It’s bad enough we know that the government tortured Abu Zubaydah, Binyam Mohamed, and countless others in an attempt to produce false confessions, faked intel about Iraq, and in general hype up a "terrorism" threat that would justify the billions bilked from the U.S. treasury for the bogus "war on terror."
But now apparently the campaign to find terrorist boogie-men has come home with a vengeance. Just ask Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) informants Emilio and Analia Maya of Saugerties, New York. According to a fascinating Associated Press report by Helen O’Neill, on November 17, 2009, Emilio was surrounded by nine ICE officers in flak jackets with guns.
"We are deactivating you"
"We are deactivating you," the officers told their former Argentinian immmigrant informer. The prisoner, who recognized agents who some years earlier had recruited him, was taken to jail over 100 milies away, and held over two weeks without charges.
Emilio and his sister Analia had made a deal with ICE back in March 2005. They could get S visas, "often known… as the ‘snitch visa’… because [it's] given to aliens who assist US law enforcement to investigate and prosecute crimes and terrorist activities."
But as O’Neill reports, quoting New York immigration lawyer Claudia Slovinsky, ICE and parent agency the Department of Homeland Security never actually award anyone the S visa. Instead, "they use the most vulnerable people to do dangerous work, make them all sorts of promises and then just abandon them."
The AP story relates how the Mayas got involved with ICE, the dangerous missions they went on, the undercover work. When the brother and sister tried to back out of the informant game, they were told they had to continue or they would be deported. In fact, it turned out later that a deportation order for Emilio had been shuttling around ICE since December 2005, while for years they used him as an informant.
The Coerced Production of "Intelligence" on Terrorism
But the most interesting part of the story concerns what happened after Emilio and Analia had been working for ICE for some three years (emphases added):
In 2008, they say, the agents began demanding information on terrorism and guns – information the Mayas simply couldn’t provide. The brother and sister continued offering tips about local activities, but they were no longer sent on undercover jobs….
At a meeting in the Price Chopper parking lot [in May 2009], Emilio says, agents bluntly told him that unless he delivered information on weapons and terrorism, his work permit would not be renewed and he would be deported.
What seems clear is that the government, failing to get the easily controlled Mayas to drum up some kind of terrorist plot in order to feed the agency’s need promote itself and get a larger slice of the anti-terrorism funds sloshing around Washington, D.C., put the strong-arm on these immigrants, and when they couldn’t get them to produce, has prepared to deport them.
It doesn’t matter if a Congressman or a Senator intervened, as they did in this case. ICE and DHS apparently have little to fear from congressional inquiry. They are in a bureaucratic war to justify their existence, and in DC, it’s still, in the Obama years, all about terrorism.
Take a look at ICE’s own website, where it touts itself as "A Federal Leader in Combating Terrorism."
As the second largest federal contributor to the nationwide network of Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) plays a critical role in protecting the country against the threat of terrorism. With agents assigned to counter-terrorism investigations across the United States and around the world, ICE lends its expertise in enforcing immigration and customs laws to the over 100 JTTFs to investigate, detect, interdict, prosecute and remove terrorists and to dismantle terrorist organizations.
What are the JTTFs?
Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs) are small cells of highly trained, locally based, passionately committed investigators, analysts, linguists, SWAT experts, and other specialists from dozens of U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies. It is a multi-agency effort led by the Justice Department and FBI designed to combine the resources of federal, state, and local law enforcement.
The picture is clear: ICE wants its seat at the table with the other 40 or so agencies now associated with the national JTTFs. It’s like a big assembly line feeding raw intel to the FBI and Department of Justice, and what matters is that you keep producing. The quality of the intelligence, as evidenced by the attempt to squeeze "terrorism" "tips" out of the hapless and unconnected Mayas, is evidently not so important. What is important is that everyone get paid and the gravy train keep rolling.
"We’re Going to Change Your Brain"
The saddest thing in the O’Neill story is to read about the impotence members of Congress have when soliciting the protection of their constituents with agencies from the executive branch.
But the scariest thing is to reflect upon similarities between the ICE/Mayas case and the torture of prisoners in the "black sites", rendition hellholes, Guantanamo and Bagram. Rather than the use of blackmail and extortion to coerce informants to produce bogus reports about terrorism, the U.S. abroad has resorted to outright torture.
The torture of prisoners like Binyam Mohamed — much in the news lately with the revelations by UK judges that Mohamed was subjected to CIA "enhanced interrogation technique"-style torture as early as March 2002 — was not about, or at least not solely about, the collection of information. It was about the manufacture of information, including false confessions and fingering others for prosecution or further torture. In an interview a few years back with Binyam Mohamed’s attorney, Clive Stafford Smith of Reprieve:
Binyam explained that, between the savage beatings and the razor cuts to his penis, his torturers “would tell me what to say.” He added that even towards the end of his time in Morocco, they were still “training me what to say,” and one of them told him, “We’re going to change your brain.”
This emphasis on brainwashing — for that is the popular terminology for such an assault on the psyche of a prisoner — is a key component of the kind of psychological torture that was researched by both the United Kingdom and the United States in the years following World War II. It highlighted the use of isolation, sleep deprivation, fear, stress positions, manipulation of the environment, of food, the use of humiliation and both sensory deprivation and sensory overload upon the prisoner. The idea was to overwhelm the nervous system and make a human being collapse without a blow being made, without scars, without evidence usable in court.
