Paul Armantano, the Deputy Director of NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws), has given us one of two easy, yet important reasons to vote yes on California’s Proposition 19. He points out in a November 1 essay at Truthout, that the laws for marijuana possession are disproportionately enforced. These laws are both the result of and spur to societal racial and ethnic discrimination.
African-Americans and Latinos use marijuana at lower rates than whites, yet they are prosecuted for minor cannabis possession offenses in California’s largest cities at rates two to twelve times higher than Caucasians, according to a pair of just-released reports commissioned by The Drug Policy Alliance, the California NAACP and the William C. Velasquez Institute.
From 2006 to 2008, African Americans were arrested for marijuana possession offenses in California’s 25 largest cities at four, five, six, seven and even twelve times the rate of whites, the report found….
But some of the slicker opponents of Proposition 19 would have you believe that prosecutions for cannabis possession is no big deal in supposedly progressive California. But Armantano notes, “From 1990 through 2009, police departments in California made 850,000 criminal prosecutions for possessing small amounts of marijuana and half a million marijuana possession prosecutions in the last ten years, the report found.” And those prosecutions fall much more heavily upon African Americans and Latinos than whites. . . .
In presumably liberal San Jose, where blacks make up only 2.9 percent of the population, studies found that blacks were arrested “at more than five times the rate of whites.” In the City of Torrance, in the Los Angeles basin, another city where blacks constitute about 2 percent of the population, African Americans are arrested at five times the rates of whites. Latinos are similarly targeted. Just from 2006 to 2008, “Latinos were arrested for marijuana possession offenses in California’s 33 largest cities at ‘double to nearly triple’ the rates of whites.
So one good reason to end this insane marijuana prohibition is because it is discriminatory. Apparently the National Latino Officers Association agrees, as does “the National Black Police Association, the California Council of Churches IMPACT, the California National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the California League of United Latin American Citizens, the Latino Voters League, the Progressive Jewish Alliance and the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), Western States Council,” because they all support voting Yes on Prop. 19.
The other easy reason to support Proposition 19, among the many reasons for ending the illegal status of marijuana, is that doing so will save lives. Whether it is legal access to the drug for medical patients, the facility of doing necessary medical research that the ultimate removal of marijuana from dangerous drug status will bring, or the removal of hundreds of millions of dollars of illegal booty from the hands of criminal cartels, with the consequent drug wars and murders that luridly spread across the headlines, cannabis legalization will save lives.
As a psychologist who has worked with patients who abuse drugs, I can testify that while not totally safe — no drug is — marijuana is far safer than most drugs, both legal and illegal. When there is the occasional patient who needs help with a marijuana problem, they will be far more likely to come to treatment if the illegality and stigma of use is removed.
Voting Yes on Proposition 19 should be a no-brainer. Laws banning drugs, especially those that are mostly innocuous, are discriminatory. Legalizing marijuana will help save lives, and put a serious dent in the power of the drug cartels and criminal gangs preying on the defenseless.




24 Comments

Jeff:
What are the latest poll numbers on Prop. 19. And from all available information and crystal balls, what is the prognosis for Prop. 19 passing?
I am getting conflicting information and would like to get the skinny from you and or others.
Thanks for the post. I will keep my fingers crossed and vote yes tomorrow.
For the latest news on Prop. 19, take a look at Firedoglake’s “Just Say Now” webpage: http://justsaynow.firedoglake.com/“
The polls seem to be all over the place. The most important thing is to help get out the vote, contribute to the cause, and make sure, above all, not to forget to vote yourself. Every vote counts.
Ask-and-you-shall-receive department… Jon Walker has a post just up at the FDL main site: Prop 19 Trails by Small Margins in Latest Polls
“Proposition 19, which would legalize and regulate production and distribution of marijuana in California, is trailing slightly in the two most recent polls from Field and PPP. Both Field and PPP have the No vote outnumbering the Yes vote by seven percent. SurveyUSA has Prop 19 in slightly better shape, with No trailing Yes by only two points, which is unchanged since last week.”
I love the artwork.
I would vote yes if I still lived in CA.
Wait a minute. I’ll just contact ACORN II and they can arrange it.
Why do conservatives love fake controversies so much? Reinforces obvious prejudices against “those people” without having to call them ni**ers?
OT: Current HuffPo headline: “OBAMA AGENDA ‘ALL AT RISK’”
The greatest risk to Obama’s alleged “agenda” is Obama himself.
“Read the Law… it will eliminate the Drug free work place.
So a bus driver can smoke some weed then drive your kids home… not on my watch..” – My buddy Chris on facebook just now.
Fucking fearmongering. Like there aren’t already bus drivers that smoke pot?
Unfortunately for everyone, the organization is not longer operational. However, like you I would vote yes if I lived in CA. The best I can do is offer everyone out there moral support. Best wishes to everyone who worked so hard for this very important initiative.
I already voted Yes for Prop 19. And, don’t get me started on bus drivers. Or fearmongers. What’s for lunch?
I just had spaghetti bolognese with fresh veggies :) cucumber ans squash and peppers and mushrooms. It was delicious. The tri-tip looked too well done for my taste.
I’m heading out at 4 to vote. And I plan on wearing my Just Say Now tshirt while I do it.
Here in eastern PA you would be offered a jacket to put over your tshirt. No electioneering permitted inside the voting station!
I’m pretty sure that’s the case here, too. If anyone objects I’ll just take my shirt off.
Will that be a no no, 100 feet from the polling place? Just don’t want you to lose your vote.
Okay, ghost, I owe you one. :)
Dude! ‘Cause you’re a guy, you might get away with that. I wouldn’t. :) And, it would be safer for the neighborhood.
MSNBC is calling the governor race in CA a Lock for Brown. Ah, once less thing to worry about. No. More. Meg. And, she spent how much money? Terrible waste of funds.
Not a waste for her. She got a shit-ton of facetime. And she’ll just sell some more shares of eBay to make up for it.
I’ll live happier without having to live with that face time. Ugh. Some one online posted picture of her and Charles Laughton as twins separated at birth. There was a resemblance, I must say. Still, good riddance to that face time.
I could never stand her. Nice to see eMeg will be enjoying her offseason like the Padres and the Dodgers.
Although now that that’s sorted, Jerry Brown, huh? WTF? We’re in deep shit.
Yes, this kind of fear-mongering is patently ridiculous. As everyone knows, a bus driver can smoke week now and then drive your kids home… if you want to make people frightened or freaked out. A bus driver can also down a fifth of bourbon and do the same thing. Or can have a seizure, or any number of even scarier things.
As I said in the article, if a bus driver had a chronic problem smoking cannabis and needed help, he or she is much more likely to get such professional help if the drug were legal and did not have the stigma of criminality attached to it.
One thing for sure money CAN buy you, and that’s a gigantic ego.
Meg, we hardly knew ye (and thank god).
Yes. Has that “High Times” spirit I remember well.
Not all pot smokers are unresponsible. this is something that can happen now too nd has happened with alcohol. responsible smokers won’t be showing up to work high. and if they do fire them just like they would for coming in work drunk