was the chief financial beneficiary of its failure. (I note that he announced he was for it round about the time it became clear that the glut of oil coming from the Bakken — oil that’s cheaper to extract and refine than that of the tar sands muck that Keystone was to transport — had doomed the Keystone XL pipeline.)
All that being said, fracking is (probably) on the whole less polluting, especially where carbon is concerned, than the processes used to extract and mess with the frozen tar just to get it so it can flow in a pipeline. (One of the things that delayed the exploitation of the tar sands was the concern that it would take more energy to exploit them than would be got from them.)
The Friends of the Earth website states the following:
It still is amazing that we use a 4,000 lbs auto to transport a 170 lb person.
The same train of oil tankers is traveling south thru Haverstraw at least 2x/day, persumably on to Newark or nearby. Price is still high, just like J.D. Rockefeller…and for some reason, heating oil, which is less refined and has no federal and state road tax, costs more than gasoline…Why?…Because they can, just like J.D.R.