In an article at Truthout by H.P. Albarelli and Jeff Kaye, the connections between the old CIA mind control and torture research programs and those of today are documented. The conclusion is that radical change is needed if these crimes are not to consume our nation:
The allegations of drugging by Mohamed and other prisoners are redolent of the use of hallucinogenic and other powerful mind altering drugs by the U.S. in its Artichoke, MK-ULTRA and other programs….
The CIA has been accused of involvement in continuing interrogation experimentation upon prisoners. The recent release of the previously censored summary of Mohamed’s treatment in Pakistan notes that "The effects of the sleep deprivation were carefully observed." As Stephen Soldz notes in an article on the British court revelations, "Why were these effects being ‘carefully observed’ unless to determine their effectiveness in order to see whether they should be inflicted used upon others?"…. The role of doctors, psychologists, and other medical professionals in the CIA/DoD torture program has been condemned by a number of individuals in their respective fields, and by organizations such as Center for Constitutional Rights and Physicians for Human Rights….
This country needs a clear and definite accounting of its past and present use of torture. Like a universal acid, torture breaks down the sinews of its victims, and in the process, the links between people and their government are transformed into the naked exercise of pure sadistic power of rulers over the ruled. The very purpose of civilization is atomized in the process. We need a full, open and thorough public investigation into the entire history of the torture program, with full power to subpoena, and to refer those who shall be held accountable for prosecution under the due process of law.



23 Comments




Only slightly OT, but a UK Guardian article the other day noted:
Consider, for instance the case of Jamil Rahman, age 32, a former civil servant from south Wales:
Meanwhile, back in the U.S. of A., the role of informants in helping set up terrorist “plots” was examined in a New York Times article in May 2009 on the case of the so-called Newburgh Four:
The article, by William K. Rashbaum and Kareem Fahim, notes that the defense of entrapment doesn’t get very far with juries in these cases. But the common use of such informants at the center of these terrorism cases is reminiscent of the role of agents provocateurs in various radical and civil rights groups in the 1960s.
Thanks, Jeff. If ICE begins to change brains here in the US, our country is slipping further into the abyss.
What kind of terror tips could Hispanic immigrants provide? Which Hispanic Terror group threatens America a serious threat?
Any of these Doctors ever going to lose their license?
While we’re on the subject –
Saw The Ghostwriter last night. It’s a fucking masterpiece and easily the most important political film since Bulworth. And just as Warren Beatty is dismissed for being a “womanizer,” Polanski can be written off as a “child rapist” — though the truth about that incident tells a different story that will one day be explicated in full. It won’t of course be believed by the Kool-Aid drinkers of America. But they’re not likely to cotton to The Ghostwriter either as it’s a thorough indictment of the the war criminals who still reside in high places and (the really important part) exposes their mindset. If you believe in “American Exceptionalism” and that we are ar heart represented by “good people” who are “fighting terorism” then you’re not going to like this film.
And we’re not going to have much to say to one another either.
On an immediate level the film deals with Tony Blair. If you’re aware of his recent legal testimonyy (covered extensively in the UK but virtually ignored by the U.S. media for obvious reasons) then you’ll know that every word of this film is true.
In fact I’d say it was already the top candidate for Best Documentary of 2010.
I don’t want to say any more until you people have seen it. Especially because it’s the sort of film that requires lengthy and detailed discussion. But the cast (Ewan McGregor, Pierce Brosnan, Olivia Williams and especially and most surprisingly Kim Cattrell) is beyond superb.
And it has the best Polanski finale since Chinatown
Polanski is the toughest of the tough.
Hitler couldn’t kill him.
Manson couldn’t kill him.
Who do these rank amateurs think they are?
They have NO IDEA of who they’re dealing with.
Is it at the theatre, on DVD?
Anyone have any idea when we can see the FDL survey results?
Here.
OT but I found something quite interesting.
Jeff, Petra Bartosiewicz is writing a book on DoJ terrorism trials, with a working title something like The Best Justice Money Can Buy. The plots are nearly all initiated by the undercover agent to draw in the hapless dupes who fall for it. She did an interview for antiwar.com radio last year in which she said she had asked the agents how many times when they went out to “investigate” and “infiltrate” a “terrorist” plot, it turned out to be no plot at all. The answer was never. IOW, if there wasn’t a plot to begin with, the agent makes sure there is one by the time he’s done.
Thanks. Nice pic.
Oh, another thing Jeff. There’s no better member of congress than Hinchey, who went to bat for the Mayas. He would give it a full court press, not just lip service.
Thank You I’ll look for it.
Exactly. These poor souls (and I’m not real sympathetic to informers) didn’t get the message, which ICE couldn’t just come out and say: Make it up! Turn in some drug dealer (a Padilla type, perhaps). Some group, perhaps they could then insert an operative to entrap them with talk of jihad or something like that. Next thing you know, you got the Saugerties Six, or some such, full of twenty-something losers from the wrong side of the tracks.
Hell, isn’t America full of would-be terrorists ready for some government-provided spark to set them off?
The Mayas didn’t have the American nuance to read between the lines, and now they are screwed.
Thanks, I will be looking for that, and also more into her work.
That’s why Hinchey’s relative failure to break through on this depressed me, as it shows that ICE appears to stand above Congressional power.
Hey, one dark-skinned person is the same as any other!
Like GITMO, “you don’t leave innocent”.
Sounds like another form of torture to me.
It’s opening tomorrow in New York and L.A.
Serendipitously, Bill Fisher has a new article out today at Truthout, which examines ICE’s “Secure Communities” program, which targets “dangerous aliens”:
Thanks Jeff, I will add this to my Obama scandals list (item 141).
Incompetent
Corrupt
Egregious